Material Breach is not Relevant
December 20, 2002

Why SenderBerl does not endorse an attack on Iraq despite any findings of “material breach.”

1. SenderBerl finds Saddam Hussein an evil man who should be removed from office.
   
2. SenderBerl finds Saddam Hussein an evil man who should have been removed from office long ago but was intentionally kept on as a bogeyman until post 9-11 to justify a broad range attack against Middle East oil interests, allowing, in the interim, the massive loss of lives within Iraq, via economic sanctions, and further encouraging the escalation of the Oslo process to crisis proportions, to coincide with this oil agenda, post 9-11. North Korea and other world interests have made it clear that the guiding force behind the administration’s interest in Iraq is oil.
   
3. SenderBerl has major concern with executive decisions taken since 9-11 where the administration has told the American people to prepare for a ten to twenty year conflict.
   
4. SenderBerl has major concern with executive decisions institutionalizing emergency laws, police state in nature and scope, year after year, on the basis of a continuing war against terrorism, platformed again on 9-11.
   
5. Such posture in essence establishes and institutionalizes police state laws in contravention to the United States Constitution, negatively impacting individual rights and protections, the hallmark of this country and its provided form of government which is created to serve and protect those tenets and precepts.
   
6. SenderBerl finds this administration’s position, since 9-11, seeking to undermine Middle Eastern regimes separate and apart from Iraq, unacceptable.
   
7. SenderBerl finds this administration’s radical departure, since 9-11, from precedents set by all former administrations' foreign policy programs, unacceptable.
   
8. SenderBerl finds this administration’s setting forth, since 9-11, that it wants to democratize foreign states to its image of how they should look and operate, unacceptable.
   
9. SenderBerl finds this administration’s public declaration to bring democracy to foreign states, unacceptable, when fundamental rights and liberties in our own country, since 9-11, are being diluted and compromised.
   
10. SenderBerl finds the administration’s declaration, since 9-11, for world domination and control, as set forth by its National Security Strategy, unacceptable.
    
11. SenderBerl finds the administration’s declarations in its National Security Strategy, released September 20, 2002, as effectively dissipating international good will built up by prior administrations during past decades.
    
12. SenderBerl finds the administration’s international policies out of line with the times, in that it fails to understand that military strikes and attacks are no longer suggestive of victory and they are otherwise antiquated.
    
13. SenderBerl finds that the administration’s lack of acknowledgment that a small state with biotoxins can effectuate similar if not greater damage to domestic interests than nuclear bombs and weapons, unacceptable.
    
14. SenderBerl finds it criminal that all these unacceptable actions, decisions and paths are the result of 9-11, when there is probable cause that the administration well knew about the breadth and scope of the terrorism in play on 9-11.
    
15. SenderBerl finds it criminal, if this is proven to be the case, particularly when a wrongful course has a nexus to domestic oil cartel interests who backed the President and his family in reeking out a marginal victory in the last election.
    
16. SenderBerl finds that the interests of this nation have been compromised by the President laying the foundation for theaters of war throughout the planet, having intentionally provoked countries to react to the above positions, declaring a willingness and desire to engage other countries in battle and/or subjugate them to blockades or other actions perceived and rightfully so as acts of war.
    
17. SenderBerl finds it unacceptable that this administration has sent a message that the United States cannot be relied upon and otherwise manipulates countries by infiltrating infrastructure to commit acts that are literally and figuratively treasonous to their sovereign interests to pursue regime change or effectuate control of foreign governments, when such agenda and course may be the fruit of a poisonous tree.
    
18. SenderBerl finds it unacceptable that the United States has an affirmative relationship with the press and media through its limited ownership to censor and/or regulate stories and story lines under the umbrella of national security and national interests, whereas the disclosure of same would serve not diminish the national interests and serve to identify whether there has been a movement underfoot to compromise the bedrock principles and protections to which this country has been committed and to which its citizens have given their lives therefor.

Wherefore, if there is a nexus between 9-11 and the administration’s advance knowledge and thereby complicity therein in allowing the success of the attacks on the World Trade Center towers where thousands of lives of our own citizens were sacrificed to undertake an agenda that was otherwise not doable without the moral outrage generated by the events of 9-11, and this administration has any nexus with regard to its success, then aside from all else, including the financial and emotional havoc and pain to which we have been subjugated, all executive decisions derivative thereto, including any planned attacked on Iraq would be the illegal fruits of a poisonous tree and must be stopped pending resolution with what a growing number of citizens herein are coming to recognize as enemies within, pursuit of secret agendas with infiltrated infrastructure to endorse a course and result that may very well be and seems to us to be against the best interests of this sovereign nation. Any leadership that can announce openly a path for world domination and control is a leadership that can readily serve itself not the nation allowing citizens to be compromised or sacrificed to successfully implement such a self-serving course of historical avarice.

This course, using the façade of world peace, world health, control of world pollution, to mask one to obtain world domination and control, has been identified by us for many years and was first indicated in a major fashion by posting our novel for free access on the Internet: www.senderberl.com/recapturing/america. This novel posted in 1997 is more timely and understandable today than when first posted, identifying agendas years before the public, including professional writers and journalists, had any major indication of what may be taking place.

Conclusion: This administration is without clean hands to pursue any war that will cost the lives of our children, to further a self-serving agenda that long term will undermine the sovereign interests of the United States of America. Without full disclosure and public discussion, hiding truths behind the facade of national security, our country is being deliberately weakened and abused.

We post releases which further the above contentions.

We cannot stop ourselves from urging one last time that everything be done to stop President Bush from attacking Iraq. The issues and problems have to be addressed through Israel, and keeping Saddam around as a gateway to commence a foray for Middle Eastern oil is something which will prove to be a mistake that cannot be reversed.

Those countries threatened by the National Security Strategy will deploy whatever weapons they can to offset the US military complex and those weapons readily available are biotoxins, which use will change the landscape for the future.

Not only do they equal nuclear weapons in invoking massive death and destruction, they will pull a curtain of darkness over the planet as the parties motivated by hate and disgust for each other move to a regional and global conflict.

Our market systems seem to suggest that President Bush may walk in and literally neutralize resistance in Iraq with modern day weapons. The US markets will then react accordingly, but not only the Middle Eastern leaders, but all those threatened by the National Security Strategy, including China, will then launch a counter attack.

