BUSH MAY ANNOUNCE TONIGHT FINDING WMD IN IRAQ
This will confirm our long held perspective (see http://www.rense.com/general49/where.htm)

After writing the analysis below, we remembered that Blair is scheduled to visit with Bush this week. Next we reviewed our own link to the left regarding WMD http://www.senderberl.com/fp/notes.htm#jump14 recognizing that we all along expected Bush prior to November 2004 to reveal finding WMD in Iraq. There it is: the deflection and misdirection to obfuscate all that has happened. If so, he’s going for Iran and Syria and the demand for more troops will fill Iraq with needed military to allow Bush to complete the mission. If so, we will have to dust off Nostradamus because we may be on the path to the type of Middle East war and devastation he long ago described.

Bush News Conference: Scheduled for 8:30 PM.
Buckle Up

SenderBerl believes the President has to deflect the type of questions and issues we would be throwing at him. To do so, he has to announce something spectacular. No doubt the last seven days in seclusion in Crawford have been to hatch up something dramatic. Thus, we believe Condoleezza Rice should be the first to go. He's hard pressed allowing any changes in the CIA, if he dares do so, without removing her. Moreover, we believe .that he is going to have to make some more dramatic announcements to keep the press and media off balance to deflect the type of questions he cannot afford to face and obfuscate about. Buckle Up. The only truly positive he can offer from where we sit is that he has decided also not to run for a second term. We have noted a major retraction in anticipated advertising during the past seven days. Without Rice there and with the truth looming about 9-11 and the worsening quagmire in Iraq, and his failing in his mission, www.senderberl.com/BMI.pdf, we do not believe he has the drive to even commit to the run for office.

What can Bush do opposite to what we express above? Reveal that Saddam has talked and disclosed the location of WMD. This would be the Straussian play to the otherwise "normal" play of the true realities before him. This would be Bush's way of saying, I'm keeping Condy by my side and to heck with the truth about 9-11, Iraq and everything else: I was right and now I'm going to complete my mission and move against Syria and Iran, and damn the consequences.

The frightening dynamic about these polarized insights is that are both in play for tonight's news conference.
Both would deflect the type of truth we have enunciated in recent major expressions posted below.

"I would have moved mountains to stop the attack"
President Bush 04-12-04

THESE QUESTIONS AND POINTS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS IN THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY

Mr. President -- forget about moving mountains -- how about canceling your visit to read with second graders once you learned a hijacked plane went into a landmark New York City building?

Mr. President how about calling NORAD and checking whether military jets were up there ready to intercept since the August 6, 2001 memo fully supported that America was not only under attack but an active target of feared terrorism?

Mr. President how about telling us what you did when you heard that multiple jets were hijacked?

Mr. President, since you knew that there was a threat of terrorism using hijacked planes, how in the world could you tell the American public when you say you saw the first plane go into the north tower, that this was the deed of a poor pilot, as though it was a joke of some sort? By the way, how could you see the video of it before any video was known to exist of the incident?

Mr. President how about cutting short your stay in Crawford in August 2001 when putting the nation on the highest alert in US history and forgetting to tell the country about the imminent danger (when you found it appropriate to offer us the advice when misleading us when it came to Iraq)?

Mr. President, how could your National Security advisor help move mountains to stop the attack when she admits that she did not know until May 2002 that there was intel in the pipeline that terrorist were planning on using planes as missiles?

Mr. President Osama bin-Laden according to a video you released received a telephone call on or about September 6th 2001 about an imminent attack on the US. I believe it was a cell phone call. Do you believe that the National Security Agency had that call intercepted since the agency is tuned into his voice? If so did you receive that intel from the NSA(gency)? Mr. President, you changed your schedule suddenly on the morning of September 7th, did that have anything to do with the call Osama bin-Laden received?

Mr. President if our initial mission was to capture Osama bin-Laden wouldn't the best source to ultimately track him down be to have his family here in the USA for questioning? However, when all flights were grounded, was it you personally that authorized them to leave the USA and if not who authorized it?

The President will have one of his few formal news conferences tomorrow.
He's already falling apart and if the press core does its job the American public may get a look at the truth of this President and his administration.

Mr. President the August 6, 2001 memo is only one part of the intelligence available to you. What did the National Security Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency have to offer concerning the fact that the US was on the highest state of alert in American history? Did you to ask them to monitor communications focused on airplanes and hijackings and Osama bin-Laden's known voice?

