Marilyn Monroe: Happy Birthday Mr. President 2004?
April 21, 2004

Political Conversation: Condi’s Slip
http://www.newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/people/columns/intelligencer/n_10245/

A pressing issue of dinner-party etiquette is vexing Washington, according to a story now making the D.C. rounds: How should you react when your guest, in this case national-security adviser Condoleezza Rice, makes a poignant faux pas? At a recent dinner party hosted by New York Times D.C. bureau chief Philip Taubman and his wife, Times reporter Felicity Barringer, and attended by Arthur Sulzberger Jr., Maureen Dowd, Steven Weisman, and Elisabeth Bumiller, Rice was reportedly overheard saying, “As I was telling my husb—” and then stopping herself abruptly, before saying, “As I was telling President Bush.” Jaws dropped, but a guest says the slip by the unmarried politician, who spends weekends with the president and his wife, seemed more psychologically telling than incriminating. Nobody thinks Bush and Rice are actually an item. A National Security Council spokesman laughed and said, “No comment.”

Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. uniquely foreshadowed and explained the meaning of this new Rice faux pax.
www.senderberl.com/bushrice.htm
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. in a radio interview just last evening in Washington D.C. pointed out that Colin Powell's now public disclosure of a "separate government" operating from within the Bush administration allows the public to reassess Rice's role as a cover for those complicit in the deeds of 9-11.Rice, perhaps based on our own public analysis of the deep dynamics of her true role, widely accessed and read globally, probably now responds to the recognition that everyone from father to son has played her to the hilt. She further has concluded that her previous honest deferral to Cheney and "his experience" was part and parcel of the shadow government playing her the fool, now one that has to politically abandon her. Thus Rice is in a parallel psychological dynamic to Marilyn Monroe in her telling slip at Madison Square Garden some 40 years ago.

XMRADIO INTERVIEW APRIL 20, 2004

The radio interview coincided with two major news stories. One was the disclosure that NORAD routinely ran mock trials for hijacked airplanes used as missiles into buildings. The second was Colin Powell disclosing a "separate government" within the walls of the White House and Bush administration. These disclosures came a day after SenderBerl released its major interpretation based on the 9-11 Commission hearings to date: www.senderberl.htm/CAB.htm

Highlighted dynamics during the course of the interview:

President Bush should not have gone into the classroom. Mr. Ehrlich noted the major difference between President Bush and the American public the morning of 9-11. Whereas the American public needed two planes striking landmark NYC buildings to conclude that America was under attack and subject to major terrorism, President Bush only required knowing that a single plane, not to say four planes, were hijacked and off transponder. Thus, before the first plane struck the North World Trade Center tower, President Bush based on Tenet's warning that something big was coming and the US just off, according to the White House per Richard Armitage the highest alert level in United States history, KNEW that the hijacked plane was EXACTLY what was feared forthcoming. Thus, NORAD and US military defense forces should have been sent aloft and the President should have passed altogether on sitting down reading with second graders when presidential decisions were highly likely regarding interception of hijacked planes heading for major metropolitan areas, planes that may have well carried nuclear payloads.

President Bush remaining at the Booker elementary school conclusively proved that the President knew the parameters of the events of 9-11: Secret Service protocol is to protect the President of the United States. The Secret Service charged with protecting the life of the President was compelled to remove him immediately from a publicly known facility that was highly likely a putative target of the terrorism in play on 9-11. However not only did President continue reading with second graders he offered a live televised national address from the school. Thus, it is clear that the Secret Service hearing about a single hijacked plane, and knowing the President was scheduled to appear at a publicly known facility, adjacent itself to an airfield, would never ever under any circumstances have allowed the president to pursue a schedule to a hastily arranged publicly known non secure facility -- to mingle among second grade school children who further who have been put at risk. There was only one conclusion: the President knew the parameters of the terrorism in play that day.

That's one terrible pilot: Again the president was acutely aware, as made clear by Condoleezza Rice and Richard Armitage, that this country faced imminent danger from terrorism. Plane hijackings were exactly in accord with the putative parameters of the terrorism expected and feared. Thus when a hijacked plane is driven into the North World Trade Center tower, the President, contrary to the rest of America, well knew that this was terrorism. For him to then characterize his original reaction to finding out about the first plane going into the north WTC tower as one where he thought that now "there's one terrible pilot" seriously demeans this nation on an even higher plateau than when he demeaned this nation and his responsibilities by shooting off so far away from Washington in August 2001, knowing that terrorism was imminent and the American people were being kept in the dark about it.

The President saw the the first plane go into the north World Trade Center tower on a television monitor: When you encounter a historical tragedy, such as the JFK assassination, people decades later remember exactly where they were and how they found out about it. Here we have the Commander in Chief three months after 9-11 tell the American pubic that he saw the first plane go into the north WTC tower on a television monitor. Everyone well knows that there was no way he could have seen it: the video of the event taken coincidentally by a film crew in the area and not broadcast to much later in time. Thus, the President put his foot into his mouth. He either has a mental degenerative disease or else he did see it and the only way Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. suggests, strongly suggests, he could have seen it is IF HE RECEIVED A PRIVATE MILITARY FEED OF THE EVENT AS IT TOOK PLACE AS PLANNED AND ANTICIPATED.

Dr. Rice was ignorant of known intelligence that terrorists planned on using planes to strike landmark buildings until more than eight months after 9-11: This incredible admitted reality first attested to Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. that Condoleezza Rice could not be the real National Security Advisor. She was totally ignorant of NORAD protocol for hijacked plane interceptions, when as here the hijacked planes could be delivering a nuclear holocaust onto a major metropolitan area, and she did not know of basic and fundamental intel central to her responsibilities and role as the President's National Security Advisor. Thus, when asked by Mark Thompson the host of Make it Plain whether Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. thought Dr. Rice was responsible for the wanton neglect of government in impeding the terrorism of 9-11, Mr. Ehrlich offered the response, in view of Colin Powell's support of our position, that Dr. Rice was a cover for the shadow government complicit in the events of 9-11, and that we were inclined to believe that the President and Vice-President and others were directly responsible for the events of 9-11 for the reasons outlined by us at www.senderberl.com/CAB.htm.

These are issues central to the 9-11 Commission investigation of the events of 9-11. One of the surest solutions from our point of view in assuring that there will be no future major domestic terrorism is to identify and to uproot the shadow government in operation in this administration.

<=====>

Incredible News Events Over the Past 24 hours.
April 19, 2004 10:00PM
A MUST READ!

Laying Out the Heart of the Case Against the President
Chronologically Presented and Argued

 By Joseph B. Ehrlich, President
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
April 18, 2004

FREE TO REPRODUCE AND DISTRIBUTE IF DONE IN ITS ENTIRETY

THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT POSTING WE HAVE DONE ON 9-11

LINK HERE

SENDERBERL PRODUCES A TRANSCRIPT FROM AN OSAMA BIN-LADEN NOVEMBER 2001 VIDEO PRODUCED BY THE GOVERNMENT THAT SPEAKS TO PRESIDENTIAL AND MILITARY COMPLICITY IN 9-11!

