Essentials

 

President Bush

John Kerry

Dick Gephardt

Howard Dean

Alan Greenspan

Richard Perle

Condy Rice

Tony Blair

Jessica Lynch

Ted Kennedy

Arnold Schwartzenegger

Ralph Nadar

Tommy Franks

H. Neil Mallon

Oil

U.S. Dollar

Interest Rates^

Outsourcing

Unemployment

Stock Market

 

Israel

OPEC

Middle East FN 41

WMD

 

BBC

U.S. Military

New World Order

Regime and Culture Change

 

Constitution

Religion

Sovereign and Independent America

Crop Circles and UFOs

Paul Wolfowitz

Commentary 1000 word

Special Message

Exposition

Op-Ed

Rense_Jones

State of the Union

Radio Interviews

 

Historical Insights 1

Historical Insights 2

Historical Insights 3

America Intentionally Maimed and Damaged

Supplemental Links 1

Supplemental Links 2

 

Recapturing America

TWA Flight 800

Princes Diana

9-11

Booker Elementary

Pinpoint Accuracy

Patriot Act

Elitist Centrix

Peres Personified

NSS

Military Government

No Exit Strategy

New America

Bush Compromised

Military Compromised

Military Maltreated

NSS Undermined

EU and Iraq

EU and NSS

Syria and Iran

bush on polish tv

Religious analysis

closing windows of opportunity

covert agenda for Israel

Nafta 97

Audio excerpts
jun 9 03 – all wma

bush boxed out from Syria and Iran
3 minutes 30 seconds

world domination
1 minute 43 seconds

wmd
2 minutes 8 seconds

superior military not determinative
40 seconds

MAY 23 02
audio excerpts

No Further Domestic Terrorism
1 Minute 59 Seconds

Americans want an investigation of 9-11
47 Seconds

Presidential Legerdemain
2 Minutes 24 Seconds

Checks and Balances
2 Minutes 15 Seconds

Bush administration cover to undermine regimes in syria, iraq and iran
1 Minute 29 Seconds

SPECIAL

Brokaw Bush and WMD
17 Seconds

             
 
 

MAR 15 04: Yen in headlines today -- Fed seems to be taking the right track

MAR 17 04: SenderBerl Interprets New Threat to France as Real

SenderBerl does not believe it is Al-Qaeda and that a new elevated element has now emerged.
Read our perspective here

Remember, our telling you that the elitist centrix were those who ran over the children of those outside their class, and then sent the parents a bill for inconvenience caused them and the injury to their horses?

Well, link to this article and find out that our world is truly upside down and returning where it once was: to the hands of those who seek to enslave and oppress and who operate with an arrogance hard to describe yet believe. Here we have a man unjustly imprisoned for 25 years and there are those in the English government who are willing to send him a bill for some $125,000 for food and lodging. Incredible. Don't forget that there were those in the U.S. military injured in the Iraqi war who also received a bill for food from the US Government, while hospitalized with their injuries. Is it a bad dream? Sometimes we really think so.

http://www.sundayherald.com/40592

WHAT do you give someone who’s been proved innocent after spending the best part of their life behind bars, wrongfully convicted of a crime they didn’t commit? An apology, maybe? Counselling? Champagne? Compensation? Well, if you’re David Blunkett, the Labour Home Secretary, the choice is simple: you give them a big, fat bill for the cost of board and lodgings for the time they spent freeloading at Her Majesty’s Pleasure in British prisons. On Tuesday, Blunkett will fight in the Royal Courts of Justice in London for the right to charge victims of miscarriages of justice more than £3000 for every year they spent in jail while wrongly convicted. The logic is that the innocent man shouldn’t have been in prison eating free porridge and sleeping for nothing under regulation grey blankets.

SenderBerl's Analysis on the Bombings in Madrid Mar 11 2004
What did today's events have to do with the President's TV Campaign
Steady Leadership In Times of Change?

Falling Into the NWO lair

Incredible but True
Mar 14 7:00AM

INSERT: MAR 14 04 7:00pm: PSOE PREVAILS OVER ANZAR'S PP

Blair Loses War Ally as Socialists Win Spanish Election Prime Minister Tony Blair was speaking to his new Spanish counterpart today to congratulate him on a surprise election victory.
Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero’s triumph robbed Mr Blair of his key European ally, Jose Maria Aznar, on the war with Iraq .


SenderBerl has told you all along that Bush intends to uncover them and there has already been reports that WMD have been delivered to Iraq. Dean's interview on Meet the Press was excellent and touched upon the very reason why Bush needs to find them. In fact, we believe that Rumsfeld may have said what he did after the President heard what Dean said today. Link here to read what Dean said.

The Bush administration had thought the PP (Anzar's political party aligned with the war on Iraq) would from the get go blame Al-Qaeda and then forge the issue that the Spanish people needed the PP to continue in the fight against terrorism. However, those within the PP, distant from the ploy, concluded that the safest road was to blame the local terrorists, the ETA. Thus, they forged the mental dynamic that the ETA was responsible to cast the Spanish people into support of the PP. However, it was evident from the first that it was not the ETA. Thus, now that the Spanish people are angry at being misled by the PP, they are, by the logical standard imposed by the PP, concluding that it was Al-Qaeda but now using that conclusion to support the PSOE rather than the PP.

