Satellite Page

ANSWERING THE QUESTION REGARDING OUR GLOBAL SOURCES
Reflecting on the Debates and the Supreme Court's taking up the Pledge Case

Reflections on the Debates (October 14 2004): From a reality point of view the one who stood out among the crowd was Dick Cheney. He had true command of the issues and could integrate different dimensions and planes of argument and viewpoint. Thus, it was clear that by his accentuated monotone he threw it as we knew for sure the case post Bremer and Rumsfeld. If Cheney was prepared for the debate he would have swallowed Edwards whole. As it turned out, Edwards didn't do the job people were expecting. Being a successful trial lawyer does not equate to being a skilled politician. Moreover, Edwards was the only party to the debates that probably stood innocent to the full scope of what was taking place. In fact, we believe that you as a reader of this site probably know more than he does about what is taking place. Second, on our list is Kerry. He was prepared on every plane and did the needed job. He tried to parallel the style and tone of John Kennedy and did a good job of it but inserted erudite discussion in response to issues that left most viewers confused. Next, is George Bush who in our opinion with everything we have said was more successful than Edwards. Bush despite all his limitations has grown up in a political environment and thus was able to reap more effective results than Edwards. As we stated, Edwards was out of his league, but he did convey the point that the Kerry Bush ticket is for middle Americans and thus did his job. What should stand out to you is how the NWO fully controlled the publicly perceived reality of the debate. They were subtle but they moved it exactly how they wanted it. Kerry and Edwards have taken the lead and taken hold of the all important momentum that will produce the planned results in November 2004. There is no doubt that the NWO could have produced the victory (to our amazement) for Bush-Cheney but for the reasons expounded upon by us November 19, 2003, the NWO needs to pass the presidency to Kerry.

You should clearly understand by now why we have always deemed the NWO our target audience. We said from the beginning that there was no power on earth that could prevail over them; the NWO had full control and power to do whatever they desired. However, this assessment of the NWO reality also proffered that they would stumble and fail for while they held the power on earth against man they could never prevail against G-d. They knowingly and willingly challenged the precept that G-d even existed and our mission was to explain to them the background dynamics that when they stumbled and failed that they would understand that they had to give up the course and that the only result was to return to a path where they would not continue to undermine G-d. Many E-mails received reflect a viewpoint that we may have been successful in the effort of reaching the NWO. We truly hope to see that this has been the case. Until we more conclusively know, we believe that Kerry may continue the course in Iraq to install a puppet government (on the predicate of abandoning Bush cabal interest in controlling the oil). However, we can tell Kerry now (to wit the NWO) that any such puppet government will be short lived and that Iraq will go the way of Iran. Thus, our recommended plan for peace in Iraq which makes the best of it and acknowledges the forthcoming ultimate reality. Moreover, our true disappointment in our perspective is that G-d had to intervene to curtail the course. This was needed because our form of government failed. It became corrupted by a Congress that allowed evil to enter it and take operational control. The NWO will probably be asking what will it have to do now to curtail China and Asia from becoming dominant. SenderBerl can answer that easily: the USA and Israel will have to return to the Judeo-Christian precepts and Israel will have to give up the secular course and become a nation that honors G-d's name to the world. This doesn't mean that it has to parallel the religious orthodox as some people may believe. Not at all. In fact, one of SenderBerl's main contentions is that the religious orthodox carry the most egregious fault for Israel's failings as we explain in connection with the Trial of Rabbi Eliezer ben Hycranus, which offers some of the most insights into the current reality that we have provided over the years. Israel needs to be a country that educates its children for LOVE OF G-D so that they would understand the dynamics SenderBerl has presented without the need for us to have addressed these issues at all (and if so history and events would never have unfolded as they have). Israel should have moved against the evil in their midst when Rabin was assassinated. America should have moved against the evil in our midst when 9-11 took place and the obvious was in front of our noses and the fact that Amir did not and could not have shot Rabin (thanks Barry Chamish).

Last night Ted Koppel on Nightline asked why the poll numbers were so close if John Kerry won the three debates. It attests how you, now carrying knowledge not shared or known by your fellow Americans, can play a role in the future. Change is via the collective efforts of all of us. Aside from our mission to confront the NWO with the truth, it was to educate those following us throughout the years so that they could educate others. That so many of you have expressed that you have undertaken the effort pleases us beyond words or description.

Many of the E-mails receive reflect the thoughts of many of you: that we have global contacts and resources to so accurately interpret and successfully make the difficult interpretations we have during the past decade. We want to be clear: what we do is a GIFT FROM G-D. You can't offer interpretations that at times prevail over the efforts of $60 billion vested intelligence agencies by having secular contacts here or elsewhere. We have been blessed with the ability to provide what we have over the past decade. You should understand being blessed is offset with consequences that would have convinced many to abandon the course. However, we applaud our families that support the sacrifice. We also relay that having the knowledge always opens a portal to understanding evil and evil designs that could prove depressing but G-d has protected us from such a result as He protected us when the NWO seemed affirmatively angry with us when we produced three writings in late 2002 that proved to the Congress that Bush was complicit in 9-11 and also enlisted Congress not to support giving Bush open authorization since it would to be the fruit of the poisonous tree. See http://www.senderberl.com/case.htm http://www.senderberl.com/reason.htm

There is no telling what the oil cabal that controls Bush may do. If they undertake some further treacherous and treasonous course we expect that the mainstream NWO is prepared to counteract it. In the meantime, we are pleased that we have reached the point where events incredibly support interpretations made by us for a decade: that what China did in September 2004 attested to the NWO that we knew China as well as we knew Japan. What we threw in just recently that the NWO we are sure did not miss is that Japan is with China not the NWO. This no doubt made many in mainstream NWO ill. However, after a decade they have a basis to understand that we may be correct and WHY we may be correct.

It's a dangerous world. A very dangerous world. ONLY BY RETURNING TO MAKING G-D CENTRAL TO THE AMERICAN WAY WILL THINGS IMPROVE FOR THE USA. Thus, we find it of interest that the Supreme Court of the United States just now (post Hu Jintao's statements in September) took up the Ten Commandments case. We trust we know which way they will move on it. Here is what we wrote in June 2002:

What the Middle East has to do with our Pledge of Allegiance

Very timely that a Federal Circuit Court (one of the nation's highest courts) deemed it worthy to rule the pledge unconstitutional. It highlights the point that the United States is committed to removing G-d over time from the nation. That G-d is part and parcel of the Nation is reflected by the numerous oaths and affirmations referencing His role in connection with this Nation. All our forefathers are turning in their graves watching this attempt to further rid G-d from the Nation.

What about the legal issue? Israel has to be a Jewish State, one honoring G-d before the world. The new world order has infiltrated Israel this past decade where the judiciary serves the new world order not the State of Israel. Rulings there permit the eventual dilution of the State where the only thing Jewish about it over time will be its name. In fact, we argued long ago that with the law of return the Jewish people would be an operative minority in their own land.

Since a strong movement arose against the right of return, Israel has been flooded by new world order forces with immigrants that are non Jewish platforming the dilution of the Jewish nature of the nation over time. The new world order forces are focused and patient. One has to be vigilant because the new world order wants to undermine G-d and remove G-d from the hearts and souls of the population. In this regard, it is easy to see and perceive that the new world order agenda is affirmatively evil.

In the US, the argument is that there must be a separation of church and state: that the rights of those who do not believe in G-d must be protected from enmeshment of a religious nature. While the US has been committed to protecting minority rights, it doesn't have to compromise the precepts upon which it was established to undermine itself in the protection of individual rights.

Thereby, with pornography, while citizens have the technical right to pursue invidious material, the country does not have to undermine the responsibility to its children, culture and heritage to protect the right of men and women to a different lifestyle and culture. Taking it to the extreme, the legal system does not have to allow or support sedition if a group of Americans are committed to such a course. Sedition it does not allow, but pollution to the noble precepts underlying this country it does.

Thus, no child has to say the pledge but to use the legal system to say that the pledge is unconstitutional because it references G-d undermines the precepts underlying the Constitution which was belief in one G-d: that the United States is a country based and founded upon monotheism.

If people wish to worship idols, that perhaps is their choice, but to undermine the pledge to the flag is only a stone throw away from moving to undermine the Constitution (since it was written by a body not reflective of the current pluralistic population reality in the 50 states). Man has freedom of choice, but a nation has an obligation to those who sacrificed and gave their lives to establish it. To do otherwise, legally speaking, would be a breach of contract.

Now let's extrapolate out to the Middle East. First, of course, Israel was gifted by G-d to the Jewish people. Those who do not believe in G-d or who do not believe in carrying obligations in that regard are free to do so but nothing they do should undermine the bedrock principles, accepted by the way globally, in connection with the historic meaning of the State of Israel. The only argument carrying a modicum of validity by those fighting for the State are those connective to the element of Zionism separate and apart from G-d. Their argument is that they sacrificed to platform a secular state to protect Jewish life. The Jewish religious leadership carried the important responsibility to explain that G-d in regifting Israel as proven by the miracles of 1948 and 1967 works through whatever means He wishes to accomplish His ends; that they had to recognize that their efforts may have only resulted in a secular state in Uganda, but the reality is that there was a giving back of the whole, reflects the need to stand subservient to He who truly acted to work the end. Thus, people under democratic precepts in Israel may carry the right not to believe in G-d but to deny the historic and biblical reality, to remove G-d from Israel would be the same as removing G-d the Constitution, the flag and the pledge from America.

As to the Arabs, below is a story which shows that Bush threatens to remove financial assistance to Palestinians if they don't do things his way. Regardless of how convincing one can make the argument that doing things President Bush's way is for the global good, one has to respect the right to reject compromising the precepts of a people no matter how much it is argued that they are backwards. The Arab world sees the Circuit Court decision rendering the pledge unconstitutional the polluted result of a country which is willing to distance itself from G-d. They don't want to be like us. If the judiciary confirms the ruling, and the pledge is rendered unconstitutional because it says "one nation under G-d" this suggests something seriously wrong and ill with our country, just as the undersigned and many others think it sick and ill for pornography to be a featured mainstay of "Home Box Office," accessible to the children of this country (not to discount a government and media which willingly stands blind to the drug epidemic at the nation's schools).