Suggested Findings for the 9-11 Commission

Circumstantial and direct evidence prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following:

a.       The Bush administration showed wanton neglect in protecting the nation on 9-11 from anticipated and forewarned domestic terrorism;

b.      As to allow the conclusion that it allowed the historically recorded terrorism of that day to take place;

c.       That the Bush administration or a shadow government in control thereof was complicit in the events of that day to elevate the terrorism otherwise planned by Al-Qaeda cells in the United States, taking flight lessons to aid in a planned hijacking of US aircraft;

d.      That the Bush administration could have prepared and should have prepared a structured plan to respond to the imminent threat of airplane hijackings but did not only do so but the record shows that the sitting administration did not in fact convey requisite and needed information and command for the FBI, FAA and other agencies to properly move forward to preclude the attack or prevent the damage done on 9-11 to major metropolitan areas;

e.       That the Congress is compelled to pursue the issue that the long in place NORAD system to protect the country including major metropolitan areas from nuclear attack, failed on 9-11 to intervene even after four planes went off transponder and more than one plane was known hijacked by 8:25 AM that day;

f.        That the President and his administration’s argument that it simply underestimated the threat and danger in play and that there were systemic problems in the country’s infrastructure to meet and address the attack of 9-11, which it could not correct in its first 233 days in office, is deemed fully irrelevant to the conclusions and determinations otherwise rendered above under the known facts and circumstances deemed central and relevant to the events of 9-11.

WHEREFORE, this Commission’s findings should be forwarded to the United States Congress for immediate action deemed fitting, appropriate and required in view of the serious and dire implications thereof to the nation.

Do Not Let The NWO Leaders Get Rid Of Bush Via Iraq Rather Than 911
http://www.rense.com/general51/bush911.htm

THIS PRESIDENT AND HIS ADMINISTRATION SHOULD SOON IMPLODE
TENET AND OTHERS KNOW IT TOO WELL!

THE PROOF THAT THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION DID NOTHING TO PREPARE FOR PLANE HIJACKINGS AND LEFT THE COUNTRY IN A STATE OF BENIGN IF NOT CRIMINAL NEGLECT FOR THE EVENTS THAT UNRAVELED ON 9-11

"OC Navy Adm. Yedidya Ya'ari said the United States fell asleep in its watch over its airspace and shoreline."

LINK HERE

Let’s Not Forget
By Joseph B. Ehrlich
April 16, 2004

When it came to his personal safety, President Bush spared no time and effort making sure that he would not be the target of terrorism in July 2001 in Genoa.

We wrote on April 14: "ABC Nightline April 13, 2004 did a devastating show on Bush and his lies and deceptions since his first days in office regarding Iraq. It also highlighted the scripted nature of the President's performance avoiding answers to questions and simply spewing forth answers intended to support the Iraqi presence despite the worsening quagmire for the US there." We now can link you to a key excerpt from that Nightline show. While we are pleased to highlight it to you, it represents the agenda to push Bush out on Iraq, while SenderBerl believes that the issue is not limited to only waving Bush off from office but unraveling the truth about 9-11 so that the invidious NWO agenda can be detected, admitted to and the players expunged from government.

Keep Your Eye on the Ball
CIA corrects Tenet but not under oath!
April 15, 2004

Tenet, director of central intelligence since 1997, testified that he had no contact at all with Bush in August, the month in which the president received a CIA report suggesting that al-Qaida terrorists were already in the United States and might be planning a domestic hijacking. The agency later telephoned reporters on Wednesday to correct Tenet's testimony, saying he did meet twice with the president that month, once during Bush's nearly monthlong vacation that August at his Texas ranch and once when the president returned to Washington later that month. In defending Bush from recent allegations that he was not sufficiently attentive to domestic terrorist threats before 9-11, the White House has cited his face-to-face contacts with Tenet as proof of his interest.

SenderBerl: So it has gone to correcting it from meeting once to meeting on both August 17th and August 31st. I guess Tenet has memory problems. Or does he? Here is where things get complex to convolute truth to deny the American public justice. First, the CIA telephoning to correct Tenet's testimony does not change Tenet's testimony under oath. So he should be invited back to correct it under oath. Further, Tenet has been acting as though he has been telling the truth but SenderBerl is aware that if necessary the CIA would take all the blame for 9-11. Thus, it could as part of the cover-up/whitewash/ or even part and parcel of the components of government complicity in 9-11 to lay the foundation the heart of the systemic problem Condy Rice claims the Bush administration could not cure in 233 days. Our point is that it is all deflection and misdirection because all the central issues and dynamics are derailed. Those include whether Osama bin-Laden cells could have consummated the degree of terrorism seen that day opening up the dynamic of the pod and of course the usual host of issues proving complicity such as the President and the Secret Service's weird behavior on 9-11 while at the Booker elementary school. We continually point out below that you just can't pass up on the meaning of the failure of NORAD to respond at all and Condy Rice ADMITTING that she wasn't even briefed on terrorists using planes as missiles until May 2002. Again, the NWO leadership is agreeing that Bush is out but on the predicate of Iraq not 9-11 and thus the importance of pursuit of 9-11. We noted that two of the 9-11 widows when confronted last night whether they were claiming Bush and government complicity in 9-11 backed off from verifying such stance and backtracked and said their interest was in preventing future terrorism. They should have had the courage to raise the very questions they posited to the 9-11 Commission, avoided by the Commission to date. We don't fault them no matter how disappointed we are about it because others should have carried the courage and obligation to say what is evident and crystal clear. If anyone doubts Bush complicity he or she simply is willing to keep their heads in the sand and unfortunately by doing so keeps the elitist centrix in operational control of the country.

You Have to Understand How the Administration Brings Forth Lies and Deception to the 9-11 Commission

Here is a vital excerpt of Dr. Rice's opening statement to the 9-11 Commission heard and relied upon by the country and the world. You tell us whether you see how the big lie is perpetrated by this administration.

At the beginning of the administration President Bush revived the practice of meeting with the director of central intelligence almost every day in the Oval Office, meetings which I attended along with the vice president and the chief of staff. At these meetings the president received up-to-date intelligence and asked questions of his most senior intelligence officials. From Jan. 20 through Sept. 10 the president received at these daily meetings more than 40 briefing items on Al Qaeda. And 13 of those were in response to questions he or his top advisers posed.

SenderBerl: We give up if the American public and media now swallows this legerdemain. This is repulsive. First, the question arises whether an opening statement is testimony and thus whether it is testimony under oath. Next, Dr. Rice QUALIFIED that the President met with Tenet daily only at the "beginning of the administration." Next, she says that only "at the beginning of the administration" did Bush asked questions. Next, when she says, "from Jan 20 to Sept 10 the president received at these daily meetings more than 40 briefing items on Al-Qaeda. And 13 of those were in response to questions he or his top advisers posed," the very sad reality is that all these meetings could have been done and consummated in the first 40 days of the administration meaning that there could be perhaps as little as none or only one or two meetings after May 2001. Thus, the reason the White House must have died when Tenet testified UNDER OATH that he did not meet with Bush in August 2001 while Bush was on vacation for an entire month while the country faced the threat of domestic terrorism. Moreover, ladies and gentlemen, the President's was so on top of things that after taking thirty long days away, an historical amount, from Washington, he decides to CHANGE HIS PLANS ON SEPTEMBER 7TH TO TRAVEL TO FLORIDA TO READ WITH SECOND GRADE CHILDREN.

WE ARE GOING TO GIVE UP IF YOU DON'T SHOUT AND HOLLER LOUDLY AT THIS. THE 9-11 VICTIMS SHOULD BE IN ARMS AND SHOULD TELL THE NATION AND WORLD THAT THEY BELIEVE THIS ADMINISTRATION IS DIRECTLY COMPLICIT IN 9-11.

We prove to you how they have no respect for our nation and definitely not for you the individual citizen the fool that has allowed them to get to where they are today. Sorry. Sad but true. Wake up, PLEASE!