Thus, the entire intended dynamic to try to give the PP a boost to secure parliamentary control now blows up and seems to operate for the PSOE the intended political victim of the deed. We now await the results of the election

SenderBerl said in Recapturing America that the game plan to interfere in international elections including those of allies would one day blow up and possibly take the world to war. It was a serious mistake to elect the son of a father who was a one term president -- especially one who shows the body language of a man totally removed from the American people and the fundamental precepts of this country: one who knowingly and willingly allows the military to be used and abused and who during a second term will surely show that he carries the same sentiment to the American people (separate and apart from his ploy to the people of New York from showing idle care and concern over an event which he denies them answers). It would be noteworthy to highlight that the Spanish people at least show a willingness to denounce a government that plays them for the fools the American people have been played to be since TWA Flight 800.

Many of the protesters slammed the government for initially saying the prime suspect was Basque separatist group ETA. "This is a dictatorship!" protesters shouted in Madrid. "Before we vote, we want the truth." More than 5,000 crowded round the PP's headquarters in Madrid, flanked by riot police. "It's a technical coup d'etat if a government retains information. That's not playing clean," a 32-year-old engineer, who gave his name as Rafa, said in Madrid.

Keep in mind that the PP was projected to lose parliamentary control prior to March 11th. Thus, it is ludicrous for anyone to assume that Al-Qaeda pursued terrorism in Spain to help depose the PP where the deed from where we sit could have only boosted the PP into majority parliamentary control (and not otherwise have improved POSE's interpreted position of undermining PP control).

Spain has 1,300 troops in Iraq after supporting a war opposed by most of the population. The PSOE has said it will bring troops home if it wins. -- The PSOE wants to return to a more Europe-focused foreign policy after Aznar clashed with Germany and France to support the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Rajoy has said he wants good relations with both Europe and the United States. POLLS The most recent poll, published on March 8, showed the Socialists narrowing the PP's lead to 4.5 percentage points from 6.2 points in an earlier survey. The PP were seen taking between 168 and 173 seats, short of the 176 seats needed for an absolute majority and below the 183 it won in 2000.

IT ALSO SEEMS IMPORTANT FOR THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ELECTION LOSS DUE TO TERRORISM WHERE THE DATA ON MARCH 8TH SHOWN ABOVE ATTESTS THAT THE PSOE WAS GOING TO SUCCEED OVER THE PP.

NEVER FORGET THAT THE PRIME BENEFICIARY OF SPAIN'S TERRORISM IS BUSH.

IT HIGHLIGHTED HIS CAMPAIGN MESSAGE AND
TOOK KERRY RIGHT OFF THE FRONT PAGE.

WAS THIS THE AIM OF AL-QAEDA?

President Bush has regained the lead from Sen. John Kerry in the latest IBD/TIPP Poll as the boost the challenger got from the Democratic primaries wears off and the incumbent starts his own campaign in earnest. The nationwide poll of 863 adults taken last Monday through Thursday showed that, among 743 registered voters, Bush leads Kerry 45% to 40%, with 6% going to Independent Ralph Nader.

====>Rice-Dean on Meet the Press Mar 14 04

Russert asks Rice outright: Will you testify under oath in public about September 11?

Dean proves that either he or Edwards would be a remarkably helpful running mate for Kerry, assuring him the Presidency.

However, will we prove correct and see Kerry offer it to Gephardt?

DISINFORMATION

If the government's initial suspicion that ETA was behind the blasts turns out to be right, this could benefit Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar's ruling Popular Party (PP) which has campaigned on its tough line against the Basque separatist group, analysts said. If, however, some indications al Qaeda could have been behind the attacks gain credence, many Spaniards might point a finger at the PP for stirring Muslim wrath by backing Washington and London in Iraq.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=586&e=1&u=/nm/20040312/wl_nm/spain_explosions_election_dc

SenderBerl: NOT TRUE. NOT TRUE AT ALL. The act of terrorism benefits the incumbent party, when it is aligned with a war against terrorism.

The Importance of Sunday's Elections in Spain

Anzar's political conservative party was projected to take a heavy hit on Sunday due to its support of Bush's War in Iraq, amongst other matters. Consequently, a victory for the party would translate into confirming the benefits of terrorism for the NWO game plan to keep NWO affiliated political leaders in full power, when support not only erodes but victory for the opposing side spells lack of future support. Moreover, this will be a sign to Bush of what he needs to see done in order to assure his own re-election albeit the American people are equally fed up with carrying suspicions regarding his across the board failings as detailed by the Democrats. A victory for Anzar this Sunday casts a heavy shadow over the future and encourages Bush to further such ploys for his personal agenda. Blair and Bush instead of addressing the threat (see below) simply pander it globally to help secure their political futures. The truth of it as SenderBerl has analyzed on this site is that it is all a cover for world domination and control, admitted to by the NSS. Cheney has been baiting potential terrorists since 9-11 to go out there and do their thing. It is so evident -- this event taking place when it has -- for the reasons it did that it plain to us that it is NOT the work of a true terrorist network, all of whom have been instructed for the reasons we have explained to sit and do nothing until at minimum the November 2004 US elections. Bush and Cheney understanding this and the disclosed reality that they will not win, have taken the bull by the horns and again show that those committed to an evil agenda know no boundaries to their deeds for they have no respect for human life but conveniently as those in history before them see it as a usable vehicle to pursue their agenda for continued control.

