Give Control
of Iraq to OPEC
Take note John Kerry
May 1, 2004
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. has long
interpreted that the Bush administration
true mission in the Middle East was to
control OPEC. See www.senderberl.com/BMI.htm.
Thus, it is important for you to
recognize that the solution to the
quagmire in Iraq would be to turn the
covert agenda inside out and allow OPEC
to control the election process to
representative government for the Iraqi
people.
Covert agendas mean that no one is
supposed to recognize or admit to the
true scope of the purpose of invading
Iraq. Thus, it is then appropriate for us
to formally proffer that the Bush
administration can exit its own agenda
and extract itself from the quagmire by
removing itself completely from Iraq,
including all interest in its national
treasures, other than to conclude with
OPEC a long term deal for favorable
pricing in respect to the great
sacrifices of the USA in freeing Iraq
from the tyranny of Saddam Hussein. Now,
it is just and fair for the Bush
administration to conclude that OPEC,
carrying large representation of
Arab/Islamic nations, could best
implement a new government, one free from
the tyranny represented by Saddam
Hussein.
The USA would have no other role
except for assuring candidates from a
full spectrum of interests and that the
elections are in fact free and open and
that OPEC itself does not influence the
elections or pact the field with
candidates to its favor and bias.
Can it be that dynamically simple? Yes.
The Middle East nations and leadership
see the threat of future USA intrusions
abated and removed and the USA receives
for its sacrifices in freeing Iraq from
the stranglehold of Saddam Hussein
favorable long-term oil contracts. It
also serves as a platform to rebuild
trust and respect for the USA in that it
helps prove that the USA is no longer out
for world domination and control and that
its primary purpose in invading Iraq was
not oil.
There is only one reason why the Bush
administration at this point would not
jump at this portal to resolving the mess
the US faces in Iraq, now irretrievably
forged due to a set of photographs
causing the US to lose the high moral
ground: that the President continues to
push his original agenda.
Regarding the photos of Iraqi prisoner
abuse, we can only add that these photos
were long known to the US military and
the Bush administration and albeit the
President publicly saying yesterday that
he is shocked by such unacceptable
conduct, US troops have been
indiscriminately killing innocents on a
wholesale basis since January (a moral
outrage we think at even a higher level
than these photos). This latter type of
conduct, where the British noted that US
troops were treating Iraqis as sub human,
rationalizing wholesale loss of human
life, platformed our efforts to highlight
to the Congress that if it didn’t
stop the course of the current
administration, it was relegating the
country to a fate similar to both Rome
and Germany in times past. SenderBerl
emphasized that when a Congress allows a
leader to move unchecked, the
consequences per history are routinely
abuse and a leadership first slowly
moving and then more quickly moving to
police state control. This is exactly the
course of the country under the current
administration.
Thus it is crystal clear that if the
Bush administration does not extricate
itself as it should as presented above or
in similar fashion, quickly, efficiently
and with a chance of regaining some of
the honor and respect lost, then there is
no alternative but to conclude that
President Bush continues in his mission
as set forth in our exposition www.senderberl.com/BMI.htm
.
If this course is accepted and works,
feel free to ask us the solution for the
Israel/Palestinian quagmire. Once you
cast off the hidden covert agendas of an
administration, the road and solution to
peace is, excuse us, quite simple. The
Bush administration from day one never
wanted peace but only the predicate to
obtain control over OPEC as the prelude
to pursuit of the President’s
National Security Strategy for world
domination and control (see footnote
below). What is it that President Bush
boldly said in the straightforward manner
and way he likes to speak:
"If
this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck
of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the
dictator." --President-Elect
George W. Bush, CNN News,
Aired December 18, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. ET
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0012/18/nd.01.html
Footnote. The CIA and other
intelligence agencies consistently
thwarted President Clinton from pursuing
a military course against Saddam Hussein.
We have long asserted that Saddam was the
bogeyman for the move against OPEC when
the time was right. Bush 41 expected to
win a second term. He did not. If
President Clinton pursued a military
course against Saddam, Clinton and the
Democrats would be in the oil business.
No way. Thus, after 9-11, the portal was
open for the quest to control OPEC. What
undermined it is that the Bush cabal was
wrong on two major points: Saddam did not
use WMD after the US through the UN
stripped him of all effective military
hardware (he had nothing else to use) AND
when he did not use WMD to defend Iraq,
the Bush cabal is still recovering from
the failure of their primary backstop:
that they would find WMD in Iraq. If
either of these two events had happened,
Bush would have been in both Syria and
Iran already and would not have faced the
quagmire he now faces in Iraq.
Sender, Berl
& Sons Inc.
www.senderberl.com
senderberl@AOL.COM
|