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO FORWARD THIS MATERIAL TO THE 9-11 COMMISSION SO THAT THEY CANNOT LATER SAY THEY MISSED THESE POINTS.

TENET TELLS THE TRUTH AND BUSH CRINGES!

WASHINGTON, April 14 (Reuters) - CIA Director George Tenet insisted he had no contact with the president who was vacationing in Texas during the month before the Sept. 11 attacks. But he was mistaken. A CIA spokesman later said Tenet had in fact gone to Texas during August of that year to brief President George W. Bush. "I didn't see the president. I was not in briefings with him during this time. He was on vacation. I was here," Tenet told the commission investigating the attacks on Wednesday. "You didn't see the president between August 6, 2001, and September 10th?" asked Tim Roemer, one of the commissioners. "Well, no," Tenet replied. "When do you see him in August?" Roemer continued. "I don't believe I do," Tenet replied. Roemer: "You don't see the president of the United States once in the month of August?" Tenet: "He's in Texas and I'm either here or on leave for some of that time, so I'm not here." Roemer could not suppress his incredulity, and persisted, asking Tenet whether he had talked to Bush in August. "In this time period, I'm not talking to him, no," Tenet replied.

SenderBerl: While the President after his testimony put a fire to his face, having the CIA say that Tenet did meet with him on August 17th, SenderBerl says to you that the issue is the one we presented days ago indicated below and which we now repeat:

Mr. President how about cutting short your stay in Crawford in August 2001 when putting the nation on the highest alert in US history and forgetting to tell the country about the imminent danger (when you found it appropriate to offer us the advice when misleading us when it came to Iraq)?

This is not malfeasance. This is intentional neglect and the evidence shouts to anyone who wants to see it that this administration allowed 9-11 to take place as we all along said for without 9-11 Bush could have stayed in Crawford the entire four years of his term because he had nothing to offer or else to define his presidency. His entire purpose in office was to implement an agenda long in hand.

The Rense.com has a link to evidence that a pod was added to the bottom of the plane striking the South World Trade Center tower an argument only confirming SenderBerl's argument that the plane wasn't off its mark when it struck to the East but did so with pinpoint accuracy. See http://www.rense.com/misslepod.JPG AND http://www.senderberl.com/ps/index.html#d1.

Further please do not forget that after being in Crawford an entire month, the longest stay away from Washington by any president before him, Bush once in town slept maybe one night in the White House and then changed his schedule the day after Osama bin Laden got his telephone call that something big was going down to fly to Florida to read with second graders. Now, also don't forget that this president who cannot keep sequences in mind, also highlighted that when he saw the first plane go into the tower, an accomplishment since there was no known video of it when he said he saw it, he attributed the accident to bad piloting. This president knew from the record before the 9-11 commission that terrorists were in the US and were planning on hijhacking a plane. Only if he is more stupid than some think he is, he could not fail, at least his advisors could not fail, to connect a hijacked plane not to bad piloting but to the very terrorism forewarned. Couple this with his leisurely residence at the Booker School exposing not only himself but the school children to planned terrorism expressly provides evidence that President Bush knew and was complicit in the deeds of that day. Now, I also have to add that one of the most outlandish facts verified during recent weeks is that Condy Rice admits that she did not know about planes being possibly used as missiles to strike buildings until May 2002 -- SOME EIGHT MONTHS AFTER 9-11. Would someone like to ask the President or Dr. Rice how a National Security Advisor could admit to such a sad reality? Thank you. Otherwise, I think it is quite clear that this President well knew about what we today know is 9-11 and that he also knew with his closest aides and oil cabal cohorts that 9-11 was a necessary and essential condition predicate for him to establish his presidency and implement the plans in hand prepared and drawn by those serving the New World Order. There is no doubt that the direct and circumstantial evidence attests to this and any one who denies it does not serve his country and for those in government contravene their respective oaths of office.

LOSS OF CONFIDENCE
April 14, 2004 Early AM

ABC Nightline April 13, 2004 did a devastating show on Bush and his lies and deceptions since his first days in office regarding Iraq. It also highlighted the scripted nature of the President's performance avoiding answers to questions and simply spewing forth answers intended to support the Iraqi presence despite the worsening quagmire for the US there. As we recently noted in one of our analyses, everyone is leaving Iraq, making it obvious to the world that it is just an American presence and effort there, or better said a Bush oil cabal one (we note how many French and Germans -- those said to oppose the war -- are running as fast as they can from Iraq confirming our point in www.senderberl.com/BMI.htm).

President Bush has been told that he will not win a second term. We doubt he was told the real truth that even his supporters have concluded it would be contrary to even NWO interests for him to continue on.

Our only concern is that he is sending additional troops to Iraq. It is obvious that he has further demoralized the military by making it plain that they cannot trust their Commander in Chief who assured them that they would be home now and now lets them know what further fools they are to have ever relied upon him -- the man who carries a plastic Thanksgiving Day turkey and travels to Baghdad for his political photo ops (Mr. Mission Accomplished).

This video below is historically significant because it shows not only that he had an NSA who was operated without any relevant information but we have a President who born with a silver spoon in his mouth is starting to fall apart when things don't go his way and everyone around him has to tell him that he cannot continue playing in his global play room any longer.

SenderBerl will say this: it is not his own fault. It is the fault of the NWO leadership who figured that he carried the exact mindset they needed for them to pursue the agenda to beat up the world so that could pursue a course for Middle East oil and world domination and control. President Bush has been a voluntary and willing Manchurian candidate. What the NWO failed to factor in is that they faced an Opponenet Whom would impede their well carved out charade -- One who knew the truths of their intent for the Middle East and America and knew that that the aristocrats of time past were making their historical appearance to create a world inapposite to freedom and justice, a world that would no longer carry any nexus to religion and G-d. Thus, one must conclude that Mel Gibson's successful expression of faith was no accidental coincidence and without question may have forged itself in the psyche of those who now seem to stand somewhat bolder in confronting the evil of the New World Order agenda. Again those who seek to undermine religion and G-d and those who with wantonness and callousness accept the death of infants, children and innocents as acceptable when necessary, and often so, are those in pursuit of an evil design and agenda. That is why SenderBerl never waivered for a moment that it recognized the enemy and that we did not have to carry doubt about the correctness of our efforts to portray them as we have.

These men do not feel a scintialla of the pain when they are stripped of their name and honor as to when they are stripped of their wealth. That is the best punishment possible for them in this life. We are sure that they face a terrible consequence for their deeds in the next life, with a book of death filled with negative credits and thus they have forged for themselves a very heavy chain. Every time we hear their words that they care for the soldiers it enrages us. We would love for President Bush to submit to a lie detector about how much he truly cares for the serfs that fall for the elitist centrix. Otherwise, we would like to see him put on the uniform and join the toops in Falluja and lead by example as true leaders in time past carried at least enough commitment and honor to do. If he had to do so the war would end within 48 hours. His entire life has been scripted and now he has lost Condy to aid him through these periods of stress and the the video below makes it crystal clear that we were on target for her true role as we have set forth for you at www.senderberl.com/bushrice.htm.