Blair's dramatic warnings ring terrifyingly true

LAST WEEK, Tony Blair delivered a speech in Sedgefield which has proved horrifically prescient. In words he wrote himself, Mr Blair used the address to defend his fears. Britain and other developed countries were in mortal danger, he said, from a threat "different from anything the world has seen before". This threat was defined not by Iraq but by 11 September, 2001 - an event which crystallised in the Prime Minister’s mind the dangers posed by global terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.

Falling Into the NWO lair

The parliamentary presidential candidates, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero from the Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE), and Mariano Rajoy, from the ruling Popular Party (PP), publicly announced the end of all electoral activities. Moreover, both of them agreed that at such a terrible time the political forces should set aside all differences and prioritize the objective of doing away with terrorism.***As a result of that meeting with the ministers of the interior and defense and the vice presidents, the government decreed three days of mourning and called for demonstrations in every Spanish city under the slogan “With the victims, with the Constitution and for the defeat of terrorism.”http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/marzo/juev11/11atent-i.html

SenderBerl: Do you hear those behind the terrorism laughing? Do you think true terrorists would have done such a deed to help Anzar and his Partido Popular? Can you believe the PSOE so naive as to what it before them? Yes. We can. It's the hallmark of people whom cannot dare to think that such evil could surround what they witnessed. This is an advantage of evil over good. After all these years of analyzing geopolitical events, we, on the other hand, find it easy to extract the putative truth out of the dastardly deed.

If Anzar and the PP thought the terrorism would hurt them, they were positioned to call off, delay the elections. However, it was believed that the terrorism could only help them, which was true -- but they bungled it by trying to lay it off on the ETA.

President Bush was told for the reasons we have covered herein that he will not win in November 2004. President Bush thus aligns with the most feared part of his cabal to grasp at victory. He throws out the need for a good economy and stock market for the platform for victory:

A domestic/global wave of terrorism.

The circumstantial evidence against him is the same as 9-11. Read below and see why either one or both the following scenarios lies ahead:

1. a wave of domestic/global terrorism
2. a surprise military launch against Syria and Iran.

Rense.com posted an article prepared by us on some recent interpretations.
The Meaning and Consequences

About Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
(after reading the above, you might particularly enjoy the following link)

Fed We Believe Agrees that a Weak Yen will Harm EU and thus USA (Material below from Forbes Mar 15 04)

Analysts link that abrupt move higher to efforts by the Bank of Japan, which in January and February bought half of the annual record set in 2003 of 20 trillion yen ($180 billion).

The greenback spiked lower on Monday, however, immediately after a Japanese news wire said the
BOJ was considering abandoning its heavy interventions at the end of March.

SenderBerl: The only way the BOJ would abandon them is if the Fed advised them accordingly.

"Many people still expect this move up in dollar/yen to run out of steam as we enter the new fiscal year in early April," said Marc Chandler, chief currency strategist at HSBC in New York.

Analysts think Japan hopes to keep the dollar above 110 yen at least until Japanese companies report their fiscal year-end results. A sharply stronger yen could skew Japanese earnings to the downside for some international corporations based in Japan. That, in turn, could weaken the Japanese stock market.

SenderBerl: Stock Markets don't fall for these machinations and thus we note that the Senderberl Nikkei model is currently short.

The same analysts generally think the dollar would fall sharply below 110 if the BOJ removed its dollar-supportive bids.

SenderBerl: The Yen should as we said below be at par with the dollar. The Euro Yen relationship is out of kilter and is very important since the US needs and wants to sell to the EU and with a weak Yen US business are at a disadvantage, the Japanese truthfully are better capitalists and businessmen.

We include a new special commentary by Mr. Ehrlich. Link here

Link here to original commentary on Japan and the Yen

WE FINALLY ARE HAPPY TO SEE THE FED DO SOMETHING HELPFUL.
LET'S SEE IF THE YEN DOES RISE VS. THE DOLLAR AND THE EURO.

DISCLOSURE: SENDERBERL AS INDICATED BY THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE IS LONG THE YEN.

Watch out for Japan (Again)!
MAR 7 2004

It’s nearly twenty years to the day, and here we are in 2004 facing the same scenario we presented to the government originally in early 1983: Japan is out to benefit itself at the expense of the U.S. and now the EU.

Extract Material Sent to House and Senate Intelligence Committees

Insert Mar 9 04: One thing we should have made clear: the Japanese are probably also using U.S. dollars obtained at nearly no cost to Japanese international conglomerates from U.S. banks to help drive the euro higher to aid its design to obtain unjust EU market share. The smartest move the Fed could make in here is to buy Yen to counter a Japanese strategy the Japanese do not want to let go. Ultimately the Yen has nowhere else to go but up. However, if it moves up when the Japanese want it to do so, there won't be much left to the U.S. dollar and the remainder of American industry left standing when the Japanese last deployed the strategy (in the mid 80s) will tumble, buckling this time even General Motors who will be squeezed at home and overseas.

