Richard Clarke’s remarks and revelations on Meet the Press are so vital to the public interest that we decided on top of all else we have recently done to highlight and analyze what he said in the context of 9-11.

Bush's Attacks on Clarke Only Prove He's Right
Sidney Blumenthal writes, "One of the first official acts of the incoming Bush administration in Jan. 2001 was to demote the office of national coordinator for counterterrorism on the National Security Council, a position held by Richard Clarke... Under Clinton, signifying the importance the president attached to the issue, Clarke was elevated to Cabinet rank, which gave him a seat at the Principals Meeting, the decision-making group of the highest figures involved in national security. By demoting the office, Bush and his team sent a signal... about the salience they assigned to terrorism -- below issues they regarded as truly serious, like Star Wars and the military threat of China. By removing Clarke from the table, the Bush administration put him in a box where he could only speak when spoken to. No longer would his memos go to the president; instead they had to pass though a chain of command of Condoleezza Rice and her deputy Stephen Hadley, who bounced every one of them back."

SenderBerl's perception of Condoleezza Rice's true role in the Bush presidency
Important Photo Album Posted
March 27, 2004
This analysis should be linked to by those familiar with the other analyses on this site

Abstract: Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. explains that many mysteries are answered understanding that Condy Rice is not the true National Security Advisor. She was hand selected by Bush 41 in the late 90s to spend two years with his son to teach him foreign affairs. When he won the presidency, Bush 41 fully supported her having the NSA position, where she could be with his son constantly to monitor that he would not revert to drugs or alcohol under the pressures that would arise in connection with the events of 9-11. Most significantly, Bush 41 encouraged a close personal relationship between them because it was essential to his son pulling off his assigned role as President of the United States in the NWO quest to obtain control over Middle East oil.

THIS WE THINK IS DESTINED TO BE THE MOST DARING AND CONTROVERSIAL INTERPRETATION WE HAVE MADE. HOWEVER, WE BELIEVE IT IS TRUE AND IT DEALS WITH MATTERS OF STATE AND THUS WITHIN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

Bush should have demurred from WMD jokes...

as we discuss below during a time of war with soldiers dying daily, He should have spared even a single mother or father the pain he surely caused a parent losing his or her child in the invasion and occupation of Iraq. However, on the deeper level his behavior shows a callousness and indifference bordering on the perceptions we carry in connection with the events of 9-11.

We came to conclude that Condoleezza Rice is not really the National Security Advisor, and certain events and behavior bore it out. Thereby, she was a pawn herself, a dupe in the NWO scheme, to what took place on 9-11. She may have been used by Bush in more ways than one and we believe that she is Bush's Achilles Heel and that there is a deeply dark and important reason why she is not appearing under oath publicly before the 9-11 Commission (where her appearance could activate the full potential of Richard Ben-Veniste to bring out truths that will instantly bury the current administration). Link here to read our special posting following up on Condoleezza Rice. Until President Bush allows the families of 9-11 victims and this country to receive the truth and answers concerning 9-11, it is the obligation of every American to stand on guard against enemies within, especially when the events of 9-11 have platformed an administration winning office by the slimmest of margins willing to change the character and culture of this country and take us onto a path for admitted global domination and control.

Excerpt from Link: SenderBerl cannot rest knowing the truths behind 9-11. SenderBerl cannot accept the acquiescence of the American people to their own subjugation by those who have no respect whatsoever for them, who lie, who deceive and who have plans to make America a third world nation. SenderBerl cannot accept that there has been a silent coup to pursue the course of one world government, denying the American people forever a choice of true representation and democracy, and ultimately allowing evisceration of the Constitution, our government, our heritage with extirpation of the Judeo-Christian ethic and thereby denying the American people justice. The enemies of America like the enemies of Israel are not beyond their borders, they are among the leadership. The long perceived effort to remove G-d from the people of Israel and the United States and to implant hedonism and to institutionalize drugs and other vices and improper values to the children of both countries compelled us to do what we could. This effort is reflected in large part through this site. We have no primary qualm with Condoleezza Rice. She sees those pursuing evil around her as friends, albeit recently from looking at the photographs on this page, she has begun to realize that she has been nothing more than a house pet. Most of those serving as pawns are used by the NWO true leadership, having been manipulated as willing and complicit dupes, being led to believe they are really inside and part and parcel of a "team."
They cannot fathom the depth of the evil of the course that surrounds them and that they too are ultimate victims.

