Need for a Religious Resolution
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. 2002 Analyses regarding thereto

March 30, 2002

Again, regardless of course Israel takes, outside of rededication to G-d and a religious resolution, its ultimate future is in shambles. Any construction that anything taking place is with the assistance of G-d in answer to the prayers enlisted in synagogues throughout the world escapes the historical point of the Diaspora: that G-d knows He is asked to help when things are dim, but escapes His expressed desire in Torah that the Jewish people remember Him and honor Him openly and globally when things are so good that there is nothing for which to entreat Him to intervene. The mitzvah is not praying and begging Him to intervene in difficult times, that’s a slam dunk; it is to realize that to demean Him by sitting on one’s hands with tape over one's mouth when His gift to the Jewish people is being willingly relinquished, to not glorify His Name before the world, attests that the Diaspora was a waste of time and opportunity for the Jewish people.

As we have relayed, Israel is in trouble regardless of whether or not it accepts the peace, since it is Israel’s obligation to pursue a religious resolution to the conflict. Moreover, we emphasize that if the current peace proposal is accepted, the entire region is in trouble, since acceptance of the new world order peace process is one which will remove G-d from the entire region and invoke the most feared biblical consequences. Again, the fundamental question and issue is whether you believe that G-d would support an Israel and region which drives the peoples away from rather than to Him? Understanding this simple question and its correct answer addresses all the other times the Jews, Christians and Muslims were removed from Jerusalem and punished accordingly. To think that the result will be anything different only reflects a person's lack of belief and faith in G-d, which no doubt will be repaired onced the dreaded consequences of the holy books unravel. However, by then, it will be too late to resolve the horrific reality.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
March 30, 2002

We have been asked how we have come to the understanding that the Arab/Islamic world will accept a genuine peace if Israel sincerely and successfully pursues a religious resolution.

The answer is in Qu’ran 29:46

[29:46] Do not argue with the people of the scripture (Jews, Christians, and Muslims) except in the nicest possible manner - unless they transgress - and say, "We believe in what was revealed to us and in what was revealed to you, and our god and your god is one and the same; to Him we are submitters."

Read this over 100 times and as we have submitted all along the solution is simple as long as it is sincere and earnest. However, if man continues stubborn and is intent in refuting G-d and highlighting his agenda over G-d’s agenda and/or design, then brace yourselves for the unimaginable.

Why wouldn't the U.S. and Israel pursue a religious resolution?

G-d’s wish for Israel to be a nation of ministers glorifying His name to the world is something the Arab/Islamic nations must not only not interfere with, but assist with, unless Israel affirmatively pursues a course removing G-d further from the State of Israel and the Jewish people. Since Israel is pursuing such a course, the Arab/Islamic nations pursue the course and agenda they do as enemies of Israel. If Israel pursued earnestly and sincerely the correct course, a religious resolution, moving the people of the region to G-d not away from him, the Arab/Islamic nations and people would no longer enemies of Israel.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.

What the Middle East has to do with our Pledge of Allegiance

Very timely that a Federal Circuit Court (one of the nation's highest courts) deemed it worthy to rule the pledge unconstitutional. It highlights the point that the United States is committed to removing G-d over time from the nation. That G-d is part and parcel of the Nation is reflected by the numerous oaths and affirmations referencing His role in connection with this Nation. All our forefathers are turning in their graves watching this attempt to further rid G-d from the Nation.

What about the legal issue? Israel has to be a Jewish State, one honoring G-d before the world. The new world order has infiltrated Israel this past decade where the judiciary serves the new world order not the State of Israel. Rulings there permit the eventual dilution of the State where the only thing Jewish about it over time will be its name. In fact, we argued long ago that with the law of return the Jewish people would be an operative minority in their own land.

Since a strong movement arose against the right of return, Israel has been flooded by new world order forces with immigrants that are non Jewish platforming the dilution of the Jewish nature of the nation over time. The new world order forces are focused and patient. One has to be vigilant because the new world order wants to undermine G-d and remove G-d from the hearts and souls of the population. In this regard, it is easy to see and perceive that the new world order agenda is affirmatively evil.

In the US, the argument is that there must be a separation of church and state: that the rights of those who do not believe in G-d must be protected from enmeshment of a religious nature. While the US has been committed to protecting minority rights, it doesn't have to compromise the precepts upon which it was established to undermine itself in the protection of individual rights.

Thereby, with pornography, while citizens have the technical right to pursue invidious material, the country does not have to undermine the responsibility to its children, culture and heritage to protect the right of men and women to a different lifestyle and culture. Taking it to the extreme, the legal system does not have to allow or support sedition if a group of Americans are committed to such a course. Sedition it does not allow, but pollution to the noble precepts underlying this country it does.