SenderBerl has added essential links to the left of the lead page.

This web site provides, according to your own comments to us, some of the finest substance on the Internet. It is designed to assist those who wish to look into deeper planes to find and verify truths. Once doing so, it would be the ultimate goal, due to the dire straits once described by us and now apparent, to help you to recognize a duty to do your own part in helping put America and thus the world back on track. When we wrote Recapturing America way back in December 1996, completing it in January 1997, we were way ahead of the curve in recognizing the agenda in play. However, our goal was to highlight the evil design of an agenda masking itself in noble motives and aims. When you see what our children have been and are exposed to on television, public education sabotaged, drugs institutionalized, and recognize that students in college are being openly solicited for the sex trade; when you recognize that those in leadership are preparing you to abandon the bedrock of this country, the U.S. Constitution and its Bills of Rights; that it adopts policies domestically and internationally the antithesis of what this country has ALWAYS represented, and that, as we interpreted in Recapturing America, the U.S. dollar would be deliberately sabotaged to make the US compliant to one world government; weakened and maimed to assure that a strong US military and country would not remain in a country planned on being abandoned by those scripting our current course, then you are dealing with those serving an evil design. If you don't see it and accept it seven years later, then you are simply shirking your own duty to take on an active role against it, which can be served in so many affirmative and positive ways, then you will be recorded in history as one of those in this generation that made waste of all the lives lost and sacrifices rendered by those who preceded you, so that you could have what no generation before you could have even dreamed and what you so easily squander for those who follow.
ADDED IN HTML FORMAT
Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage
Regime and Culture Change Unmasked

November 2003: SBS says HIS OWN SUPPORTERS WILL NOT ALLOW BUSH to win re-election.

It all started, as far as proving our point, on Feb 8th when Karl Rove did not yank the Meet the Press interview after the first fifteen minutes of the President's performance. Then came the 9-11 Commission posturing, with Condy Rice in the limelight, next came the position of supporting outsourcing of jobs, gay marriage, followed by Alan Greenspan on compromising Social Security. Now the ad campaign.

December 2003: SBS explains why Gore support for Dean indicates he will be undermined as the Democratic nominee.

January 2004: SBS declares Kerry the next President of the United States

February 2004: SBS declares that Gephardt will be Kerry's running mate

Kerry will be king, says royal poll theory
By JASON HOPPS in London
08mar04

IF ROYAL genes have any influence, John Kerry looks destined to dethrone George W. Bush in November's US presidential election. According to a theory its British proponents say has proved surprisingly accurate over the past century, the candidate with the bluest blood in his veins will win the White House. In 2000 it was Bush. This time, it's Kerry. "Our research is not yet complete, but my bet is that Kerry has more royal connections and that he is more noble than President Bush," said Harold Brooks-Baker, publishing director of Burke's Peerage, a guide to the British aristocracy. "But both candidates have a remarkable number of royal connections and both are related to Queen Elizabeth." Yale-educated war veteran Kerry, 60, can trace his roots via the first Massachusetts governor, John Winthrop, to every great family in Boston and a host of royals in Europe. "Kerry can almost certainly be traced back to King James I and to the bloodlines straight through the Windsor and Hanover families," Brooks-Baker said. James I, the son of Mary, Queen of Scots, ruled England from 1603-1625 and is best remembered for commissioning a new translation of the Bible. Much of Kerry's royal heritage comes through his mother's side. Kerry, a Catholic, recently learned that his paternal grandfather was an ethnic German Jew born in a former mining town near the Polish border. Although Kerry's family tree might have more royal branches than Mr Bush's, the President himself is no commoner. Mr Bush was more royal than Al Gore, his opponent four years ago, and also boasts a direct descent from Henry III and from Henry VIII's sister Mary Tudor, who was also the wife of Louis XI of France. He is also descended from Charles II of England. Brooks-Baker said there has always been a significant "royalty factor" in those who aspired to the White House, with Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan among those who had strong blue blood links.

A 1000 word capsule of where we are….
By Joseph B. Ehrlich

Sept. 11 Families Disgusted by Bush Campaign Ads

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Families who lost relatives in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks voiced outrage on Thursday at President Bush's first ads of his re-election campaign that use images of the devastated World Trade Center to portray him as the right leader for tumultuous times. ***Ron Willett of Walnut Shade, Missouri, said he was disgusted when he saw the ads. Willett, who lost his 29-year-old son, John Charles, when planes hit the trade center, said he is now so upset, "I would vote for Saddam Hussein before I would vote for Bush." *** Several family members said their annoyance at Bush's using the emotional images stems in part from his refusal to testify in open session before the federal commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. "There is really a hypocrisy here. The Bush administration will not cooperate fully with the 9/11 commission and at the same time they are trying to invoke and own 9/11 and use it for his re-election," said Stephen Push from the Washington office of "Families September 11th." His wife died on the plane that crashed into the Pentagon that day. The International Association of Fire Fighters, which endorsed Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry also denounced the campaign spots as "hypocrisy at its worst."