"George Bush didn't tell us the truth about the economy, about job loss, about the true cost of his deceptive prescription drug plan, or about the existence of weapons of mass destruction. There's nothing funny about that."

Should politicians be allowed to laugh publicly in time of war? Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. has only one thing to say: they want to lead, put them and their sons and families onto the sands of Iraq and let their beepers ring and see whether they would carry on as they all do. If they want to have a good time, let them leave the political field. If they want to speak and represent the American people, let them be in a position where they are absent joviality because in these times their ability to laugh does not reflect the sentiment of the American people.

Thus, the answer to the question is that they show great disrespect for the American people by laughing in public. They should have in times of war respect for the mothers and fathers that on this day they are publicly laughing lost their sons and daughters. If one of them would lose their child would they all be out there laughing? Then what is the difference between their losing a son or daughter and anyone else during a day of a time of war? They should all apologize, but Bush laughing publicly and at WMD, to boot, is disgusting {let us all also be the first to tell you that they can laugh because they don't see America at war. If America was at war it would be under serious threat. What they see is a bunch of serfs out there in a campaign to seize control of oil. It is as though they were a bunch of mercenaries, however, they have enlisted them to do the dangerous work for a penny on the dollar. You see, they don't subscribe to outsourcing when they get cheap labor here at home}. We're sorry. The truth hurts. They even handed injured soldiers bills for food and services when they were hospitalized. What else do you need to hear?

Let's Look at Reality: There are only 583 Soldiers and their families not laughing...

But 2,928 maimed and injured Soldiers, some no doubt for life, who were sitting by their TVs got a chance to enjoy the President's jokes about WMD. We're surprised he didn't invite a couple of them to join him on the dais.

A Daily Look at U.S. Deaths in Iraq

By The Associated Press

As of Wednesday, March 24, 583 U.S. service members have died since the beginning of military operations in Iraq a year ago, according to the Department of Defense. Of those, 394 died as a result of hostile action and 190 died of non-hostile causes, the department said. The British military has reported 58 deaths; Italy, 17; Spain, eight; Bulgaria, five; Ukraine, three; Thailand, two; Denmark, Estonia and Poland have reported one each. Since May 1, when President Bush declared that major combat operations in Iraq had ended, 446 U.S. soldiers have died--279 as a result of hostile action and 167 of non-hostile causes, according to the military. Since the start of military operations, 2,928 U.S. service members have been injured as a result of hostile action, according to the Defense Department. Non-hostile injured numbered 434. ___

Those that just missed having a chance of enjoying President Bush's humor...

The latest deaths reported by the military: --Army Spc. Clint Matthews, 31, Bedford, Pa.; died Friday from injuries he suffered when his vehicle went over an embankment in Baji, Iraq, on March 17; assigned to 1st Battalion, 18th Infantry Regiment, Schweinfurt, Germany. --Army Pfc. Bruce Miller, Jr., 23, Orange, N.J., died Monday from non-hostile injuries in Mosul, Iraq; assigned to the 2nd Infantry Battalion, 3rd Infantry Regiment, 2nd Infantry Division, Fort Lewis, Wash. AP-NY-03-25-04 0025EST

Analysis of Select Portions of March 24^th 9-11 Proceedings

Clarke began his testimony with an apology to loved ones of those roughly 3,000 people killed in the attacks on airliners, the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

"Your government failed you, and I failed you," he said. "We tried hard, but that doesn't matter because we failed you. And for that failure, I would ask, once all the facts are out, for your understanding and for your forgiveness."

SenderBerl: This apology by Clarke suggests that there is something to apologize for. Firefighters who valiantly try to save a child from a burning house will apologize to the parents as a matter of courtesy and form when failing to extract the child. This type of apology does not indicate fault. Thus, for the record, failure does not suggest culpable fault. Thus, again, it is important to keep your eye on the ball. The true issue is whether there is complicity for an event without which the plans in hand could not unravel.

March 24 2004 Ben-Veniste questioning Armitage

BEN-VENISTE: Is it correct that -- let me go to the period of just prior to 9/11. At this point you were confirmed?

ARMITAGE: Yes, sir.

BEN-VENISTE: At this point you were aware, were you not, of the most heightened alert level in the United States up to that point with respect to the potential for a terrorist attack of significant magnitude.

ARMITAGE: Yes, I was. I was one of those to whom Director Tenet turned, along with other seniors in the administration, and made it very clear that we had a big problem coming. He didn't know where and he didn't know when, but he said it was coming.