Warning
http://www.rense.com/general51/warn.htm

Preparing For Bush
http://www.rense.com/general51/prep.htm

Condy Rice De Facto Admits To NOT Being The NSA
http://www.rense.com/general51/notto.htm

Do Not Let The NWO Leaders Get Rid Of Bush Via Iraq Rather Than 911
http://www.rense.com/general51/bush911.htm

Condoleezza Rice April 8, 2004 Sworn Testimony 9-11 Commission
http://www.rense.com/general51/ricesworn.htm

Kean & Hamilton Reached? - Meet The Press
http://www.rense.com/general51/reach.htm

Is Colin Powell Sending A Message To Condoleezza Rice?
http://www.rense.com/general51/iscolinpowellsending.htm

Preparing For Condy - Part II
(Condoleezza will not be the good witness many expect)
http://www.rense.com/general51/conf.htm

Preparing For Condy Rice
http://www.rense.com/general50/condid.htm

Condi - The Pressure Is On
http://www.rense.com/general50/cnnfi.htm

Analysis - Richard Clarke On Meet the Press
http://www.rense.com/general50/meet.htm

Condy Rice Is Not The National Security Advisor
http://www.rense.com/general50/condyriceisnot.htm

 Analysis Of Select Portions Of March 24 911 Proceedings
http://www.rense.com/general50/anal.htm

Democrats Send Bush Covert Message To Not Run In 2004
http://www.rense.com/general50/covert.htm

Watch Out For Japan (Again)!
http://www.rense.com/general50/watch.htm

Comment on the Mel Gibson Movie Controversy
http://www.rense.com/general49/comm.htm

The Meaning and Consequences
http://www.rense.com/general49/men.htm

A 1000 Word Capsule Of Where We Are
http://www.rense.com/general49/where.htm

Regime And Culture Change Unmasked
http://www.rense.com/general47/changse.htm

Deposing The President (2002)
http://www.rense.com/general32/depo.htm

Bush Double Double Cross (2002)
http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/12-03-02/discussion.cgi.23.shtml

The day after SenderBerl appeared on August 5, 2002 Rense Radio Show havoc reigned and Jeff Rense lost his entire archive of radio interviews. The August 5th radio interview never got posted. On August 6, 2002, the Washington Post confirmed what we wrote on August 4th and highlighted on the Rense show: that Saudi Arabia may be the primary target before Iraq of the Bush National Security Strategy. Now, in preparing this listing we noted that our Rense.com posting of The Bush Double Double Cross is missing so we are posting a google.com link to it.

THE MEDIA FOCUSES ON THE QUESTION WHY AMERICA HAS SUCH DIFFICULTY WINNING THE HEARTS AND SOULS OF THE IRAQI PEOPLE

We attended a class in Washington DC in November 2003 for those moving into government security and the same question was asked. We prepared specifically www.senderberl.com/UI.htm to answer that question that seems to defy government officials. It's really quite simple once you think out of the box and understand that it has nothing at all to do with hearts and minds but with their perception that the US aims to implement culture change, which Islamic culture teaches to resist heart and soul.

About Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
(after reading the above, you might particularly enjoy the following link)

President's News Conference: April 13, 2004:

The media post the news conference is packed with those on the payroll out to glorify his steadfastness to task when he showed himself before the world today to be either on the verge of falling ill (see the video above) or that he lacked the presidential demeanor to handle things when they are not going as he is accustomed. His position is that he is going to do things his way because his way is the right way and if the people want someone else they will vote in another president this November. This cannot speak well for him or the country. Did you notice that he only seemed to wake up from his stupor when speaking about OIL -- saying that OIL production and revenues were beyond original expectation. We keep hearing him say that the Iraqi people are happy that Saddam is out but the truth is that the Iraqi people want Bush out more than they wanted Saddam out. In fact, the reality is that Saddam was no threat, Iraq is a unique country with a history of internal conflict, and the US consistent with its historical interest in helping remove evil regimes could have gotten rid of him and his sons long ago. But the truth is that Saddam was essential for the agenda in play since Bush 41 to open the gateway for the NWO to get hold of Middle Eastern oil. Bush speaks to the American people as though they are dumb, blind and stupid, and the American people unfortunately have been: but the rest of the world well knows the truth and the Islamic nations and people are not going to allow Bush to succeed. Moreover, there is a higher authority that is not going to let him succeed because it is impossible from where we sit to see an invasion succeed which aims to militarily alter the culture from one of belief in G-d to one that will secularize the nation. Incredibly, Israel itself has fallen subject to this very same culture change as we succinctly explained at www.senderberl.com/UI.PDF and www.senderberl.com/UI.htm. SenderBerl explained to top Clinton people that while he thought he had four aces up his sleeve his Middle East peace effort would fail and we explained to Bush top people the same thing. Superior military force is not determinative. Moreover, it is critical to understand that this entire war effort to eliminate the threat of terrorism in fact will increase it and this country could commit ten fold the resources and manpower and there is nothing that will prevent future bioterrorism of a nature and kind that can turn this country upside down. President Bush and his oil cabal have created this danger and condition so that they could launch a campaign after marshalling a force of pawns and dupes to move out on the agenda believing there was a legitimate basis therefor. You cannot have a legitimate agenda when it seeks to diminish religion and the Judeo-Christian ethic and abates the bill or rights and the bedrock of this republic: the United States Constitution. Anyone that tries to sell you this scam is an enemy not a friend of this country. What you see in this video is the result of when man tries to assert himself in an area of the world not within the domain of men who seek to rule the world. G-d gave the Arab and Islamic people the oil and the elitist centrix while they rule the world and ordinarily get whatever they want and cannot be denied by man, are no match for He whom they suppose to defeat and oppose. That is why President Bush has dramatically aged and if he keeps pushing then it will become even apparent to those arrogant in this life that they have made a mistake with a punishment that will endure far beyond the pale of this life.

"I would have moved mountains to stop the attack"
President Bush 04-12-04

THESE QUESTIONS AND POINTS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS IN THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY

Mr. President -- forget about moving mountains -- how about canceling your visit to read with second graders once you learned a hijacked plane went into a landmark New York City building?

Mr. President how about calling NORAD and checking whether military jets were up there ready to intercept since the August 6, 2001 memo fully supported that America was not only under attack but an active target of feared terrorism?

Mr. President how about telling us what you did when you heard that multiple jets were hijacked?

Mr. President, since you knew that there was a threat of terrorism using hijacked planes, how in the world could you tell the American public when you say you saw the first plane go into the north tower, that this was the deed of a poor pilot, as though it was a joke of some sort? By the way, how could you see the video of it before any video was known to exist of the incident?

Mr. President how about cutting short your stay in Crawford in August 2001 when putting the nation on the highest alert in US history and forgetting to tell the country about the imminent danger (when you found it appropriate to offer us the advice when misleading us when it came to Iraq)?

Mr. President, how could your National Security advisor help move mountains to stop the attack when she admits that she did not know until May 2002 that there was intel in the pipeline that terrorist were planning on using planes as missiles?

Mr. President Osama bin-Laden according to a video you released received a telephone call on or about September 6th 2001 about an imminent attack on the US. I believe it was a cell phone call. Do you believe that the National Security Agency had that call intercepted since the agency is tuned into his voice? If so did you receive that intel from the NSA(gency)? Mr. President, you changed your schedule suddenly on the morning of September 7th, did that have anything to do with the call Osama bin-Laden received?

Mr. President if our initial mission was to capture Osama bin-Laden wouldn't the best source to ultimately track him down be to have his family here in the USA for questioning? However, when all flights were grounded, was it you personally that authorized them to leave the USA and if not who authorized it?

The President will have one of his few formal news conferences tomorrow.
He's already falling apart and if the press core does its job the American public may get a look at the truth of this President and his administration.

Mr. President the August 6, 2001 memo is only one part of the intelligence available to you. What did the National Security Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency have to offer concerning the fact that the US was on the highest state of alert in American history? Did you to ask them to monitor communications focused on airplanes and hijackings and Osama bin-Laden's known voice?