SenderBerl: The message is spreading. While the elitist centrix always counted on the American people being both lame and stupid, their brazen arrogance in using 9-11 as a primary tool to re-elect the President, helps assure that the President will be defeated. The American people are starting to sense they are dealing with someone representing the very dynamic their forefathers detested: aristocratic abuse. The evidence below and on this site is determinative of not only complicity by this administration but that there is no way that Bush will be allowed to be re-elected --- again even by his own covert supporters, for the reasons explained herein.

Thus we see even his ad campaign as subterfuge from within. Bush 43 can't see the forest from the trees to recognize that he is being tripped up deliberately by those who take their orders from the same people he does as well.

When we proffered on November 19, 2003, that the Democratic nominee would be the next President, knowing that Dean therefore had to be undermined, we could not have known how openly and evident they were going to be about it.

It all started, as far as proving out point, on Feb 8th when Karl Rove did not yank the Meet the Press interview after the first fifteen minutes of the President's performance. Then came the 9-11 Commission posturing, with Condy Rice in the limelight, next came the position of supporting outsourcing of jobs, gay marriage, followed by Alan Greenspan on compromising Social Security. Now the ad campaign.

INSERT MARCH 8

The evidence of our proposition mounts.

Analysis: Is Karl Rove the next Joe Trippi?

By Martin Sieff UPI Senior News Analyst Published 3/8/2004 8:40 PM
WASHINGTON, March 8 (UPI) -- Is Karl Rove the new Joe Trippi of U.S. politics: a supposed genius who turns out to be just a disastrously unrealistic dreamer when the real campaign starts? It's starting to look that way. Even Democratic Party insiders and Kerry campaign strategists have been bewildered at the passive silence and blundering slowness of the massive Republican Attack Machine to crank up and start countering their own powerful and highly effective blasts***

There is still time for Rove and his team to get back on their game. But the record of their flubs, miscalculations and failures is already long and growing longer by the day. These are no longer just an embarrassing glitch or two, missteps that everyone makes. There is a well-documented and very clear pattern to them by now.

{President Bush's performance on NBC's Meet the Press February 8, 2004 horrid!}


Is Karl Rove following orders? Whose orders?

During his February 25 testimony before the House Budget Committee, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan generated sensational national headlines by recommending that President Bush's $1.5 trillion in tax cuts be made permanent while Social Security and Medicare benefits be dramatically cut to achieve long term deficit reduction and a balanced budget. http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/030304F.shtml

Television frame grab showing aftermath scenes from the September 11, 2001 attacks being used in a campaign advertisement by U.S. President George W. Bush. Families who lost relatives in the attacks voiced outrage on March 4, 2004 at President Bush's first ads of his re-election campaign that use images of the devastated World Trade Center to portray him as the right leader for tumultuous times. "Families are enraged," said Bill Doyle, 57, of New York, who is active in several Sept. 11 family groups. "What I think is distasteful is that the president is trying to use 9/11 as a springboard for his re-election."

BUSH STONEWALLS 9/11 COMMISSION, LEAVING THE FAMILIES TO WONDER WHY

Under the Patriot Act laws, albeit no served subpoenas, are public officials who refuse to testify regarding an official investigation of 9-11 a concern to national security?
Is pre-emptive action in order?
Read this and see what you think.

New York Times Feb 26: The commission, which has 10 members and is bipartisan, said in a statement that it had also been informed by the White House that Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, had rejected its request that she testify in public about the intelligence reports that reached her desk before the Sept. 11 attacks. Democratic members of the panel said the administration's moves raised new questions about its willingness to cooperate with the commission, which is investigating intelligence and law enforcement blunders in the months and years before the 2001 attacks. The White House initially opposed creating the panel. The commission called on Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney to reconsider their decision against meeting with all 10 members of the panel. President Bush and Vice President Cheney have agreed to meet privately with the chair and vice chair but prefer not to meet with all members," the statement said, referring to the chairman, Thomas H. Kean, a Republican and former governor of New Jersey; and vice chairman, Lee H. Hamilton, a Democrat and former House member from Indiana. "We hope the president and the vice president will reconsider." The panel said it was "disappointed" by Ms. Rice's decision not to testify at a public hearing, adding, "We believe the nation would be well served by the contribution she can make to public understanding of the intelligence and policy issues being examined by the commission." Ms. Rice has submitted to several hours of questioning at a private session. Her spokesman, Sean McCormack, said the decision against public testimony was made at the recommendation of administration lawyers who warned of separation-of-powers issues (SenderBerl: checks and balances mandates oversight. It is to be praised not condemned and the public misled with "separation-of-power issues.").

SenderBerl: Let us summarily say that when elected high officials shield themselves from public scrutiny and oversight authorities under our system of government, see Essentials: Checks and Balances, Americans Want an Investigation of 9-11 audio excerpts to the left and below (from 2002), then they are a threat to national security, as they have made it very clear during their tenure that they are a threat of our form of government. See Essentials: Regime and Culture Change. The Commission is there as a whitewash and still they are petrified to appear because the Democrats through their very able counsel may throw out one or two questions that resonate through time and history.