Thus, we again show from another plateau the need for a religious resolution which will not only ultimately bring true peace to the Middle East but reaffirm this country's commitment to G-d and eradicate the evil which has rooted itself so deeply in our country as to remove the pledge of allegiance from our schools.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
June 27, 2002

From: www.senderberl.com/reason.htm.This interpretation invoked quite a reaction especially when in was openly declared on the Jeff Rense Show the next day on August 5, 2002. On August 6, 2002, the Washington Post confirmed this very perception and at the same time Jeff Rense underwent a series of events where all his audio files were lost. This is the only interview on the Jeff Rense Show that SenderBerl does not have a copy and none is known to exist.

SenderBerl explains why the NWO will make sure Kerry resoundingly wins

Special Comment, Review and Analysis by Joseph Ehrlich (October 7, 2004):

The NWO looked the other way as Bush and the oil cabal violated international law and compromised domestic constitutional precepts to launch an invasion of Iraq, and unknown to the global public, on the anticipated use of WMD (or discovery thereof in Iraq), planned to expand the campaign into Syria and Iran to secure control of Middle Eastern oil, remove Chinese influence in the region, and in doing so ultimately infiltrate China's infrastructure to remove the last major impediment to NWO world government and control.

SenderBerl pointed out that if Bush could not consummate his design in Venezuela against Chavez that it was ludicrous for anyone to think he could prove successful in such an aggressively ambitious campaign in the Middle East. Further, SenderBerl pointed out that the NWO would not and could not succeed against the Arab/Islamic nations who fought tooth and nail to protect their religious culture against a NWO campaign that spoke regime change but the thrust of which was to implement culture change in the Arab/Islamic world as it had successfully accomplished in both Israel and the USA. Thus SenderBerl advised Bush 43 directly as early on as September 13, 2001, that while the NWO controlled the dominant military power in the world, the results would not be as expected and the NWO would not succeed.

This message was reiterated by SenderBerl repeatedly throughout 2002 and 2003 where SenderBerl pointed out that the NWO had only convinced China, in witnessing Bush's criminal designs and behavior not only in Iraq but in the USA (www.senderberl.com/jeaudio.wma), against his own countrymen, that China had no choice but to approve Jiang Zemin's precepts as publicly espoused and detected by SenderBerl in the Beijing movie production of The Emperor and the Assassin.

Bush's black and white thinking not only resulted in Jiang Zemin detesting Bush to the degree that he would not relinquish control of China, but resulted in a Bush 43 mindset that refused to face the same fate as his father in faltering and failing to secure a second term in office. Thus, the NWO knew that Bush would compromise the NWO design by securing a second term due to his negative result with China and otherwise alienating the entire world including close allies by using a baseball bat which he swung wildly and haphazardly in the promotion of the NWO agenda (while serving a personal one to reward family and friends in the oil industry).

SenderBerl deduced what the NWO leadership already knew: that Bush would not accept defeat. and his cronies, enjoying the fruits of a corrupt and abusive administration, planned, if necessary, a Code Red condition where martial law would preclude the transfer of power should Bush lose in November, allowing them on this predicate to also launch a campaign against Syria and Iran to complete their original mission.

This enhanced the already detected division in the NWO leadership and when China, on or about September 20, 2004, ironically, on the second anniversary of the detested National Security Strategy, formally confirmed what SenderBerl espoused throughout the years: that Zemin all along had been in control; that China applauded and approved his perspective and precepts; that Hu Jintao had been a Trojan Horse, and now that Hu Jintao and the entire Chinese Congress openly confirmed what SenderBerl always knew: China publicly rejected Western forms of democracy for China, Bush, without question, had to go.

China confirmed what SenderBerl always knew: that the NWO plan was to make mainland China indistinguishable from Taiwan, to allow the promised unification, when China rewarded the NWO, due to China's new economic condition, role and power, by allowing Western democratic dynamics to enter the country (which the NWO deploys as the portal to infiltrate and control internal infrastructure). China thus honors Zemin and the precepts in The Emperor and the Assassin by globally declaring that it will maintain its sovereignty. In doing so, Bush's fate was definitely sealed, in that the NWO needed its alternative representative, John Kerry, to assume office to consolidate gains and reposition.

The good news in all this is that the USA under NWO control will have to take a step back and again look as though the government cares about those it governs (rules). More importantly, the NWO agenda per Bush has to be sandbagged, and that is very good because as SenderBerl explained the use of nuclear weapons was imminent, which not coincidentally was the second impetus for the NWO leadership to make sure Bush does not secure a second term.

The big loser here will be Israel who had an understandable interest in the regime change aspect of the NWO agenda for Iraq, Syria and Iran. Now, Kerry will have to bend over big time to appease these same countries and it will be at the expense of Israel. The loss for Israel will also be consistent with its failings in that SenderBerl consistently assessed that Israel's role was to protect the Arab/Islamic nations against the NWO onslaught to effectuate culture change in the Arab/Islamic nations, Israel having an obligation to recognize that both regime and culture change was imposed on Israel herself (see Regime and Culture Change Unmasked www.senderberl.com/UI.pdf ).

The big winner here will be the Arab/Islamic nations in standing steadfast against an agenda to change the culture of the region to wit remove G-d (Allah) as central to their culture and lifestyle.

Further, SenderBerl explained that the NWO agenda was self defeating in that ultimately China and the Asian nations would prevail in the NWO design for global capitalism/control, something now assured if China's influence now becomes greater than the NWO's regarding oil.

This opens a door for SenderBerl to explain a very deep covert dynamic. The NWO never wanted an alternative to oil energy. This design first served the Arab/Islamic nations under the biblical mandate of their being gifted with it (thus imputing a continued high value to it (unless of course they faltered as well in their biblical mandate)). However, the NWO aside from seeing their oil cabal group very happy about it, carried an agenda where they would control it all and thereby always hold a short leash over China and its ever growing industrial complex, thus again opening the door for infiltration and control. Now, due to the fact that the NWO design was anti-G-d, as explained by this site, and that the American people stood silent and reticent about their own victimization and an unjust invasion with uncalled for and unnecessary Shock and Awe, with overlapping abuse, torture and murder of innocents (Abu Ghraib), China may carry dominant influence over global oil and the NWO will move to develop alternative energy sources, or else what they aimed to do to the Middle East and China will boomerang back against their own interests.

Senderberl has detailed many facets and angulations regarding the above for nearly a decade, showing its understanding of today's events, by addressing them in early 1997 in Recapturing America. SenderBerl identified this campaign against the Middle East by Bush in 1998 and also interpreted in 1999 that the NWO agenda would falter and fail as it has. We have also provided the solutions. Now, because of the imminence of nuclear warfare, necessitated by the actions of a President and an oil group out of control, we stayed the course, declaring that if the American people voted in Bush they would rue the day they allowed it and the continued evisceration of their, our, historic form of government. However, now that the NWO is compelled to see Kerry prevail, Bush has to face not only Kerry and the Democrats but mainstream NWO leadership. Thus, when Bremer and Rumsfeld publicly contradict Bush, its over. Now, the NWO arsenal will launch against Bush where he will be resoundingly defeated so that when Kerry apologizes the rest of the world has a basis to see that the American people fully agree.

Recommended follow-up: http://www.rense.com/general57/whitemn.htm

See www.senderberl.com/lead2.html

Reports that China posted large numbers of troops on North Korean border: This is a difficult one if true but we are certain it has nothing to do with the reasons declared. What SenderBerl believes is that China has now assessed that Bush will lose and that he may launch against North Korea, since North Korea has too many nukes and is the most dangerous threat. Bush also feels that depending on the consequences the environment may be right for his alternative strategy to stay in power regardless of the November election results and the NWO warnings as discussed on this page. This is why SenderBerl originally interpreted that if the NWO gets first wind of it from its reliable sources throughout the military and government that the US may be cast into turmoil. The NWO can control Cheney when push comes to shove, but George Bush Jr. is another story. Thus, we have to conclude that if the story is true as it appears to be then China is sending a message to Bush to lay off unilateral action against North Korea and if Bush does the incredible post November 2nd then China will intervene for North Korea.

Yes we have asked ourselves whether China is preparing to go into North Korea to secure the nukes from Kim who is even more potentially dangerous than Bush. Our answer: Hu and Zemin would never do by military action what they could accomplish by stealth or otherwise within North Korea. Moreover, they would never give advance notice to actuate fear in Kim unless they are supporting a suggestion for him to relinquish power. How would Kim respond if he didn't oblige the Chinese warning: South Korea and possibly Japan. However again from where SenderBerl sits China would never amass troops against North Korea unless the US first pulled up stakes in Iraq. Thus, we concluded that the action was taken, if in fact the case, as a warning to Bush not to commence any unilateral campaign against North Korea. Bush again thus keeps pushing the world to war. As we said, we won't feel better until Kerry is sworn in. While Kerry will carry his own baggage because he's NWO, he has little choice for the reasons discussed on this page but to bow to American sovereignty since China now has replaced the Soviet Union as the offset to the USA, now under NWO control. Posted October 12 2004 10:20 AM.

Flashback: Sept. 27, 1950 - The British intelligence learns of a Chinese military council decision to intervene in Korea. US ignores this information. Simultaneously Chou announces publicly that "China will send troops across the frontier to participate in defense of North Korea." The hawks at the State Dept. led by Acheson and Rusk label Chou's statement a "bravado - part of a joint Soviet-Chinese diplomatic effort to save the North Korean regime." This arrogance (or ignorance) is shared by the CIA. Source: http://www.kimsoft.com/korea/eyewit19.htm Dec. 9, 1950 - MacArthur wants 26 atomic bombs. His plan is to "drop 30-50 bombs strung across the neck of Manchuria; then introduce half a million Chinese Nationalist troops at the Yalu and spread behind the front lines from the East Sea to the Yellow Sea - a belt of radioactive cobalt which has an active life of between 60 and 120 years." He says that his plan is "a cinch." Many in US support MacArthur's plan. MacArthur and company also consider chemical weapons. MacArthur is not privy to the awful secret that the Soviets have more nuclear bombs in stock than US does; and that US does not have 26 A-bombs in all of its arsenals. Source: http://www.kimsoft.com/korea/eyewit22.htm Sun Tzu said: "The art of campaign teaches us to rely not on the likelihood of the enemy's not coming, but on our own readiness to receive him; not on the chance of his not attacking, but rather on the fact that we have made our position unassailable.