SenderBerl: This is proof positive of affirmative malfeasance. Foreign intelligence agencies pointed out that American surveillance of the skies and seas were lacking on 9-11 and without question the response or should we say lack of military response proved the point.

SenderBerl again highlights to you that the President’s schedule on September 7 dramatically changed to allow him to visit two elementary schools in a non election period and year to read with second graders AFTER being criticized for being away from Washington at his ranch the entire month of August. Thus while the President keeps saying his qualified statement that if he knew terrorists were going to strike on the morning of 9-11 he would have done everything to prevent the attack, it leaves open for the record whether he knew that an attack was otherwise imminent and that there were many around him who were awaiting it to launch the agenda that unraveled immediately after 9-11.

It is relevant right in here to keep in mind the following two questions prepared by the Family Steering Committee

14. Your schedule for September 11, 2001 was in the public domain since September 7, 2001.  The Emma E. Booker School is only five miles from the Bradenton Airport, so you, and therefore the children in the classroom, might have been a target for the terrorists on 9/11.  What was the intention of the Secret Service in allowing you to remain in the Emma E. Booker Elementary School, even though they were aware America was under attack?

15.  Please explain why you remained at the Sarasota, Florida, Elementary School for  a press conference after you had finished listening to the children read, when as a terrorist target, your presence potentially jeopardized the lives of the children?

BEN-VENISTE: Now, Dr. Rice told us that Mr. Clark had briefed her that there were Al Qaida sleeper cells in the United States. Dr. Rice told us that she did not know what basis Mr. Clarke had for that. She told us that the FBI was trying to actively find Al Qaida personnel. She did not, she told us, talk to Richard Clarke prior to 9/11 about the potential for Al Qaida sleeper cells. Were she here, I would ask her the question as to why she did not discuss the issue of Al Qaida sleeper cells in the United States with her counterterrorism coordinator. Do you have any information you might be able to shed on that subject?

ARMITAGE: No, of course not.

BEN-VENISTE: Dr. Rice, following 9/11, made a statement that -- I want to make sure I get it right -- she said, I don't think anybody could have predicted that those people could take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center. Take another one, and slam it into the Pentagon. That they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile.Do you recall that she made that statement publicly?

ARMITAGE: No, I didn't see that.

SenderBerl: When a witness uses this type of technique in answering the question, it shows he was prepared to obfuscate the Commission’s inquiry and further he is not serving his duty to his public office.

BEN-VENISTE: Similarly, yesterday, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld made a statement with respect to anticipating the use of commercial airplanes as weapons. And then after I questioned him about it, he retracted that statement and said that he personally could not have or did not imagine that such a thing might happen. Dr. Rice told us privately that she wished to correct that statement that she made publicly by saying to us that she misspoke and that she, like Secretary Rumsfeld yesterday, would say that she could not have imagined using planes as missiles. Can you shed any light on who then in the apparatus of protecting the United States against threats, both foreign and domestic, ought to be coordinating this information for the benefit of the president?

ARMITAGE: I know that the director of Central Intelligence had, on at least one occasion to my knowledge, talked about hijacking of aircraft. I just don't think we had the imagination required to consider a tragedy of this magnitude. I don't know what other answer to tell you. We didn't have a homeland security czar. We've traditionally, generally, in terrorism unfortunately looked overseas. Of course, that's the major direction of Secretary Powell's and my attention.

SenderBerl: This should make the families of the victims bitter indeed. Al-Qaeda historically has shown little imagination in implementing terrorism but here the United States government declares it lacked the imagination to perceive planes being used against buildings but Al-Qaeda not only then had the imagination to plan the deed but also had the capability of carrying it off! Do you see the folly of Armitage’s argument to wit that therefore Al-Qaeda is more competent and imaginative than the U.S. government and therefore better suited to implement such actions. Further, if this in fact is the case the entire current government responsible for security should be sent to pasture because if they admit to not having the creative ability to anticipate the terrorism how in the world can such people be suited to protect us against further attack? Will they claim the next act of terrorism as successful due to their inability to imagine it? The point of course is that they didn’t need imagination at all. When four planes went off transponders, our military defensive apparatus, costing taxpayers untold billions of dollars, should have intervened. But they were kept grounded. This is where the Commission shows itself to be a whitewash. The real message of the Commission is for Bush and friends to retire; similar to Netanyahu telling Peres don’t succeed in winning in Israel after Rabin’s assassination unless you want the public to start seeing proof revealed regarding what really took place.