Mr. President do you regret that the high status of alert during the six week period during the summer of 2001 was not extended another month?

Follow-up: Mr. President, how did we go from the highest state of alert to leaving the barn door open for the attacks of 9-11?

Mr. President, can you tell the American people why military jets were kept grounded for some thirty minutes after hijackings the very subject of concern of the August 6th memorandum to you? Since we were just taken off high alert, why didn't the military defense network instantly respond, knowing that the portal was open for domestic attack?

Folks, we have offered questions galore that can be asked, but the true tragedy is if and when the questions that should be offered the President are not.

The questions we predict will focus on Iraq. As we explained, the NWO leadership has allowed the media free and open reign on Iraq and the dynamic that President Bush has united Iraq -- unfortunately for our troops, united to take American life.

We only have one question for President Bush on Iraq that should be asked:

Mr. President have you been more successful than any other President in our nation's history in demoralizing the U.S. military service man (having them fight a war platformed on a mistaken predicate, having them pay for food while hospitalized and otherwise experience inordinate delays in receiving medical treatment, having them feel that this has been a war for oil, a war with the highest level of suicides among troops, connected in many cases to being party to a brutal and wrongful occupation)?

By the way, what is the story about a new military alliance in Europe that includes basically all the former members of NATO but intentionally omits the USA?

WARNING

http://www.rense.com/general51/top.htm

This particular article on Rense.com carries high significance. What it relays is that to the British military American forces are taking lives of Iraqis with the same mindset the Germans took lives of Jews in W.W.II. This is a horrible recognition.

One senior Army officer told The Telegraph that America's aggressive methods were causing friction among allied commanders and that there was a growing sense of "unease and frustration" among the British high command. The officer, who agreed to the interview on the condition of anonymity, said that part of the problem was that American troops viewed Iraqis as untermenschen - the Nazi expression for "sub-humans".

We noted for ourselves that American militarily techniques were causing unacceptable levels of deaths of children and infants. We were ready to comment on it when we came across this highly disturbing article on Rense.com. SenderBerl can only say that this single article attests to the evil mindset of the Straussian elitists of the shadow government (see again www.senderberl.com/lucas.htm) and we are compelled to tell you what it represents for you. This type of training in our military applies equally to national special police units who carry a mindset that make them impervious to carring guilt in pulling a trigger against demonstrating Americans if they are ordered to do so. When we had a broad range draft, such orders could never be given. But when we are dealing with career military and career national police, they are trained to be without any emotions or conscience in carrying out orders. Thus, the day will come that Americans will watch in horror on television when they will not believe that American police and/or military will carry out order that will maim and kill fellow citizens for acts not warranting anything close to such behavior. Just in case you think that our perspective is too far afield, we long ago posted a letter on the Internet from the President of the Steel Workers Union giving proof positive that when Bush and Ashcroft were in full stride under the Patriot Act laws that they had no reservation in seeing police come pretty close to that under their term of office. See www.senderberl.com/miami.pdf. Do not discount what we are saying, don't discount this article on Rense.com, and do read the link to this letter which will abate any doubt you might carry about what we are telling you.

P.S. When countries use missiles to take out terrorist targets and dismiss the collateral damage especially when it encompasses the lives of infants, children and innocents, rationalizations are subterfuge for the consequences of their action: wanton murder. You can't summarily include infants, children and innocents within the realm of improvements in the technology of killing under the banner of battle and warfare. This is the type of rationalization that made its way into the mindsets of those who dealt the way they did in the concentration camps. It is time for the American people to realize that its government does not exemplify the type of government allowed or supported under the founding principles and precepts for the USA.

If we have advanced as a people, it is time to allow new solutions for old problems. The first solution is to remove the leadership that countenances the abuse of those they serve and has as part of its agenda the removal of religion from the fundamental framework of their states. A nation devoid of G-d is the direct connection to a nation that kills infants, children and innocents with impunity under the umbrella of unavoidable collateral damage.

Do not let the NWO leaders get rid of Bush via Iraq rather than 9-11
SenderBerl's Perceptions April 11, 2004

We can sum it up in a very special way. The Sunday news shows today spoke endlessly about Iraq, but the word OIL was not mentioned even ONCE.

Thus the degree of N.W.O. control is strongly evident. The deal is probably as we suspected. The 9-11 Commission will conclude that the Bush administration underestimated the danger of Osama bin-Laden and when coupled with systemic problems had a material bearing on the events of 9-11. While highly critical no reference at all to the affirmative failings and putative complicity of this administration in the day’s events.