Mr. President do you regret that the high status of alert during the six week period during the summer of 2001 was not extended another month?

Follow-up: Mr. President, how did we go from the highest state of alert to leaving the barn door open for the attacks of 9-11?

Mr. President, can you tell the American people why military jets were kept grounded for some thirty minutes after hijackings the very subject of concern of the August 6th memorandum to you? Since we were just taken off high alert, why didn't the military defense network instantly respond, knowing that the portal was open for domestic attack?

Folks, we have offered questions galore that can be asked, but the true tragedy is if and when the questions that should be offered the President are not.

The questions we predict will focus on Iraq. As we explained, the NWO leadership has allowed the media free and open reign on Iraq and the dynamic that President Bush has united Iraq -- unfortunately for our troops, united to take American life.

We only have one question for President Bush on Iraq that should be asked:

Mr. President have you been more successful than any other President in our nation's history in demoralizing the U.S. military service man (having them fight a war platformed on a mistaken predicate, having them pay for food while hospitalized and otherwise experience inordinate delays in receiving medical treatment, having them feel that this has been a war for oil, a war with the highest level of suicides among troops, connected in many cases to being party to a brutal and wrongful occupation)?

By the way, what is the story about a new military alliance in Europe that includes basically all the former members of NATO but intentionally omits the USA?

WARNING

http://www.rense.com/general51/top.htm

This particular article on Rense.com carries high significance. What it relays is that to the British military American forces are taking lives of Iraqis with the same mindset the Germans took lives of Jews in W.W.II. This is a horrible recognition.

One senior Army officer told The Telegraph that America's aggressive methods were causing friction among allied commanders and that there was a growing sense of "unease and frustration" among the British high command. The officer, who agreed to the interview on the condition of anonymity, said that part of the problem was that American troops viewed Iraqis as untermenschen - the Nazi expression for "sub-humans".

We noted for ourselves that American militarily techniques were causing unacceptable levels of deaths of children and infants. We were ready to comment on it when we came across this highly disturbing article on Rense.com. SenderBerl can only say that this single article attests to the evil mindset of the Straussian elitists of the shadow government (see again www.senderberl.com/lucas.htm) and we are compelled to tell you what it represents for you. This type of training in our military applies equally to national special police units who carry a mindset that make them impervious to carring guilt in pulling a trigger against demonstrating Americans if they are ordered to do so. When we had a broad range draft, such orders could never be given. But when we are dealing with career military and career national police, they are trained to be without any emotions or conscience in carrying out orders. Thus, the day will come that Americans will watch in horror on television when they will not believe that American police and/or military will carry out order that will maim and kill fellow citizens for acts not warranting anything close to such behavior. Just in case you think that our perspective is too far afield, we long ago posted a letter on the Internet from the President of the Steel Workers Union giving proof positive that when Bush and Ashcroft were in full stride under the Patriot Act laws that they had no reservation in seeing police come pretty close to that under their term of office. See www.senderberl.com/miami.pdf. Do not discount what we are saying, don't discount this article on Rense.com, and do read the link to this letter which will abate any doubt you might carry about what we are telling you.

P.S. When countries use missiles to take out terrorist targets and dismiss the collateral damage especially when it encompasses the lives of infants, children and innocents, rationalizations are subterfuge for the consequences of their action: wanton murder. You can't summarily include infants, children and innocents within the realm of improvements in the technology of killing under the banner of battle and warfare. This is the type of rationalization that made its way into the mindsets of those who dealt the way they did in the concentration camps. It is time for the American people to realize that its government does not exemplify the type of government allowed or supported under the founding principles and precepts for the USA.

If we have advanced as a people, it is time to allow new solutions for old problems. The first solution is to remove the leadership that countenances the abuse of those they serve and has as part of its agenda the removal of religion from the fundamental framework of their states. A nation devoid of G-d is the direct connection to a nation that kills infants, children and innocents with impunity under the umbrella of unavoidable collateral damage.

Do not let the NWO leaders get rid of Bush via Iraq rather than 9-11
SenderBerl's Perceptions April 11, 2004

We can sum it up in a very special way. The Sunday news shows today spoke endlessly about Iraq, but the word OIL was not mentioned even ONCE.

Thus the degree of N.W.O. control is strongly evident. The deal is probably as we suspected. The 9-11 Commission will conclude that the Bush administration underestimated the danger of Osama bin-Laden and when coupled with systemic problems had a material bearing on the events of 9-11. While highly critical no reference at all to the affirmative failings and putative complicity of this administration in the day’s events.

Iraq will be the vehicle to undercut the President’s re-election. This will open the door for Kerry to come in as the leader who will quickly smooth over relations and resolve Iraq. There will be no attack on Syria and Iran, but the issue regarding Iraqi oil will no doubt rest with negotiations with OPEC to favor the US with favorable long term pricing in relinquishing it. OPEC countries therefore will no doubt ultimately undertake a dominant role in resolving the political crisis in Iraq.

Problems with our perceived scenario: Iraqi religious leadership may not have the patience to wait that long. They saw US weakness this week. Bush withdrew and enlisted a cease-fire between the parties. The US no doubt didn’t want to further solder the relationship between the Shiites and Sunnis, another of Bush’s remarkable presidential accomplishments. There are endless streams of counter offensives in hand including kidnapping of personnel representative of the illusory coalition. This technique ultimately will have the truth apparent: leaving just the US alone in Iraq.

Conclusion: SenderBerl said very long ago to the Bush administration what we told the Israeli government: superior military strength does not translate into victory in the Middle East. In the Middle East the will of G-d controls and designs that implement agendas to remove people from G-d will not succeed since they operate to defame His name and existence. What we are disturbed about is that 9-11 represents this important portal for the people in the US to detect and confront the enemies within our government, those with the agenda of seeing the US ultimately weakened, maimed and abandoned. It should not be enough for you to see Bush’s poll numbers collapse to implement the resolution of 9-11. It is important to remove the shadow government that keeps iron control over the media and issues before the American public. While the rest of the world well knows and sees government complicity in the events of 9-11, Americans are under the control of the media as to how they think and respond to the 9-11 issues, being led now to find dissatisfaction over Bush in connection with Iraq, not 9-11. Kerry is Sharon. While the faces and waistlines of new leaders change, their control by N.W.O. leaders do not. Why do we interpret things like Gephardt being Kerry’s ultimate choice for Vice-President? It not only shows you how well we understand the evil in our midst but to put pressure that a low life like Gephardt doesn’t get the second slot. He will be to Kerry like Shimon Peres was to Yitzhak Rabin. Our highlighting it is aimed on putting pressure on the N.W.O. leaders not to push Kerry into picking someone he would not otherwise select.

This window of opportunity to confront the evil in our midst via the portal of 9-11 will soon shut. Please don’t let them get away with resolving it by pushing Bush out on Iraq rather than unraveling the truth of 9-11. The N.W.O. will pause for a four-year term from the rabid track taken by Bush 43, but control of our country will not be with the people, but with those who have no respect for us and for the founding precepts of this country based on the Judeo-Christian ethic.

Joseph B. Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
April 11, 2004

Comment
Events of this past week have proven distressing and further disturbing

SenderBerl's perspective is that focus should not primarily be on the August 6, 2001 PDB. SenderBerl believes that the most successful line of pursuit is on Condy Rice not having the knowledge needed and necessary to preclude what unraveled as 9-11. This then would be consistent with the line that 9-11 was allowed to happen, that the President's and the Secret Service's behavior on 9-11 were both weird and contrary to protocol, and that proof positive of complicity is inherent when the trillion dollar military machine did not impede or even act to impede four planes off transponder any one of which could have carried a nuclear payload against two major and essential metropolitan areas.