China troop story taking on significance: Oct 12 1:30 PM: The following news update is consistent with SenderBerl's perspective that reason given for troop deployment inaccurate: "China denies troops are on border to keep NKorean soldiers out China has confirmed a report that it has deployed troops to its border with North Korea. However, it has denied suggestions the move is to prevent North Korean soldiers from entering the country." Source: http://www.abc.net.au/ra/newstories/RANewsStories_1218654.htm

October 13: Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Zhang Qiyue said on Tuesday she understood that the additional Chinese troops along the border were involved in a telecommunications project. http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=6485460 China demanded yesterday that the EU lift a 15-year-old embargo on weapons sales to Beijing, criticizing it as a Cold War relic after the latest French attempt to end the ban failed. It's not in line with the present situation in relations between China and the European Union," Zhang said. "We believe the arms embargo is totally unreasonable. We want it lifted." The US has pressed the EU to maintain the embargo and has threatened to curtail transfers of some sensitive military technology to European countries if it were dropped. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2004/10/13/2003206655 ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- A former Guantanamo prisoner thought to have forged ties with al-Qaida since his release is leading a militant band whose members have strapped explosives on two Chinese engineers they kidnapped in a lawless region near the Afghanistan border.

Bulletin News 10-14-04 7:30PM
WASHINGTON - China has dispatched thousands of additional soldiers to its border region with North Korea, prompting an alert among intelligence officials in South Korea and the United States, says a diplomatic source here. 'Based on the US satellite photos and South Korea's human intelligence, the two countries concluded that China has recently deployed 10,000 elite troops to the North Korean border,' the source in Washington was quoted by South Korea's JoongAng Ilbo as saying yesterday. http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/asia/story/0,4386,278118,00.html

SenderBerl: Something is going on and we are not that comfortable about it. The link to the Internet material supporting a planned invasion on Iran http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a1130.htm is no longer there, one of our valued readers letting us know that the entire site is down. We can only say it again. Bush has no angst in taking the world to war. He does not believe China is going to do anything and from where we sit he is dead wrong. Senator Dayton closing his office in Washington strongly suggests that Washington D.C. is especially vulnerable a perfect platform to impose Code Red and avoid the elections altogether. Thus, if true, then mainstream NWO will have to intercede and this country is in very big trouble. We don't know when it is coming, before or after the election but as it stands now China is not taking this action and authorities if the case are not taking down the TBR NEWS site arbitrarily. Let us see what global markets do tonight and tomorrow. You can be sure if there is a Code Red that one of the first things to go will be the Internet.

SenderBerl: We think China will look at this at the kidnapping as an effort to intertwine them into the terrorism issue. SenderBerl has always taken the position to watch out for those former Guantanamo Bay prisoners whom we believe are Manchurian candidates ready to do the bidding of those who control them. We believe China shares the same perspective we do. If Bush thinks he is going to change China's track he's spinning his wheels. What Bush and the NWO have to remember is that China's track is one that we were able to determine many years ago as detailed by earlier postings on this site. Moreover, if the arms ban was lifted China no doubt would revalue the yuan depending exactly how much armaments it wanted to purchase. SenderBerl is not certain that it really needs armaments as much as it is further proving the case that the NWO is pursuing it as an enemy to be infiltrated and controlled with its long term hard to imagine carrot and stick course. The NWO's problem is that with Bush showing the NWO design in how he undermined the USA with 9-11 and handled Iraq, Zemin could prove his case. Bush has severely compromised the NWO agenda; the degree which we will soon clearly see and has now made China its open opponent, China assessing that it can prevail and strip the USA and NWO of its dominant global role. With the NWO exposing our children to shows such as HE'S A LADY, DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES, SEX AND THE CITY AND WIFE SWAP, we who arose to prominence under the Judeo-Christian ethic have to understand that our dominant role will not continue. http://www.rense.com/general57/whitemn.htm Not only would past generations of Americans not tolerate it, but the fact that they advertise these shows during wholesome programming for children is the reality that highlights the evil carried by those in control. They will surely pay in the next life but our point is that they should not be tolerated in this one and this proves the case of the evil in our midst and the failure of a Congress charged with the responsibility of not letting them enter our government in the first place.

China stands firm on exchange rate policy BEIJING, Oct. 11 (Xinhuanet) -- "China was resisting mounting pressure to revalue its currency or let it float because to do so would be irresponsible, a Hong Kong newspaper quoted Premier Wen Jiabao as saying Saturday. On the economic front, Wen said China should make use of the results of its measures to combat economic overheating to lay a good foundation for reforms and stable development next year. Wen made the remarks about China's currency, the yuan, Friday, a day after U.S. President George W. Bush piled pressure on his Chinese counterpart, Hu Jintao, to hammer home the message that the United States wanted China to move faster toward a flexible exchange rate system, the South China Morning Post reported. “We will take gradual steps toward building a flexible and resilient exchange system... because we have to be responsible to the Chinese people and also take into account the stability of the international financial market,” Wen was quoted as saying during a visit to Hanoi. He said the government had not wavered in its commitment to build a market-based exchange-rate system, but a prerequisite for doing so was financial stability, the newspaper said. The Chinese yuan is effectively pegged at 8.28 to the U.S. dollar. The United States has publicly called on China to move more quickly toward a flexible currency regime, but the Chinese Government has made clear it will move at its own pace. On Friday, Wen defended the Chinese Government’s exchange rate reforms, pointing out that the mainland had made notable progress on various fronts, such as lifting restrictions on capital flow and allowing greater participation of foreign institutions in the mainland’s financial market. “We have not stopped reforming the currency system since we began our reforms in 1994,” Wen said. China’s currency reform goals were a stable currency and a flexible exchange rate which would reflect market supply and demand, Wen said." Enditem (Shenzhen Daily/Agencies)

SenderBerl: China would prefer Bush devalue the dollar. Moreover, you see Zemin here responding in kind in his historic "paper tiger" fight with Bush 43. If the yuan gets revalued prices will move up in the US as it would if the dollar gets devalued. However, if the dollar is devalued it is the first platform of its removal as the international reserve currency, with global wealth moving into the euro and yuan strengthening the Chinese currency without the need to float it (resulting in more investment in China). Oil costs more for Americans but stays the same for everyone else. SenderBerl has explained why the NWO empowering China was a very big mistake. However, it is a mistake in consequence and the result of the USA turning its back on religion and G-d. See the discussions throughout this lead page. Further note: Floating, strengthening the yuan, encourages investors in China to repatriate profits (increasing the bottom line (profits) for US companies). China is not going to help Bush. Again, at the game of global commerce, Bush and the US government based on NWO predicates have fallen into a long term quagmire. The only thing the NWO can do is put up trade barriers and tariffs (or move to kick China out of the WTO). That would make the NWO schematic the laughing stock of the world.

Lots of E-mail regarding planned attack on Iran (October 12): We received from many links to http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a1130.htm and otherwise E-mail citing the text thereof. The world is crazy, our President is desperate, swearing to himself that he would not share the same fate as his father, and while we can only relay that our conclusion is that it is disinformation: that Bush would move primarily against North Korea at this point over Iran. Of course, now with China taking an overt stance against it, perhaps it will shift to Iran. Bush allowing US troops to bomb a mosque says that Bush will OK everything. Things are irreconcilable now in the Middle East. Bush and his NWO cabal may be out to subjugate Iraq and Iran and SenderBerl can only say the same thing it has been saying for near a decade: Bush and his NWO group have taken on an Opponent over which they have no chance of prevailing. Bush and his cabal had all the aces, all the resources, hidden and covert conspirators galore, and still they not only fumbled but failed. They are in denial and they are out to prove it and to heck with the world, they will sit as we said so long ago (do you remember?) in the safety of their bunkers willingly taking the world to nuclear war. We trust that the mainstream NWO will STOP THEM. We are going to curtail our comments from hereon until we soon stop our public service efforts. We have said everything there is to say and allowed you to know hidden truths not otherwise clear or apparent. It is up to you to fight for you rights and liberties and get rid of the infestation that has overtaken our beloved country. Evil is strong and evil runs wild and many throughout the world visit us these last days of our public service work and some of them have the power to do what is needed and necessary to stop this gone wild cabal from moving forward. Let us emphasize something again. Means to an end counts. You can't say that regime change is good when you embody cultural change that allows a course that opposes G-d. It won't fly. It hasn't and we cite below the insanity that McCarther was recommending during the Korean war that nearly came into play. We said it years ago, these are the same people who wanted to use an atomic bomb to carve out a new Panama Canal through the Yucatan. These people don't think things through and they will only say OOPS when they create a nuclear holocaust (as long as the right people are safe). We do sense again danger in the air and probably China mounting troops on the North Korean border attests that they have received intelligence regarding it. Remember, China was allowed to run free in the USA during Clinton's tenure and SenderBerl always stood by the proposition that they have a high level mole inside our government. This page now contains some of finest and deepest analyses integrating much of what we have offered during the past year and a half. The www.senderberl.com/lead2.html page contains lots of good material during 2002. We are quite pleased that we have made a contribution for the public good, however, it takes those situated to make sacrifices for the public good to stem the course of evil that without objection moves forward to global war. While at www.senderberl.com/ps/ps2 we offer some of interpretations we made in the 90s regarding what we see today, and Recapturing America, still provides the backdrop for first understand the NWO, the interpretation we made in the 90s that still haunts us was global warfare sometime between 2003 and 2005. This interpretation we WANT TO BE WRONG ABOUT. Thus, it takes those who can do something about it to do it now. Cheney we believe has accepted defeat of the agenda, but Bush and some of those oil cabal people and the likes of Tommy Franks who are prepared to assist in a Code Red condition, want to push the envelope. We continue to monitor things until the election. We will comment on the debate. However, the true critical story is now behind the scenes. There is no question in our minds that Bush has lost. Even Arnold today started distancing himself from him. However, who will stop him? When Bush was asked whether he made any mistakes, he failed to answer but to say he was sorry about some of the appointments he made. For sure, that is Colin Powell. While he got snookered by the NWO group, he is a loyal American, has courage, and grieves no doubt about what he knows about this administration. He is the person best situated to contain Bush but he and mainstream NWO have to be preemptive in doing so. Once Bush launches a military operation against Iran or North Korea it's over. Bush believes he will prevail in the attack and that he has nothing to lose because he has put himself before the interests of the country, the world and even the NWO. Thus, we continue to believe that the mainstream NWO is monitoring him, and either we see him joining Cheney tomorrow night in throwing in the towel, or else if he initiates military action outside of Iraq, things are going to change in a way we truly tremble about. May G-d give us another chance to find the right path under Kerry and may Kerry win the election and himself return this country to its sovereign status and reinstitute and reaffirm the Judeo Christian values that allowed us to become the nation revered throughout the world.