Iraq will be the vehicle to undercut the President’s re-election. This will open the door for Kerry to come in as the leader who will quickly smooth over relations and resolve Iraq. There will be no attack on Syria and Iran, but the issue regarding Iraqi oil will no doubt rest with negotiations with OPEC to favor the US with favorable long term pricing in relinquishing it. OPEC countries therefore will no doubt ultimately undertake a dominant role in resolving the political crisis in Iraq.

Problems with our perceived scenario: Iraqi religious leadership may not have the patience to wait that long. They saw US weakness this week. Bush withdrew and enlisted a cease-fire between the parties. The US no doubt didn’t want to further solder the relationship between the Shiites and Sunnis, another of Bush’s remarkable presidential accomplishments. There are endless streams of counter offensives in hand including kidnapping of personnel representative of the illusory coalition. This technique ultimately will have the truth apparent: leaving just the US alone in Iraq.

Conclusion: SenderBerl said very long ago to the Bush administration what we told the Israeli government: superior military strength does not translate into victory in the Middle East. In the Middle East the will of G-d controls and designs that implement agendas to remove people from G-d will not succeed since they operate to defame His name and existence. What we are disturbed about is that 9-11 represents this important portal for the people in the US to detect and confront the enemies within our government, those with the agenda of seeing the US ultimately weakened, maimed and abandoned. It should not be enough for you to see Bush’s poll numbers collapse to implement the resolution of 9-11. It is important to remove the shadow government that keeps iron control over the media and issues before the American public. While the rest of the world well knows and sees government complicity in the events of 9-11, Americans are under the control of the media as to how they think and respond to the 9-11 issues, being led now to find dissatisfaction over Bush in connection with Iraq, not 9-11. Kerry is Sharon. While the faces and waistlines of new leaders change, their control by N.W.O. leaders do not. Why do we interpret things like Gephardt being Kerry’s ultimate choice for Vice-President? It not only shows you how well we understand the evil in our midst but to put pressure that a low life like Gephardt doesn’t get the second slot. He will be to Kerry like Shimon Peres was to Yitzhak Rabin. Our highlighting it is aimed on putting pressure on the N.W.O. leaders not to push Kerry into picking someone he would not otherwise select.

This window of opportunity to confront the evil in our midst via the portal of 9-11 will soon shut. Please don’t let them get away with resolving it by pushing Bush out on Iraq rather than unraveling the truth of 9-11. The N.W.O. will pause for a four-year term from the rabid track taken by Bush 43, but control of our country will not be with the people, but with those who have no respect for us and for the founding precepts of this country based on the Judeo-Christian ethic.

Joseph B. Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
April 11, 2004

Comment
Events of this past week have proven distressing and further disturbing

SenderBerl's perspective is that focus should not primarily be on the August 6, 2001 PDB. SenderBerl believes that the most successful line of pursuit is on Condy Rice not having the knowledge needed and necessary to preclude what unraveled as 9-11. This then would be consistent with the line that 9-11 was allowed to happen, that the President's and the Secret Service's behavior on 9-11 were both weird and contrary to protocol, and that proof positive of complicity is inherent when the trillion dollar military machine did not impede or even act to impede four planes off transponder any one of which could have carried a nuclear payload against two major and essential metropolitan areas.

ROEMER: So, Dr. Rice, let's say that the FBI is the key here. You say that the FBI was tasked with trying to find out what the domestic threat was. We have done thousands of interviews here at the 9-11 Commission. We've gone through literally millions of pieces of paper. To date, we have found nobody - nobody at the FBI who knows anything about a tasking of field offices. Nothing went down the chain to the FBI field offices on spiking of information, on knowledge of al-Qaida in the country, and still, the FBI doesn't do anything. Isn't that some of the responsibility of the national security adviser?

RICE: The responsibility for the FBI to do what it was asked was the FBI's responsibility .

Commission MemberLehman in our opinion trying to help Rice inadvertently helped our case that Rice was not and is not the true National Security Advisor. See how many questions you can answer in the affirmative proving our point that she stood open and willing before the nation and the world that she was totally ignorant of facts relevant to the realm of her responsibilities.

