Richard Clarke’s remarks and revelations on Meet the Press are so vital to the public interest that we decided on top of all else we have recently done to highlight and analyze what he said in the context of 9-11.

Bush's Attacks on Clarke Only Prove He's Right
Sidney Blumenthal writes, "One of the first official acts of the incoming Bush administration in Jan. 2001 was to demote the office of national coordinator for counterterrorism on the National Security Council, a position held by Richard Clarke... Under Clinton, signifying the importance the president attached to the issue, Clarke was elevated to Cabinet rank, which gave him a seat at the Principals Meeting, the decision-making group of the highest figures involved in national security. By demoting the office, Bush and his team sent a signal... about the salience they assigned to terrorism -- below issues they regarded as truly serious, like Star Wars and the military threat of China. By removing Clarke from the table, the Bush administration put him in a box where he could only speak when spoken to. No longer would his memos go to the president; instead they had to pass though a chain of command of Condoleezza Rice and her deputy Stephen Hadley, who bounced every one of them back."

SenderBerl's perception of Condoleezza Rice's true role in the Bush presidency
Important Photo Album Posted
March 27, 2004
This analysis should be linked to by those familiar with the other analyses on this site

Abstract: Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. explains that many mysteries are answered understanding that Condy Rice is not the true National Security Advisor. She was hand selected by Bush 41 in the late 90s to spend two years with his son to teach him foreign affairs. When he won the presidency, Bush 41 fully supported her having the NSA position, where she could be with his son constantly to monitor that he would not revert to drugs or alcohol under the pressures that would arise in connection with the events of 9-11. Most significantly, Bush 41 encouraged a close personal relationship between them because it was essential to his son pulling off his assigned role as President of the United States in the NWO quest to obtain control over Middle East oil.

THIS WE THINK IS DESTINED TO BE THE MOST DARING AND CONTROVERSIAL INTERPRETATION WE HAVE MADE. HOWEVER, WE BELIEVE IT IS TRUE AND IT DEALS WITH MATTERS OF STATE AND THUS WITHIN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

Bush should have demurred from WMD jokes...

as we discuss below during a time of war with soldiers dying daily, He should have spared even a single mother or father the pain he surely caused a parent losing his or her child in the invasion and occupation of Iraq. However, on the deeper level his behavior shows a callousness and indifference bordering on the perceptions we carry in connection with the events of 9-11.

We came to conclude that Condoleezza Rice is not really the National Security Advisor, and certain events and behavior bore it out. Thereby, she was a pawn herself, a dupe in the NWO scheme, to what took place on 9-11. She may have been used by Bush in more ways than one and we believe that she is Bush's Achilles Heel and that there is a deeply dark and important reason why she is not appearing under oath publicly before the 9-11 Commission (where her appearance could activate the full potential of Richard Ben-Veniste to bring out truths that will instantly bury the current administration). Link here to read our special posting following up on Condoleezza Rice. Until President Bush allows the families of 9-11 victims and this country to receive the truth and answers concerning 9-11, it is the obligation of every American to stand on guard against enemies within, especially when the events of 9-11 have platformed an administration winning office by the slimmest of margins willing to change the character and culture of this country and take us onto a path for admitted global domination and control.

Excerpt from Link: SenderBerl cannot rest knowing the truths behind 9-11. SenderBerl cannot accept the acquiescence of the American people to their own subjugation by those who have no respect whatsoever for them, who lie, who deceive and who have plans to make America a third world nation. SenderBerl cannot accept that there has been a silent coup to pursue the course of one world government, denying the American people forever a choice of true representation and democracy, and ultimately allowing evisceration of the Constitution, our government, our heritage with extirpation of the Judeo-Christian ethic and thereby denying the American people justice. The enemies of America like the enemies of Israel are not beyond their borders, they are among the leadership. The long perceived effort to remove G-d from the people of Israel and the United States and to implant hedonism and to institutionalize drugs and other vices and improper values to the children of both countries compelled us to do what we could. This effort is reflected in large part through this site. We have no primary qualm with Condoleezza Rice. She sees those pursuing evil around her as friends, albeit recently from looking at the photographs on this page, she has begun to realize that she has been nothing more than a house pet. Most of those serving as pawns are used by the NWO true leadership, having been manipulated as willing and complicit dupes, being led to believe they are really inside and part and parcel of a "team."
They cannot fathom the depth of the evil of the course that surrounds them and that they too are ultimate victims.

"George Bush didn't tell us the truth about the economy, about job loss, about the true cost of his deceptive prescription drug plan, or about the existence of weapons of mass destruction. There's nothing funny about that."

Should politicians be allowed to laugh publicly in time of war? Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. has only one thing to say: they want to lead, put them and their sons and families onto the sands of Iraq and let their beepers ring and see whether they would carry on as they all do. If they want to have a good time, let them leave the political field. If they want to speak and represent the American people, let them be in a position where they are absent joviality because in these times their ability to laugh does not reflect the sentiment of the American people.

Thus, the answer to the question is that they show great disrespect for the American people by laughing in public. They should have in times of war respect for the mothers and fathers that on this day they are publicly laughing lost their sons and daughters. If one of them would lose their child would they all be out there laughing? Then what is the difference between their losing a son or daughter and anyone else during a day of a time of war? They should all apologize, but Bush laughing publicly and at WMD, to boot, is disgusting {let us all also be the first to tell you that they can laugh because they don't see America at war. If America was at war it would be under serious threat. What they see is a bunch of serfs out there in a campaign to seize control of oil. It is as though they were a bunch of mercenaries, however, they have enlisted them to do the dangerous work for a penny on the dollar. You see, they don't subscribe to outsourcing when they get cheap labor here at home}. We're sorry. The truth hurts. They even handed injured soldiers bills for food and services when they were hospitalized. What else do you need to hear?

Let's Look at Reality: There are only 583 Soldiers and their families not laughing...

But 2,928 maimed and injured Soldiers, some no doubt for life, who were sitting by their TVs got a chance to enjoy the President's jokes about WMD. We're surprised he didn't invite a couple of them to join him on the dais.

A Daily Look at U.S. Deaths in Iraq

By The Associated Press

As of Wednesday, March 24, 583 U.S. service members have died since the beginning of military operations in Iraq a year ago, according to the Department of Defense. Of those, 394 died as a result of hostile action and 190 died of non-hostile causes, the department said. The British military has reported 58 deaths; Italy, 17; Spain, eight; Bulgaria, five; Ukraine, three; Thailand, two; Denmark, Estonia and Poland have reported one each. Since May 1, when President Bush declared that major combat operations in Iraq had ended, 446 U.S. soldiers have died--279 as a result of hostile action and 167 of non-hostile causes, according to the military. Since the start of military operations, 2,928 U.S. service members have been injured as a result of hostile action, according to the Defense Department. Non-hostile injured numbered 434. ___

Those that just missed having a chance of enjoying President Bush's humor...