ROEMER: So, Dr. Rice, let's say that the FBI is the key here. You say that the FBI was tasked with trying to find out what the domestic threat was. We have done thousands of interviews here at the 9-11 Commission. We've gone through literally millions of pieces of paper. To date, we have found nobody - nobody at the FBI who knows anything about a tasking of field offices. Nothing went down the chain to the FBI field offices on spiking of information, on knowledge of al-Qaida in the country, and still, the FBI doesn't do anything. Isn't that some of the responsibility of the national security adviser?

RICE: The responsibility for the FBI to do what it was asked was the FBI's responsibility .

Commission MemberLehman in our opinion trying to help Rice inadvertently helped our case that Rice was not and is not the true National Security Advisor. See how many questions you can answer in the affirmative proving our point that she stood open and willing before the nation and the world that she was totally ignorant of facts relevant to the realm of her responsibilities.

IF YOU STOP AND THINK ABOUT IT, CONDY RICE IS TELLING US SHE WAS NOT AND IS NOT THE NSA. SHE CANNOT DENY IT, BUT CAN OPEN THE PORTAL FOR US TO MOVE ON IT. COLIN POWELL NO DOUBT AGREES WITH OUR PERSPECTIVE AND HE'S HARD PRESSED TO PUBLICLY COMMENT ON IT.

Is Colin Powell Sending a Message to Condoleezza Rice?

Isn't this proof positive that Condy Rice was not and is not the NSA?

"She told the commission that she regretted those comments, because at the
time she was not aware of intelligence, developed in the late 1990's, that
some terrorists were thinking of using airplanes as guided missiles. She
told the commission in the private session that she should have said, "I
could not have imagined," according to one official familiar with the
testimony, making it clear that some in the intelligence community knew
about those threats but that she did not. "Information about possible use of airplanes as missiles to destroy buildings was not briefed to her prior to that statement in May 2002," Mr. McCormack said."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/07/politics/07PANE.html

SenderBerl: Eight months after 9-11, Cheney is filling the airwaves with the imminence of further domestic terrorism and the president's own National Security Advisor was not briefed EIGHT MONTHS AFTER 9-11 that there was intellignce BEFORE 9-11 on MULTIPLE FRONTS about terrorists using airplances to destroy buildings?

http://www.startribune.com/stories/561/4712842.html
BEST RECENT EDITORIAL WE CAME ACROSS...

SENDERBERL IN MAY 2002 DETAILED THAT CONDY RICE'S REMARKS ABOUT NO ONE IMAGINING TERRORISTS USING AIRPLANES TO STRIKE BUILDINGS AS THE PREDICATE TO NOT ONLY HER DOWNFALL BUT ALSO PRESIDENT BUSH'S. NOW SHE HAS ADMITTED TO NOT KNOWING ABOUT REPORTS AS NSA SHE ABSOLUTELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN FULLY AWARE ABOUT. NOW SHE HAS ALSO MADE ANOTHER DAMAGING STATEMENT, SAYING THAT PRESIDENT BUSH WAS ONLY INTERESTED IN PLANS THAT WOULD ALLOW HIM TO DO MORE THAN SWAT AT FLIES. THERE ARE VERY FEW STRATIGIES THAT WOULD HAVE ALLOWED HIM TO ACCOMPLISH WHAT HE WANTED. RICHARD PERLE DE FACTO ADMITTED ON MEET THE PRESS WHAT PAUL O'NEILL CONFIRMED THAT THEY HAD PLANS IN HAND -- ONES THAT AWAITED DOMESTIC TERRORISM. THUS, 9-11 PRIMARILY AND UNIQUELY ASSISTED THE PRIORITIES OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE EVIDENCE CIRCUMSTANTIAL AND NOW DIRECT CLEARLY PROVES THAT AT MINIMUM 9-11 WAS ALLOWED TO HAPPEN..

SENDERBERL ALSO WAS THE FIRST TO RAISE THE ISSUE THAT CONDY RICE IS NOT THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR, TO ASK THEN WHAT WAS HER ROLE, AND TO GIVE THE DIFFICULT ANSWER TO THIS IMPORTANT MYSTERY.
FIRST, HERE IS HOW WE PRESENTED IT ON FEB 4 2004

THIS IS HOW WE ANSWERED IT:

SenderBerl's perception of Condoleezza Rice's true role in the Bush presidency
Important Photo Album Posted
March 27, 2004
This analysis should be linked to by those familiar with the other analyses on this site

Abstract: Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. explains that many mysteries are answered understanding that Condy Rice is not the true National Security Advisor. She was hand selected by Bush 41 in the late 90s to spend two years with his son to teach him foreign affairs. When he won the presidency, Bush 41 fully supported her having the NSA position, where she could be with his son constantly to monitor that he would not revert to drugs or alcohol under the pressures that would arise in connection with the events of 9-11. Most significantly, Bush 41 encouraged a close personal relationship between them because it was essential to his son pulling off his assigned role as President of the United States in the NWO quest to obtain control over Middle East oil.

THIS WE THINK IS DESTINED TO BE THE MOST DARING AND CONTROVERSIAL INTERPRETATION WE HAVE MADE. HOWEVER, WE BELIEVE IT IS TRUE AND IT DEALS WITH MATTERS OF STATE AND THUS WITHIN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

ALL THE CONDOLEEZZA RICE AND 9-11 COMMISSION ANALYSES HAVE BEEN CONSOLIDATED AT:

www.senderberl.com/bushrice.htm

Preparing for Bush

"Now, with regret, we feel compelled to relay to you that discounting this government’s involvement may have been premature."

Our letter to House and Senate Intelligence Committee members Thanksgiving Day 2002
with questions for President Bush to answer

LINK HERE

"We believe that the Congress should take note that no further military action by this administration should be allowed until the 9-11 investigation is completed. Not only will this give the administration incentive to move it ahead quickly but the outstanding issues from our perspective strongly speak against the President’s clear intent to invade Iraq, if not other Arab/Islamic nations in the region."

SENDERBERL BELIEVES THAT IT WAS THIS LETTER THAT RESULTED IN THE ATTACKS AGAINST US IN DECEMBER 2002 AND JANUARY 2003. AFTER READING THIS IT IS APPARENT WHY WE WERE TARGETED.

WE THEREFORE ARE TRULY HONORED TO PRESENT THIS LETTER TO YOU AT THIS HISTORICAL JUNCTURE.

WE CANNOT EXPRESS HOW PROUD WE ARE OF THE HOST OF FELLOW CITIZENS WHO HAVE TAKEN UP THE FLAG TO ASSURE JUSTICE AND BY DOING SO PROTECT THIS COUNTRY FROM THE EVIL THAT HAS PLANTED ITSELF IN OUR GOVERNMENT.

IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, WE POST WHAT WE ORIGINALLY WROTE CONCERNING CONDY RICE'S FAUX PAX IN MAY 2002

YOU WILL NO DOUBT FIND IT DIFFICULT TO BELIEVE THAT WE PUT THIS BEFORE THE HOUSE AND SENATE COMMITTEE MEMBERS WHEN WE DID. WE HAVE NEVER DISCLOSED THIS UNTIL NOW: THIS AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS BY E-MAIL WERE SELECTIVELY WIPED OFF ALL OUR COMPUTERS. HOWEVER, WE MAINTAINED BACKUPS AND HAVE THEM ALL, IDENTIFYING ALL CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS RECEIVING IT -- INCLUDING PRESIDENT BUSH AND VICE-PRESIDENT CHENEY.