IF YOU STOP AND THINK ABOUT IT, CONDY RICE IS TELLING US SHE WAS NOT AND IS NOT THE NSA. SHE CANNOT DENY IT, BUT CAN OPEN THE PORTAL FOR US TO MOVE ON IT. COLIN POWELL NO DOUBT AGREES WITH OUR PERSPECTIVE AND HE'S HARD PRESSED TO PUBLICLY COMMENT ON IT.

Is Colin Powell Sending a Message to Condoleezza Rice?

Isn't this proof positive that Condy Rice was not and is not the NSA?

"She told the commission that she regretted those comments, because at the
time she was not aware of intelligence, developed in the late 1990's, that
some terrorists were thinking of using airplanes as guided missiles. She
told the commission in the private session that she should have said, "I
could not have imagined," according to one official familiar with the
testimony, making it clear that some in the intelligence community knew
about those threats but that she did not. "Information about possible use of airplanes as missiles to destroy buildings was not briefed to her prior to that statement in May 2002," Mr. McCormack said."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/07/politics/07PANE.html

SenderBerl: Eight months after 9-11, Cheney is filling the airwaves with the imminence of further domestic terrorism and the president's own National Security Advisor was not briefed EIGHT MONTHS AFTER 9-11 that there was intellignce BEFORE 9-11 on MULTIPLE FRONTS about terrorists using airplances to destroy buildings?

BEST RECENT EDITORIAL WE CAME ACROSS...

SENDERBERL IN MAY 2002 DETAILED THAT CONDY RICE'S REMARKS ABOUT NO ONE IMAGINING TERRORISTS USING AIRPLANES TO STRIKE BUILDINGS AS THE PREDICATE TO NOT ONLY HER DOWNFALL BUT ALSO PRESIDENT BUSH'S. NOW SHE HAS ADMITTED TO NOT KNOWING ABOUT REPORTS AS NSA SHE ABSOLUTELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN FULLY AWARE ABOUT. NOW SHE HAS ALSO MADE ANOTHER DAMAGING STATEMENT, SAYING THAT PRESIDENT BUSH WAS ONLY INTERESTED IN PLANS THAT WOULD ALLOW HIM TO DO MORE THAN SWAT AT FLIES. THERE ARE VERY FEW STRATIGIES THAT WOULD HAVE ALLOWED HIM TO ACCOMPLISH WHAT HE WANTED. RICHARD PERLE DE FACTO ADMITTED ON MEET THE PRESS WHAT PAUL O'NEILL CONFIRMED THAT THEY HAD PLANS IN HAND -- ONES THAT AWAITED DOMESTIC TERRORISM. THUS, 9-11 PRIMARILY AND UNIQUELY ASSISTED THE PRIORITIES OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE EVIDENCE CIRCUMSTANTIAL AND NOW DIRECT CLEARLY PROVES THAT AT MINIMUM 9-11 WAS ALLOWED TO HAPPEN..

SENDERBERL ALSO WAS THE FIRST TO RAISE THE ISSUE THAT CONDY RICE IS NOT THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR, TO ASK THEN WHAT WAS HER ROLE, AND TO GIVE THE DIFFICULT ANSWER TO THIS IMPORTANT MYSTERY.
FIRST, HERE IS HOW WE PRESENTED IT ON FEB 4 2004

THIS IS HOW WE ANSWERED IT:

SenderBerl's perception of Condoleezza Rice's true role in the Bush presidency
Important Photo Album Posted
March 27, 2004
This analysis should be linked to by those familiar with the other analyses on this site

Abstract: Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. explains that many mysteries are answered understanding that Condy Rice is not the true National Security Advisor. She was hand selected by Bush 41 in the late 90s to spend two years with his son to teach him foreign affairs. When he won the presidency, Bush 41 fully supported her having the NSA position, where she could be with his son constantly to monitor that he would not revert to drugs or alcohol under the pressures that would arise in connection with the events of 9-11. Most significantly, Bush 41 encouraged a close personal relationship between them because it was essential to his son pulling off his assigned role as President of the United States in the NWO quest to obtain control over Middle East oil.

THIS WE THINK IS DESTINED TO BE THE MOST DARING AND CONTROVERSIAL INTERPRETATION WE HAVE MADE. HOWEVER, WE BELIEVE IT IS TRUE AND IT DEALS WITH MATTERS OF STATE AND THUS WITHIN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

ALL THE CONDOLEEZZA RICE AND 9-11 COMMISSION ANALYSES HAVE BEEN CONSOLIDATED AT:

www.senderberl.com/bushrice.htm

Preparing for Bush

"Now, with regret, we feel compelled to relay to you that discounting this government’s involvement may have been premature."