P.S. This analysis ties into the important analysis on this page regarding China posting troops on the border with North Korea.

How John Kerry Should Handle Iraq Once Elected: October 9, 2004:The following precepts are the only ones that avert the Bush NWO course taking the region and world to nuclear war. First: you have already alluded to the most important facet: that the US has no pretensions for controlling the Iraqi oil fields and that upon an expedient resolution will relinquish all interest except as otherwise agreed as part of the process. Second: that the USA acknowledges that Islam is a major religion not predicated upon hate or violence and that the US has no objection at all to Islamic people, desiring in the majority to doing so, implementing a religious based government. Thereby, the US accepts the democratic rejection of secular government and does not find a nexus between religious based government and terrorism. Third: The US accepts the culture and institutions of foreign sovereign countries and acknowledges that societal advancements are realties that arise through the passage of time and an integrated role of those sovereign countries into global commerce and interests. Fourth: that the US will assist any government in Iraq or anywhere in the world to promote and forge democratic principles when solicited, or to counter forces contrary thereto as anathema to the interests of a sovereign state and the promotion of peace. Fifth: Since the US acknowledges a responsibility to the Middle East nations, it will promote a unified Iraq with separate states serving the disingenuous interests among the different cultures represented by the peoples compromising the unified nation. In furtherance thereto, in respect to the efforts to remove Iraq from tyrannical reign, the US and the world community would solicit that one of the newly created states within the nation of Iraq also include an appropriate territory (State) for Palestinians wanting to exit their current condition of conflict with Israel on the strict basis that this one state will be monitored by the US to assure that no terrorism emanates from it. All Iraqi states will allocate and divide the Iraq oil revenue with the aspiration that the dissemination and distribution of Iraq oil wealth will pave the appropriate foundation for Iraq to rebuild itself economically and spiritually to honor the cultural precepts that John Kerry and the USA deem they are entitled to serve and protect. Please contact SenderBerl for further stratagems in resolving the conflict between Israel and the Arab/Islamic nations, a conflict that by definition will continue until Israel rethinks its own culture and erroneous secular course. www.senderberl.com/UI.htm Joseph Ehrlich, October 9, 2004.

Oct 11: E-mail Received on SenderBerl Proposed Iraq Peace Plan: First thank you all for the enormous response, support and applause for our comments, reviews and analyses on the lead page. When you hear words from excellent to brilliant to legendary, it warms the heart and gives hope that man will move himself to the correct path and course. Regarding the Iraqi Peace Plan everyone had good things to say about it but Paragraph 2. The points raised to us were in two categories: a. The US/NWO would never admit to or allow it and b. SenderBerl somehow has a blind spot regarding the violent agenda of Islam. We thus address both points.

Bush has failed in his missions in Venezuela and Iraq and as a result Syria and Iran. When you prevail you can mask your sins, crimes and wrongdoing in a way you cannot when you fail. China thereby because of it is dynamically able and more than willing to be the alternative power base for alienated nations (just as we long ago predicted it would be as a result of Bush's mission, which biblically was forecast for failure inasmuch as its agenda sought in the Middle East to remove nations from G-d, as it had in the USA itself and Israel (see again www.senderberl.com/UI.pdf) Moreover, the NWO had created a dynamic of conflict in China itself between politicals aligned with the industrial complex and those with the traditional Chinese Congress. Money usually walks over all obstacles. However, with Bush's failings, he has made it clear to China including those aligned with its capital/economic base that Bush/NWO were planning on using them to swing democratic reforms into China WHICH THEY NOW UNDERSTAND WAS THE DOORWAY FOR THE NWO TO INFILTRATE INFRASTRUCTURE AND THUS ULTIMATELY CONTROL CHINA (as NWO controls Israel through Peres, Barak and Sharon). Thus now China has formally and openly declared itself an offsetting global power to USA (which means NWO operating under the USA nameplate) and thus Kerry will have to win over the Middle East by dealing as we have suggested or simply the USA will be outcast from Middle Eastern/Islamic oil. Thus, the good news in following that course is that it encourages Israel itself to reassess its own course and decisions in that the means to its ends were wrong. Israel said our interest is peace via regime change in the enemy countries surrounding it when the truth we have been highlighting for a decade is that Israel has no enemies but the ones that arise when she takes or plans to take the wrong course. Thus, SenderBerl has applauded the Islamic nations because they are the only ones that have resisted coerced culture change, thereby loyal their biblical mandate. The last footnote at our formal exposition (www.senderberl.com/BMI.htm#bmi10) provided:

The bible shows the Angel of God telling Hagar, mother of Ishmael, regarding her descendants: “I will greatly multiply your descendants so that they will be too many to count. He will be a wild donkey of a man, His hand will be against everyone, And everyone's hand will be against him; And he will live to the east of all his brothers.” (Gen 16:7-12). Also see Judges 2:21-22:"I also will no longer drive out before them any of the nations which Joshua left when he died, in order to test Israel by them, whether they will keep the way of the Lord to walk in it as their fathers did, or not". In the biblical context, Israel should be a nation making God central to its existence and daily lifestyle, one honoring Him before the nations of the world accordingly, and also out there protecting the Arab/Islamic nations and peoples from efforts to remove Allah as central to their own lives and cultures.

Islam has no aggressive interests against the rest of the world. However, the same cannot be said vice-versa because simply put they control oil. As we highlight otherwise on this web page, the NWO found oil central to their own self serving agenda in terms of global capitalism but more importantly wanted to control it to keep China on a short leash. The parody is that the larger the industrial base for China the more dependent it would be on oil and thus the NWO controlling the opium needed by China would thereby control China (as a drug supplier controls the fate of the drug user).

SenderBerl highlights that the correct choice is now available. Do we take the world to nuclear war or do we move toward a more spiritual leadership in world governments. We again highlight the Question below showing that godless China protects its youth better than the US showing the degree that the USA has forsaken its culture and thus its children imbuing them with hedonistic values every which way as we further detail below.

Thereby, the solution we propose for Iraq is also one that will platform needed reassessments and changes for the USA and Israel.

October 15: Israel could one day become a "pariah state" like apartheid-era South Africa. It also looks set to collide with a European Union that is growing in power and influence. These are some of the possible outcomes if the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not resolved, reports a confidential, but leaked to the media, 25-page ten-year forecast written by the Israeli Foreign Ministry's Center for Public Research. The report, which contains no recommendations and was written in August of 2004, says it's important to improve relations with Europe since a European Union growing in power and influence would mean that Israel's main political partner, the United States, would probably diminish in international stature. http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1015/dailyUpdate.html

Question

Why does godless China address the issue in a more Christian like manner than the USA?
We mean: didn't every prior generation in the USA hold by China's position? What changed?

September 6 04: China Threatens Internet Porn Merchants with Life BEIJING (Reuters) - China has intensified its battle against Internet and mobile phone pornography by threatening distributors with life in prison, Xinhua news agency said. "Depending on the seriousness of the cases, the sentences range from living under compulsory surveillance, detainment, taking into custody by the police, to various terms of imprisonment and life imprisonment," Xinhua said. Beijing has stepped up its battle against smut in recent weeks, saying it is worried that the easy access to such material on the Internet and elsewhere will have a bad effect on youth and society.

What changed is that those who knowingly and willingly dilute education for American youth, desensitize them to sex and violence, institutionalize drugs and hedonistic values, to every form of vice and sin, dominate and control this country. These are men who value Satan not G-d. These are men who have brought you 9-11 with impunity and who condoned humiliation, abuse and torture at Abu Ghraib, the American people needing to understand that but for the photos they would stand blind or unbelieving to these crimes as they continue to do to all the other multiple unending crimes that they stand totally unaware. Those who can speak via the Internet, including ourselves, have made an effort to broadcast truths to the American people, who without a truly viable fourth estate are held hostage to those who work daily to undermine and diminish this country. Their reasons therefor are articulated by this website.