The latest deaths reported by the military: --Army Spc. Clint Matthews, 31, Bedford, Pa.; died Friday from injuries he suffered when his vehicle went over an embankment in Baji, Iraq, on March 17; assigned to 1st Battalion, 18th Infantry Regiment, Schweinfurt, Germany. --Army Pfc. Bruce Miller, Jr., 23, Orange, N.J., died Monday from non-hostile injuries in Mosul, Iraq; assigned to the 2nd Infantry Battalion, 3rd Infantry Regiment, 2nd Infantry Division, Fort Lewis, Wash. AP-NY-03-25-04 0025EST

Analysis of Select Portions of March 24^th 9-11 Proceedings

Clarke began his testimony with an apology to loved ones of those roughly 3,000 people killed in the attacks on airliners, the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

"Your government failed you, and I failed you," he said. "We tried hard, but that doesn't matter because we failed you. And for that failure, I would ask, once all the facts are out, for your understanding and for your forgiveness."

SenderBerl: This apology by Clarke suggests that there is something to apologize for. Firefighters who valiantly try to save a child from a burning house will apologize to the parents as a matter of courtesy and form when failing to extract the child. This type of apology does not indicate fault. Thus, for the record, failure does not suggest culpable fault. Thus, again, it is important to keep your eye on the ball. The true issue is whether there is complicity for an event without which the plans in hand could not unravel.

March 24 2004 Ben-Veniste questioning Armitage

BEN-VENISTE: Is it correct that -- let me go to the period of just prior to 9/11. At this point you were confirmed?

ARMITAGE: Yes, sir.

BEN-VENISTE: At this point you were aware, were you not, of the most heightened alert level in the United States up to that point with respect to the potential for a terrorist attack of significant magnitude.

ARMITAGE: Yes, I was. I was one of those to whom Director Tenet turned, along with other seniors in the administration, and made it very clear that we had a big problem coming. He didn't know where and he didn't know when, but he said it was coming.

SenderBerl: This is proof positive of affirmative malfeasance. Foreign intelligence agencies pointed out that American surveillance of the skies and seas were lacking on 9-11 and without question the response or should we say lack of military response proved the point.

SenderBerl again highlights to you that the President’s schedule on September 7 dramatically changed to allow him to visit two elementary schools in a non election period and year to read with second graders AFTER being criticized for being away from Washington at his ranch the entire month of August. Thus while the President keeps saying his qualified statement that if he knew terrorists were going to strike on the morning of 9-11 he would have done everything to prevent the attack, it leaves open for the record whether he knew that an attack was otherwise imminent and that there were many around him who were awaiting it to launch the agenda that unraveled immediately after 9-11.

It is relevant right in here to keep in mind the following two questions prepared by the Family Steering Committee

14. Your schedule for September 11, 2001 was in the public domain since September 7, 2001.  The Emma E. Booker School is only five miles from the Bradenton Airport, so you, and therefore the children in the classroom, might have been a target for the terrorists on 9/11.  What was the intention of the Secret Service in allowing you to remain in the Emma E. Booker Elementary School, even though they were aware America was under attack?

15.  Please explain why you remained at the Sarasota, Florida, Elementary School for  a press conference after you had finished listening to the children read, when as a terrorist target, your presence potentially jeopardized the lives of the children?

BEN-VENISTE: Now, Dr. Rice told us that Mr. Clark had briefed her that there were Al Qaida sleeper cells in the United States. Dr. Rice told us that she did not know what basis Mr. Clarke had for that. She told us that the FBI was trying to actively find Al Qaida personnel. She did not, she told us, talk to Richard Clarke prior to 9/11 about the potential for Al Qaida sleeper cells. Were she here, I would ask her the question as to why she did not discuss the issue of Al Qaida sleeper cells in the United States with her counterterrorism coordinator. Do you have any information you might be able to shed on that subject?

ARMITAGE: No, of course not.

BEN-VENISTE: Dr. Rice, following 9/11, made a statement that -- I want to make sure I get it right -- she said, I don't think anybody could have predicted that those people could take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center. Take another one, and slam it into the Pentagon. That they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile.Do you recall that she made that statement publicly?

ARMITAGE: No, I didn't see that.

SenderBerl: When a witness uses this type of technique in answering the question, it shows he was prepared to obfuscate the Commission’s inquiry and further he is not serving his duty to his public office.

BEN-VENISTE: Similarly, yesterday, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld made a statement with respect to anticipating the use of commercial airplanes as weapons. And then after I questioned him about it, he retracted that statement and said that he personally could not have or did not imagine that such a thing might happen. Dr. Rice told us privately that she wished to correct that statement that she made publicly by saying to us that she misspoke and that she, like Secretary Rumsfeld yesterday, would say that she could not have imagined using planes as missiles. Can you shed any light on who then in the apparatus of protecting the United States against threats, both foreign and domestic, ought to be coordinating this information for the benefit of the president?

ARMITAGE: I know that the director of Central Intelligence had, on at least one occasion to my knowledge, talked about hijacking of aircraft. I just don't think we had the imagination required to consider a tragedy of this magnitude. I don't know what other answer to tell you. We didn't have a homeland security czar. We've traditionally, generally, in terrorism unfortunately looked overseas. Of course, that's the major direction of Secretary Powell's and my attention.

SenderBerl: This should make the families of the victims bitter indeed. Al-Qaeda historically has shown little imagination in implementing terrorism but here the United States government declares it lacked the imagination to perceive planes being used against buildings but Al-Qaeda not only then had the imagination to plan the deed but also had the capability of carrying it off! Do you see the folly of Armitage’s argument to wit that therefore Al-Qaeda is more competent and imaginative than the U.S. government and therefore better suited to implement such actions. Further, if this in fact is the case the entire current government responsible for security should be sent to pasture because if they admit to not having the creative ability to anticipate the terrorism how in the world can such people be suited to protect us against further attack? Will they claim the next act of terrorism as successful due to their inability to imagine it? The point of course is that they didn’t need imagination at all. When four planes went off transponders, our military defensive apparatus, costing taxpayers untold billions of dollars, should have intervened. But they were kept grounded. This is where the Commission shows itself to be a whitewash. The real message of the Commission is for Bush and friends to retire; similar to Netanyahu telling Peres don’t succeed in winning in Israel after Rabin’s assassination unless you want the public to start seeing proof revealed regarding what really took place.

Further, the National Security Agency misses nothing monitoring telephone and E-mail around the world. If they didn't know that there were allegedly nineteen hijackers here in the United States with plans to implement 9-11, we will eat crow. We know that out government is quite expertise and adept when it wishes to be and demures from the truth when it has reason to hide truths from the American people. What did Commission Member Kerrey say when he threatened to resign his post: "I am no longer ... feeling comfortable that I'm going to be able to read and process what I need in order to participate in writing a report about how it was that 19 men defeated every single defensive system the U.S. put up to kill 3,000 Americans on Sept. 11."