Thus, no child has to say the pledge but to use the legal system to say that the pledge is unconstitutional because it references G-d undermines the precepts underlying the Constitution which was belief in one G-d: that the United States is a country based and founded upon monotheism.

If people wish to worship idols, that  perhaps is their choice, but to undermine the pledge to the flag is only a stone throw away from moving to undermine the Constitution (since it was written by a body not reflective of the current pluralistic population reality in the 50 states).  Man has freedom of choice, but a nation has an obligation to those who sacrificed and gave their lives to establish it. To do otherwise, legally speaking, would be a breach of contract.

Now let's extrapolate out to the Middle East. First, of course, Israel was gifted by G-d to the Jewish people. Those who do not believe in G-d or who do not believe in carrying obligations in that regard are free to do so but nothing they do should undermine the bedrock principles, accepted by the way globally, in connection with the historic meaning of the State of Israel. The only argument carrying a modicum of validity by those fighting for the State are those connective to the element of Zionism separate and apart from G-d. Their argument is that they sacrificed to platform a secular state to protect Jewish life. The Jewish religious leadership carried the important responsibility to explain that G-d in regifting Israel as proven by the miracles of 1948 and 1967 works through whatever means He wishes to accomplish His ends; that they had to recognize that their efforts may have only resulted in a secular state in Uganda, but the reality is that there was a giving back of the whole, reflects the need to stand subservient to He who truly acted to work the end. Thus, people under democratic precepts in Israel may carry the right not to believe in G-d but to deny the historic and biblical reality, to remove G-d from Israel would be the same as removing G-d the Constitution, the flag and the pledge from America.

As to the Arabs, below is a story which shows that Bush threatens to remove financial assistance to Palestinians if they don't do things his way. Regardless of how convincing one can make the argument that doing things President Bush's way is for the global good, one has to respect the right to reject compromising the precepts of a people no matter how much it is argued that they are backwards. The Arab world sees the Circuit Court decision rendering the pledge unconstitutional the polluted result of a country which is willing to distance itself from G-d. They don't want to be like us. If the judiciary confirms the ruling, and the pledge is rendered unconstitutional because it says "one nation under G-d" this suggests something seriously wrong and ill with our country, just as the undersigned and many others think it sick and ill for pornography to be a featured mainstay of "Home Box Office," accessible to the children of this country (not to discount a government and media which willingly stands blind to the drug epidemic at the nation's schools).

Thus, we again show from another plateau the need for a religious resolution which will not only ultimately bring true peace to the Middle East but reaffirm this country's commitment to G-d and eradicate the evil which has rooted itself so deeply in our country as to remove the pledge of allegiance from our schools.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
June 27, 2002

Palestinians reject Bush threat on US aid

By Nidal al-Mughrabi

GAZA, June 27 (Reuters) - Palestinian officials on Thursday brushed aside U.S. President George W. Bush's threat to withhold financial aid and said Palestinians would defy U.S. pressure to replace their longtime leader Yasser Arafat.

Reinforcing his call for a new Palestinian leadership "uncompromised by terror," Bush said late on Wednesday that U.S. financial aid to the Palestinians would be contingent on their embrace of reforms and rejection of terrorism.

SenderBerl: The reforms to the Islamic perspective is accepting a course which ultimately seeks to undermine the Islamic people from G-d as the Islamic people have seen the Israeli people distance themselves from G-d.

Here today we can correct the course but man stands passive to his responsibilities and obligations to the gift given him to whom previous generations would have bowed down daily in respect and reverence for such bounty and opportunity.

Evil prevails. Evil is anti-G-d. Thus all agendas against G-d, whether direct or indirect, attest to an abusive design and end. The United States of America is being intentionally maimed and damaged under this agenda. There is only one offsetting power to the evil that is now entrenched in our midst: G-d. Is man willing to seek Him out to intervene by acknowledging Him and honoring Him? Man, rather than undertake the simple road and solution, turns his back to Him, assuring the worst, interpreted by us long ago, and now in fact unraveling as interpreted. Man rushes ahead to his dark destiny because he assumes, wrongfully, despite the reality of his short tenure in universal time, that his dominance on this planet is somehow assured. Man will rue his mistake in perception.