President Bush is making a big mistake here for the very reasons set forth by us in 2002 in our interview on the Jeff Rense Show (further attesting that his supporters have covertly abandoned him). Leaders used to be on the front line when their nation went to war and stood at personal risk. Today's leaders are far from the battlefront, and show themselves when they fail to account to the nation they serve, not rule. We know why Bush, Cheney and Rice dread an appearance albeit they have been assured that nothing untoward will happen (Bush and Cheney don't even pretend to offer sworn testimony). Bush and Rice are masters of prepared text; when hit with a question from left field they may slip and touch upon the truths we have been highlighting to the public for seven years. We would love to see Rice asked whether she was aware (and when) of the numerous reports that Al-Quaeda were planning attacks with airplances on major buildings. If she says yes, she then lied when she said what she did after 9-11. If she did not, then how are we to believe that she is the true National Security Advisor? SenderBerl here would like to deploy the logic behind the Patriot Act to suggest that public officials who seek to hide from responding to Committee questions regarding 9-11 and whose associates have indicated plans in hand to put the country under military control should be subject to pre-emptive action and removed from office pending investigation of the disturbing and thus suspicious behavior as outlined by the New York Times story.

The sad aspect of what we write is that we know the truth about what took place on 9-11.
If you have reviewed this site, you should know the truth as well.


Condy Rice on Feb 18 apparently not happy that Bush is not getting rid of her problem
See Essentials:
Condy Rice
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice (R) leans on the chair
belonging to U.S. President George W. Bush in the Oval Office of the White House, February 18, 2004.


Feb 28 04

9/11 panelist may quit over Bush secrecy
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/story/168092p-146920c.html

WASHINGTON - Frustrated by Bush administration restrictions, a former senator said yesterday he might quit the special commission investigating the Sept. 11 terror attacks. Ex-Sen. Bob Kerrey (D-Neb.), now president of New York's New School University, told the Daily News that resigning is "on my list of possibilities" because the administration continues to block the full panel's access to top intelligence officials and materials. "I am no longer ... feeling comfortable that I'm going to be able to read and process what I need in order to participate in writing a report about how it was that 19 men defeated every single defensive system the U.S. put up to kill 3,000 Americans on Sept. 11," said Kerrey.

INSERT MAR 4

Campaign To Force Bush et al To Testify Re- 911

VENEZUELA IS MORE IMPORTANT TO THE NSS AGENDA THAN SYRIA

To understand why read Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage

(02-28) 06:15 PST CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) -- Clashes between police and thousands of protesters pressing for the recall of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez overshadowed a summit of developing nations, with at least two people killed and dozens injured. The confrontation came Friday as Chavez opened a two-day summit with the leaders of 18 other developing nations in Caracas, urging them to reject free-market policies imposed by industrialized nations. "Globalization has not brought expected independence. It has increased dependence. ... It has extended poverty," Chavez said. "Free market ideology was created by the North to serve its own interests."

A 1000 word capsule of where we are….
By Joseph B. Ehrlich
IMPORTANT NEW MATERIAL INSERTED BELOW

Arnold Schwarzenegger on Meet the Press Feb 22 2004 de facto confirms
SenderBerl's position on August 9, 2003 that Karl Rove behind the CA recall

SenderBerl stands on its position that absent ultimate occupation of Syria and Iran, President Bush will not be allowed by his own major supporters to sit another four years in the White House. (NEW LINK TO NOV 19 03 SENDERBERL INTERPRETATION).This was the predicate for the unified action seen to undermine Howard Dean.

US signals 'possible use of force' over Iran weapons

A senior American state department official says Iran is still trying to develop nuclear weapons, and the United States will consider all options to deal with the problem, including the possible use of force.UN nuclear weapons inspectors say they have found plans for an advanced centrifuge that Tehran failed to declare while disclosing its atomic program. Diplomats say the plans don't represent a new nuclear capability, but the State Department's John Bolton says the findings show Iran isn't co-operating with the UN inspectors. 2/13/2004 http://www.abc.net.au/ra/newstories/RANewsStories_1044197.htm

NEW INSERT FEB 19: EVIDENCE MOUNTS THAT BUSH IS BEING ABANDONED BY KARL ROVE
SENDERBERL EXPLAINED THAT IN JAN 04 THE DECISION WAS MADE FOR KERRY GEPHARDT
WE NOW AWAIT TO SEE IF OUR GEPHARDT INTERPRETATION IS CORRECT
WE DISLIKE GEPHARDT FOR THE SAME REASONS WE DISLIKED PERES AS RABIN'S SECOND IN COMMAND
USA TODAY WASHINGTON — President Bush finds his ratings slipping as Democrats get closer to picking a nominee and stepping up their attacks. Bush's job approval has been steady this month, but some scores on personal qualities have dipped, according to a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll taken Monday and Tuesday. Bush's slip coincides with growing complaints about slow job growth, accusations that he shirked his National Guard duty in the 1970s, failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and stalled efforts to establish democracy there. His score for honesty and trustworthiness is at the lowest point of his presidency. Just 42% said the president has a clear plan for solving the country's problems.