While the US has prepared itself for a ten to twenty year war, this interpretation, which is unacceptable in itself, institutionalizing police powers and laws into the fabric of the nation, discounts the use of bioterrorism. What the US fails to understand is that those without military might have to deploy whatever weapons they can use to offset the weapons of the NWO. Thus, once they take that step, and they will take that step, the ten to twenty year war becomes a quick war because once deployed people start dying in horrific ways everywhere, with the victims and their countries moving into a state of panic and chaos.

If this paints a lurid picture, it explains why we have expended every effort to explain what is taking place and why it is important to preclude the NWO agenda.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
December 17, 2002

SenderBerl: Since oil may wind up igniting things globally, we wanted to review our November 13th E-mail to you and offer you an updated perspective. We wrote that day:

A Discussion about Iraq and Oil
November 13, 2002 2:30PM

First (and foremost): Our systems support a major bottom and forthcoming major rise in oil prices. These interpretations are across the board for crude, heating and unleaded gasoline. We interpret the down move today in the oils are moving positions from weak to strong hands.

Second: Once Osama bin-Laden appeared out of the woodwork, we concluded early this morning as we expressed that Saddam would accept the inspectors.

Third: By accepting the inspectors, Saddam was saying that he was going to play a good boy and cooperate in every sense of the word.

Fourth: By doing so, when there is an attack on US interests such as a major naval vessel, Saddam is going to say, not me. I am looking to be a good boy and cooperate, get rid of WMD, and Mr. President Bush you prevailed. So, go back to your first assignment and agenda, and get the man who you and everyone else believed died because he is out to get you and I'm not.

Fifth: Saddam was so eager to start playing good guy now, no doubt having been told the Osama scenario, that he "succumbed" on Wednesday, not waiting until the Friday deadline.

Sixth: From our perspective, he and his son who spoke against the Parliament's decision to reject the UN resolution were too happy in playing along with the UN resolution.

Seventh: This puts the ball into Bush's lap. He's got a massive amount of military moving into for an attack on Iraq, and now he knows that Saddam is going to play along, and that Osama is going to plan a major terrorist attack against US military or here at home.

Eighth: President Bush is there not to have Saddam play along but to give him reason to attack because his mission is to capture and gain control of the oil (that's what justifies lower oil prices).

Ninth: He knows that China is out to stop him.

Tenth: He is faced with issue of who will he attack when the US faces the major Osama incident of terrorism. He wants to attack Iraq. He doesn't want to attack Osama because there is nothing to attack.

Eleventh: If the world points to Osama, he is left with a Sharon scenario: what to do after being subject to terrorism?

Twelfth: Thus, he has to blame Saddam. Thus the dynamic for Tonkin II.

Conclusion: If anyone thinks that Bush is going to be stuck like Sharon is, to wit: being contained from capturing the oil, while facing terrorism against his military and domestically here and home, they don't know our President and those at State and Defense who are going to bend over to give him the international excuse to attack.

All this is going to play out in our opinion quickly BECAUSE our systems do support a major bottom taking place right now in the oil complex, and rising oil prices are not consistent with Bush sitting around waiting for an excuse to attack.

President Bush will create one. Otherwise, Saddam may have in fact destroyed nearly all his WMD because he is now to Bush what Arafat was to Sharon when he was pigeon holed in his compound surrounded by Israeli troops: technically safe.

However, again, it is important to understand that Bush is not Sharon, and he will do something to open the doorway for him to do what he wants.

Of course, Jiang Zemin knows this as well and no doubt is equally prepared.

No need to watch a movie. As you can see, day by day, the players give command performances; however, no one wants to see the forest from the trees. Sharon right now has the full opportunity to pursue a religious resolution with the Arab/Islamic nations.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
November 13, 2002 2:30PM

A Discussion about Iraq and Oil II
December 9, 2002 2:00PM

1. The chart in January heating oil shows you that the oils did in fact bottom on or about the date we wrote the above.




2. Saddam has had a very large halo around his head.

2a. Saddam has even apologized to Kuwait.

3. China inserted North Korea into the equation.

3a. North Korea has essentially proven to the world community that Bush is only interested in Saddam because it seeks to capture to control Iraqi oil and oil reserves.

3b. Bush in making continued promises for major tax cuts to stimulate the economy, while continuing spendthrift spending, has further convinced the world that he needs the oil to pay for his self-serving programs.

4. We interpreted that Osama bin-Laden will not attack the US until after Bush attacks Iraq.

5. Bush has been trying everything and anything to cajole Saddam to give him any excuse to attack.

6. Saddam has not played along with Bush's wishes. In fact Bush's wishes encourages him to restrain himself, something otherwise difficult for him to do.

6a. Saddam has received sincere praise from Arab/Islamic leaders and we have interpreted that Saudi Arabia has apologized to Saddam for accurately forewarning the Arab/Islamic world of a US agenda that no one could believe until Bush openly admitted to it.

6b. The National Security Strategy was the most serious blunder in US history because we are not sure how the US plans on getting out from under it. Without question, it has undermined our future.

7. Bush finds himself between a rock and a hard place and wants to attack Iraq on the belief it will be over quickly and then he can move against North Korea.

8. North Korea has irritated the situation by giving the world community more reason why Bush should be moving against it not Iraq who everyone now believes as we have that it has no WMD sufficient to platform a US attack.

9. China has opened up a new front with Venezuela.

10. Bush has had to move quickly in Venezuela based on received intelligence to plug the hole in Venezuela opened by China. If he loses there, and is precluded by Saddam's compliance from moving against Iraq, due to world pressure and opinion (and thanks to Bush's obsessive calls for attack, the entire world is monitoring events in Iraq), and North Korea keeps saying you, Bush, want us, not Iraq, and the Saudis can exact some revenge for now knowing that Bush was out to undermine them with the attack on Iraq, Bush will have compromised US global interests more quickly and more seriously than any President in US history.

Conclusion: There are those at the highest level of the NWO not part of the oil cartel that are no doubt in major conflict with the oil cartel segment. Bush 41 and friends are saying that screw everyone, let's roll and get the oil and take it from there. The other side is pointing to consequences that we agree are inevitable in case the oil group really believes that they can deploy the military to steal oil assets.

We thus conclude that since Bush and cohorts have screwed up big time, including opening the gateway for Zemin and friends to continue on in power, Bush will in fact have to retract his agenda and do whatever it takes to neutralize the situation and save as much face as he is able to do.