Conclusion:

Israel is the responsible country having been selected and taught and possessing scholars who have spent innumerable hours in study of Torah that it is has the responsibility in being given the land via the miracles of 1948 and 1967 to install a government which honors G-d before the nations of the world. Without understanding the protection of His Name comes before all else, Israel’s future as a nation is again under real threat of destruction as was the exact case some 2000 years ago. There is no way that the land having its nexus to G-d will evolve into a place where the people residing therein turn their backs to G-d, in defamation of His Name. Thus, SenderBerl was able to interpret way before Barak even made the offer to Yasser Arafat that President Clinton’s best laid out plans would fail, as they did. Once Israel voluntarily handed back G-d’s gift, Israel’s destruction was assured. Moreover, this would open a portal to the shift in the paradigm of world control. Thus, G-d intervened to harden Yasser Arafat’s heart to turn down what was seen by the secular world as a historically generous offer to turn over land for peace. No process defaming G-d could platform any true or genuine peace. Moreover, the Islamic leadership including Yasser Arafat didn’t want to be aidors and abettors in such a design, and thus this formed the platform for their denial of the Clinton plan. Moreover, the conclusion by the Islamic religious leadership, now patently admitted to by President Bush, that the new world order forces wants to modernize the region, which translates into moving the people of the region from G-d, Allah, drives them into the waiting arms of China, who has taken control of the Mid-East and which dynamic in part has been the platform for the need of the United States to move to recapture it back. Despite all the misinformation to the contrary, the issue is oil. Does anyone believing in G-d think it just coincidence that the Arab nations have control of this vital resource?

Thus under these dynamics, see Peres Personified http://www.senderberl.com/peres.pdf for a more detailed religious perspective, SenderBerl was able long ago to interpret that Israel despite its superior military would, if it didn’t recognize its biblical role, succumb to the Arab nations surrounding it. Thus, now it is seen that despite its military, Islamic terrorists have undermined the country as it sinks by its own weight under the turmoil and stress of continued and repeated suicide bombings. There is no defense to someone willing to take his or her life for a cause. Now, in recent weeks, Israel seemed satisfied that it has been able to quell the spate of suicide bombings. However, even sophisticated Israel, did not immediately recognize that it fell victim to a Trojan Horse scheme hatched by Chinese strategists. If Israel reoccupies the West Bank, needing to draw in numerous reservists, taking them out of the work force, when the country is otherwise on the brink of economic collapse, Israel might sink by its own weight without the need for a military attack against it by the Arab nations. The Arab nations are applauding the results seen from a strategy that to our minds came from China. Moreover, when you lace all this with continued suicide bombings, those people with the responsibilities inherent in Israel who willingly turn their backs to G-d and the need to bow to Him will ultimately turn their backs on Israel as well. Thus, Israel, despite its military, and despite the resources of the United States finds itself in the quagmire of falling into quicksand. SenderBerl has never tired of repeating itself that the only solution is a religious solution.

The United States, in the meantime, operating as a country itself affirmatively distancing its people from G-d, with a covert leadership which also seeks to undermine the tenets upon which this country was founded, is drawn into the invisible dynamics because under the new world order agenda it needs to take control of all major countries (especially those representing Islamic oil and nuclear) and also now finds itself desperate to undermine the reality of China (when Clinton and the US were looking the wrong way) taking control of the Middle East. President Bush started off well; buying Musharraf and then moving forward on the secular plan of land for peace having Israel agree to move back to 1967 borders until the US recognized that without taking out the regimes, which it in any event wanted to do, in Iraq, Syria and Iran, that any move back to 1967 borders by Israel was a suicidal gesture by Israel because after forfeiting strategic lands the Arab nations in the hands of the current leaderships ultimately would again militarily attack. Thus G-d’s design again prevailed, undermining every effort, where G-d gives Israel every chance and opportunity to realize and undertake the correct course, which is not giving up the land under an agenda that will dilute G-d further in the region. Moreover, when President Bush on June 24th made the irrevocable error of openly admitting that he wanted to install hand selected leaderships in the Middle East to fashion the countries into the image of the new world order, he made a costly error, no doubt by G-d’s design. The United States has now irretrievably lost the Middle East, leaving it no alternative now but to move militarily against those in the declared axis of evil. Now, realizing that the Islamic nations are in cooperation with each other in not giving President Bush any reason to launch a military attack in the region, the United States is desperate and the EU notes the same and rejects President Bush’s announced agenda of a pre-emptive strike against Iraq (which would also mandate an attack of Syria by Israel) all opening a possible portal to Armageddon.