Further, the National Security Agency misses nothing monitoring telephone and E-mail around the world. If they didn't know that there were allegedly nineteen hijackers here in the United States with plans to implement 9-11, we will eat crow. We know that out government is quite expertise and adept when it wishes to be and demures from the truth when it has reason to hide truths from the American people. What did Commission Member Kerrey say when he threatened to resign his post: "I am no longer ... feeling comfortable that I'm going to be able to read and process what I need in order to participate in writing a report about how it was that 19 men defeated every single defensive system the U.S. put up to kill 3,000 Americans on Sept. 11."

BEN-VENISTE: Well, can you tell me, since you're sitting in for Dr. Rice, what it was that Dr. Rice had before her to suggest that the United States might be a target in this period of extraordinarily heightened threat during the summer of 2001?

ARMITAGE: I can't.

***

BEN-VENISTE: Have you paid attention to at least some of the appearances Dr. Rice has made on the airwaves?

ARMITAGE: No, actually I haven't.

***

BEN-VENISTE: Well, when did you learn for the first time that Al Qaida was responsible for the Cole?

ARMITAGE: I don't know the exact date. I think it's just like building coral: came to the conclusion.

BEN-VENISTE: Some time after March?

ARMITAGE: Yes, that would be my recollection.

BEN-VENISTE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thank you, Mr. Secretary.

SenderBerl:: When did you learn that Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9-11? A real inquiry would pursue the important issue whether he and others could believe, even with their admitted lack of imagination, whether from their knowledge of previous acts of terrorism, whether Al-Qaeda could have pulled this event off by itself. No one of course appears with demolition expertise and no one of course has appeared to confirm that those at flight school would have near zero chance of hitting two building with the dead point accuracy done on 9-11. It’s all a farce, and the only way more truth will unravel is if Bush insists on re-election. Bush 41 will paint the picture for his son. As we interpreted on November 19, 2003, Bush will not be allowed to undertake a second term unless he can manipulate an environment to platform an attack and occupation of Syria and Iran. Madrid was the first evidence of such an effort but yet again he has fumbled on the twenty-yard line. Now, we have Sharon out to help him out. Its time to bench them all.

Incredible article by Pat Buchanan
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37720

You are now put on notice that America will be a third world nation. So accept it! To add insult to injury Buchanan is telling you that it is your fault. Thus, don't blame him or anyone else, because they now are going to admit to the bad news. You have to understand that everyone who appears in the media on a constant basis is NWO approved. Could you imagine what we would be saying if we were on the air? Again, we remind you that a producer years back wanted to do a one hour special platformed on our thesis in the Princess Diana murder. We laughed and told her they would never allow her to do it. She reminded us that she was an award winning producer and she did what she wanted. Need we tell you who proved correct.

There was some interesting interchange at the 9-11 hearing. We await the transcript. But please do note that the focus is whether Bush could have done more. This is not the issue. This is the focus for those who want to misdirect the public not direct themselves to what is important: what happened and why did the government not intercede as they should have when four planes went off transponder. The families of the victims have lost confidence in their government and their country. They no doubt will be told to read Buchanan's article above so that he can explain to them that the America they believed in, simply said, no longer exists.

Now, with the Supreme Court having the pledge case, the third branch of government can put its signature as to whether it can stand up to the other two corrupted branches of government in this "New America." We really can't take too much more ourselves because the course is set and the consequences are those we have interpreted for quite some time. Can America be saved (recaptured)? We believe so, but it will take a populist movement that doesn't want the elitist centrix admitted to by Buchanan to rule. In Recapturing America we pointed out that Bush 41 just came out one day and said we are in a "New World Order." Once he used the three words he sanitized the coup, which took America on a course without the approval of its citizens. Now, Buchanan comes out and says well we are a third world nation, and you have let the new aristocrats take charge and undermine it -- so you are on notice to keep your mouth shut in the future because it's all your fault.

What have we been telling you? Wake up America. Time has just about run out. The media is there to massage you right back into a status of a serf. You'll work and labor just to make ends meet and without G-d, religion, or anyone in the controlled media to tell you about the injustices part and parcel of your everyday life, you will be a citizen of the new banana republic. You'll be using US dollars to blow your nose. Of course, Buchanan or his surrogate will be on the airwaves telling you that it's all your fault.

Hamas Says It Has No Plans to Strike U.S. Targets
Wed Mar 24, 2004 06:17 AM ET

Bush Wins!
Hamas vowing revenge against America fell right into the trap.
SenderBerl's entire point regarding Madrid and telling pawn and puppet Sharon to do what he did is to bring TERRORISM CENTER STAGE which is the ONLY platform on which Bush can win.