NOW WITH 9-11 UNRAVELING,
WE PRAY THAT JUSTICE IS SERVED.

Condy Rice Blows It. American People Incensed. A lot of al-Qaeda Activity Inside the United States Summer of 2001. Rice says she knew nothing but intelligence community knew alot. Bush will covertly concede the office to Kerry as SenderBerl interpreted in November 2003 would be the case

Preparing for Condy Rice...Part II. SenderBerl utilizes Condy Rice's appearance on 60 Minutes to explain why she will prove to be a poor witness and why her appearance may prove to be a watershed event for the Bush administration.

HAVE NO DOUBT ABOUT IT, THE PRESSURE IS ON BIG TIME
THERE WAS A REASON THEY REFUSED TO LET CONDY TESTIFY
WILL THE 9-11 COMMISSION BE ABLE TO RECOGNIZE IT AND IF SO PURSUE IT?

THERE IS LITTLE DOUBT IN OUR MIND THAT CONDY RICE WAS NEVER THE TRUE NSA
THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS EMERGING COULD BE DRAMATIC TO SAY THE LEAST: IT COULD EXPOSE A SHADOW GOVERNMENT AND THOSE INVOLVED THEREIN SITTING WITH THE VICE-.PRESIDENT IN SOME WELL PROTECTED AND FORTIFIED BUNKER (FURTHER EXPLAINING HIS LONG PERIODS OF ABSENCE).
The above photo of President Bush is also from March 30, 2004. It captures our point.

While Rice says on television shows that she, as the president's National Security Advisor, earnestly pursued terrorism from day one, she cannot engage in such legerdemain when under oath before the 9-11 Commission.

Click on image to hear Richard Perle
fully support Clarke's criticisms of Rice and Bush

Dr. Rice:

• In view of the highest state of alert in US history during the six weeks in the summer of 2001, what would have been the difference had the 9-11 attack taken place during this six-week period of time?

• There was a sense of urgency during that period of time. How do you account moving from a state of urgency to one of complacency and de facto neglect on 9-11?

• Do you think 9-11 could have been prevented had the heightened alert status been maintained for another month?

• Do you think the military national defense system should have been keyed and one would imagine it was keyed to sending up planes to intercept a number of planes off transponder (under military planning of various modes to defend against nuclear attack upon major cities)?

• Why then was there no response particularly when the military and national defense system knew we were just taken off the highest alert level in US history?

• Did you ever warn or advise President Bush to immediately leave the Booker T. Elementary School once you knew that America was under attack?

• As National Security Advisor, should you have been aware that there was more than one report detailing that terrorists planned on deploying commercial aircraft against U.S. targets?

• Was Vice-President Cheney aware that terrorist were considering the use of commercial planes to implement attacks on US targets?

• Was it Vice-President Cheney who dealt with Richard Clarke's offered proposals for President Bush?

• Did 9-11 ultimately allow President Bush to do more than swat at flies?

• MANY MORE QUESTIONS AND LINES OF QUESTIONS ARE IN THE ARTICLES BELOW

THE TESTIMONY OF DR. RICE BEFORE THE 9-11 COMMISSION COULD PROVE TO BE THE WATERSHED EVENT FOR THE PRESIDENT AND HIS ADMINISTRATION. WE BELIEVE THE TRUTH CAN BE ELICITED FROM HER, BUT THAT DEPENDS FULLY ON WHETHER THE 9-11 PANEL WILL DISCHARGE THEIR FIDUCIARY DUTIES OR PROVE THEMSELVES PART OF THE PROBLEM AND ISSUE.

Kean and Hamilton Compromised?

Preparing for Condy Rice...Part II. SenderBerl utilizes Condy Rice's appearance on 60 Minutes to explain why she will prove to be a poor witness and why her appearance may prove to be a watershed event for the Bush administration.

Richard Clarke’s remarks and revelations on Meet the Press are so vital to the public interest that we decided on top of all else we have recently done to highlight and analyze what he said in the context of 9-11.

Preparing for Condy Rice. Her agenda will be to obfuscate and thus it is imperative for the 9-11 Commission to ask questions from which it will be difficult to escape the truths reflected by the realities taking place in connection with 9-11. We drafted some for your interest and possible benefit.

Is Colin Powell Sending a Message to Condoleezza Rice?
April 3, 2004

President Bush on March 30, 2004 showing the strain in his eyes and face in announcing that Condoleezza Rice would testify under oath before the 9-11 Commission. Bush 41 has come out and publicly displayed his concern over the attacks on Bush 43. The true crisis in our opinion is that there is a fear among those complicit in 9-11 of whom may prove vulnerable and either intentionally or accidentally slip and open a portal to the dark side of this administration and its complicity in 9-11. President Bush may now recognize that Condy was reporting to Bush 41 behind his back all along, recognizing that his father and his other NWO suporters, including big oil, didn't think him worthy of cutting the umbilical cord.
Even aristocrats have bad days, witness the French and American Revolutions.

Bush 43 leaving the Briefing Room March 30 2004
It is worthy to note how Bush 41 expresses his anger over the reality that truth might emerge regarding 9-11.
It is "deeply offensive and contemptible" to hear "elites and intellectuals on the campaign trail" dismiss progress in Iraq since last year's overthrow of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, the elder Bush said in a speech to the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association annual convention. ***The former president appeared to fight back tears as he complained about media coverage of the younger Bush that he called "something short of fair and balanced."

IT IS ADMIRABLE HOW AN ARISTOCRAT DEFENDS HIS SON (PARTICULARLY WITH ALL AT STAKE FOR THE BUSH FAMILY AND FOR THOSE WHOM HE IS PUBLIC SURROGATE ) BUT OUR POSITION IS WHO IS DEFENDING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITH THE SAME SORT OF TENACITY? WHO REALLY SPEAKS FOR THOSE 3000 SOULS LOST SO THAT A GROUP OF ELITISTS COULD MOVE FORWARD ON AN AGENDA FOR WORLD DOMINATION AND CONTROL?

HAVE NO DOUBT ABOUT IT, THE PRESSURE IS ON BIG TIME
THERE WAS A REASON THEY REFUSED TO LET CONDY TESTIFY
WILL THE 9-11 COMMISSION BE ABLE TO RECOGNIZE IT AND IF SO PURSUE IT?

THERE IS LITTLE DOUBT IN OUR MIND THAT CONDY RICE WAS NEVER THE TRUE NSA
THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS EMERGING COULD BE DRAMATIC TO SAY THE LEAST: IT COULD EXPOSE A SHADOW GOVERNMENT AND THOSE INVOLVED THEREIN SITTING WITH THE VICE-.PRESIDENT IN SOME WELL PROTECTED AND FORTIFIED BUNKER (FURTHER EXPLAINING HIS LONG PERIODS OF ABSENCE).
The above photo of President Bush is also from March 30, 2004. It captures our point.

Lots to Hide and NWO Concerns over both Bush and Rice

Bush insisted on the joint appearance in agreeing to take questions from all 10 members of the panel investigating the Sept. 11 attacks. He initially offered to meet only with the top two members, former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean, the chairman; and former Rep. Lee Hamilton, the vice chairman. The arrangement virtually eliminates any possibility of divergent answers from Bush and Cheney; lets Bush pass off any question he'd rather avoid; and makes follow-up questions all but impossible.