BEN-VENISTE: Well, can you tell me, since you're sitting in for Dr. Rice, what it was that Dr. Rice had before her to suggest that the United States might be a target in this period of extraordinarily heightened threat during the summer of 2001?

ARMITAGE: I can't.

***

BEN-VENISTE: Have you paid attention to at least some of the appearances Dr. Rice has made on the airwaves?

ARMITAGE: No, actually I haven't.

***

BEN-VENISTE: Well, when did you learn for the first time that Al Qaida was responsible for the Cole?

ARMITAGE: I don't know the exact date. I think it's just like building coral: came to the conclusion.

BEN-VENISTE: Some time after March?

ARMITAGE: Yes, that would be my recollection.

BEN-VENISTE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thank you, Mr. Secretary.

SenderBerl:: When did you learn that Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9-11? A real inquiry would pursue the important issue whether he and others could believe, even with their admitted lack of imagination, whether from their knowledge of previous acts of terrorism, whether Al-Qaeda could have pulled this event off by itself. No one of course appears with demolition expertise and no one of course has appeared to confirm that those at flight school would have near zero chance of hitting two building with the dead point accuracy done on 9-11. It’s all a farce, and the only way more truth will unravel is if Bush insists on re-election. Bush 41 will paint the picture for his son. As we interpreted on November 19, 2003, Bush will not be allowed to undertake a second term unless he can manipulate an environment to platform an attack and occupation of Syria and Iran. Madrid was the first evidence of such an effort but yet again he has fumbled on the twenty-yard line. Now, we have Sharon out to help him out. Its time to bench them all.

Incredible article by Pat Buchanan
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37720

You are now put on notice that America will be a third world nation. So accept it! To add insult to injury Buchanan is telling you that it is your fault. Thus, don't blame him or anyone else, because they now are going to admit to the bad news. You have to understand that everyone who appears in the media on a constant basis is NWO approved. Could you imagine what we would be saying if we were on the air? Again, we remind you that a producer years back wanted to do a one hour special platformed on our thesis in the Princess Diana murder. We laughed and told her they would never allow her to do it. She reminded us that she was an award winning producer and she did what she wanted. Need we tell you who proved correct.

There was some interesting interchange at the 9-11 hearing. We await the transcript. But please do note that the focus is whether Bush could have done more. This is not the issue. This is the focus for those who want to misdirect the public not direct themselves to what is important: what happened and why did the government not intercede as they should have when four planes went off transponder. The families of the victims have lost confidence in their government and their country. They no doubt will be told to read Buchanan's article above so that he can explain to them that the America they believed in, simply said, no longer exists.

Now, with the Supreme Court having the pledge case, the third branch of government can put its signature as to whether it can stand up to the other two corrupted branches of government in this "New America." We really can't take too much more ourselves because the course is set and the consequences are those we have interpreted for quite some time. Can America be saved (recaptured)? We believe so, but it will take a populist movement that doesn't want the elitist centrix admitted to by Buchanan to rule. In Recapturing America we pointed out that Bush 41 just came out one day and said we are in a "New World Order." Once he used the three words he sanitized the coup, which took America on a course without the approval of its citizens. Now, Buchanan comes out and says well we are a third world nation, and you have let the new aristocrats take charge and undermine it -- so you are on notice to keep your mouth shut in the future because it's all your fault.

What have we been telling you? Wake up America. Time has just about run out. The media is there to massage you right back into a status of a serf. You'll work and labor just to make ends meet and without G-d, religion, or anyone in the controlled media to tell you about the injustices part and parcel of your everyday life, you will be a citizen of the new banana republic. You'll be using US dollars to blow your nose. Of course, Buchanan or his surrogate will be on the airwaves telling you that it's all your fault.

Hamas Says It Has No Plans to Strike U.S. Targets
Wed Mar 24, 2004 06:17 AM ET

Bush Wins!
Hamas vowing revenge against America fell right into the trap.
SenderBerl's entire point regarding Madrid and telling pawn and puppet Sharon to do what he did is to bring TERRORISM CENTER STAGE which is the ONLY platform on which Bush can win.

Our point in Madrid was that Al-Qaeda had zip interest in perpetrating terrorism unless they wanted to help the Bush presidential campaign. Now, read this SenderBerl insert again because it shows you that unless we get a 9-11 Commission genuinely pursuing the issue, we are going to see terrorism again in the U.S. probably with the same complicity by the Bush administration as seen on 9-11. Why Condy Rice is scared of appearing before a Commission that will only whitewash it, mystifies us, unless our proposition regarding her role is true.

Don't Think it is Coincidence
Mar 23 2004

So long since 9-11, so long has the world carried anger against Bush administration policies, and then contrary to Al-Qaeda and terrorists interests terrorists blow up trains in Madrid. Aznar's political party bungles it and blames the ETA rather than Al-Qaeda, engendering the ire of the populace who brings in the POSE who moves to withdraw the 1000 Spanish troops from Iraq. The crime in Madrid brings billions of minds throughout the world including not so coincidentally the political psyche of the American people onto terrorism, which returns center stage in line with the Bush administration's political campaign efforts. Now, Sharon does something he could have done all along. However, regardless of the argument whether or not his action was beneficial to Israel, he guarantees an escalation of terrorism in Israel and lays a concrete foundation to support it in the USA. We can only say what we said before. Terrorism in the US helps Bush. Al-Qaeda would not do anything to help Bush. Thus, how convenient that there were no legitimate claims from the deed in Madrid which aside from making terrorism world center stage, helping Bush, would have helped Aznar's political party had it not fumbled the ball put into its lap. To us it smells nearly 100% 9-11. The proof is in the timing. There is only ONE only ONE ONE ONE dynamic on which Bush can coerce and support a victory: that is the US being in the vortex of another act of domestic terrorism. Thus, we the American people are fools, like none before us, for permitting representatives to even breathe another day without having them banging the door for a publicly aired investigation of 9-11. We also have a suggestion. The Congress should invite some independent citizens to ask questions also of the witnesses. If they ever dared to discharge their fiduciary responsibility accordingly, we would call in the Secret Service detail of the morning of 9-11 and ask for a non tampered copy of the Secret Service manual and guidelines. We are really going to be angry if the US is subject to any terrorism between now and election day, because there is no question that terrorists DO NOT INTEND to benefit BUSH and any such act HELPS BUSH IMMENSELY.
Major Analysis on the terrorism in Spain has moved here

Question Received: If Bush's insider circle is intent on sabotaging his re-election, why all these machinations allowing him to bring terrorism center stage?