Our point in Madrid was that Al-Qaeda had zip interest in perpetrating terrorism unless they wanted to help the Bush presidential campaign. Now, read this SenderBerl insert again because it shows you that unless we get a 9-11 Commission genuinely pursuing the issue, we are going to see terrorism again in the U.S. probably with the same complicity by the Bush administration as seen on 9-11. Why Condy Rice is scared of appearing before a Commission that will only whitewash it, mystifies us, unless our proposition regarding her role is true.

Don't Think it is Coincidence
Mar 23 2004

So long since 9-11, so long has the world carried anger against Bush administration policies, and then contrary to Al-Qaeda and terrorists interests terrorists blow up trains in Madrid. Aznar's political party bungles it and blames the ETA rather than Al-Qaeda, engendering the ire of the populace who brings in the POSE who moves to withdraw the 1000 Spanish troops from Iraq. The crime in Madrid brings billions of minds throughout the world including not so coincidentally the political psyche of the American people onto terrorism, which returns center stage in line with the Bush administration's political campaign efforts. Now, Sharon does something he could have done all along. However, regardless of the argument whether or not his action was beneficial to Israel, he guarantees an escalation of terrorism in Israel and lays a concrete foundation to support it in the USA. We can only say what we said before. Terrorism in the US helps Bush. Al-Qaeda would not do anything to help Bush. Thus, how convenient that there were no legitimate claims from the deed in Madrid which aside from making terrorism world center stage, helping Bush, would have helped Aznar's political party had it not fumbled the ball put into its lap. To us it smells nearly 100% 9-11. The proof is in the timing. There is only ONE only ONE ONE ONE dynamic on which Bush can coerce and support a victory: that is the US being in the vortex of another act of domestic terrorism. Thus, we the American people are fools, like none before us, for permitting representatives to even breathe another day without having them banging the door for a publicly aired investigation of 9-11. We also have a suggestion. The Congress should invite some independent citizens to ask questions also of the witnesses. If they ever dared to discharge their fiduciary responsibility accordingly, we would call in the Secret Service detail of the morning of 9-11 and ask for a non tampered copy of the Secret Service manual and guidelines. We are really going to be angry if the US is subject to any terrorism between now and election day, because there is no question that terrorists DO NOT INTEND to benefit BUSH and any such act HELPS BUSH IMMENSELY.
Major Analysis on the terrorism in Spain has moved here

Question Received: If Bush's insider circle is intent on sabotaging his re-election, why all these machinations allowing him to bring terrorism center stage?

Answer: The oil cabal is an entity to itself and it not only wants Bush's re-election but it wants to quiet the NWO leadership by giving Bush the platform to complete his mission, by moving for control over Syria and Iran. Thus, Madrid and Sharon in Israel launch their new initiative which kills two birds with one stone. As highlighted it takes Kerry off the front page, puts terrorism front and center stage and puts Bush back in the game as will further be attested to by his poll numbers. Most importantly continued terrorism seals the case and offers the continued platform and opportunity for Bush to complete his mission. Hamas vowing revenge against America fell right into the trap. Anything taking place here in the US thus has a connect the dot nexus to the terrorist network the key to implementation of the NWO Middle East policies. While Kerry is a NWO team member as well, his role would be to smooth over Bush damage. However, Bush, via Madrid and Sharon, has been thrown back into the the game, where with baseball bat in hand he still intends to beat the Middle East into NWO submission and take control over OPEC.

Hamas will be told that it made a dire mistake by vowing revenge against the U.S. However, the Middle East will recognize what we are telling you now, and thus Bush really is pushing the envelope where we believe Middle East leaderships have planned by necessity a retort that will regretfully take us close to devastating war on a dimension and plane never before seen in history. Recently, at Cheney's residence the word is that they are blasting away at a new major nuclear bunker for the Vice-President. He probably knows what we strongly suspect. He and Bush weren't go to roll over and take their lumps for failing in their mission as we have articulated in Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage. Your E-mail to us shows us you sense the tragic times we are in and how dangerous and perilous things are for America, our facing enemies from within and without -- all intent on stripping away all that made this country great. You are right. It is the penalty we are paying for standing dumb and silent regarding TWA Flight 800, Princess Diana, Bill Clinton and 9-11 -- allowing the true enemies of America to undermine America's great wealth not in dollar and cents but in its true national treasures, its Constitution, its principles of government, and its character and commitment to the Judeo-Christian ethic. Should the American people not push, push hard, for the truth regarding 9-11, the silent coup that has put control of this country into the NWO, precluding true elections and candidates of opposing viewpoints, will have fully succeeded and given control of this country back to whom we wrestled it from some 250 years ago. Then NWO pawn Tommy Franks will prove his words correct when history attests that the great experiment called democracy has failed, and this great land will have fallen to our true enemies -- the European aristocracy, whom have returned to rule, and this time with a sophisticated iron hand.