We believe the above attests, particularly if the CIA and DIA assess that Chavez will now prevail in Venezuela, that Bush has been relying on the video game squad at the Pentagon, competent in taking out Afghanistan, but not much experienced or too lazy or inept to work up a plan that can do what Bush wants when the targets are backed up covertly by the Chinese. Otherwise, if they recognize what we have been saying, they are without the courage to tell Bush to his face that his projects for world domination and control are out of sync with reality and the times.

We believe Bush is on the precipice of losing a major international battle to the Chinese and that the US's future control of oil through our long standing relationship with Middle Eastern states has been irretrievably compromised and lost.

Bush can take the NSS document, tear out the sheets, and wipe away the tears from policies and an agenda which defies historical description.

If you think Bush's economic team, which truly meant to restore some integrity into the system, needed replacement, it is the entire administration which needs it. If Israel doesn't learn a quick lesson, if this proves to be the case, then Israel is far from being off the hook. In fact, for Bush to regain points in the Middle East, he will have to give the Arab/Islamic nations their wishes as far as Israel is concerned (AND QUICKLY). Bush will get cheap oil and a bruised ego. Israel will get the brunt of Bush's misjudgments and miscalculations, for which Israel globally announced their full unequivocal support.

In the meantime, keep your eye on developments in Venezuela. It is hard for us to believe that Bush would trigger the strike without having a full fledged plan to win. If Bush loses, the above scenario and outlook is in play. If he can't win in Venezuela, how in the world can he dare begin he can go forward with his questionable agenda in the Middle East. He can't. He shouldn't. If he stumbles in Venezuela forces and powers that be may compel Bush to throw in the towel.

We need leaders no longer aligned with the NWO. We need them badly.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
December 9, 2002 2:30 PM.

Venezuela

SenderBerl: If you think this is coincidence, then you have to pause and rethink it. Read the article below and our highlighted comment and then consider that the strike reared its head on December 3rd, the day after the China meeting, and was formalized on December 4th. The true enemy again is China who is doing to the US what the US wants to do to it. Again, now that Bush issued that idiotic NSS document, he has unified the world against us. Chavez no doubt with have China's strategic assistance so, with the US pulling out all stops, and having prepared for this strike, we and the world leadership will watch very carefully who prevails.

Conclusion: China is forcing Bush to spread resources all over the planet. Bush has not been tested in a major conflict scenario. Again, the US is great at defeating countries with mickey mouse militaries; however, its repeated squeamishness in calling China its enemy in here, suggests that it is scared. Listen carefully: if Chavez consolidates his power in Venezuela, Bush will be even more desperate than he already is to move against Iraq. If China is in Venezuela, Bush better know what China has ready for Bush in the Middle East. It can be a very bad picture ahead for the US, especially when we continue to tremble at a call we made in 1999 seeing Global War in 2003 unless the US and Israel pursue a religious resolution in the Middle East.

We hope the administration knows what it doing. From everything we have assessed particularly in releasing that NSS document, it doesn't seem that way at all, and if it doesn't then it better reign in the military before it opens a door that cannot be shut.

What scares us the most is the second article below which speaks for itself (and we include a brief comment on it as well).

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
December 8, 2002 10:30 PM

Last updated at: (Beijing Time) Tuesday, December 03, 2002

Chinese Premier Meets Venezuelan Foreign Minister

December 3, 2002: China and Venezuela have seen frequent exchanges of high-level visits, enhanced trade and economic cooperation and closer consultations and coordination in international affairs in recent years, Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji said Monday.

Zhu made the remark in a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Roy Chaderton Matos, giving high evaluation of the development of bilateral relations since China and Venezuela forged diplomatic ties.

He mentioned in particular the visits between Chinese PresidentJiang Zemin and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez in April and May last year, which defined a strategic partnership for common development for the two nations in the new century.

SenderBerl: This is exactly what Zemin did in Iran, Syria and Lebanon (and don't tell anyone, Egypt as well).

China values its relationship with Venezuela, and pledges continued efforts to further friendly ties, Zhu said.

Chaderton praised China's achievements since his last visit 21 years ago, saying the country is building its future in line with its magnificent blueprint.

He said Venezuela attaches importance to developing relations with China, and the two countries' long-term friendship and strategic partnership will benefit both peoples.

Chaderton conveyed President Chavez's greetings to Zhu, who asked to send his regards to the president, and also expressed condolence on the casualties caused by a blaze in Venezuela's capital Caracas last night.



People's Daily Online --- http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/

====

SenderBerl: It is this type of story (below) which suggests what this country opposes. Not that the Secret Service should not question someone taking photographs, but utilizing police state laws and tactics against those who are not meant to be within its ambit.

Does the experience of the subject's attorney reflect the USA or war time Germany? Today this subject was released. Tomorrow he is imprisoned without notice. The day after he may be taken and with one wrong answer shot. Thus, the need to take police state laws seriously especially when espoused on one day's activities, and now one day's activities in which the government may have been complicit.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
December 8, 2002

PHOTOGRAPHER ARRESTED FOR TAKING PICTURES OF VICE PRESIDENT'S HOTEL
Posted 5 Dec 2002 06:03:48 UTC

An amateur photographer named Mike Maginnis was arrested on Tuesday in his home city of Denver - for simply taking pictures of buildings in an area where Vice President Cheney was residing. Maginnis told his story on Wednesday's edition of Off the Hook.

Maginnis's morning commute took him past the Adams Mark Hotel on Court Place. Maginnis, who says he always carried his camera wherever he went, snapped about 30 pictures of the hotel and the surrounding area - which included Denver police, Army rangers, and rooftop snipers. Maginnis, who works in information technology, frequently photographs such subjects as corporate buildings and communications equipment.

The following is Maginnis's account of what transpired: As he was putting his camera away, Maginnis found himself confronted by a Denver police officer who demanded that he hand over his film and camera. When he refused to give up his Nikon F2, the officer pushed him to the ground and arrested him. After being brought to the District 1 police station on Decatur Street, Maginnis was made to wait alone in an interrogation room. Two hours later, a Secret Service agent arrived, who identified himself as Special Agent "Willse." The agent told Maginnis that his "suspicious activities" made him a threat to national security, and that he would be charged as a terrorist under the USA-PATRIOT act. The Secret Service agent tried to make Maginnis admit that he was taking the photographs to analyze weaknesses in the Vice President's security entourage and "cause terror and mayhem."