Our letter to House and Senate Intelligence Committee members Thanksgiving Day 2002
with questions for President Bush to answer

LINK HERE

"We believe that the Congress should take note that no further military action by this administration should be allowed until the 9-11 investigation is completed. Not only will this give the administration incentive to move it ahead quickly but the outstanding issues from our perspective strongly speak against the President’s clear intent to invade Iraq, if not other Arab/Islamic nations in the region."

SENDERBERL BELIEVES THAT IT WAS THIS LETTER THAT RESULTED IN THE ATTACKS AGAINST US IN DECEMBER 2002 AND JANUARY 2003. AFTER READING THIS IT IS APPARENT WHY WE WERE TARGETED.

WE THEREFORE ARE TRULY HONORED TO PRESENT THIS LETTER TO YOU AT THIS HISTORICAL JUNCTURE.

WE CANNOT EXPRESS HOW PROUD WE ARE OF THE HOST OF FELLOW CITIZENS WHO HAVE TAKEN UP THE FLAG TO ASSURE JUSTICE AND BY DOING SO PROTECT THIS COUNTRY FROM THE EVIL THAT HAS PLANTED ITSELF IN OUR GOVERNMENT.

IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, WE POST WHAT WE ORIGINALLY WROTE CONCERNING CONDY RICE'S FAUX PAX IN MAY 2002

YOU WILL NO DOUBT FIND IT DIFFICULT TO BELIEVE THAT WE PUT THIS BEFORE THE HOUSE AND SENATE COMMITTEE MEMBERS WHEN WE DID. WE HAVE NEVER DISCLOSED THIS UNTIL NOW: THIS AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS BY E-MAIL WERE SELECTIVELY WIPED OFF ALL OUR COMPUTERS. HOWEVER, WE MAINTAINED BACKUPS AND HAVE THEM ALL, IDENTIFYING ALL CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS RECEIVING IT -- INCLUDING PRESIDENT BUSH AND VICE-PRESIDENT CHENEY.

NOW WITH THE 9-11 UNRAVELING,
WE PRAY THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED.

Condy Rice Blows It. American People Incensed. A lot of al-Qaeda Activity Inside the United States Summer of 2001. Rice says she knew nothing but intelligence community knew alot. Bush will covertly concede the office to Kerry as SenderBerl interpreted in November 2003 would be the case

Preparing for Condy Rice...Part II. SenderBerl utilizes Condy Rice's appearance on 60 Minutes to explain why she will prove to be a poor witness and why her appearance may prove to be a watershed event for the Bush administration.

HAVE NO DOUBT ABOUT IT, THE PRESSURE IS ON BIG TIME
THERE WAS A REASON THEY REFUSED TO LET CONDY TESTIFY
WILL THE 9-11 COMMISSION BE ABLE TO RECOGNIZE IT AND IF SO PURSUE IT?

THERE IS LITTLE DOUBT IN OUR MIND THAT CONDY RICE WAS NEVER THE TRUE NSA
THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS EMERGING COULD BE DRAMATIC TO SAY THE LEAST: IT COULD EXPOSE A SHADOW GOVERNMENT AND THOSE INVOLVED THEREIN SITTING WITH THE VICE-.PRESIDENT IN SOME WELL PROTECTED AND FORTIFIED BUNKER (FURTHER EXPLAINING HIS LONG PERIODS OF ABSENCE).
The above photo of President Bush is also from March 30, 2004. It captures our point.

While Rice says on television shows that she, as the president's National Security Advisor, earnestly pursued terrorism from day one, she cannot engage in such legerdemain when under oath before the 9-11 Commission.

Click on image to hear Richard Perle
fully support Clarke's criticisms of Rice and Bush

Dr. Rice:

• In view of the highest state of alert in US history during the six weeks in the summer of 2001, what would have been the difference had the 9-11 attack taken place during this six-week period of time?

• There was a sense of urgency during that period of time. How do you account moving from a state of urgency to one of complacency and de facto neglect on 9-11?

• Do you think 9-11 could have been prevented had the heightened alert status been maintained for another month?

• Do you think the military national defense system should have been keyed and one would imagine it was keyed to sending up planes to intercept a number of planes off transponder (under military planning of various modes to defend against nuclear attack upon major cities)?

• Why then was there no response particularly when the military and national defense system knew we were just taken off the highest alert level in US history?