The United States now realizing that China with whom it is now inextricably linked commercially is the future enemy to be reckoned with, in our opinion, allows the market to sink. Originally, a strong market was critical to the new world order agenda, but now that it has seriously unraveled at the critical end game, and now that the US realizes that China has captured the Middle East and that China is against the new world order agenda, it has to decide how to deal with China, and the government is releasing first official word platforming a future declaration against China. Once it does so, the market would tank in any event, because so many US corporations make their goods and products today in cost effective China. Add to this the open understanding that China not the US controls the Middle East and the reality is that the US is between a rock and a hard place. Moreover, this unfolding scenario would, as is seen in the last two weeks, result in foreign dollars evaporating from the US markets and economy, adding to the true woes facing the US, which the White House and government have masked with corporate abuse of financial reporting and stock options all which the government all well knew if not supported during the Clinton tenure to drive the market to 10000+ in accord with new world order interests. Thus, it is not only Israel that may sink by its own weight, for as Japan knew during the late 80s and 90s when they tried to undermine the dollar; that things will change in incredible ways if the US dollar is no longer the world reserve currency of choice.

Trust this not going to get things too complicated but Recapturing America related that undermining the US dollar ultimately was part of the new world order plan. Thus, the Euro after having been played down against the dollar is now on par and headed higher as the world shifts from dollars to Euros. We respectfully submit, that everything unraveling and seen unraveling by us for many years is solely because we and those who have been blessed with success, happiness, wealth, education, opportunity, everything past generations prayed for us to G-d, now have squandered our gift and the beautiful environment given to us by turning our backs on G-d permitting controlling governments pursuing agendas uprooting G-d from our nation and our lifestyle best exemplified by the television programming and other evil our children are exposed to daily and repeatedly in their daily lives. The drug epidemic is known by every school child, but our government, our media, our citizens pay no more than lip service to its existence as they also passively stand by when new world order forces from one day of terrorist activities permit a police state environment to come into play in our great land. Corruption and greed, all end products of evil, have taken control. Thus, again, these days represent the last opportunities open and available to speak out and do whatever one can to promote the religious solution to the Middle East. That is where the healing and the answers rest. Otherwise, China will get stronger and your future and those of your children will get darker until there is no opportunity left. The generation that has everything will be the first to fail to provide an equal or better future for their own children. The word shameful doesn’t even begin to describe it.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
July 21, 2002

PS. Important point of clarification: Normally one will hear that the answer connects with the need of the Jewish people to return to Torah and ritual observances. This type of answer accommodates those who are aligned with religious Judaism. In our respectful opinion that is not the appropriate criteria for the critical issue existant with the putative loss of Israel. The true criteria is humbly submitted connected with the following example:

A wealthy father has an estate of $110 million dollars and four children who equally divide $100 million in cash held by the estate. The other $10 million dollars connects with a property which the father asks the children to maintain as a nature preserve for the community he so loved during his lifetime; to honor his name in the community and keep him in their minds and hearts.

About 2 years after his death, the community learns that the children have decided to sell the property for $20 million dollars to the State for use as a toxic waste site. The community asks what type of man could raise such children who were so eager and willing to dishonor him, his request and name to the community he so loved?

If the man were alive and were able to do so he would deny his children the land he so loved knowing that they would not bear the responsibility of honoring his name as he requested therewith. It didn’t matter that the children made their love of their father known, that they maintained his business, lived in the same type of home their father lived, vacationed where he vacationed, and faithfully visited his grave site. What was important to the father, not the children, was that his name be honored in connection with the land bequeathed to them. While they were ritually observant and attested to their love of their father in every which way, they dishonored his name to the community.

Likewise, G-d is concerned that the people in the land of Israel honor Him before the world; ritual performance and study of Torah serves those people agreeable to doing so, but failing to protect His name to the world, dishonors G-d and his request and covenant with the people of Israel.

An attempt to explain why the paradigm of control may now shift to China

SenderBerl: It has been a long standing position that Israel would discover that despite its intense military might that it might succumb to the surrounding Arab nations. This is a consequence of the insistence of the government to puruse a course leading the people of Israel and the region away from G-d. The excerpts below  now reflect this very dynamic discussed in further detail in www.senderberl.com/peres.pdf. Again, the scenario is one where we are witnessing Israel collapse from its own weight. The solution is for Israel to honor G-d before the nations of the world. This is what Israel is all about. This is what the Jewish people and their forefathers attested to and committed to for generations. However, it is the very last thing they will undertake. For the many years they could never envision or see Yasser Arafat as a threat to Israel. However, when Arafat turned down President Clinton's and Barak's generous offer, the Israeli government could not even begin to fathom what was happening. The very last thing they are willing to accept, not to appear "backward." is that G-d intervenes. If the Israeli people and government wish to act as though He does not exist, then Israel will not exist. The choice is their own.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
August 8, 2002

PS. To be clear, to respond by saying that the Israeli people acknowledge the Jewish holidays and heritage, visit and participate at the synagogue, or any other response of this genre is insufficient. The only way is for Israel to openly act before the entire world to honor His Name and role for the State of Israel AND TO MEAN IT.