When Maginnis refused to admit to being any sort of terrorist, the Secret Service agent called him a "raghead collaborator" and a "dirty pinko faggot."

After approximately an hour of interrogation, Maginnis was allowed to make a telephone call. Rather than contacting a lawyer, he called the Denver Post and asked for the news desk.

This was immediately overheard by the desk sergeant, who hung up the phone and placed Maginnis in a holding cell.

Three hours later, Maginnis was finally released, but with no explanation. He received no copy of an arrest report, and no receipt for his confiscated possessions. He was told that he would probably not get his camera back, as it was being held as evidence.

Maginnis's lawyer contacted the Denver Police Department for an explanation of the day's events, but the police denied ever having Maginnis - or anyone matching his description - in custody.

At press time, the Denver PD's Press Information Office did not return telephone messages left by 2600.

The new police powers introduced by the USA-PATRIOT act, in the name of fighting terrorism, have been frightening in their apparent potential for abuse.

Mike Maginnis's experience on Tuesday is a poignant example of how this abuse is beginning to occur. It suggests that a wide range of activities which might be considered "suspicious" could be suddenly labeled a prelude to terrorism, and be grounds for arrest. We will continue to post updates to this story as we learn them.

http://www.2600.com/news/display/display.shtml?id=1441

Bush Aide: Inspections Or Not, We'll Attack Iraq

SenderBerl: Update: Is it Iraq or Saudi Arabia which is the first target?

Update: With the continued terrorists bombings and Israel's inability to adequately respond or contain them, the need to undermine China through taking out regimes in Iraq, Iran and Syria continues paramount. Moreover, needless to say, President Bush is desperate to recapture the Middle East. Thus, Senator Biden took less than a week to speak for war with Iraq, as shown below.

However, SenderBerl has detected a new twist to the US strategy. To show out of the box thinking, the strategists are telling President Bush in our opinion that while he has everyone looking to the right, implement a strategy to overthrow the Saudi regime. Taking control of Saudi Arabia would be a major feather in the NWO scheme (and be a MAJOR blow to China).***

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Ber & Sons Inc.
August 4, 2002

SenderBerl: We appeared on the Jeff Rense Show last evening, giving an overview of our assessment of China and the Middle East. We do this on the premise that government officials listen in and thus we can possibly further our aim to direct the leadership to a religious resolution, the ONLY real and genuine resolution.

Among the many things we covered was our August 4th interpretation that we believe that Saudi Arabia not Iraq is President Bush's primary target. Then this morning the Washington Post prints the story below.

Please note our comments interspersed below.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
August 6, 2002

Briefing Depicted Saudis as Enemies
Ultimatum Urged To Pentagon Board

By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 6, 2002; Page A01 A briefing given last month to a top Pentagon advisory board described Saudi Arabia as an enemy of the United States, and recommended that U.S. officials give it an ultimatum to stop backing terrorism or face seizure of its oil fields and its financial assets invested in the United States.

"The Saudis are active at every level of the terror chain, from planners to financiers, from cadre to foot-soldier, from ideologist to cheerleader," stated the explosive briefing. It was presented on July 10 to the Defense Policy Board, a group of prominent intellectuals and former senior officials that advises the Pentagon on defense policy.

"Saudi Arabia supports our enemies and attacks our allies," said the briefing prepared by Laurent Murawiec, a Rand Corp. analyst. A talking point attached to the last of 24 briefing slides went even further, describing Saudi Arabia as "the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the most dangerous opponent" in the Middle East.

The briefing did not represent the views of the board or official government policy, and in fact runs counter to the present stance of the U.S. government that Saudi Arabia is a major ally in the region. Yet it also represents a point of view that has growing currency within the Bush administration -- especially on the staff of Vice President Cheney and in the Pentagon's civilian leadership -- and among neoconservative writers and thinkers closely allied with administration policymakers.

One administration official said opinion about Saudi Arabia is changing rapidly within the U.S. government. "People used to rationalize Saudi behavior," he said. "You don't hear that anymore. There's no doubt that people are recognizing reality and recognizing that Saudi Arabia is a problem."

SenderBerl: Realizing that overthrowing the current Saudi regime and gaining direct control of its oil fields is a much more digestable solution than attacking Iraq (one which would cause China a severe blow to its success in the Middle East.

The decision to bring the anti-Saudi analysis before the Defense Policy Board also appears tied to the growing debate over whether to launch a U.S. military attack to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq.

SenderBerl Note

The very next morning we could not as usual obtain a copy of our interview. Thereafter Jeff Rense told us that his entire historical archive of interviews were stolen. Thus, if we had seen it posted for a single day, we would have secured it, but nothwithstanding our position regarding Saudi Arabia as the primary target was noted by us to the Congress on October 10, 2001, within thirty days of 9-11:

"Has anyone outside the ambit of the administration assessed the consequences of a putative overthrow of the current regimes in Pakistan (Islamic nuclear) and Saudi Arabia (Islamic oil)? Would not these be likely and doable projects encouraged by the American presence and activity in the area and thus worsen rather than improve things for America long term, unless the U.S. intends to then invade and occupy these two countries to in fact remedy the situation it itself encouraged? Could such a plan be implemented without your review and vote?"

Click here for: Analyzing Perle v. Feurth on Meet the Press

Which Reality Represents Man's Future?

There is a conflict between two perceptions of reality. We will deal with these two perceptions in as succinct fashion as we can muster from the planes of Israel, China and the U.S.

Israel: Current Israeli reality includes seeing that Oslo failed in every dimension. Moreover, there is the understanding that Oslo was nothing more than a set up to platform Israel's own destruction. These two conclusions now coming to the forefront, Israel's solution is to play along with Bush (N.W.O.) and take out Iraq, Syria and Iran while making sure it survives. In this regard, it wants to be in the vanguard of the attack with Bush, thinking that quick success best guarantees Israel's survival.

One can immediately see that the above perception is secular and is totally devoid of G-d but imbued with logic and reason.