What distresses SenderBerl is that our children on Sunday evening September 26 04 watched Extreme Makeover: Home Edition. The forces of evil are clever as highlighted in Recapturing America. The show is old fashioned, Americans doing good for neighbors in need of help. However the forces of evil find it the ideal forum to expose our innocent children to the inundation of advertisements for WIFE SWAP and DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES with their subliminal messages. We saw the same evil design when we took our children to Spiderman 2. The advertising included exposing our children to big screen powerful ads for SEX AND THE CITY. Thus it behooves YOU to read what we wrote in 1998:

"The true plan is to also make inroads into the Arab/Islamic world. Why is this important to everyone. You must consider the following perspective. If the new world order forces prevail, Israel will turn into a culture which falls victim to the forces and design of the unbridled commercialism of the new world order. The culture will turn, as it would have with a Peres victory in 1996, anti religious, big corporate business, and ultimately and quickly it would turn into a society which also sacrifices its children to the wealth and power offered by new world order forces. If this is so, then two of the three branches of religious culture will essentially have turned pagan: Christianity, lost to the new world order forces, in the U.S. (while Christianity is still strong in numerous segments in the U.S. it is without real influence in the new world order forces controlling the government, and its policies); Judaism, being also now lost to the new world order forces, if Israel is forced to adopt the new world order design and subjugate itself to its pressures and forces.The reason why this is important, is that Christianity, Judaism and Islam are the trilogy of religious forces stemming from Abraham and the Old Testament. Look at the United States. It adopted by subliminal design a system of checks and balances paralleling the existence of the three major religions. The executive branch is lost. The Congressional branch is highly corrupt and ineffective and may be classified as lost. Thus, the entire nation hangs in the checks and balances function and power of the third branch, the judiciary. When too much time elapses it gives the evil forces of the new world order time to move against the third branch in an attempt to corrupt it to get the results. If all three branches of government fail, then American constitutional government is lost. The new world order forces have taken control of the country."

THEY MOVED EXTREME MAKEOVER: HOME EDITION TO 8:00PM TO CAPTURE MORE CHILDREN AND NOW ALSO ARE ADVERTISING A NEW REALITY SERIES WHERE MEN DRESS AS WOMEN. THE CHOICE IS NOW. THOSE LEADING AMERICA ARE NOT LOYAL TO THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE AND SHOW THEIR DISDAIN TO OUR CHILDREN AND SOCIETY (inserted October 11 04).

Insert October 12 04: China Offers Rewards for Reporting Porn: October 11, 2004, 8:32 PM EDT BEIJING -- China's police ministry on Sunday handed out rewards of up to $240 to people who reported pornographic Web sites in a campaign to stamp out online smut, the government said. Some 445 people have been arrested and 1,125 Web sites shut down with the help of public tips since July, the official Xinhua News Agency reported, citing the Ministry of Public Security. The ministry handed out rewards of $60 to $240, Xinhua said, but it didn't say how many people received them. China encourages Internet use for education and business but bans sexually oriented content on its own Web sites and tries to block access to foreign sites deemed pornographic or subversive. The online crackdown is part of a sweeping official morality campaign launched this year on orders from communist leaders. Television stations, video game makers and other suppliers of popular culture have been ordered to reduce or eliminate violent or sexually oriented content. http://www.newsday.com/technology/business/wire/sns-ap-china-porn-rewards,0,2094223,print.story?coll=sns-ap-technology-headlines

Special Comment, Review and Analysis by Joseph Ehrlich (October 7, 2004)
SenderBerl explains why the NWO will make sure Kerry resoundingly wins

October 8 04: Only 96,000 jobs were created in September compared to expectations of 148,000. Bush between this and the perfectly NWO timed Duelfer WMD report should get whacked good by Kerry tonight in the Town Hall debate. However, the lesson here connects with the fact that cable news pundits declared that those who thought the Dept of Labor was rigging numbers for Bush are now proven wrong. This is an example of NWO democracy at work. Since the NWO is out to completely pull the rug from Bush it takes advantage of the dynamic to attest that democracy is still in work and play in America. The American people and the world must remember that the design to undermine the USA is now on hold because of the reasons explained on this web page. China now officially replaces the former Soviet Union as the political offset to the NWO (hidden under the USA nameplate). Amoral corporate America is in for a bad time, the individual is back, at least for now. However, the American people and world better well remember how close we all come here to a nuclear holocaust (SenderBerl however will feel more secure in saying this when Kerry is sworn into office). SenderBerl's role and mission is about complete. We trust that the NWO, Congress, Israel and the American people have learned from our efforts. This will best be evidenced when the American people post a Kerry victory uncover and acknowledge the truths of 9-11, and the citizens of Israel do the same regarding the Rabin assassination. If these two wrongs continue swept under the rug, then the NWO remains in full operational control, having taken a step back, before it again resumes its campaign for world domination and control (after it figures how to do now to China what it did to the Soviet Union -- this may take thirty years). The bad news is that the true consequences of the Bush spending spree and actions coupled with high oil prices have been contained by the NWO and Bush administration. The American people are in for a bad economic experience and Kerry better move quickly to close the gap between rich and poor or else frustrated and angry citizens are going to react to the forthcoming economic realities as they already should have done regarding 9-11.

Kerry's deadly remarks against Bush (Town Hall Debate October 8, 2004)
New York Times Editorial: "Even worse, the president's refusal to come up with even a minor error - apart from saying that he might have made some unspecified appointments that he now regretted - underscores his inability to respond to failure in any way except by insisting over and over again that his original decision was right."

Washington Post October 11th releases 5 point lead Kerry over Bush. Study dated October 4. Do you understand the reason for the delay? Answer: Kerry will win by a large margin but due to the psychological factors we have covered it would be counterproductive to have Kerry's lead too wide until the eve of the election. Click on image for full detail.

October 12, 2004 WASHINGTON-- Sen. Mark Dayton said Tuesday he is closing his Washington office because of a classified intelligence report which made him fear for the safety of his staff. SenderBerl: So what about all the rest of the people on the Hill and in the District of Columbia? Do they get to share in the intelligence or is the Senator like President Bush who when he went off to Crawford in August 2001 decided not to share the intelligence with New York that there was a real threat of imminent terrorism against it (not to say task the FBI or FAA as Condy Rice said she did but then we found out she did not). www.senderberl.com/xmradio1.htm#flag1 www.senderberl.com/CAB.htm www.senderberl.com/fp/notes3.htm

Senator Dayton (July 2004): "What I find much more shocking and alarming were the repeated and catastrophic failures of the leaders in charge, and the other people responsible, to do their jobs," Dayton says. "To follow established procedures. To follow direct orders from civilian and military commanders. And then they failed to tell us the truth later."Dayton says he was particularly disturbed by what he described as negligence by the Federal Aviation Administration in failing to call for military backup when terrorists hijacked four planes."

October 13, 2004: Third Debate Assessment: 10:30 PM: Kerry won this debate in a major way. The easiest way to explain it is to say that when the cameras first focused on President Bush he looked ill, pale and haughty. Moreover, his performance was in line with the way he looked from the first and throughout the first hour. Kerry was fluid, Bush was choppy, erratic, and lost a lot of support when it was apparent that he spewed forth prepared zingers, which he thereafter abandoned. Thus, SenderBerl interpreted that the debates would make up for the gap necessitated due to concerns of carrying a lead prior to the RNC. It has and now we believe the media will be critical of the President no doubt in a major way in the days prior to November 2nd again to preclude too far of a lead not to actuate any concerned behavior by the President and his oil cabal. If you look at the President's face and demeanor you will see that he does not carry the degree of stability we would prefer in a President of the United States. Needless to say, we have long ago rejected a President that compromised American citizens, America's military, America's Constitution and Bill of Rights, and had an obvious nexus to 9-11 and the torture, abuse, and murder at Abu Ghraib. The question regarding "strong women" and President Bush's response served Kerry big time because Kerry's biggest problem was his wife as we alluded to from the time he was specified as the Democratic nominee. Americans don't normally like a President who seems subservient to a First Lady. Thus this was neutralized tonight. Very interesting and again supportive of our assessment that mainstream NWO fully desires Kerry to win.

SCHIEFFER: We've come, gentlemen, to our last question. And it occurred to me as I came to this debate tonight that the three of us share something. All three of us are surrounded by very strong women. We're all married to strong women. Each of us have two daughters that make us very proud. I'd like to ask each of you, what is the most important thing you've learned from these strong women? BUSH: To listen to them.

PRESIDENT BUSH WE BELIEVE MAY BE ILL.
THE PHOTOS SUGGEST IT AND SO DOES THE EVIDENCE WHEN WE CONNECT THE DOTS.
October 15, 2004 3:15 PM

TEMPE, Ariz. - The Rev. Jesse Jackson breathed new life into the Internet-bred rumor that President Bush had secret audio assistance in the first debate - saying a bulge in Bush's suit jacket ``looks like something.'' ``We ought to know what it was,'' the former presidential candidate said. ``We need to know what the object was. It could be nothing. But it looks like something.'' Internet bloggers were abuzz about a photo showing the president with a square-shaped protrusion under his jacket.But White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card said, ``The president had nothing on his back that I know of. I think it was just a badly tailored suit.''

SenderBerl: We have been asked about this and we believe it ties into his missing his annual medical physical this year. This suggests something wrong with the president when combined with his appearance during the debates, especially the third one. It must have something to do when he cannot move around for more than a specified block of time. However, on the third debate he came out looking bad. Whatever it is, it represents just another reason that it is time to put in a new leadership. {Footnote: Don't forget his February 2004 Meet the Press interview -- see the October 3, 2004 presentation}

The White House cited Bush's heavy travel schedule for his decision to delay his annual physical exam, which usually takes place in August, until after the election. White House spokesman Scott McClellan said Bush's doctors "felt it was perfectly fine to do it later this year... The president is a very active person. He's in great health. http://olympics.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=6432892

SenderBerl: Do you see the further evidence of it? Why was there a need for the doctors' report to declare that "all the data suggests that he will remain so for the duration of his presidency?" He was scheduled for his next physical in August 2004 and thus the wording suggests that they knew he would be skipping it.

SenderBerl: Our thoughts are that if the President is ill or likely to develop a more serious illness than he may already have, that he will lose the election and save face; the facts suggesting that his election loss may have proven true not on the basis of his presidential record but his medical record.

As to the questions asking us about John Kerry's remark that so angered the Cheneys: worse than the remark was his explanation of it. If he gave the correct answer and explanation he could have settled it, but his answer and the campaign saying that Cheneys' daughter was "fair game" was a mistake that became compounded into a serious mistake. Kerry should ask Cheney's daughter if she feels a public apology is in order and if so he should do it. This is another example of NWO people focused on ends and justifying the means.

Needless to say skipping the physical examination is a serious matter especially before an election.
Where is Senator Kerry on this issue not to say $50 oil and not a word on 9-11.