• Did you ever warn or advise President Bush to immediately leave the Booker T. Elementary School once you knew that America was under attack?

• As National Security Advisor, should you have been aware that there was more than one report detailing that terrorists planned on deploying commercial aircraft against U.S. targets?

• Was Vice-President Cheney aware that terrorist were considering the use of commercial planes to implement attacks on US targets?

• Was it Vice-President Cheney who dealt with Richard Clarke's offered proposals for President Bush?

• Did 9-11 ultimately allow President Bush to do more than swat at flies?

• MANY MORE QUESTIONS AND LINES OF QUESTIONS ARE IN THE ARTICLES BELOW

THE TESTIMONY OF DR. RICE BEFORE THE 9-11 COMMISSION COULD PROVE TO BE THE WATERSHED EVENT FOR THE PRESIDENT AND HIS ADMINISTRATION. WE BELIEVE THE TRUTH CAN BE ELICITED FROM HER, BUT THAT DEPENDS FULLY ON WHETHER THE 9-11 PANEL WILL DISCHARGE THEIR FIDUCIARY DUTIES OR PROVE THEMSELVES PART OF THE PROBLEM AND ISSUE.

Kean and Hamilton Compromised?

Preparing for Condy Rice...Part II. SenderBerl utilizes Condy Rice's appearance on 60 Minutes to explain why she will prove to be a poor witness and why her appearance may prove to be a watershed event for the Bush administration.

Richard Clarke’s remarks and revelations on Meet the Press are so vital to the public interest that we decided on top of all else we have recently done to highlight and analyze what he said in the context of 9-11.

Preparing for Condy Rice. Her agenda will be to obfuscate and thus it is imperative for the 9-11 Commission to ask questions from which it will be difficult to escape the truths reflected by the realities taking place in connection with 9-11. We drafted some for your interest and possible benefit.

Is Colin Powell Sending a Message to Condoleezza Rice?
April 3, 2004

President Bush on March 30, 2004 showing the strain in his eyes and face in announcing that Condoleezza Rice would testify under oath before the 9-11 Commission. Bush 41 has come out and publicly displayed his concern over the attacks on Bush 43. The true crisis in our opinion is that there is a fear among those complicit in 9-11 of whom may prove vulnerable and either intentionally or accidentally slip and open a portal to the dark side of this administration and its complicity in 9-11. President Bush may now recognize that Condy was reporting to Bush 41 behind his back all along, recognizing that his father and his other NWO suporters, including big oil, didn't think him worthy of cutting the umbilical cord.
Even aristocrats have bad days, witness the French and American Revolutions.

Bush 43 leaving the Briefing Room March 30 2004
It is worthy to note how Bush 41 expresses his anger over the reality that truth might emerge regarding 9-11.
It is "deeply offensive and contemptible" to hear "elites and intellectuals on the campaign trail" dismiss progress in Iraq since last year's overthrow of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, the elder Bush said in a speech to the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association annual convention. ***The former president appeared to fight back tears as he complained about media coverage of the younger Bush that he called "something short of fair and balanced."

IT IS ADMIRABLE HOW AN ARISTOCRAT DEFENDS HIS SON (PARTICULARLY WITH ALL AT STAKE FOR THE BUSH FAMILY AND FOR THOSE WHOM HE IS PUBLIC SURROGATE ) BUT OUR POSITION IS WHO IS DEFENDING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITH THE SAME SORT OF TENACITY? WHO REALLY SPEAKS FOR THOSE 3000 SOULS LOST SO THAT A GROUP OF ELITISTS COULD MOVE FORWARD ON AN AGENDA FOR WORLD DOMINATION AND CONTROL?

HAVE NO DOUBT ABOUT IT, THE PRESSURE IS ON BIG TIME
THERE WAS A REASON THEY REFUSED TO LET CONDY TESTIFY
WILL THE 9-11 COMMISSION BE ABLE TO RECOGNIZE IT AND IF SO PURSUE IT?

THERE IS LITTLE DOUBT IN OUR MIND THAT CONDY RICE WAS NEVER THE TRUE NSA
THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS EMERGING COULD BE DRAMATIC TO SAY THE LEAST: IT COULD EXPOSE A SHADOW GOVERNMENT AND THOSE INVOLVED THEREIN SITTING WITH THE VICE-.PRESIDENT IN SOME WELL PROTECTED AND FORTIFIED BUNKER (FURTHER EXPLAINING HIS LONG PERIODS OF ABSENCE).
The above photo of President Bush is also from March 30, 2004. It captures our point.