Answer: The oil cabal is an entity to itself and it not only wants Bush's re-election but it wants to quiet the NWO leadership by giving Bush the platform to complete his mission, by moving for control over Syria and Iran. Thus, Madrid and Sharon in Israel launch their new initiative which kills two birds with one stone. As highlighted it takes Kerry off the front page, puts terrorism front and center stage and puts Bush back in the game as will further be attested to by his poll numbers. Most importantly continued terrorism seals the case and offers the continued platform and opportunity for Bush to complete his mission. Hamas vowing revenge against America fell right into the trap. Anything taking place here in the US thus has a connect the dot nexus to the terrorist network the key to implementation of the NWO Middle East policies. While Kerry is a NWO team member as well, his role would be to smooth over Bush damage. However, Bush, via Madrid and Sharon, has been thrown back into the the game, where with baseball bat in hand he still intends to beat the Middle East into NWO submission and take control over OPEC.

Hamas will be told that it made a dire mistake by vowing revenge against the U.S. However, the Middle East will recognize what we are telling you now, and thus Bush really is pushing the envelope where we believe Middle East leaderships have planned by necessity a retort that will regretfully take us close to devastating war on a dimension and plane never before seen in history. Recently, at Cheney's residence the word is that they are blasting away at a new major nuclear bunker for the Vice-President. He probably knows what we strongly suspect. He and Bush weren't go to roll over and take their lumps for failing in their mission as we have articulated in Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage. Your E-mail to us shows us you sense the tragic times we are in and how dangerous and perilous things are for America, our facing enemies from within and without -- all intent on stripping away all that made this country great. You are right. It is the penalty we are paying for standing dumb and silent regarding TWA Flight 800, Princess Diana, Bill Clinton and 9-11 -- allowing the true enemies of America to undermine America's great wealth not in dollar and cents but in its true national treasures, its Constitution, its principles of government, and its character and commitment to the Judeo-Christian ethic. Should the American people not push, push hard, for the truth regarding 9-11, the silent coup that has put control of this country into the NWO, precluding true elections and candidates of opposing viewpoints, will have fully succeeded and given control of this country back to whom we wrestled it from some 250 years ago. Then NWO pawn Tommy Franks will prove his words correct when history attests that the great experiment called democracy has failed, and this great land will have fallen to our true enemies -- the European aristocracy, whom have returned to rule, and this time with a sophisticated iron hand.

Hamas Says It Has No Plans to Strike U.S. Targets
Wed Mar 24, 2004 06:17 AM ET
Insert MAR 24 04

Clarke didn’t mince words. “Frankly,” he told Stahl, “I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he’s done such great things about terrorism. He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have done something to stop 9/11. Maybe We’ll never know. I think he’s done a terrible job on the war against terrorism.” Ouch! These revelations are particularly damaging because they undercut the only category in which the public approves of Bush’s performance, his alleged leadership in the war on terrorism. According to all recent polls, almost 70 percent of the American public believes Bush is doing a good job in the war on terror. By contrast, most Americans don’t like his economic policies, believe he’s in bed with big business, and are now even questioning his handling of the ongoing war in Iraq. Clarke, a registered Republican who former Clinton Administration aides described as a “hawk,” claimed Bush and his team jumped all over him to come up with evidence that Saddam Hussein was connected to the attacks. When Clarke pointed out that the CIA, FBI, and White House staffs had already thoroughly investigated any potential link between Saddam and Al Qaeda and found none, Bush told him for a third time and in no uncertain terms, “Look into Iraq, Saddam.” http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=689

THE ANSWERS TO MANY OF THE MYSTERIES CAN BE FOUND IN:
Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage
Regime and Culture Change Unmasked

Panel calls for Rice to appear
Associated Press
MAR 23 2004

CAPITOL HILL - Members of the federal panel that's been looking into 9/11 say they're not hearing from everyone they want to hear from. The panel has opened two days of hearings on the anti-terrorism efforts of the Bush and Clinton administrations before 9/11. The ten-member panel had invited National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice to testify. She declined, with the White House citing concerns about separation of powers. One panel member says that's not a good enough excuse. Another mentioned the book written by former anti-terrorism adviser Richard Clarke, who accuses the Bush administration of downplaying the al-Qaida threat before 9/11. Former Democratic Congressman Timothy Roemer also noted that Rice has been featured in the media disputing Clarke's claims. He suggests the debate shouldn't be played out in the media, but before the panel.
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=688
For example, Kristen Breitweiser, one of four New Jersey widows of the 9/11 disaster who also lobbied Congress and the president to appoint this commission made this simple observation: “How is it possible we have a national security advisor coming out and saying we had no idea they could use planes as weapons when we had FBI records from 1991 stating that this is a possibility.”

RECOMMENDED: http://etherzone.com/2004/raim032404.shtml

Bravo!
A must read link for public action re 9-11. Please link.

Here are two questions posited for President Bush!

14. Your schedule for September 11, 2001 was in the public domain since September 7, 2001.  The Emma E. Booker School is only five miles from the Bradenton Airport, so you, and therefore the children in the classroom, might have been a target for the terrorists on 9/11.  What was the intention of the Secret Service in allowing you to remain in the Emma E. Booker Elementary School, even though they were aware America was under attack?

15.  Please explain why you remained at the Sarasota, Florida, Elementary School for  a press conference after you had finished listening to the children read, when as a terrorist target, your presence potentially jeopardized the lives of the children?

Support Them!
Questions prepared by:
The Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
http://www.911independentcommission.org/

http://tomflocco.com/index.php

Major Comment Mar 22 04 from Joseph B. Ehrlich
Inserted Below

Rense.com posted an article prepared by us on some recent interpretations.
The Meaning and Consequences

About Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
(after reading the above, you might particularly enjoy the following link)

SenderBerl has added essential links to the left of the lead page.

This web site provides, according to your own comments to us, some of the finest substance on the Internet. It is designed to assist those who wish to look into deeper planes to find and verify truths. Once doing so, it would be the ultimate goal, due to the dire straits once described by us and now apparent, to help you to recognize a duty to do your own part in helping put America and thus the world back on track. When we wrote Recapturing America way back in December 1996, completing it in January 1997, we were way ahead of the curve in recognizing the agenda in play. However, our goal was to highlight the evil design of an agenda masking itself in noble motives and aims. When you see what our children have been and are exposed to on television, public education sabotaged, drugs institutionalized, and recognize that students in college are being openly solicited for the sex trade; when you recognize that those in leadership are preparing you to abandon the bedrock of this country, the U.S. Constitution and its Bills of Rights; that it adopts policies domestically and internationally the antithesis of what this country has ALWAYS represented, and that, as we interpreted in Recapturing America, the U.S. dollar would be deliberately sabotaged to make the US compliant to one world government; weakened and maimed to assure that a strong US military and country would not remain in a country planned on being abandoned by those scripting our current course, then you are dealing with those serving an evil design. If you don't see it and accept it seven years later, then you are simply shirking your own duty to take on an active role against it, which can be served in so many affirmative and positive ways, then you will be recorded in history as one of those in this generation that made waste of all the lives lost and sacrifices rendered by those who preceded you, so that you could have what no generation before you could have even dreamed and what you so easily squander for those who follow.
ADDED IN HTML FORMAT
Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage
Regime and Culture Change Unmasked