The other reality involves seeing that Oslo set in motion Israel's biblical course because it failed since 1967 to instill love of G-d into the Jewish people in the Land of Israel. We saw Oslo before there was Oslo because as early as 1984 we set forth the proposition that G-d might mock Israel's failure since 1967 by having Israel voluntarily hand it back. Thus, when Oslo arose, it was no surprise to us, and we knew its true agenda and course, when Israel operated as a state putting its trust in man over G-d. Moreover, with Oslo Israel became a puppet state to the new world order leadership, today's Pharaoh. When Rabin was murdered, it triggered the sequence of Barak formally handing it back, Barak leaving Jewish troops to die in the field in giving up Jewish holy sites, the global desecration of G-d's Name to the world with his stated secularization plans, all with passivity and perceived indifference by the entire global Jewish leadership: resulting in the dire straits seen today in Israel.

Thus, while Israel currently sees teaming up with Bush and winning with Bush as the ticket to a good future, we see massive death and devastation and the final act in this theater of pathos. Our reality sees the simple solution of Israel recognizing what we said above, honoring its Torah, its heritage, the beliefs of prior generations all the way to the forefathers, and undertaking a course of proffering Israel as a nation which exists to honor G-d. From our perception of reality, we need not rely on man nor logic or reason. Such simple course resolves the problems and platforms a continued future for good.

We await the outcome of which version of reality will be pursued, the consequences speaking as to which version was correct.

China: Current N.W.O. reality sees a country that will never give up all that it has due to the grandiose ness of the US. China has built futuristic advance infrastructure on the compelled sacrifices of the American people and its government, allowing China to see itself as the leading world economic juggernaut into the foreseeable future. The only thing that can undermine it is if China wants to counter N.W.O. efforts for one world government. Thus, China will not risk to lose what it has gained, and will allow Bush to pursue the N.W.O. course is the Middle East which it declares to China is to undermine religious fundamentalism. China as a godless country always confirmed its understanding of the need to eradicate religious fundamentalism with its derivative problems.

Our perception of reality is that China would reveal itself as formally opposed to the N.W.O. agenda after it received entry into the W.T.O. We were correct, it even giving such indication prior thereto, seeing if Bush was going to intercede and stop its W.T.O. admission, driving China into a formal conflict position with the US. Now, we have explained as a matter of record its declaration in metaphor format through the movie The Emperor and the Assassin that China will oppose the N.W.O. agenda. Moreover, we have proffered that the West Nile Virus that was discovered in the US in August 1999, to our minds is a result of the Chinese Embassy bombing in May 1999. Moreover, Bush's National Security Strategy formally confirmed China's expressed concerns. This secular perspective is further clarified and buttressed by the religious perspective that China as the godless nation will in fact assume world supremacy and undermine Israel and the US as punishment for both following agendas distancing and intending to remove G-d from the future for its peoples. Not only does China not subscribe to the N.W.O. agenda but it also has factored in the reality that its success is platformed on cheap labor (a finite factor) and the willingness of the N.W.O. to enmesh itself into Chinese infrastructure. The new landscape is replete with the US corporate presence, the first wave in the N.W.O. attack to capture and control internal infrastructure. The result of the Chinese Congress shows that China is aware of it and therefore our reality perspective for China is that it will risk what it has gained because it knows that Bush going in the capture and control Middle East oil makes it simply a function of time before China must bend and bow to Bush (N.W.O.)

We await the outcome of which version of reality will prove correct.

United States: Bush's reality is that he de facto at this point controls the Executive, the Congress and the Supreme Court. He also has full legal powers to do just about anything he wants without the need for approval from anyone else. Thus, due to debts to the oil cartel group, and allegiance to his father's commitment to the N.W.O., which he now endorses in any event himself, he is out to capture Middle Eastern oil and oil reserves. Only with this asset can the N.W.O. offset China's expressed intent not to be a N.W.O. player, now that it has received entry into the WTO and otherwise has expressed its reason for not participating in it (The Emperor and the Assassin). Thus, Bush's reality is that he has to move now to do it, and then all he has to do later is take care of those whining about what he did. However, since he's in the driver's seat, one by one he will dispose of the whining, but the N.W.O. will be in technical global control. Give the N.W.O. five to ten years in a prosperous China (think of Japan's glorious years in the 80s and early 90s), and thereafter they will have their own N.W.O. people running in perpetuity the country.

Our perception of reality is that the move to capture and control Middle Eastern oil will be the defining moment in the future course and it will not result in Bush's well planned and supported secular vision for N.W.O. one world government world control and confiscation. It was with interest we noted Bush's approval of a formal 9-11 investigation, even with N.W.O. poodle Kissinger at the helm. Mr. China will of course assure that nothing gets in the way of the N.W.O. agenda. However, the very fact that the families of the 9-11 victims mustered enough clout and effort to get what a reluctant Bush wanted sandbagged is revealing. Thus, we see that the investigation opens a door, the only door, to undermine at this point Emperor Bush, because his complicity in 9-11 is a matter to our minds beyond a reasonable doubt. We explain below. However, regardless, our perception of reality is that G-d gave the Arab/Islamic nations the oil, and whether Bush or anyone else likes it or not, no one under an agenda to remove G-d from the region will prevail in any such effort to confiscate by force the oil asset. 

We await the outcome of which version of reality will prove correct.

Here in addition to the interrogatories we prepared showing the dynamics in play regarding Bush is our perception of why Bush's complicity is beyond a reasonable doubt. It depresses us to admit it to ourselves for when a culture under monotheism stands able to allow over 2,500 innocents to die to platform required moral outrage, that government will be punished by G-d. We have gone through a maze of thoughts on it, and asked why not the same expression for a government which stood passive to what was it 500,000 or 1,500,000 innocent children and/or people dying as the result of oppressive sanctions? When a government can turn on its own people, it automatically and inherently represents evil of the highest degree and magnitude. We know that one day these people will declare we sacrificed a couple of thousand of innocents to spare millions, many millions of innocents. We are sorry but that excuse and rationalization doesn't wash to us. There was another course, and there is always another course, before sacrificing your own citizens for an agenda with very questionable allegiances to the citizens giving the power in the first place. Likewise, Sharon shows his inability to pursue the correct alternative course, when he sat knowing the agenda in play, which took the lives of innocent children on their way to school. While he is tormented by his accession to such a reality, he stays sane by utilizing the excuse and rationalization that some had to die to serve the interests of the many. This type of thinking and logic serves man not G-d. If he was willing to bow and bend to G-d, he would have long ago seen that there was another way.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
November 30, 2002

The Bush Double Double Cross
November 3, 2002

This is going to be a very deep and scary analysis and interpretation on top of the ones we have already issued concerning President Bush and his administration. Those with a nexus to the putative amoral creation of requisite moral outrage for the war against terrorism really may have exceeded all bounds of decency in planning out new world order world domination and control.