Lots to Hide and NWO Concerns over both Bush and Rice

Bush insisted on the joint appearance in agreeing to take questions from all 10 members of the panel investigating the Sept. 11 attacks. He initially offered to meet only with the top two members, former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean, the chairman; and former Rep. Lee Hamilton, the vice chairman. The arrangement virtually eliminates any possibility of divergent answers from Bush and Cheney; lets Bush pass off any question he'd rather avoid; and makes follow-up questions all but impossible.

SenderBerl: This is serious stuff. Aristocratic heads could wind up rolling. Thus, Bush 41 secured Bush 43's safety by having him appear with Cheney, who will go down with a feigned heart attack if necessary to stop the proceedings (all the NWO has is horrid memories of Bush's dismal interview with Tim Russert on Meet the Press in February). Condoleezza Rice however inadvertently holds some other keys to putting the NWO into serious danger. Cheney despite anything else said to the contrary doesn't like her and he doesn't have much confidence in her. She has the tendency, real tendency to talk before thinking at times. Cheney and others of his genre don't intend to let Rice put them in pinstripes. Thus, we monitor events. The NWO's first choice would be to approach all the Commission members and/or get one to do what is necessary to stop blood letting if Rice stumbles and crumbles before the national cameras. We are positive that Cheney is monitoring her drills for the Commission hearing. She better convince him she can do the job.

Focus: The key dynamic regarding Clarke's testimony is not that Bush shifted resources too early from Al-Qaeda to Iraq, to weaken the war against terrorism, because, on the historical dimension, this can be argued to be nothing more than an error in presidential judgement, but the fact that Clarke was jumping up and down for a presidential response to the IMMINENT MAJOR TERRORISM KNOWN FORTHCOMING against the United States of America; that he was deliberately denied direct presidential contact; that his efforts to communicate with the President concerning his concern and alarm, ultimately shared in by Tenet, was deliberately stifled; that the President thereby knowingly and willingly never implemented a formal strategic design, only relenting for a period of several weeks in elevating the American defensive shield, with the terrorism of 9-11 not so coincidentally taking place only days after the heightened defenses were not only diminished but severely and inexplicably dropped to a degree making America nearly totally vulnerable, days before the President changed his schedule to travel to Florida to read with second graders, after criticism for being away from the White House for the entire month of August. Couple this with the fact that the Secret Service did not implement its own protocol to protect the President, and that it allowed him to remain there for an extended period of time, a publicly known location, to speak to the nation on television, and that the American trillion dollar military alert defensive response system failed to send up a single jet plane to defend this nation, when four American planes went off transponder, military and civilian intelligence fully aware of the implications thereof, ESPECIALLY AFTER HAVING JUST GONE OFF HEIGHTENED DEFENSIVE ALERT, speaks to exactly where the focus of Clarke's testimony should lie. Further couple this with Paul O'Neill's admission, supported by Richard Perle, that the Bush administration was sitting with plans in hand to implement a design for world domination and control (first stop OPEC) and just waiting for an act of major domestic terrorism, then you have the slam dunk case that 9-11 was allowed to happen and that the Bush administration knew what was about to take place and wanted it to take place and was complicit thereby therein. If the White House for a second thought the President was in danger, the President would have been whisked away from the Booker Elementary School. His staying there was proof positive that they knew the parameters of the terrorism in play that day and that it would not put the President at risk when seated with the second graders in Florida at the Booker Elementary School.

RUSSERT: For six weeks in the summer of 2001, at home and overseas, the U.S. government was at its highest possible state of readiness--and anxiety--against imminent terrorist attack."Did Dr. Rice instruct you to organize that meeting?MR. CLARKE:  No.  I told her I was going to do it.  And I had already been doing it two weeks before, because on June 21, I believe it was, George Tenet called me and said, "I don't think we're getting the message through.  These people aren't acting the way the Clinton people did under similar circumstances."  And I suggested to Tenet that he come down and personally brief Condi Rice, that he bring his terrorism team with him.  And we sat in the national security adviser's office.  And I've used the phrase in the book to describe George Tenet's warnings as "He had his hair on fire."  He was about as excited as I'd ever seen him.  And he said, "Something is going to happen."RUSSERT:  But you kept your guard up for six weeks, through the end of August.  Why didn't you stay on high alert through September 11th?  And you regret this day that you didn't because you may have stopped that attack

The Congress in allowing the Patriot Act to take hold stated inter alia "...all Americans are united in condemning, in the strongest possible terms, the terrorists who planned and carried out the attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, and in pursuing all those responsible for those attacks and their sponsors until they are brought to justice." If the Americans people were compelled to allow our own government to undermine their fundamental Constitutionally protected guarantees and rights, with the blessings of the Bush administration, then the White House is surely hard pressed to argue that Condoleezza Rice can stand on a claim to deny the American people her sworn testimony regarding the events of 9-11.