History proves serious large scale protests by the public correct.
Those protesting reflect only a small percentage of those sharing their sentiment.
Especially so when the media did nothing to publicize that public protests would be taking place.
News story worth reading
http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFreePress/News/2004/03/21/389789.html
SENDERBERL BELIEVES THAT IF THE US ECONOMY CAN BE GENUINELY HELPED; IF WE CAN GET A NEW PRESIDENT, IF WE CAN KEEP AMORAL CORPORATIONS OUT OF CONGRESS AND WE CAN GET A LEADERSHIP RESPECTING OUR JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ROOTS WHO IS WILLING TO DO, NOT TALK, AND DEAL WITH THE DRUG AND EDUCATION PROBLEMS IN THIS COUNTRY, AND JUST SPEAK THOSE FEW WINNING WORDS TO RALLY THE COUNTRY TO A GENUINE COURSE, AMERICA CAN BE RESTORED. YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENED AFTER OUR JAPANESE YEN ANALYSIS. WE SENT THAT TO THE HOUSE AND SENATE. THIS MESSAGE WE SEND TO YOU AND FEEL FREE TO SEND IT TO THE CONGRESS BY WRITING YOURSELF OR PICKING UP A PHONE AND SPEAKING TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVE OR THEIR AIDS/ASSISTANTS. YOU CAN AND WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE. IF YOU READ OUR ANALYSIS ON THE PORTAL FOR ULTIMATE JUSTICE, YOU WILL RECOGNIZE THAT YOUR ACTION UNBEKNOWNST TO YOU CAN AND WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
Special personal commentary by Mr. Ehrlich. Link here
Extract Material Sent to House and Senate Intelligence Committees
Major Analysis on Japan, Yen and U.S. Dollar has moved here
Major Analysis on the terrorism in Spain has moved here
SenderBerl notes that the White House has attributed the PP's failing to benefit from the terrorism to the fact that they unwisely attributed it to the ETA rather than Al-Qaeda, as we interpreted from the get go. However, the failing belongs to Bush 43 with the consequences enumerated by us by the link and by the Major Comment dated March 22, 2004.

MAR 17 04: SenderBerl Interprets New Threat to France as Real

SenderBerl does not believe it is Al-Qaeda and that a new elevated element has now emerged.
Read our perspective here

Major Comment Mar 22 04 from Joseph B. Ehrlich

This weekend’s news shows gave us enormous support for interpretations long made and held by Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. The following is highly important from our respectful point of view:

1. While Richard Clarke’s interviews were quite damaging to the Bush administration, the most important thing he said is something generally overlooked by the media and others. Clarke said that Clinton could not get the CIA and FBI to deal with terrorism issues. This is directly supportive of our analysis that when Bush 41 lost in his re-election bid it was imperative under the N.W.O. agenda to make sure that Clinton didn’t eliminate Saddam for he was the bogeyman serving as the future platform for the intrusion into the Middle East for oil. The oil cabal surely had no intention on seeing Clinton reap the windfall of an attack and victory over Iraq. They had no intention on seeing him and his own cabal, Democrats no less, in the oil business. Thus, this confirms what we knew all along: that Clinton was directed to deal with Saddam in a manner where he would remain the latch key for what unraveled as 9-11, the final required predicate for the Middle East invasion.
   
2. Clarke noted his surprise and dismay over Cheney failing to speak out against Al-Qaeda. When you understand that there are inside agendas and then there are deeper inside agendas, you will easily understand and see how all the pieces fit together.
   
3. The most important thing Clarke said to foreshadow Bush’s upcoming woes is his remarks on Condolezzaa Rice, which parallel our own perceptions. He said no NSA was ever closer to the President of the United States than in her relationship with President Bush. He described it as an unusually close relationship with Bush. When we featured the interpretation inserted immediately below, we had concluded that Condy Rice was George Bush’s true Achilles Heel. Although highly educated and well positioned with experience, there is a dark side to her role in the White House. We want to say no more than her service to President Bush sends a mocking message to Bill Clinton and one that regretfully truly mocks us the citizens of the USA and our government. However, suffice it to say, Clarke verified that she seemed to not even recognize the dynamics attendant to Al-Qaeda and there is no question that she operated as the most ignorant NSA ever to publicly serve the President. The truth of it as she and other deep insiders know: she is not the NSA and thus her dread and refusal to appear under oath in public especially if PUBLICLY questioned UNDER OATH as we said by the counsel for the Democratic side of the 9-11 Commission. Thus, as far as we can see, Kennedy and others, have moved to have Bush agree to throw the election for the good of the country (similar to what took place on several dimensions after Jack Kennedy’s assassination), but it seems to date that Bush is resisting, stubborn as he is, and thus more and more is being leaked until he gets the point that he has no choice. As we said, what Bush 43 doesn’t fully know, is that even his N.W.O. backers have covertly and very silently agreed not to support his re-election. There is no way the Democratic insiders and others are going to tolerate his continuing on, with not only the degree of global alienation, but more importantly his continuing to fail in his missions including the one where he was supposed to be from the get go in Syria and Iran and now his fumbling Madrid.
   
   

   License to Lie

   
   INSERTED FEB 4 2004
   
   A NSA who is trembling about 9-11, admitting to standing without knowledge about terrorists planning to deploy airplanes against buildings. She didn't lie to the media under the intense first spotlights of 9-11. It would have been prima facie evidence that someone so stupid could hold such an important post. Thus, if she didn't lie, and otherwise didn't know, why is she in every central photo next to the President of the United States, including the one where the President was kept waiting for Jiang Zemin's arrival at his Crawford ranch? She looks as though she has a central role, and is ever present as though she has a central role, but how can someone in such a central role not know what she should have known as NSA and now stands afraid to testify before the 9-11 commission, which exists to whitewash 9-11 (unless she's not privy to that either)? She has an important role. But what is it?
   
   Someone really detests this nation and we are quite frankly upset that the American people tolerate the way this country is being demeaned and defaced instead of built to its great potential because of people who have concluded that it must be abandoned and left as a weak, maimed country with a globally perceived depraved people incubated and nourished by television programming standards that increasingly become the central focus of daily life for the vast majority of American people. This country's heritage is too precious to squander as this generation seems all to willing to do. What purpose is education if the American people act lame, blind and stupid? How much longer will the American people sit and allow themselves to be so disgraced by those carring absolutely no respect for them?
   