Advice to John Kerry re: Mary Cheney: Since the Republicans are making undue hay of the mistake, SenderBerl suggests you say the following: "President Bush was asked whether homosexuality was a matter of choice. His answer skirted the question. I thus indicated in my response that the answer was right in front of him in terms of the Vice-President and his daughter. I made a mistake in personalizing the answer as I did with someone not formally part and parcel of the campaign. My own people compounded it when they said that Mary Cheney was "fair game." In the theater of a presidential campaign and in one debate we made a mistake. We are sorry. However, when the Bush-Cheney minions seek to capitalize on our mistake then it only accentuates to me and the American people that if we can acknowledge our misspeak why can't the Bush-Cheney minions see the egregious failing in President Bush in not being sorry or apologizing for mistakes that resulted in deaths and permanent injuries to thousands of American children and others in Iraq?"

This entire episode with Mary Cheney found SenderBerl focused on the issue of homosexuality. Thus, we offer our perspective on this sensitive topic. The answer from where we sit rests with having a framework to make societal decisions. That framework is the abandoned and/or eroding Judeo-Christian one. From that framework homosexuality represents the same type of born disorder that would make other individuals with other problems at risk in mainstream society and from where we sit has to be treated/tolerated as other problems at birth. Thus, to contend that homosexual couples should be able to adopt children is pandering to the adults at the expense of the child who will matter of factly suffer as a result thereof regardless of the degree of love and attention foisted on that child by the "parents." In an extreme example, story books can have a child raised by a family of gorillas and find true love in that environment but the result is a child carrying problems in integrating into mainstream society. Thus, while the existence and environment of true love is noteworthy it does not in fact serve the best interests of that child, only so when there is no other alternative. Likewise, telling the child that there is an alternative to mainstream lifestyle in that he could if he was raised by a family of gorillas find true love, would prove an assertion confusing to the child making the child think what then is lacking in being raised by a natural set of parents, making such an alternative available to others. It is not made available and thus it answers why homosexual partners should not raise children. Thus, if you get rid of the Judeo-Christian framework it is impossible to resolve a difficult dilemma especially in the short amount of time we have: in fact without a framework you can never resolve it. SenderBerl in addressing the adoption issue has thus answered all subservient ones.

An African American who declared himself to us "black as midnight" and indicated he was an angry man asked us to reconciliate our homage to the precepts of the founding fathers and their acceptance of slavery. Our answer was as short and to the point as our answer above. Without the Judeo-Christian framework there would have been no basis to soon thereafter determine that it was wrong and there would never have been a Civil War. In fact, slavery would have continued. We then followed up with our major contention that without the Judeo-Christian framework we would all be, the majority of white and black and all other colors, enslaved today by those free from the constrictions thereunder. That in fact is why the elitist centrix always detested the Judeo-Christian framework and why they want to get rid of it.

In fact, the Bush people's overreaction to Kerry's remark/mistake highlights how people with evil designs use mistakes. In our favorite story in Les Miserables the main character gets sent to the galleys for ten years for stealing a piece of bread. He is earmarked a criminal in an elistist controlled government and time in history. He stole a piece of bread so that his family would not simply starve to death. There was no alternative for him but to make a mistake. But the consequence to him of his mistake was of tremendous benefit to the evil design in control: absolutely free labor for ten years on a commercial/military ship for the state. Thus it is clear that people can be earmarked a criminal and not be evil while those designating others criminals are not technically criminals but simply evil, which is far worse than being a designated criminal, such as the circumstance highlighted in Les Miserables. Need SenderBerl connect the dots to bring this dynamic back to the Bush administration deployment of troops in Iraq. Here we have low paid innocents during the drudge work for an evil design as we have identified at www.senderberl.com/BMI.pdf and elsewhere throughout this site. When professionals are needed for essential engagement work, the Bush team hires mercenaries who work at ten to hundred fold the rate of the low paid US troops. Thus, the elitist centrix when they were in full control sent out the word to their justice system to impose heavy penalties for small crimes/mistakes (grave injustice) here this administration extracts from this country low paid troops to expose them to hardships to secure control of Middle Eastern oil and of course will not apologize for misrepresenting the basis for war or the consequences thereof. It would be tantamount to the government and the court apologizing to the main character in Les Miserables for sending him to the galleys for ten years for the mistake of stealing a small piece of bread. Moreover, note how in Les Miserables the main character reflects the dynamic that he has no choice in life but to commit another crime to survive so that he will in fact be sent to the galleys again (however G-d intervened to help him from that expected result and reality). Here we see that reservists are not let go, invited to enlist as reservists with one understanding, and having made their mistake, find themselves ensnared by the elistist having control over them, their families and their future. Thus, the Bush team put before the country the man who made the mistake of taking a small piece of bread, while they distract the country from the evil that is in their midst as described by this site.

We conclude by telling you that we have given a lot of thought to the concept of good and evil during our public service time. We have to be careful about what we say but we feel it appropriate to say that there is a role for evil and G-d we believe channels it to serve good when good honors G-d. If good turns its back on G-d then evil does not get channeled to serve good and death, destruction, mayhem and chaos become mainstream. When we a decade back addressed the NWO when we began our public service efforts we said there are nine known planets in this Universe. Eight are without life, only one supports life attesting that Earth would be like the others but for G-d's intervention. Thus, there is no other life on the other eight planets because if there were it would diminish G-d's intervention for Earth in this Universe. Thus, what happened? Evil went forth to argue there was life on other planets in this Universe. You could see how happy they were to find "water" on Mars attesting to them that there must have been life on Mars "at one time." This is a perfect example how we are able to address such complex global issues. SenderBerl without question bows to G-d and in doing so has the framework to address and integrate highly complex global dynamics and illusions into basic truths and realities. The NWO spends its life seeking to refute G-d so that it can prove itself worthy to carry the power it does but the sad reality for them is that they will all answer for the wrongs and injustices they have perpetrated on the grand scale they have done.

We hope Senator Kerry addresses his mistake as we have suggested. Otherwise, evil is getting away again with murder making Kerry the criminal for a single remark and mistake while they are chopping at the bit for another four years to perpetrate their truly evil agenda. While Kerry is NWO he is on the side that just foolishly believes that it is the best course (for those not genuinely believing in the Judeo-Christian framework). This again is the consequence our abandoning it and of course during Bush's tenure you have witnessed the erosion to the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Give them four more years and you will clearly see it but of course it would be darn stupid of us to allow it.

HIGH PRICED OIL AND A PLUNGING DOLLAR WILL ALLOW CHINA TO OVERTAKE THE USA
While the Bush/oil cabal serve their own interests and designs, China has devised a strategy, and a good one, to allow it to become independent of Middle Eastern Oil should it come under the control of the NWO. China is assisting the Bush/oil cabal in promoting higher global prices. Do you think that any American President absent ties to the oil industry would have allowed this treasonous course to take place?

Our analysis on the dollar on October 22nd preceeded a slew of news stories globally on October 23rd regarding the dollar. Very interesting. However, it is important no note that China following the Japanese design in the 80s is selling dollars like crazy buying their own currency at deflated prices and then once doing so will invest it overseas (when China finally authorizes the yuan to be revalued). Where? Japan invested in the USA. China will invest in Canada accounting for the large rise in the Canadian dollar (which we attribute to Chinese buying). China owns a lot of Canada. China is now strategically situated to pose a real military threat to the USA. While you will never hear a word about it from China, let Senderberl be the first to tell you that the CMC has such design on Canada. Moreover, what does Canada have that the USA does not? Yes, high priced oil making Bush and his cronies rich will also allow China to develop their own oil resources in Canada (please understand that these projects can only be profitably pursued with high priced crude).

It has been criminal allowing oil to rise as it has done and it is double criminal when the design helps China take a strategic position in Canada, another country that the NWO shadow government has mishandled. If the USA and Israel do not return to the Judeo-Christian precepts, you can take this short analysis, tack it to your calendar for 2005 and 2006, and remember who told you about this first. We are soon closing down as we will further address Monday or Tuesday. Thus, we have given you our best these last weeks and months. Tune in tomorrow because we have another autoresponder special that should interest you.

SenderBerl addresses the dollar and oil from a narrow US military perspective: The US interests are served if oil is low and the dollar recovers quickly from current price levels. SenderBerl has been long the Swiss franc, euro, yen and British Pound but now has scaled back significantly recognizing the danger in the dollar falling further. The NWO wanted this to happen since it wanted to undermine the USA. But now with China undermining the NWO design, the NWO needs to counter in a manner coincidentally serving the best interests of the USA. The US military has to recognize the danger posited to the USA from China's upcoming strategic design on Canada. While SenderBerl helps the USA as part of its civic responsibility it helps the NWO indirectly and thus SenderBerl highlights that while it recognizes this result that all the help we provide will be of no consequence unless the NWO relinquishes its anti-G-d stance and returns the USA to the Judeo-Christian precepts and to wit national sovereignity (which it may have no choice of doing now that China replaces the former Soviet Union). Our obligation, meaning the people of the USA, have the responsibiity under a Kerry victory to get rid of the vermin in our midst who have infiltrated our country as they have and have taken it over. The elitist centrix no doubt will be the ones to hang the pawns and poodles and restore themselves to their overt patriotic duty. October 24 04.

October 25, 2004: George Bush has exploited the suffering of September 11 and turned back decades of efforts to make the world a safer place, the former president Jimmy Carter says in an interview with the Guardian published today. Attacking Mr Bush and Tony Blair over Iraq, Mr Carter calls the war "a completely unjust adventure based on misleading statements". He also criticises Mr Bush for "lack of effort" on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and accuses him of abandoning nuclear non-proliferation initiatives championed by five presidents. The US "suffered, in 9/11, a terrible and shocking attack ... and George Bush has been adroit at exploiting that attack, and he has elevated himself, in the consciousness of many Americans, to a heroic commander-in-chief, fighting a global threat against America," Mr Carter says. "He's repeatedly played that card, and to some degree quite successfully. I think that success has dissipated. I don't know if it's dissipating fast enough to affect the election. We'll soon know." Former President Carter quoted at http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1335313,00.html

October 25 2004 Early AM: Dollar hit historic lows. Here at this critical point as we indicated on October 22 the US Dollar plunges against the Yen, Euro, and Swiss franc. If this doesn't stop right in here, if the market doesn't reverse, it suggests that they are letting the dollar go and with it goes America. If anyone says that a cheap dollar is good for America, he is an enemy of the state. The same people said that NAFTA was good for America, outsourcing is good for America, and that open borders are good for America.