Here is a series of links to SenderBerl articles recently posted by Rense.com

Analysis - Richard Clarke On Meet the Press
http://www.rense.com/general50/meet.htm

Condy Rice Is Not The National Security Advisor
http://www.rense.com/general50/condyriceisnot.htm

 Analysis Of Select Portions Of March 24 911 Proceedings
http://www.rense.com/general50/anal.htm

Democrats Send Bush Covert Message To Not Run In 2004
http://www.rense.com/general50/covert.htm

Comment on the Mel Gibson Movie Controversy
http://www.rense.com/general49/comm.htm

The Meaning and Consequences
http://www.rense.com/general49/men.htm

A 1000 Word Capsule Of Where We Are
http://www.rense.com/general49/where.htm

About Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
(after reading the above, you might particularly enjoy the following link)

Supplemental Links
More Supplemental Links

SenderBerl has added essential links to the left of the lead page.

This web site provides, according to your own comments to us, some of the finest substance on the Internet. It is designed to assist those who wish to look into deeper planes to find and verify truths. Once doing so, it would be the ultimate goal, due to the dire straits once described by us and now apparent, to help you to recognize a duty to do your own part in helping put America and thus the world back on track. When we wrote Recapturing America way back in December 1996, completing it in January 1997, we were way ahead of the curve in recognizing the agenda in play. However, our goal was to highlight the evil design of an agenda masking itself in noble motives and aims. When you see what our children have been and are exposed to on television, public education sabotaged, drugs institutionalized, and recognize that students in college are being openly solicited for the sex trade; when you recognize that those in leadership are preparing you to abandon the bedrock of this country, the U.S. Constitution and its Bills of Rights; that it adopts policies domestically and internationally the antithesis of what this country has ALWAYS represented, and that, as we interpreted in Recapturing America, the U.S. dollar would be deliberately sabotaged to make the US compliant to one world government; weakened and maimed to assure that a strong US military and country would not remain in a country planned on being abandoned by those scripting our current course, then you are dealing with those serving an evil design. If you don't see it and accept it seven years later, then you are simply shirking your own duty to take on an active role against it, which can be served in so many affirmative and positive ways, then you will be recorded in history as one of those in this generation that made waste of all the lives lost and sacrifices rendered by those who preceded you, so that you could have what no generation before you could have even dreamed and what you so easily squander for those who follow.

ADDED IN HTML FORMAT
Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage
Regime and Culture Change Unmasked

Special personal commentary by Mr. Ehrlich. Link here

Extract Material Sent to House and Senate Intelligence Committees

Major Analysis on Japan, Yen and U.S. Dollar has moved here

Major Analysis on the terrorism in Spain has moved here
SenderBerl notes that the White House has attributed the PP's failing to benefit from the terrorism to the fact that they unwisely attributed it to the ETA rather than Al-Qaeda, as we interpreted from the get go. However, the failing belongs to Bush 43 with the consequences enumerated by us by the link and by the Major Comment dated March 22, 2004.
Major Comment Mar 22 04 from Joseph B. Ehrlich

<====>

MAR 17 04: SenderBerl Interprets New Threat to France as Real

SenderBerl does not believe it is Al-Qaeda and that a new elevated element has now emerged.
Read our perspective here

People from over eighty countries have visited our site over the past seven years to gain an understanding on the macro scale to what is taking place around them and why the world is dramatically changing. Even President Bush stands today blind to the reality that his supporters and friends have already determined that he must lose his bid for a second term. His father no doubt knows the reasons why but to spare his son does not share it with him (aside from being instructed as well not to do so). However, for the global majority, including the vast majority of Americans, it is important to understand what is taking place, for those leading, in the brazen and arrogant manner they do, are taking us to a dark and dire future. Technological advancements and achievements without concurrent growth in the moral ethic foreshadows the very dark future biblically described. SenderBerl urges you to read both Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform for Moral Outrage and Regime and Culture Change Unmasked.