4. Clarke’s most apparent and open damaging remark from where we sit is that Bush will be recorded and seen by history as the President who among other failings spurred on a new wave of emerging elevated terrorism. President Bush, Clarke asserted, was a living recruitment poster boy for Al-Qaeda and he did specifically note that if Bush were to move against Syria and Iran to ultimately move to undermine the Saudi Regime, one would shudder to think of the consequences. Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. has said and concluded that the window that he missed was during the initial invasion against Iraq. Our exposition details that the Pentagon had two levels of high confidence: that Saddam would use it during the invasion against Iraq and if incredibly as it sounded then if he did not that they would use the back stop: it’s discovery. The most important event and dynamic of this time (which should be tacked on to Arafat turning down Clinton and Barak’s offer of Jerusalem and the West Bank) is the fact that Saddam did in fact dispose of all of it and there were no WMD to be found. Now, in this regard, there is an earth-shattering article that appeared on the Internet – so earth shattering that we reproduce it in full. It says there was a black op agenda by the shadow government to plant WMD as a double backstop concurrent with the invasion. However, when the team of 100 assigned to the task confronted the opportunity of loading the plane with cash, billions of it from Iraqi banks and Saddam’s art collection, they fumbled the mission in terms of WMD. When collected together in Iraq it seems, from what we can glean from the article, asserting that they all died from friendly fire, Cheney or another (Tenet perhaps) misdirected two bunker buster bombs for them.
   
   US tried to plant WMDs, failed: whistleblower

   Daily Times Monitor
   
   According to a stunning report posted by a retired Navy Lt Commander and 28-year veteran of the Defense Department (DoD), the Bush administration’s assurance about finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was based on a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) plan to “plant” WMDs inside the country. Nelda Rogers, the Pentagon whistleblower, claims the plan failed when the secret mission was mistakenly taken out by “friendly fire”, the Environmentalists Against War report. Nelda Rogers is a 28-year veteran debriefer for the DoD. She has become so concerned for her safety that she decided to tell the story about this latest CIA-military fiasco in Iraq. According to Al Martin Raw.com, “Ms Rogers is number two in the chain of command within this DoD special intelligence office. This is a ten-person debriefing unit within the central debriefing office for the Department of Defense.” The information that is being leaked out is information “obtained while she was in Germany heading up the debriefing of returning service personnel, involved in intelligence work in Iraq for the DoD and/or the CIA. “According to Ms Rogers, there was a covert military operation that took place both preceding and during the hostilities in Iraq,” reports Al Martin Raw.com, an online subscriber-based news/analysis service which provides “Political, Economic and Financial Intelligence”. Al Martin is a retired Lt Commander (US Navy), the author of a memoir called “The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran-Contra Insider,” and is considered one of America’s foremost experts on corporate and government fraud. Ms Rogers reports that this particular covert operation team was manned by former military personnel and “the unit was paid through the Department of Agriculture in order to hide it, which is also very commonplace”. According to Al Martin Raw.com, “the Agriculture Department has often been used as a paymaster on behalf of the CIA, DIA, NSA and others”. According to the Al Martin Raw.com story, another aspect of Ms Rogers’ report concerns a covert operation which was to locate the assets of Saddam Hussein and his family, including cash, gold bullion, jewelry and assorted valuable antiquities. The problem became evident when “the operation in Iraq involved 100 people, all of whom apparently are now dead, having succumbed to so-called ‘friendly fire’. The scope of this operation included the penetration of the Central Bank of Iraq, other large commercial banks in Baghdad, the Iraqi National Museum and certain presidential palaces where monies and bullion were secreted.” “They identified about $2 billion in cash, another $150 million in Euros, in physical banknotes, and about another $100 million in sundry foreign currencies ranging from Yen to British Pounds,” reports Al Martin.
   
   “These people died, mostly in the same place in Baghdad, supposedly from a stray cruise missile or a combination of missiles and bombs that went astray,” Martin continues. “There were supposedly 76 who died there and the other 24 died through a variety of ‘friendly fire’, ‘mistaken identity’ and some of them—their whereabouts are simply unknown.” Ms Rogers’ story sounds like an updated 21st-century version of Treasure Island meets Ali Baba and the Bush Cabal Thieves, writes Martin.
   
   “This was a contingent of CIA/ DoD operatives, but it was really the CIA that bungled it,” Ms Rogers said. “They were relying on the CIA’s ability to organise an effort to seize these assets and to be able to extract these assets because the CIA claimed it had resources on the ground within the Iraqi army and the Iraqi government who had been paid. That turned out to be completely bogus. As usual.” “CIA people were supposed to be handling it,” Martin continues. “They had a special ‘black’ aircraft to fly it out. But none of that happened because the regular US Army showed up, stumbled onto it and everyone involved had to scramble. These new Iraqi “asset seizures” go directly to the New US Ruling Junta. The US Viceroy in Iraq Paul Bremer is reportedly drinking Saddam’s $2000 a bottle Napoleon-era brandy, smoking his expensive Davidoff cigars and he has even furnished his office with Saddam’s Napoleon-era furniture. http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/?page=story_12-8-2003_pg1_9
   
   This is an incredible event and one that signifies to the N.W.O. the operation of forces of a heavenly nature against their schemes and designs. They are being sent continual messages but as arrogant and stubborn as they are, they are accustomed to prevailing and they don’t want to read the handwriting on the wall. We endeavor to tell those complicit in such greed that they will be held to account. What is incredible to us is that they who have such wealth, wealth for several lifetimes, just have no conscience in moving for more of it and stand willing to do the evil they do to obtain it seeking permanent control of the planet’s resources to boot.

5. Richard Clarke was pushed out since he was out of the loop and too aggressive and open in questioning the many things that dismayed him when he sat in on terrorism issues and questions. He further noted that what disturbed him was that he sensed post 9-11 that the event was the platform for political benefits and decisions. No doubt about it. The one thing he would not say otherwise apparent from what we all know is that the Bush administration at the ultimate high levels, meaning the President and those truly backing him, with select military, were complicit in 9-11. Either Bush has to agree to pass on re-election (covertly of course), or else the Democrats will open the gateway to the truth of it all via their involvement in the 9-11 Commission. Thus, the Commission stands operative as insurance that Bush will do as he agrees. The problem however we note is that he has not agreed to date. Bush 41 ultimately will have to paint the obvious for his son. Thus, under any construction our November 19, 2003 interpretation that Bush would not be supported by his own people (including his father) for re-election unravels as an accurate assessment.
   
   Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage
   Regime and Culture Change Unmasked
   
6. Condy Rice wrote an Op-Ed piece for the Washington Post and we do not intend to pick on her but she keeps on burying herself big time. She asserts in the first paragraph of her Op-Ed that the U.S. government worked hard prior to 9-11 to counter the Al-Qaeda threat.  She has the gall to say under the complicity of this administration in 9-11 that “The seriousness of the threat was well understood by the president and his national security principals.” She is the same person telling Chavez after the coup attempt to respect Constitutional principles, when the US directed that Venezuela’s Constitution be revoked and a dictatorship imposed. More relevant is that she is the person who announced to the general public that the administration had no idea that Al-Qaeda had any plans to use planes for terrorism by directing them into buildings (when there were already some three reports in that very regard in the intelligence pipeline).
   