If the US Dollar fails as the international reserve currency the dark days ahead are magnified and will encompass a wider spectrum of Americans including the upper middle class. Investment in America will fade and the stock market if it does rise will do so under bannana republic type of principles. Inflation will be beyond comprehension and the loss of services also will be beyond comprehension. We are monitoring the dollar right now because if the dollar keeps dropping right in here it will suggest a material need to devalue and the pressure will be enormous for Greenspan to jack up interest rates and we would expect a series of two to three 1% upward adjustments to the prime rate starting withinin days of the election -- that is, if the government doesn't want to see the dollar erode any further. The US still is the dominant global economic power but it will not recover if those creating policy are doing so in a manner to make things worse not better. We did note that no one asked the candidates whether they would allow the US dollar to be devalued. Write in to the media and ask them if they would find it appropriate to ask the candidates that question.

From the past: to the now: In July 1982 SenderBerl interpreted that interest rates would go from where they were then to where they are today (click here for graphic of newspaper article). Unless the dollar is held in check interest rates will have to steeply rise. The NWO took advantage of a two decade run in global manipulation to create what we see today without recognizing or in fact caring then what we need to confront now. SenderBerl's interpretations on this site that the most serious long term mistake the NWO made for itself and the USA was to empower China as it has done. The NWO cannot now contain China because China now follows a path and position it would have held long ago but for intervention for those under monotheism. Since the USA and Israel have diluted it and in fact move on a course to take people away from making Judeo-Christian precepts and principles central, China will in fact assume a dominant role across the board and the USA and Israel face a future other than they would have otherwise desired. Moreover, the NWO itself is a category that China ultimately will dismember. They have great patience but they have already turned the table against the NWO the most important decision since the collapse of the Soviet Union being Hu Jianto precluding democratic designs on China.

Question received: I find most of your opinions to be informed, intelligent and many do come true. However I must take exception to your opinion on Bush not being favored by the NWO. As you are likely aware, part of the NWO plan for the United States is essentially to break it down. It must be said that Bush has done an outstanding job of that. So much so that, in that regard, what more could anyone ask?

Answer: This is from someone obviously relatively new to our site. Thus, we feature the question because the answer is important. The NWO fears the use of nuclear weapons/devices. That is because they diminish investment assets for long periods of time. Massive conventional death and destruction is fine. However, rendering plant, equipment, territory and property unusable especially in prime investment areas for decades is not. Thus, since Bush did in fact fail in his NWO mission and since Bush has created the predicate for NWO opponents to use nuclear devices/weapons should Bush prevail in November, Bush needs to be removed. He and his oil cabal don't think so because they don't want to relinquish what they have believing they will get it all the next four years. However, mainstream NWO we interpret and conclude see it our way. The American failing is that the people stand almost psychotically complacent when they are faced with the greatest loss of national resources in its entire history, when they confront $55 plus oil, an eroding infrastructure including US dollar, historical debt, an undermined social security system, unconscionable health and drug care costs, and compromise to basic and fundamental freedoms and rights.With this reality in front of their faces, it is surreal to hear ANYONE in America supporting such a leader who came into office with lies and deceptions and did more to change this country than any president coming into office "legitimately." Further, we have proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt of his complicity in 9-11 and the clear and convincing evidence that the administration fully condoned the abuse, torture and murder at Abu Ghraib; demeaning this nation by bringing it among those that history customarily rejects. This alone points to the truth we have argued that America was subject itself to coerced regime and culture change. See www.senderberl.com/UI..pdf www.senderberl.com/BMI.pdf www.senderberl.com/recapturing/america .

This war on terrorism is bogus
The 9/11 attacks gave the US an ideal pretext to use force to secure its global domination
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/comment/0%2C12956%2C1036687%2C00.html
First, it is clear the US authorities did little or nothing to pre-empt the events of 9/11. It is known that at least 11 countries provided advance warning to the US of the 9/11 attacks. Two senior Mossad experts were sent to Washington in August 2001 to alert the CIA and FBI to a cell of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation (Daily Telegraph, September 16 2001). The list they provided included the names of four of the 9/11 hijackers, none of whom was arrested.

SenderBerl: The NWO allowed Kerry to attack Bush on Iraq but not 9-11.
However, the rest of the world seems ready to seriously attack Bush on 9-11. Bravo.

October 17: Candidate Kerry: You have not highlighted $50 oil or even 9-11. Now, SenderBerl believes that there is a vital national issue in President Bush failing to take his physical examination and when the RNC Chair says as follows (which we heard repeated on Meet the Press this morning): Mehlman said: "The president is an alien. You heard it here first. The president is an alien. That's your quote of the day. He has been getting information from Mars. The shock of the debate will be the president's alien past will be exposed, which is why that box is there." Now, if you don't have John Edwards pushing the point of the President's missed physical or at least take out some ad space making an inquiry about it (to wit if the President is not well the country needs to know before not after the election), then we are going to wonder. Moreover, Democratic Senators should be marshaled to the point since it is a matter of national interest. We cannot believe that the Kerry campaign can pass on an issue that Mehlman skirts as he has now on more than one occasion. Mehlman saying the President's tailor is no longer there doesn't cut it. The President's annual exam is an obligation to the nation and especially so before an election. It diminishes the nation to circumvent it before a vital national election.

STOCKHOLM, Oct 13 (Reuters) - Former chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix said on Wednesday the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq had failed tragically in its aim of making the world a safer place and succeeded only in stimulating terrorism. Blix, in implicit criticism of the main protaganists U.S. President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, said the action had also failed to deter any ambitions on the part of Iran or North Korea to develop nuclear weapons. "The acknowledged gain of the war was that a treacherous and murderous dicator (Saddam Hussein) was removed, but the rest has been tragedy and failure," he told Reuters in an interview. "It has stimulated terrorism." *** "Is the world safer? No. It's not safer in Iraq," he said in his native Stockholm. "If North Korea and Iran are contemplating going for weapons of mass destruction, then it hasn't stopped them. It has not solved the Middle East conflict." *** Iraqi Science and Technology Minister Rashad Omar issued the invitation after an IAEA report on Monday said neither Baghdad nor Washington appeared to have noticed the disappearance of nuclear equipment and materials once closely monitored by IAEA.

SenderBerl: First Anan and then Blix are warning Americans that their choice could lead to a global holocaust. Isn't it enough that the only thing that Bush protected was the oil and that even the ammo dumps went unguarded, resulting in Americans being now killed with that very ammo?

KERRY: I believe the president made a huge mistake, a catastrophic mistake, not to live up to his own standard, which was: build a true global coalition, give the inspectors time to finish their job and go through the U.N. process to its end and go to war as a last resort. I ask each of you just to look into your hearts, look into your guts. Gut-check time. Was this really going to war as a last resort? The president rushed our nation to war without a plan to win the peace. And simple things weren't done. That's why Senator Lugar says: incompetent in the delivery of services. That's why Senator Hagel, Republican, says, you know: beyond pitiful, beyond embarrassing, in the zone of dangerous. We didn't guard 850,000 tons of ammo. That ammo is now being used against our kids. Ten thousand out of 12,000 Humvees aren't armored. I visited some of those kids with no limbs today, because they didn't have the armor on those vehicles. They didn't have the right body armor. I've met parents who've on the Internet gotten the armor to send their kids. There is no bigger judgment for a president of the United states than how you take a nation to war. And you can't say, because Saddam might have done it 10 years from now, that's a reason; that's an excuse.

SenderBerl: We heard Mehlman today October 17 also speak for preemeptive strike, that Americans should endorse the policy of affirmative war. Look at what Bush has accomplished with it? Americans don't understand why there has been no terrorism in response to Bush's War. This site of course explains it. But what Americans should comprehend is that RESPONSE will be the case big time should Bush win. Everyone is trying to warn the American people. There are too many who choose to stick their head in the sand. We have gotten lots of e-mail suggesting that China will jointly attack North Korea with US troops to show their solidarity with the NWO for containment of nuclear weapons. We have addressed all issues and we have tended to be correct on many material issues. We do not believe that China will attack North Korea. We do believe that Bush is thinking of attacking Iran before the election. We have made our perspective on such a decision clear that if Bush could not succeed in Venezuela it on the secular plane suggested that he would not succeed as we argued on the religious plane in Iraq, which he has not, and now without any success he wants to take on Iran (and thus Syria). The Donald would have fired him a long time ago. We have a Congress with its head between its tail, a media in the firm grasp of Bush, and an American people who when they go and see Fahrenheit 9-11 won't accept what they see because if it were true the mainstream media would have done a piece on it on 20-20, Nightline or Dateline. Without seeing it there, it has to be propaganda.

October 18: WILL BUSH WIN? SenderBerl has been watching the poll numbers since the third debate and Kerry's mistake and those poll numbers had us demoralized how the American people can vote in a man who we believe has made Bill Clinton look like a saint of a President to those who despised Clinton. Then we realized we got taken in ourselves to the dynamics created for Bush and his oil cabal. The only way America could re-elect Bush is a. America has become insane as a nation or b. the election count was rigged. We believe the American people sense the injustice from the victims of 9-11 to our troops in Baghdad. When the news comes from the front that American troops refuse to obey orders, they sense something serious is wrong. Finally, Kerry has taken advantage of the truth today, giving a stunning speech in West Palm Beach, some of which we were able to hear. This press report touches on it:

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (Reuters) - President Bush arrogantly ignored the advice of his top generals about the need for more equipment to fight the war in Iraq, Democrat John Kerry said on Monday. At an early rally here, the senator from Massachusetts seized on remarks published in The Washington Post by the former top U.S. commander in Iraq complaining last winter to the Pentagon that a poor supply situation was threatening the Army's ability to fight. "The president is always talking tough about what he's going to do to protect America," Kerry said, calling Bush's talk of support for the troops, "nothing more than empty rhetoric."Army Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez wrote in a letter on Dec. 4, 2003, to top Army officials that the lack of vital spare parts for tanks, helicopters and other systems was so severe that "I cannot continue to support sustained combat operations with rates this low," the newspaper reported. "Despite the president's arrogant boasting that he has done everything right in Iraq and that he's made no mistakes, the truth is beginning to come out and ... on Nov. 2 it will catch up with," Kerry said. "Let me tell you something I learned from Vietnam; listen to the troops and give them the equipment they need."