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush distanced himself Wednesday from White House predictions that the economy will add 2.6 million jobs this year, the second embarrassing economic retreat in a week and new fuel for Democratic criticism. "Now they're already walking backwards on their own predictions," Democratic presidential front-runner John Kerry said in Ohio, where unemployment has risen from 3.9 percent to 6 percent since Bush took office.

INSERT FEB 29

John McClaughlin 2/29/04 notes on NBC the Washington rumors that Karl Rove is proving "incompetent."

SenderBerl has explained this perceived phenomenon and it of course suggests that we have been on target. Now, with John Edwards otherwise deserving the Vice Presidential slot and able to serve as an aid to Kerry in the South, will Kerry pick him or as we have explained Dick Gephardt?

<========>

Republican leaders rebuke Bush aide over jobs

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican speaker of the House of Representatives joined Democrats on Wednesday in rebuking one of President George W. Bush's chief economic advisors for saying the outsourcing of U.S. jobs to workers overseas may benefit the economy.

SenderBerl Commentary
FEBRUARY 16, 2004

It is amazing how some people are led to blow themselves up to protect those really guilty of policy. We proved the point when Richard Perle appeared on NBC's Meet the Press -- that the President and his administration had plans in hand prior to 9-11 and were admittedly waiting for the predicate to take place to take America to war. No one could have made it clearer than Richard Perle. Thereafter the media brings forth Paul O'Neill a good American to take the spotlight on the very issue spilt by Richard Perle. Now, we highlighted that on January 28, 2004, Alan Greenspan went out and told the world in a moment of political lapse that he deplores those that attack outsourcing. Now this poor new White House aide, Harvard credentials and all, is set up, to take the entire media spotlight for the point made by Greenspan. We add some appropriate excerpts. This is the type of loyalty symbolic of Rome. Caesar has made many enemies, and unless he's following our analyses he might be the last to know that Brutus has already planned his political demise in November 2004.

MSNBC Updated: 10:50 a.m. ET Feb. 16, 2004

White House chief economic adviser Greg Mankiw found himself on the hot seat last week as he learned first-hand exactly how sensitive the issue of jobs can be in this presidential election year.

Bush made no mention of the controversy surrounding the chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, Gregory Mankiw, who praised the shifting of U.S. jobs abroad.

WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) -- One day after a rare rebuke from the top Republican lawmaker on Capitol Hill, President Bush's chief economist apologized Thursday for comments seen as insensitive to the plight of the unemployed.

Bush distances himself from aide on exporting jobs

SenderBerl: Let us highlight our perspective on this issue. We encountered a woman who works six days a week 52 weeks a year. She sent her oldest son to college sacrificing herself to afford him a college education. He graduated and is a gifted computer programmer. He spent over a year and could not find any work in the field. He and his fellow graduates all well know that all the potential entry work went to India where it is done costing corporations pennies on the dollar. You should empathize with the sense of injustice felt by this mother. If you can do it, you know that this case of injustice is yet another sign and indication of the agenda in play. It is one that diminishes this nation and its citizens. These people behind it sit in the comfort of knowing they are outside the pale of risk and consequence (in fact they materially benefit, as though they already didn't have enough). Put them and their wealth and greed at risk for a moment, and outsourcing is over.

NEW INSERT FEB 19

Heads should roll' over Iraq
Adviser wants U.S. intelligence chiefs to quit
Cites faulty conclusions on Saddam's weapons

ERIC ROSENBERG
SPECIAL TO THE STAR

WASHINGTON—Richard Perle, a chief proponent of last year's U.S. invasion of Iraq, yesterday called for the chiefs of the Central Intelligence Agency and the U.S. Defence Intelligence Agency to step down because of their faulty conclusions that Saddam Hussein possessed mass-killing weapons.
Feb. 18, 2004. 01:00 AM

SenderBerl: It obviously isn't enough for Paul O'Neill to have been put on the sacrificial altar for Perle's loose lips on Meet the Press. Now, let's clean house at the CIA to let that agency know that their future is TOTALLY political as well. What Perle is hot over, aside from masking his own failings to the NWO schematic, is that Tenet should have known the backstop strategy as detailed by us in Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage would fail. Perle's de facto position in any event was to declare war on the entire Middle East. The only failure was, as we interpreted, based on the biblical plane, that, like Clinton, despite the best laid plans, despite carrying four aces, and one up their sleeves, the agenda would not play out as they anticipated. However, in keeping up with their own ego driven course, they fail to glean the message to them.

Key Pentagon Advisor Richard Perle Resigns Post as Head of Defense Policy Panel
Jenny Falcon
New York
27 Feb 2004, 02:10 UTC
A Defense Department adviser who is considered a major force behind the U.S. decision to go to war in Iraq has resigned from a Pentagon board he had served on for 17 years. Richard Perle announced his resignation in New York.

WILL ALAN GREENSPAN NOW RAISE INTEREST RATES?
FEBRUARY 15, 2004

If you had the opportunity to see the audiovisual presentation, then you will have marveled at the remarkable news this past week when OPEC announced its intent to keep oil prices high!