7. What Senator Kennedy emphasized on Meet the Press was Bush’s dismal failing in his “No Child Left Behind Program.” The very sad reality my fellow citizens is that they both, Democrats and Republicans, have failed in education and in allowing drugs to become mainstream and available to everyone including our children. Thus, the very sad point is that the contest between the two parties is which group will control the crime in place against America and the American people. Those deep insiders in the Republican party connect with the agenda in Recapturing America, and their design to abandon us, when the now confirmed, this past week, new admitted reality that Whites ultimately will be a minority in the USA when it turns into a Black Hispanic country. Not to be overly cynical, one of the myriad of reasons the Hispanic people were allowed to flood into the USA was not to make it a manifest future BLACK AND WHITE  issue. Thus, this allowed us to recognize plans way back when to weaken the military for when the country is abandoned they did not intend to leave it with the world’s foremost military machine and THUS OUR ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE THE TRUTH BEHIND THE EMERGENCE OF THE NEW ALTERNATIVE TO NATO POST THE IRAQI INVASION -- A NATO WITHOUT THE INCLUSION OF THE U.S.

All the pieces fit and increasingly so. Our point is that we did not set out to be right but to make you aware that your future was going to be dim dire and dark. The entire bull market during the Clinton tenure was for you to wallow in your own greed and wealth, while this country’s true wealth was being stripped away from it layer by layer – your allowing the covert shadow government to emerge and implement their evil design primarily attested and seen by the events of 9-11. When Israel sat stupid and silent after the assassination of its Prime Minister, it opened the portal to its destruction. History will surely show that if the US sits equally stupid and silent regarding 9-11, that it will join Israel in the slide into the deeper and darker levels of the abyss.

Joseph B. Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
March 22, 2004

Another Recapturing America Issue moves to the Forefront!

Wed Mar 17 2004 14:49:40 ET // America in 2050: Whites will be down to half the population /// By 2050 minority groups will make up 49.9 percent of the U.S. population, it will be reported Thursday. Asians and Hispanics will see the most dramatic increases between now and midcentury, cenusus sources explain, ahead of a news release...
Filed By Matt Drudge...

Remember, our telling you that the elitist centrix were those who ran over the children of those outside their class, and then sent the parents a bill for inconvenience caused them and the injury to their horses?

Well, link to this article and find out that our world is truly upside down and returning where it once was: to the hands of those who seek to enslave and oppress and who operate with an arrogance hard to describe yet believe. Here we have a man unjustly imprisoned for 25 years and there are those in the English government who are willing to send him a bill for some $125,000 for food and lodging. Incredible. Don't forget that there were those in the U.S. military injured in the Iraqi war who also received a bill for food from the US Government, while hospitalized with their injuries. Is it a bad dream? Sometimes we really think so.

http://www.sundayherald.com/40592

WHAT do you give someone who’s been proved innocent after spending the best part of their life behind bars, wrongfully convicted of a crime they didn’t commit? An apology, maybe? Counselling? Champagne? Compensation? Well, if you’re David Blunkett, the Labour Home Secretary, the choice is simple: you give them a big, fat bill for the cost of board and lodgings for the time they spent freeloading at Her Majesty’s Pleasure in British prisons. On Tuesday, Blunkett will fight in the Royal Courts of Justice in London for the right to charge victims of miscarriages of justice more than £3000 for every year they spent in jail while wrongly convicted. The logic is that the innocent man shouldn’t have been in prison eating free porridge and sleeping for nothing under regulation grey blankets.

http://www.freepressinternational.com/new_world_disorder.html

More than a decade ago, after Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, President George H. W. Bush explicitly sought to initiate, as he put it to Congress, a "new world order." He made that momentous declaration on Sept. 11, 1990. Eleven years later, the suddenly mystical date of 9/11 motivated his son to finish what the father began. A year ago this week, Bush the younger launched a war against the man who tried to kill his dad, initiating the opposite of order. The situation hardly needs rehearsing. In Iraq, many thousands are dead, including 564 Americans. Civil war threatens. Afghanistan, meanwhile, is choked by drug-running warlords. Islamic jihadists have been empowered. The nuclear profiteering of Pakistan has been exposed but not necessarily stopped. Al Qaeda's elusiveness has reinforced its mythic malevolence. The Atlantic Alliance is in ruins. The United States has never been more isolated. A pattern of deception has destroyed its credibility abroad and at home. Disorder spreads from Washington to Israel to Haiti to Spain. Whether the concern is subduing resistance fighters far away or making Americans feel safer, the Pentagon's unprecedented military dominance, the costs of which stifle the US economy, is shown to be essentially impotent. ***That Bush retains the confidence of a sizable proportion of the electorate suggests that Americans don't particularly worry anymore about truth as a guiding principle of their government. In that lies the irony. The Bush dynasty has in fact initiated a new order of things. The United States of America has become its own opposite, a nation of triumphant freedom that claims the right to restrain the freedom of others; a nation of a structured balance of power that destroys the balance of power abroad; a nation of creative enterprise that exports a smothering banality; and above all, a nation of forcefully direct expression that disrespects the truth. Whatever happens from this week forward in Iraq, the main outcome of the war for the United States is clear. We have defeated ourselves.

====>Rice-Dean on Meet the Press Mar 14 04

Russert asks Rice outright: Will you testify under oath in public about September 11?

Dean proves that either he or Edwards would be a remarkably helpful running mate for Kerry, assuring him the Presidency.

However, will we prove correct and see Kerry offer it to Gephardt?

SenderBerl stands on its position that absent ultimate occupation of Syria and Iran, President Bush will not be allowed by his own major supporters to sit another four years in the White House. (NEW LINK TO NOV 19 03 SENDERBERL INTERPRETATION).This was the predicate for the unified action seen to undermine Howard Dean.

US signals 'possible use of force' over Iran weapons

A senior American state department official says Iran is still trying to develop nuclear weapons, and the United States will consider all options to deal with the problem, including the possible use of force.UN nuclear weapons inspectors say they have found plans for an advanced centrifuge that Tehran failed to declare while disclosing its atomic program. Diplomats say the plans don't represent a new nuclear capability, but the State Department's John Bolton says the findings show Iran isn't co-operating with the UN inspectors. 2/13/2004 http://www.abc.net.au/ra/newstories/RANewsStories_1044197.htm

NEW INSERT FEB 19: EVIDENCE MOUNTS THAT BUSH IS BEING ABANDONED BY KARL ROVE
SENDERBERL EXPLAINED THAT IN JAN 04 THE DECISION WAS MADE FOR KERRY GEPHARDT
WE NOW AWAIT TO SEE IF OUR GEPHARDT INTERPRETATION IS CORRECT
WE DISLIKE GEPHARDT FOR THE SAME REASONS WE DISLIKED PERES AS RABIN'S SECOND IN COMMAND
USA TODAY WASHINGTON — President Bush finds his ratings slipping as Democrats get closer to picking a nominee and stepping up their attacks. Bush's job approval has been steady this month, but some scores on personal qualities have dipped, according to a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll taken Monday and Tuesday. Bush's slip coincides with growing complaints about slow job growth, accusations that he shirked his National Guard duty in the 1970s, failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and stalled efforts to establish democracy there. His score for honesty and trustworthiness is at the lowest point of his presidency. Just 42% said the president has a clear plan for solving the country's problems.