Let's go back to the Saudi initiative in late March 2002. In accordance with our interpretation, the Arab League in Beirut was unified across the board in the Saudi initiative. This only suggested to us that Israel and the US had already agreed to it. Notably, within 24 hours, Sharon initiated the claimed "criminal" incursion into the West Bank, without anyone, anyone at all, bolting from the Beirut unified position or threatening to. This immediately ratified our interpretation that Arafat was the safest man in the Middle East and our truly incredible but sadly true interpretation that what was playing out was staged and orchestrated.

What is critical to see at this juncture is what were the Arab League and Israel told by the Bush administration to persuade them to undertake the staging and orchestration? Were both parties told the same thing to manifestly further the Saudi initiative or was each party told something highly beneficial to it at the expense of the other?

Israel no doubt immediately recognized what we ourselves concluded: simple serious acts of terrorism would undermine the entire Saudi initiative. Thus the Bush administration in our respectful opinion sold the Israeli government on the absolute need to eliminate all Arab/Islamic regimes who would ultimately undermine or uproot the planned peace to wit: Iraq, Syria and Iran. Sharon was told to go into the West Bank and Gaza and eliminate every known terrorist (after the platform was created with the lives of innocents including children), and once doing so that the United States would then proceed against Iraq as a prelude for the US and Israel to effectuate regime change in Syria and Iran.

It all looked good to Israel. The United States would be in control of all enemy states and Israel could only be a major beneficiary of the US agenda.

What Israel never saw was that it fell into the Chinese trap and design when it went into the West Bank to reoccupy it in punishment for the terrorism (as a mask to undertake elimination of all terrorist cells). What Israel could not itself see even with all its intelligence and analytic brilliance was that the US strategic design of having Israel suffer from Palestinian terrorism to predicate its incursion into the West Bank and Gaza to eliminate local terrorists cells, put them into a reality of economic malaise approaching economic collapse (foreseen by Chinese intelligence working in parallel with the Arab/Islamic nations, the Chinese urging the Arab/Islamic nations not to trust the US when it came to Israel).

Israel lost its vital tourism industry and compounded the financial implosion by pulling out reservists from the already damaged and sinking economy. Sharon very soon thereafter realized the trap he fell into and adjusted the depth of the planned reoccupation of the West Bank. He went to President Bush seeking additional financial assistance to escape the Chinese design (which was seen in microcosm under the sniper spree in the Washington, DC metropolitan area). President Bush has put Sharon into a quagmire telling him that he is compelled to close the dollar window for political reasons at this time for both Israel and the Palestinians (Bush telling Sharon not to worry --Sharon worried has submitted a plea for $10 billion is US aid to compensate for the staged and orchestrated terrorism and its unforeseen consequences).

Moreover, what Israel never expected, once committing to the Bush plan, was that on June 24, 2002, Bush would escalate the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians to one between Islam and the West (the US). President Bush came out and ratified what we had been saying all along: that the US wanted to mold the Arab/Islamic nations into the image of the new world order agenda to wit: remove Allah from His central role for the Arab/Islamic people.

Israel already in the abyss had to endure the reality of the National Security Strategy, which announced that President Bush and his administration was out for world domination and control. What must have petrified the Israeli government was what we immediately concluded: President Bush deliberately went out to unify the Arab/Islamic world and China against not only the United States, but Israel as well. Why was President Bush so openly brazen about it?

The only reason we could see for him doing so is that it committed the United States to the attack against Iraq. It was long apparent to us that Saddam Hussein despite his being the personification of evil was never the target of US policy but the bogeyman for its true pursuit: Islamic oil. When President Bush post 9-11 went into Afghanistan, we immediately noted his global language praising the Saudis and Pakistanis for their support of the US military effort and incursion.

The Saudis and Pakistanis leaderships no doubt called President Bush and told him thanks but no thanks: no need to praise their cooperation with the US agenda. Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. proffered to the House and Senate Intelligence committees that President Bush's true agenda was to initiate rebellion against both governments so that he could intervene to seize and control Islamic nuclear and oil.

Rebellion did not materialize. What did materialize was the Saudi initiative, suicide bombings against Israel, Sharon's incursion into the West Bank to eliminate terrorist cells, to lay the groundwork for the US design to now attack Iraq on the basis of undertaking regime change of all countries supporting terrorism and operating against Oslo or the Saudi initiative, what one preferred to believe.

However, two new developments. First, Sharon when he realized the trap he fell into, decided to turn the tables and put the West Bank and Gaza into a similar dynamic, so to his mind if anyone was trying to engender the collapse of the Jewish State, he was responding by encouraging the Palestinian people to abandon the West Bank and Gaza by making their lives equally unpalatable.

Israel was consumed with offsetting the economic phase of the attack upon it, and regretting how it fell into the trap, now having to beg for billions from the US on the basis that it should not suffer in this manner from following the US guidelines "for peace."  It could not see the forest again from the trees.

We then offered our extreme interpretation that Israel was at the mercy of the Bush administration, pointing out that Israel was overlooking the tragic obvious: how could the US justify its design for Arab/Islamic oil bringing along Israel before the world as a co-beneficiary of its design and ultimate effort?

This was a pretty good point we were making. We pointed out that the US design, even before the NSS and the Rose Garden remarks, was for oil (see below). Now, since the Rose Garden remarks, it became very clear that President Bush and his administration were out for all the oil, any lingering doubt removed with the National Security Strategy. Thus, when the US attacked, the game plan as understood by Sharon, was for Israel to engage Syria (helped along by the fact that the Congress now only allows Bush to attack Iraq), to remove Hussein and Assad in one major swoop. Israel's problems would be essentially over. But would they be over? Or would the reality be no Israel or an Israel barely clinging to life?

When Sharon recently went to Washington for final consultations with President Bush prior to the planned US attack on Iraq, he without doubt posited this disturbing dynamic: how was the US going to face the consequences of a victorious Israel when the US was going to undertake an occupation of Iraq and capture and seize all its oil?

Were there those in his administration who were touting to the President the material benefits of a failed Israel? Would massive deaths in Israel provide the US with the requisite moral outrage to control if not seize all Middle East oil?  Would such results give the US what it wanted and needed: oil and removal of the Chinese presence and design in the Middle East? It became increasingly apparent to Israel that if Israel was victorious in the US occupation and campaign that it would cause the US many long term problems and that with a failed Israel it would solve the remainder of the US's problems.