OPEC to Cut Crude Output by 1 Million Barrels a Day  
Published: February 10, 2004
ALGIERS, Feb 10 — OPEC sought to strengthen its grip on world oil markets today with a surprise announcement that it was cutting its production, in an aggressive display of its desire to maintain oil prices at their highest level in two decades.*** Officials from large oil-importing nations such as the United States and Japan reacted to OPEC's move with apprehension. "

Not only did OPEC take this action, but also they made it clear why they were taking the action:

FEB 11 2004:Obaid bin Saif Al-Nasseri, the UAE's energy minister, said: "This decision is pre-emptive action against a fall in prices." Opec is worried about a short-term price collapse as winter ends in the US and Europe - the largest importers of oil.

The language “pre-emptive action” was no coincidence or accident. Since OPEC has declared retaliation, the dollar faces the specter of a steep and sudden plunge. Alan Greenspan therefore may be compelled to take pre-emptive action himself and raise interest rates to keep the dollar’s drop at bay, or even raise it more than anyone expects, as his own form of retaliation.

It’s global political theater at its finest. All in all, when governments are in the ring, you don’t want to get in the way of locomotives playing chicken.

In a bold new interpretation on February 6, 2004 , SenderBerl furthers its explanation why Kerry will win by highlighting its perspective that Kerry will choose Gephardt as his running mate and if the case why we urge Kerry to reject Gephardt for the very same reason Nixon ultimately would not succumb to the pressure to choose Nelson Rockefeller to replace Spiro Agnew, when the latter became the first Vice-President to be removed from office in the politically expedient manner recorded by history. The consequences for masking the truths connective to the Kennedy assassination continue to plague this nation, as political theater continues to demean the nation.

Atheism lessons planned for schools
15 February 2004
http://education.independent.co.uk/news/story.jsp?story=491532

SENDERBERL: IT SEEMS THAT THE ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGENDA ENTAILS THE BRITISH DOING MORE THAN RELINQUISHING THE BRITISH POUND

Government considering dismantling BBC
SENDERBERL EARLIER COMMENT


Sun Feb 15, 4:01 AM ET

LONDON (AFP) - The government is considering a plan to break up the BBC and remove its independent status in the wake of a bitter row with the state-funded broadcaster over the Iraq (news - web sites) war, a report said.

SenderBerl: It's a full frontal assault. They are moving fast because the word is finally out and the faster they finish obtaining full operational global control the better for them and the worse for those who have sat too long on their hands with tape over their mouths.

SENDERBERL HAS BEEN HIGHLIGHTING THE STORY BELOW SINCE THE SECOND PHASE OF THE IRAQI WAR. THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH OUR PERSPECTIVE THAT THE U.S. MILITARY HAS TO BE EMASCULATED TO IMPLEMENT THE NWO SCHEMATIC. LET BUSH CONTROL OPEC AND HE'LL MOVE THE BULK OF THE MILITARY FROM THE MIDDLE EAST TO THE STREETS AND SHELTERS OF AMERICA.

Wounded U.S. Soldiers Maltreated
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=654
February 18, 2004

Combat veterans wounded in Iraq were left waiting weeks and even months for proper medical attention at military bases. According to an officer, their living conditions were so unacceptable for injured soldiers he said they "were being treated like dogs." Then the Pentagon underreported the number wounded.***With the specter of the Vietnam quagmire hanging over them, Bush and Rumsfeld can only talk about a "successful" war by emphasizing the relatively low number of Americans killed in Iraq, and hiding the extraordinarily high number of wounded. But for those who had sacrificed their lives and limbs to preemptively protect the U.S. against Saddam Hussein’s nonexistent weapons of mass destruction, Bush’s war has been a complete failure.

<====>

People from over eighty countries have visited our site over the past seven years to gain an understanding on the macro scale to what is taking place around them and why the world is dramatically changing. Even President Bush stands today blind to the reality that his supporters and friends have already determined that he must lose his bid for a second term. His father no doubt knows the reasons why but to spare his son does not share it with him (aside from being instructed as well not to do so). However, for the global majority, including the vast majority of Americans, it is important to understand what is taking place, for those leading, in the brazen and arrogant manner they do, are taking us to a dark and dire future. Technological advancements and achievements without concurrent growth in the moral ethic foreshadows the very dark future biblically described. SenderBerl urges you to read both Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform for Moral Outrage and Regime and Culture Change Unmasked.

Special Video on the U.S. Dollar presented by Joseph B. Ehrlich
Click on graphics below to link to it.

   

 
             
 


Daily documented performance for January 2004 at www.senderberl.com/january.xls

Supplemental Links
More Supplemental Links


This web site unravels the truth about these stories coming to the public only AFTER the U.S. dollar hits historical lows. Will President Bush, if he wins in 2004, adopt a two tier U.S. dollar? We think so.

Will President Bush, if he wins, allow the dollar to be removed as the international reserve currency? We think so and circumstances should be that he will have no other choice as America is positioned to compromise its sovereignty to willingly accept its submission to one world government.

Your vote in 2004 is important and so is the candidate the Democrats present. This is a serious site for the serious times ahead, as America is allowed to decline in stature and wealth, and it is important to learn why this is being done and what it will take to stop us from falling further into an irreversible slippery slope, one creating a class schism the antithesis to everything this country represented to its citizens and to the world.


Supplemental Links
More Supplemental Links