SenderBerl: This is serious stuff. Aristocratic heads could wind up rolling. Thus, Bush 41 secured Bush 43's safety by having him appear with Cheney, who will go down with a feigned heart attack if necessary to stop the proceedings (all the NWO has is horrid memories of Bush's dismal interview with Tim Russert on Meet the Press in February). Condoleezza Rice however inadvertently holds some other keys to putting the NWO into serious danger. Cheney despite anything else said to the contrary doesn't like her and he doesn't have much confidence in her. She has the tendency, real tendency to talk before thinking at times. Cheney and others of his genre don't intend to let Rice put them in pinstripes. Thus, we monitor events. The NWO's first choice would be to approach all the Commission members and/or get one to do what is necessary to stop blood letting if Rice stumbles and crumbles before the national cameras. We are positive that Cheney is monitoring her drills for the Commission hearing. She better convince him she can do the job.

Focus: The key dynamic regarding Clarke's testimony is not that Bush shifted resources too early from Al-Qaeda to Iraq, to weaken the war against terrorism, because, on the historical dimension, this can be argued to be nothing more than an error in presidential judgement, but the fact that Clarke was jumping up and down for a presidential response to the IMMINENT MAJOR TERRORISM KNOWN FORTHCOMING against the United States of America; that he was deliberately denied direct presidential contact; that his efforts to communicate with the President concerning his concern and alarm, ultimately shared in by Tenet, was deliberately stifled; that the President thereby knowingly and willingly never implemented a formal strategic design, only relenting for a period of several weeks in elevating the American defensive shield, with the terrorism of 9-11 not so coincidentally taking place only days after the heightened defenses were not only diminished but severely and inexplicably dropped to a degree making America nearly totally vulnerable, days before the President changed his schedule to travel to Florida to read with second graders, after criticism for being away from the White House for the entire month of August. Couple this with the fact that the Secret Service did not implement its own protocol to protect the President, and that it allowed him to remain there for an extended period of time, a publicly known location, to speak to the nation on television, and that the American trillion dollar military alert defensive response system failed to send up a single jet plane to defend this nation, when four American planes went off transponder, military and civilian intelligence fully aware of the implications thereof, ESPECIALLY AFTER HAVING JUST GONE OFF HEIGHTENED DEFENSIVE ALERT, speaks to exactly where the focus of Clarke's testimony should lie. Further couple this with Paul O'Neill's admission, supported by Richard Perle, that the Bush administration was sitting with plans in hand to implement a design for world domination and control (first stop OPEC) and just waiting for an act of major domestic terrorism, then you have the slam dunk case that 9-11 was allowed to happen and that the Bush administration knew what was about to take place and wanted it to take place and was complicit thereby therein. If the White House for a second thought the President was in danger, the President would have been whisked away from the Booker Elementary School. His staying there was proof positive that they knew the parameters of the terrorism in play that day and that it would not put the President at risk when seated with the second graders in Florida at the Booker Elementary School.

RUSSERT: For six weeks in the summer of 2001, at home and overseas, the U.S. government was at its highest possible state of readiness--and anxiety--against imminent terrorist attack."Did Dr. Rice instruct you to organize that meeting?MR. CLARKE:  No.  I told her I was going to do it.  And I had already been doing it two weeks before, because on June 21, I believe it was, George Tenet called me and said, "I don't think we're getting the message through.  These people aren't acting the way the Clinton people did under similar circumstances."  And I suggested to Tenet that he come down and personally brief Condi Rice, that he bring his terrorism team with him.  And we sat in the national security adviser's office.  And I've used the phrase in the book to describe George Tenet's warnings as "He had his hair on fire."  He was about as excited as I'd ever seen him.  And he said, "Something is going to happen."RUSSERT:  But you kept your guard up for six weeks, through the end of August.  Why didn't you stay on high alert through September 11th?  And you regret this day that you didn't because you may have stopped that attack

The Congress in allowing the Patriot Act to take hold stated inter alia "...all Americans are united in condemning, in the strongest possible terms, the terrorists who planned and carried out the attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, and in pursuing all those responsible for those attacks and their sponsors until they are brought to justice." If the Americans people were compelled to allow our own government to undermine their fundamental Constitutionally protected guarantees and rights, with the blessings of the Bush administration, then the White House is surely hard pressed to argue that Condoleezza Rice can stand on a claim to deny the American people her sworn testimony regarding the events of 9-11.

Supplemental Links
More Supplemental Links

SenderBerl has added essential links to the left of the lead page.

This web site provides, according to your own comments to us, some of the finest substance on the Internet. It is designed to assist those who wish to look into deeper planes to find and verify truths. Once doing so, it would be the ultimate goal, due to the dire straits once described by us and now apparent, to help you to recognize a duty to do your own part in helping put America and thus the world back on track. When we wrote Recapturing America way back in December 1996, completing it in January 1997, we were way ahead of the curve in recognizing the agenda in play. However, our goal was to highlight the evil design of an agenda masking itself in noble motives and aims. When you see what our children have been and are exposed to on television, public education sabotaged, drugs institutionalized, and recognize that students in college are being openly solicited for the sex trade; when you recognize that those in leadership are preparing you to abandon the bedrock of this country, the U.S. Constitution and its Bills of Rights; that it adopts policies domestically and internationally the antithesis of what this country has ALWAYS represented, and that, as we interpreted in Recapturing America, the U.S. dollar would be deliberately sabotaged to make the US compliant to one world government; weakened and maimed to assure that a strong US military and country would not remain in a country planned on being abandoned by those scripting our current course, then you are dealing with those serving an evil design. If you don't see it and accept it seven years later, then you are simply shirking your own duty to take on an active role against it, which can be served in so many affirmative and positive ways, then you will be recorded in history as one of those in this generation that made waste of all the lives lost and sacrifices rendered by those who preceded you, so that you could have what no generation before you could have even dreamed and what you so easily squander for those who follow.

ADDED IN HTML FORMAT
Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage
Regime and Culture Change Unmasked

Special personal commentary by Mr. Ehrlich. Link here

Extract Material Sent to House and Senate Intelligence Committees

Major Analysis on Japan, Yen and U.S. Dollar has moved here

Major Analysis on the terrorism in Spain has moved here
SenderBerl notes that the White House has attributed the PP's failing to benefit from the terrorism to the fact that they unwisely attributed it to the ETA rather than Al-Qaeda, as we interpreted from the get go. However, the failing belongs to Bush 43 with the consequences enumerated by us by the link and by the Major Comment dated March 22, 2004.
Major Comment Mar 22 04 from Joseph B. Ehrlich

<====>

MAR 17 04: SenderBerl Interprets New Threat to France as Real

SenderBerl does not believe it is Al-Qaeda and that a new elevated element has now emerged.
Read our perspective here

People from over eighty countries have visited our site over the past seven years to gain an understanding on the macro scale to what is taking place around them and why the world is dramatically changing. Even President Bush stands today blind to the reality that his supporters and friends have already determined that he must lose his bid for a second term. His father no doubt knows the reasons why but to spare his son does not share it with him (aside from being instructed as well not to do so). However, for the global majority, including the vast majority of Americans, it is important to understand what is taking place, for those leading, in the brazen and arrogant manner they do, are taking us to a dark and dire future. Technological advancements and achievements without concurrent growth in the moral ethic foreshadows the very dark future biblically described. SenderBerl urges you to read both Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform for Moral Outrage and Regime and Culture Change Unmasked.