We now interpret that Sharon who just the other day proclaimed to the world that Israel never had a better friend in the White House than Bush 43, now carries serious concerns about what answers he received from President Bush.

It is multi dimensional and deep but this is all historically important. We were concerned a short time ago that Sharon was a possible target for assassination. We interpreted that with an imminent attack against Iraq, the NWO was not happy in having a supreme military man like Sharon in control of Israel. He may launch counter attacks out of preset boundaries; Sharon like Rabin was committed to the best interests of the Jewish State when under attack. Similar to the times of Rabin, if something happened to Sharon, Shimon Peres would assume the Prime Minister post and the Minister of Defense was already another NWO pawn and poodle.

However, what happened since that putative assassination assessment is that President Bush got slammed big time at the UN by all the other countries fully knowing his agenda against Iraq and the rest of the region and taking the US to task for it.

While it was always crystal clear to us, it seems that since the NSS document it has become more clear to the rest of the world, who was now intent to tell the President that his policies of unilateralism were going to be rejected and that his attempt to obtain a cloak of approval was not going to succeed.

So now, we have Sharon going back to Israel after getting his final marching instructions regarding the US attack on Iraq, and Israel's overt and covert roles, and we are shocked to see that Peres and Ben-Eliezer, the NWO Foreign Minister and Defense Minister resign on the flimsiest of pretexts.

The original news reports are focused on Ben-Eliezer, that he undertook the strategy to serve himself in his attempt to rest control of the Labor party. However, these claimed political machinations are minimized by the overlooked fact that Shimon Peres agreed to resign and he controls Ben-Eliezer not vice versa.

THIS TELLS US THAT BUSH WILL NOT NOW INITIATE THE ATTACK ON IRAQ BUT THAT HE PLANS ON FORCING ISRAEL TO INITIATE A REGIONAL WAR WHERE BUSH WILL INTERCEDE ON BEHALF OF ISRAEL AGAINST SYRIA AND IRAQ.

To understand this new perceived path, we have to now look over the dynamics from the Arab/Islamic side of the equation. First, why would the entire Arab League in Beirut support the Saudi initiative? Second, why when Sharon within 24 hours went into the West Bank would not a single state including Syria and Libya not bolt from the accord reached just hours before in Beirut?

One has to today conclude that while the Bush administration was selling Sharon on the ultimate end of undermining Arab/Islamic regimes, that the Arab/Islamic states were being sold by the Bush administration that there would be no Israel or a drastically reduced Israel and that the Holy City would be theirs to share as they pleased.

It wasn't just that the 67 portion of Israel was going to revert to the Arab world, but everything. This is the only incentive which could make sense to the entire Arab League playing along with a strategy which required Sharon to make an incursion into the West Bank without anyone bolting from the Arab League accord in Beirut.

The US specified its interests in terms of eliminating the threat of terrorism, especially suicide bombers, hitting the shores of the US, with the Arab League, we surmise, not understanding that once Israel reverted in full to the Arab world that there would be no need to eliminate terrorists.

Thus, this suggested that the need to eliminate terrorism had to do with what the Arab League thereafter saw was that the true goal of the US was not the mask of WMD or suicide bombers, but its critical asset oil (previously seeing it as a pretext to set up Israel for the inevitable under the Bush NWO agenda). Not only Iraqi oil and oil reserves but control of all other regional oil, especially Saudi oil. This was not supposed to be so obvious and clear to the Arab League but we below cite the dates and language of some of our analyses making it clear that we concluded we could not agree with US policies which preemptively went out not to protect our nation but to illegally seize and control Middle Eastern oil because the government didn't like the reality that China went out during the Clinton term and captured the Middle East and now the NWO oil cartel was not going to lose its relationship with Middle East oil powers and  indirect historical control of Middle East oil.

We must interject that if there was any chance of saving it, President Bush irrevocably lost it and played into China's hand by releasing the National Security Strategy, the dumbest move for US interests one could ever imagine.

The Bush administration is probably on serious medication having to play this deeply dangerous game of telling Israel that it is its best friend, and still having the nerve to tell the Arab League that the US is simply doing all these convoluted maneuvers to set up the environment so that they can have back the Holy City and that Israel will no longer be an issue in a future relationship between the US and the Arab world (saying that they have reason to align for the future with the US rather than China, who the US tells the Arab world, especially Saudi Arabia, cannot be trusted).

Conclusions: The reality is that now both Israel and the Arab world do not trust the Bush administration, and quite frankly, no doubt Americans will no longer as well as the Bush administration's amoral nexus to 9-11 and other designs unravels. However, the point is that Sharon came back to Israel, knowing that his life was at risk, and also now knowing that the US may very well be setting up Israel to take a fall for the reasons articulated. He cannot take the chance that it may be the case. Thus, he will not go by the Bush game plan, allowing Israel to succumb while he is at the helm.

Thus, Peres reporting about Sharon's concerns, was no doubt directed to leave the Sharon government. The question is for what purpose? The US (NWO) no doubt has reached the new conclusion offered above that its interests are now better served by having Israel initiate the attack  and then having the US intercede for it.

You have to understand the depth of this new design. In each step, depending on the results, the Bush administration is situated to play either scenario, or the one we believe is now in play: the Bush double double cross, where both Israel is lost and the Arab regimes undermined per US ends.

With the Arab world under US control (in punishment for the devastation to Israel), those who are livid over the loss of Israel are assuaged, while with Israel lost, a new platform for a renewed US relationship with the Arab world is created over time, giving them the Holy City as a prize for losing the oil and their sovereignty. This leaves the Bush administration only with China to deal with, now having effectively removed it from the Middle East.

Now, assuming that China, Israel and the Arab League understands what we proffer, what can we expect to see to offset this design?

SenderBerl hopes you understand that all the above represents our contention that all roads lead to the same result unless Israel primarily in here undertakes the religious resolution with the Arab/Islamic world.

What you have just read represents mutuality of interests between them, because they are both being set up for the Bush double double cross. Thus, we are here to promote the religious resolution between Israel and the Arab/Islamic world for this will permit as we argued long ago the US to clean shop from the NWO influences who take us on the road to our own destruction here at home, and that is where China comes into the picture.