Hamas Says It Has No Plans to Strike U.S. Targets
Wed Mar 24, 2004 06:17 AM ET
Insert MAR 24 04

Clarke didn’t mince words. “Frankly,” he told Stahl, “I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he’s done such great things about terrorism. He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have done something to stop 9/11. Maybe We’ll never know. I think he’s done a terrible job on the war against terrorism.” Ouch! These revelations are particularly damaging because they undercut the only category in which the public approves of Bush’s performance, his alleged leadership in the war on terrorism. According to all recent polls, almost 70 percent of the American public believes Bush is doing a good job in the war on terror. By contrast, most Americans don’t like his economic policies, believe he’s in bed with big business, and are now even questioning his handling of the ongoing war in Iraq. Clarke, a registered Republican who former Clinton Administration aides described as a “hawk,” claimed Bush and his team jumped all over him to come up with evidence that Saddam Hussein was connected to the attacks. When Clarke pointed out that the CIA, FBI, and White House staffs had already thoroughly investigated any potential link between Saddam and Al Qaeda and found none, Bush told him for a third time and in no uncertain terms, “Look into Iraq, Saddam.” http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=689

THE ANSWERS TO MANY OF THE MYSTERIES CAN BE FOUND IN:
Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage
Regime and Culture Change Unmasked

Panel calls for Rice to appear
Associated Press
MAR 23 2004

CAPITOL HILL - Members of the federal panel that's been looking into 9/11 say they're not hearing from everyone they want to hear from. The panel has opened two days of hearings on the anti-terrorism efforts of the Bush and Clinton administrations before 9/11. The ten-member panel had invited National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice to testify. She declined, with the White House citing concerns about separation of powers. One panel member says that's not a good enough excuse. Another mentioned the book written by former anti-terrorism adviser Richard Clarke, who accuses the Bush administration of downplaying the al-Qaida threat before 9/11. Former Democratic Congressman Timothy Roemer also noted that Rice has been featured in the media disputing Clarke's claims. He suggests the debate shouldn't be played out in the media, but before the panel.
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=688
For example, Kristen Breitweiser, one of four New Jersey widows of the 9/11 disaster who also lobbied Congress and the president to appoint this commission made this simple observation: “How is it possible we have a national security advisor coming out and saying we had no idea they could use planes as weapons when we had FBI records from 1991 stating that this is a possibility.”

RECOMMENDED: http://etherzone.com/2004/raim032404.shtml

Bravo!
A must read link for public action re 9-11. Please link.

Here are two questions posited for President Bush!

14. Your schedule for September 11, 2001 was in the public domain since September 7, 2001.  The Emma E. Booker School is only five miles from the Bradenton Airport, so you, and therefore the children in the classroom, might have been a target for the terrorists on 9/11.  What was the intention of the Secret Service in allowing you to remain in the Emma E. Booker Elementary School, even though they were aware America was under attack?

15.  Please explain why you remained at the Sarasota, Florida, Elementary School for  a press conference after you had finished listening to the children read, when as a terrorist target, your presence potentially jeopardized the lives of the children?

Support Them!
Questions prepared by:
The Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
http://www.911independentcommission.org/

http://tomflocco.com/index.php

Major Comment Mar 22 04 from Joseph B. Ehrlich
Inserted Below

Rense.com posted an article prepared by us on some recent interpretations.
The Meaning and Consequences

About Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
(after reading the above, you might particularly enjoy the following link)

SenderBerl has added essential links to the left of the lead page.

This web site provides, according to your own comments to us, some of the finest substance on the Internet. It is designed to assist those who wish to look into deeper planes to find and verify truths. Once doing so, it would be the ultimate goal, due to the dire straits once described by us and now apparent, to help you to recognize a duty to do your own part in helping put America and thus the world back on track. When we wrote Recapturing America way back in December 1996, completing it in January 1997, we were way ahead of the curve in recognizing the agenda in play. However, our goal was to highlight the evil design of an