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush distanced himself Wednesday from White House predictions that the economy will add 2.6 million jobs this year, the second embarrassing economic retreat in a week and new fuel for Democratic criticism. "Now they're already walking backwards on their own predictions," Democratic presidential front-runner John Kerry said in Ohio, where unemployment has risen from 3.9 percent to 6 percent since Bush took office.

INSERT FEB 29

John McClaughlin 2/29/04 notes on NBC the Washington rumors that Karl Rove is proving "incompetent."

SenderBerl has explained this perceived phenomenon and it of course suggests that we have been on target. Now, with John Edwards otherwise deserving the Vice Presidential slot and able to serve as an aid to Kerry in the South, will Kerry pick him or as we have explained Dick Gephardt?

<========>

Republican leaders rebuke Bush aide over jobs

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican speaker of the House of Representatives joined Democrats on Wednesday in rebuking one of President George W. Bush's chief economic advisors for saying the outsourcing of U.S. jobs to workers overseas may benefit the economy.

SenderBerl Commentary
FEBRUARY 16, 2004

It is amazing how some people are led to blow themselves up to protect those really guilty of policy. We proved the point when Richard Perle appeared on NBC's Meet the Press -- that the President and his administration had plans in hand prior to 9-11 and were admittedly waiting for the predicate to take place to take America to war. No one could have made it clearer than Richard Perle. Thereafter the media brings forth Paul O'Neill a good American to take the spotlight on the very issue spilt by Richard Perle. Now, we highlighted that on January 28, 2004, Alan Greenspan went out and told the world in a moment of political lapse that he deplores those that attack outsourcing. Now this poor new White House aide, Harvard credentials and all, is set up, to take the entire media spotlight for the point made by Greenspan. We add some appropriate excerpts. This is the type of loyalty symbolic of Rome. Caesar has made many enemies, and unless he's following our analyses he might be the last to know that Brutus has already planned his political demise in November 2004.

MSNBC Updated: 10:50 a.m. ET Feb. 16, 2004

White House chief economic adviser Greg Mankiw found himself on the hot seat last week as he learned first-hand exactly how sensitive the issue of jobs can be in this presidential election year.

Bush made no mention of the controversy surrounding the chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, Gregory Mankiw, who praised the shifting of U.S. jobs abroad.

WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) -- One day after a rare rebuke from the top Republican lawmaker on Capitol Hill, President Bush's chief economist apologized Thursday for comments seen as insensitive to the plight of the unemployed.

Bush distances himself from aide on exporting jobs

SenderBerl: Let us highlight our perspective on this issue. We encountered a woman who works six days a week 52 weeks a year. She sent her oldest son to college sacrificing herself to afford him a college education. He graduated and is a gifted computer programmer. He spent over a year and could not find any work in the field. He and his fellow graduates all well know that all the potential entry work went to India where it is done costing corporations pennies on the dollar. You should empathize with the sense of injustice felt by this mother. If you can do it, you know that this case of injustice is yet another sign and indication of the agenda in play. It is one that diminishes this nation and its citizens. These people behind it sit in the comfort of knowing they are outside the pale of risk and consequence (in fact they materially benefit, as though they already didn't have enough). Put them and their wealth and greed at risk for a moment, and outsourcing is over.

OPEC to Cut Crude Output by 1 Million Barrels a Day  
Published: February 10, 2004
ALGIERS, Feb 10 — OPEC sought to strengthen its grip on world oil markets today with a surprise announcement that it was cutting its production, in an aggressive display of its desire to maintain oil prices at their highest level in two decades.*** Officials from large oil-importing nations such as the United States and Japan reacted to OPEC's move with apprehension. "

Not only did OPEC take this action, but also they made it clear why they were taking the action:

FEB 11 2004:Obaid bin Saif Al-Nasseri, the UAE's energy minister, said: "This decision is pre-emptive action against a fall in prices." Opec is worried about a short-term price collapse as winter ends in the US and Europe - the largest importers of oil.

The language “pre-emptive action” was no coincidence or accident. Since OPEC has declared retaliation, the dollar faces the specter of a steep and sudden plunge. Alan Greenspan therefore may be compelled to take pre-emptive action himself and raise interest rates to keep the dollar’s drop at bay, or even raise it more than anyone expects, as his own form of retaliation.

It’s global political theater at its finest. All in all, when governments are in the ring, you don’t want to get in the way of locomotives playing chicken.

In a bold new interpretation on February 6, 2004 , SenderBerl furthers its explanation why Kerry will win by highlighting its perspective that Kerry will choose Gephardt as his running mate and if the case why we urge Kerry to reject Gephardt for the very same reason Nixon ultimately would not succumb to the pressure to choose Nelson Rockefeller to replace Spiro Agnew, when the latter became the first Vice-President to be removed from office in the politically expedient manner recorded by history. The consequences for masking the truths connective to the Kennedy assassination continue to plague this nation, as political theater continues to demean the nation.

<====>

People from over eighty countries have visited our site over the past seven years to gain an understanding on the macro scale to what is taking place around them and why the world is dramatically changing. Even President Bush stands today blind to the reality that his supporters and friends have already determined that he must lose his bid for a second term. His father no doubt knows the reasons why but to spare his son does not share it with him (aside from being instructed as well not to do so). However, for the global majority, including the vast majority of Americans, it is important to understand what is taking place, for those leading, in the brazen and arrogant manner they do, are taking us to a dark and dire future. Technological advancements and achievements without concurrent growth in the moral ethic foreshadows the very dark future biblically described. SenderBerl urges you to read both Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform for Moral Outrage and Regime and Culture Change Unmasked.

Special Video on the U.S. Dollar presented by Joseph B. Ehrlich
Click on graphics below to link to it.

This web site unravels the truth about these stories coming to the public only AFTER the U.S. dollar hits historical lows. Will President Bush, if he wins in 2004, adopt a two tier U.S. dollar? We think so.

Will President Bush, if he wins, allow the dollar to be removed as the international reserve currency? We think so and circumstances should be that he will have no other choice as America is positioned to compromise its sovereignty to willingly accept its submission to one world government.

Your vote in 2004 is important and so is the candidate the Democrats present. This is a serious site for the serious times ahead, as America is allowed to decline in stature and wealth, and it is important to learn why this is being done and what it will take to stop us from falling further into an irreversible slippery slope, one creating a class schism the antithesis to everything this country represented to its citizens and to the world.