Succinctly put, we believe that China has given Syria for its steadfastness, in not caving in to US pressures, protection against US design to overthrow its regime, and we believe it has given the same assurances to Iran, and thus you can see how close we are to not only regional but global war, and the reasons therefor.

However, in this paper, we are detailing the perceived double double cross strategy of the Bush administration, made even more evident to us with the forced collapse of the Sharon government. Sharon's new Defense Minister is a hawk, and the US no doubt, will encourage Israel to defend itself, and there will no doubt be enough terrorism for Israel to initiate a regional conflict in its legitimate defense, where the US will enter to "save the region and the world." 

While we can envision strategies Israel and the Arab world can or may independently deploy to offset Bush's double double cross, they will be to no avail, for again, but for the religious resolution, all roads lead to disaster.

Look at some of the things below SenderBerl wrote in early 2002 and see how true they have become. The US had turned its back not only on G-d, but on its own Constitution, and for the stock market wealth given under Clinton, they looked aside as corruption and greed became institutionalized in the American infrastructure. Payment for that error is now being extracted.

With Peres gone from the government of Israel, the gateway has opened for Sharon to pursue a true peace.

We respectfully submit that you do everything possible to convince the Prime Minister that any course other than the religious resolution will lead to the devastation of the State of Israel.

The Arab nations are not Israel's enemies. By failing to recognize the correct course, Israel and the Arab/Islamic world will succumb, each in their own way, and open the gateway to the ultimate conflict and contest between the US and China, where the US will pay for its grievous errors and sins.

Thus, the US, Israel and Arab/Islamic world should all recognize that the only course to serve their own futures is the religious resolution. Abandon G-d and the future can only be dark and dire without His intervention.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
November 3, 2002

Key dates: June 24, 2002, President Bush's Rose Garden Remarks
                      September 20, 2002, National Security Strategy


SenderBerl wrote:

March 30, 2002: China is telling Arab nations that Israel is dying economically from the terrorist attacks.

April 11, 2002: China drives President Bush's decisions and concerns.

April 12, 2002: The US is now committed to a course where it must undermine all regimes aligned with China (under the banner of supporting terrorism).

May 5, 2002: US tells Israel that it accepts responsibility to neutralize Iraq, Iran, Syria, which responsibility it does not assume with great reluctance.

May 5, 2002: Upsetting the Saudi peace initiative is a doable project for China.

June 17, 2002 (days before the President's Rose Garden Remarks!): ... replacing regimes will secularize the subject countries diluting Islam. This is an intended or unintended end which the Qu'ran proscribes and demands unbridled resistance....However, from US statements since 9-11, it has become clear that part of the US agenda isto mold the Islamic world to its perception of its place in the new world order. PRESIDENT BUSH SAYS THIS SEVEN DAYS LATER.

June 21, 2002 (still days before the Rose Garden Remarks): Sharon moving in troops, willingly calling up reserves, will put Israel into a serious financial bind.

June 21, 2002: US's best course may be to see Israel face a slow death, inevitable from a collapsed tourist industry and deployment of personnel to a reoccupation of the West Bank.

June 21, 2002: Many of the EU's and US's problems are resolved by Israel failing as a sovereign state and country.

June 21, 2002: If President Bush pulls away from a preemptive strike against Iraq, and Israel faces continual terrorist attacks (while the EU and US do not), Israel has an imminent survival crisis....If the State of Israel wants to act as though it is devoid of any major nexus to G-d, then G-d will not be with Israel in resolving the crisis. THIS NOW FORESHADOWS THE POINT WE ARE MAKING ABOVE.

June 21, 2002: We tell you right now that the Middle East will not return to its historic relationship with the U.S.....making it very clear to the Arab/Islamic nations that the US was intent on uprooting its nexus to Allah. This will prove to be an irreparable breach for the foreseeable future.

ROSE GARDEN REMARKS

July 4, 2002: The US needs global moral outrage to take out states that sponsor terrorism. Of course the collateral benefit is the targeted key benefit: the ability to recapture the Middle East from China.

July 4, 2002: The US knew major terrorism would derail the Saudi peace plan --only conclusion is that the US knew it was easy to uproot, expected it to be uprooted, and WANTED it to be uprooted.

July 20, 2002: Simply said, these men concluded that the American form of government was to be ultimately rendered antiquated.

July 20, 2002: Despite the misinformation to the contrary, the issue is oil.

July 26, 2002: (Religious resolution will) free the Congress from the coercive power of the power elite behind the one world government agenda. THIS MONTHS BEFORE THE CONGRESS GIVE BUSH THE GREEN LIGHT TO WAGE WAR AGAINST IRAQ.

July 29, 2002: The war against terrorism has all along been the war against China.

July 29, 2002: Powell says US troops will stay in Asia "to guard against nations that might have aggressive intent."

July 31, 2002: The US knows that China has prevailed and it is essentially going out and saying we are taking it back like it or not and if you don't like it we are ready to see what you are going to do about it. This represents nothing higher than adolescent logic and thinking.

July 31, 2002: SenderBerl believes that saying that we are going to take over the oil fields and put in a caretaker government is undertaking a course of insanity....The leadership is acting as though it is desperate. This is usually the nexus to making a mistake.

August 1, 2002: Issue not WMD but to obviate reality that Middle East has been lost...translates into a compromise of oil supplies for not only the US but the EU.

August 4, 2002: Is it Iraq or Saudi Arabia which is the first target? SenderBerl believes that President Bush has ordered an affirmative effort to replace the Saudi leadership. This is one of the best kept secrets in Washington (assuming we are correct). CONFIRMED BY THE WASHINGTON POST ON AUGUST 6TH AFTER OUR APPEARANCE ON THE POINT ON THE JEFF RENSE SHOW ON AUGUST 5TH.

August 9, 2002: Israel admits that it underestimated the significance of suicide bombings.

August 9, 2002: Assad given full assurances by China that it will protect Syria from US/Israel machinations.

August 12, 2002: America doesn't subscribe to a government that tells its citizens we are going to war with anyone who we don't like who could possibly pose a threat to us. If we subscribe to such a tenet or claim, then what stops China from proffering to its people the very same tenet or claim? If they did it first, the uproar from Washington would be deafening. THIS IS WRITTEN MORE THAN A MONTH BEFORE THE RELEASE OF THE NSS.

August 13, 2002: Why Sharon and why now? Sharon not inclined to follow US military directives when Israel under attack.... PM Sharon's death = moral outrage = attack on Syria.