SenderBerl: Thus what we said in eary August continues to hold true but we were shaken ourselves from confidence in our own interpretation when we read yesterday that polls had Bush ahead by 8 points! We first thought it all a bad dream until we realized that there must be some reason that the close race is being played to the very eve of the election. Moreover, we realized today that Americans will rise to the task on election day. When push comes to shove they will recognize that Bush's time is up. If Kerry wins RESOUNDINGLY as we dared interpret (link above) the truth behind it will be laid to rest with the truth with the Kennedy assassination. The powers that be would never admit the danger facing this country as we now approach the most important election in US history.

Question: Oil is plunging since we delivered our analysis (October 24, 2004, four days ago) on the strategic need for the US to now make sure, vis a vis Chinese activity in Canada and in further view that Hu Jintao has aligned himself fully with Jiang Zemin in regards to policy against the US, that oil prices stay low and the US dollar stay high. Do you think that this has suddenly taken place since our analysis because the US shares our strategic concerns or is it only because of the elections on November 2, 2004 (it certainly isn't because of the public justification for it: that they suddenly stumbled on the fact that oil inventories are far greater than anyone expected -- as though no one knew about it till now)? Posted October 28 04

Lots of E-mail on this one already. First, the dollar rose then it fell. Other currencies all over the lot too. What does it mean? We will tell you what we see. We see China strategically moving to forerun a rise in US interest rates and in the meantime keep driving the US dollar south while maintaining an excuse that it has done something to give the yuan additional global value. This also to counteract falling oil prices which China does not want to see happen. Everyone thinks China wants low cost oil because of its industrial complex. Thus China brilliantly hides behind this facade that we exposed on October 24, 2004, http://www.senderberl.com/satellite.htm#canada showing why its wants higher oil prices (independence is more valuable to China that the across the board global impact of higher oil prices). Thus, the US should heed our advice, raise interest rates sooner than later, and get oil prices quickly down to the $30-$40 barrel level. Moreover, we tell you as our valued interested reader that the NWO has to give up for at least ten years on its global one world government agenda and we believe that it will have to return to showing itself publicly as American patriots. We just tell you one thing: when they do, don't forget to clean house, because without cleaning house, this we truly believe will be the last chance to do so. If they could have gotten to Syria and Iran when they invaded Iraq, and if China opened itself up to democratic governmental reforms, they would have proven themselves the vermin they are and the enemies to the USA and its citizens. They can change colors faster than you can think about the issues that may soon be forgotten. Don't forget what they near accomplished and how close they were to getting there. If correct, SenderBerl still holds that the NWO needs Bush to exit and in a cooperative manner and needs Kerry in to reposition itself and prepare for the next stage of conflict created when offsetting powers arise to singular superpower states. SenderBerl has explained that conflicting powers do serve a positive purpose inasmuch as a singular power always becomes an abusive power that ultimately turns on those whom they purport to represent and serve. We are very happy and proud to soon leave knowing that the NWO must retrace and hide again among us, but you will honor us by not forgetting that they are the enemy within.

Last night we admitted to making a mistake. The Yankees lost when under our paradigm for analyzing the entire series, we were proven wrong. When one admits to mistakes it permits one to reassess other things as well. We know we have a highly regarded record for difficult interpretations but that doesn't mean that we ever think we are going to be right about everything we say, think or assess. Consequently, by missing the mark on the playoff, we spent time looking over what we have been writing about, to see whether anything written requires an element of added humility and a need to restate or correct. Thus, the one thing we came across is being so harsh in proffering how can any genuine American vote for Bush. What crossed our minds is that many Americans voting for Bush are voting for him because they think he believes in G-d. The basis for that belief is his implicit stand on homosexuality. On the other hand, there is Kerry criticized by his own Church on the issue of abortion, standing openly willing and ready to further liberalize homosexuality by endorsing gay marriage.

Thus, we saw the need to clarify the paradigm for our position in asserting how any American could vote for Bush. By doing so, we address those who believe that voting for Kerry is more anti-G-d than voting for Bush. Our restated position is that both are NWO and both are anti-G-d. Bush reflects the amoral corporate camp where taking the stand he does serves his own agenda of enlisting the vote on his behalf. Yes, he no doubt for sure is anti-gay but one has to understand corporate amorality: if Kerry were anti-gay and Bush needed that block of votes, Bush would be out there supporting this group if it translated into victory. Look at Bush's stance regarding open borders. This is another aspect of his agenda. First, he is not supported by the African-American community and his open border policy is popular with the fast growing Latino community, where his policies across the board seek their vote and support. Second, opening the borders is a further reflection of his union busting amoral corporate perspective providing a wholesale supply of cheap illegal (below minimum wage) labor while constantly exporting minimum wage labor and minimum labor plus work overseas. Third, it serves the main NWO design in accentuating the racial mix in the US under the long term NWO design as expressed in Recapturing America and otherwise on this site.

Thus, there is no difference between Bush and Kerry in terms of their allegiance to the NWO agenda but there is a big difference in how they try to get there at this point of time. Voting in Kerry opens a window of opportunity to correct the course, while voting in Bush-Cheney pushes the envelope where they will compound mistakes already made by moving against Syria, Iran and North Korea. For while the regimes may be dangerous, SenderBerl has pointed out that they are dangerous to give us a message that we have to correct house domestically. How better to say it that to highlight what we wrote President Bush on September 14, 2001, thee days after 9-11, aware that Bush would proceed against the Middle East under the open umbrella of 9-11 (at that time unwilling ourselves to believe that he was as complicit in it as we subsequently concluded):

The United States represents the Christian point in the trilogy of monotheistic religions deriving from Abraham. The United States prospered and grew when it was a country steeped in religious tenets and values. Now, it is a country which has gone astray, turned its back on G-d, and in the throes of its economic success spews forth drugs, violence and sex upon its children under a banner of hedonistic and paganistic principles, creating an entire generation even further removed from G-d’s presence in our daily lives.

Do you think that G-d will intervene for the United States and Israel when these important countries seek to shed their connection to G-d? Do you think G-d will intervene for Israel against the Arabs and Islamic countries when the result will move a government agenda that defames and defiles G-d’s Name? Do you think the United States honors G-d’s intervention for it, by now blasting forth a generation of children riddled with morals which only align themselves with a paganistic future and lifestyle?

For the full text of what SenderBerl wrote the President link here: www.senderberl.com/September142001.htm. Thus, we all should emphasize to those who believe that Bush holds closer to G-d than Kerry that neither of them do: their god is to be found in connection with the NWO design and it is not the G-d that is the one G-d under the Judeo-Christian heritage and that Clinton, Bush and Kerry will push forth that agenda undermining this country but that Kerry opens a window to still change things whereas voting in Bush does not and in fact almost makes certain as now everyone agrees the use of a nuclear device that will be the open portal to a dark and devastating future for all of us. Bush and Cheney and that NWO faction mold reality to fit their perspective that will hammer a quick victory against Iran. They really believe they are going to succeed in Iraq once Syria and Iran are neutralized by an attack. These guys have made so many mistakes it is hard for us to imagine that they are unwilling to do what we have done by simply being wrong on a call regarding the playoffs: rethink, reassess and re-evaluate the reasons they have failed across the board when they otherwise believed that victory was stacked high to their favor.

October 19: Yankees/Red Sox: We did this many years back with a sporting event and we will do a forecast again. If Boston wins tonight, the Yankees will win tomorrow in game 7 of the playoffs. This has nothing to do with a New York bias but just the way the NWO runs things. Let's see if we are right.

While Kerry's events are open to the public, Bush's affairs require the signing of a "loyalty oath". Quietly wearing an anti-Bush T-shirt or badge is grounds for expulsion. Bush faces only adoring audiences vetted by the campaign's enforcers. At his town hall events, questions are planted for maximum political effect. At one, a veteran merely got up and requested permission to salute his commander in chief. Compelling visuals? Perhaps. But it does little to acquaint Bush with reality. *** Given the force of Republican efforts to deify Bush, his debate performances came as a big shock to many Americans. They showed a Bush quick to anger, indecisiveness, pettiness and petulance. The sheltered Bush was clearly unprepared for the debate and unprepared to face criticism. In fact, it seemed to take him by surprise. No one seemed to have told him he had critics. Source: http://www.rense.com/general58/MADNEDSS.HTM

With regard to the story below (what a hectic news day) regarding the unguarded and unprotected munitions depot, ABC ran an excellent story supporting the KSTP-TV video showing that on April 18, 2003, the depot was laden with major explosives, left not only unguarded but totally accessible to the opposition forces. This surely was used to kill and maim many American soldiers. While the controlled news focuses on 1000+ dead, SenderBerl also is sensitive to the reality that some 30,000 American soldiers have been seriously injured, many if not most carrying injuries for life. We repeat, directly below the video, what SenderBerl wrote for Rense.com on April 11, 2003, even before the KSTP-TV news crew filmed at the munitions depot. IF SENDERBERL COULD CONCLUDE THAT DUE TO THE FACTS A WAR OF ATTRITION WAS INEVITABLE, WOULD SOMEONE SUPPORTING BUSH TELL US HOW THE PRESIDENT AND HIS TEAM COULD NOT HAVE FIGURED IT OUT FOR THEMSELVES? Is this the type of leadership you want another four years?