Extract (further analysis below):

Yaakov Perry, former head of Israel's domestic intelligence agency, said Israel and the United States completely underestimated the significance of suicide bombings and its potential for spreading throughout Arab society.

****

"Anyone involved in this war knows that the lone suicide bomber is the nightmare of intelligence organizations, precisely because identifying and locating him is so difficult," Perry said. "I must admit that the sheer number of suicide bombing acts over the course of the last year overwhelms me and many like me."    


'Mega-terror' attack possible, Sharon toldJANINE ZACHARIA and LAMIA LAHOUD    Aug. 8, 2002    
As Prime Minister Ariel Sharon consulted with senior officials Wednesday about prospects for a "mega-terror" attack that could kill scores and explored possible responses, the Palestinian Authority tentatively endorsed Israel's offer of a phased pullback. Intelligence officials warned Sharon that terrorists could be plotting to bomb a high-rise building or some other type of attack that could cause widespread damage unseen so far in the current conflict.


SenderBerl: The Israeli people are already in a matter of months demoralized. Again, those who are willing to turn their backs on G-d are willing to turn their backs on Israel. Thus, once the government sees the start of an exodus of citizens from Israel under a number of rationalizations, perhaps the Jewish people will stop rationalizing their failure to accept G-d as central to Israel and her existence.
   
Excerpt:

The united Jewish voice that was once a plumb line for American policy in the Middle East is now a fractured shadow of what it was just ten years ago. I couldn’t help but ask myself, “Is this group representative of Jews across America?” I sadly concluded that the balance of American Jewry has so distanced itself from the struggles of World War II and the ensuing trials associated with the creation of the state of Israel that they no longer even view Jews in Israel as brothers and sisters. For thousands of years, struggles for the faith have been an essential part of Judaism; persecution has been so much more prominent than times of (relative) freedom that a few decades of religious tolerance have left the American Jewish psyche in a vacuum. For some, that has fostered a materialistic, short-sighted worldview.

It is a sad day when after centuries of struggling for a homeland, Jews on the front lines are abandoned by those living comfortably in safety thousands of miles away. The propaganda machine of anti-Semitism, now rampant in the media, has spun its web of deception even among American Jews, upon whom - second only to G-d - Israel desperately needs to depend. As the state of Israel stands alone on the world stage, it looks like American Christians will be the ones to stand up - along with a minority of Jews.
----------------------------------
Stephen A. McDonald writes for www.bigtreenews.com


SenderBerl: An opinion piece which refers to G-d! It is important to point out that the reliance upon G-d seems to be at this point of time subservient to the committment to honor Him before the other nations of the world. The "challenge" of two thousand years of the Diaspora is to work to honor Him in good times. In bad times, G-d knows that those turning their backs on Him will be the first to plead for His intervention. By bowing to Him in good times, the world might know the reason for the blessings resulting in the good times. If however the choice is to turn their backs to Him -- the choice then is to become a godless culture -- and if that is the case then the paradigm of control will shift to the godless culture who would have carried control without G-d's intervention: China.

The clock is ticking...

No Way Out

With all due respect, we again reiterate that every effort no matter how sincere will never change the slippery slope we are upon because success in such effort will make successful, agendas moving the people under monotheism away from G-d.

The following brief excerpts clearly attest to it.

Excerpt One: Hamas says will target Israeli leadership

By Joseph Logan

BEIRUT, Aug 9 (Reuters) - The militant Palestinian Islamist group Hamas said on Friday that it will target Israeli leaders in response to the Jewish state's tactic of killing senior Palestinian militants behind attacks on Israelis.

SenderBerl: We have felt that Sharon is at real risk. This confirms it. Two separate groups operating with two different agendas seeking the same end. One of these groups believes that peace will be possible without Sharon. There is no peace possible without a religious resolution. You will see it again and again and while everyone sees the same thing, no one is willing to admit to the need for a religious resolution because it seems man rather face the specter of death and devastation rather than bow to G-d. Man of course will again bow but only when it is too late.

Except Two: Iraqi cleric says U.S. waging war against Islam

By Nadim Ladki

BAGHDAD, Aug 9 (Reuters) - An Iraqi prayer leader on Friday urged Muslims across the world to rally behind Iraq in the face of U.S. threats which he said were tantamount to waging war on Islam.

"America does not target only Iraq, it targets Islam...This is a war against Islam," Sheikh Abdul-Ghafour al-Qaisi said during Friday prayers at Baghdad's Grand Imam mosque.

SenderBerl: Now consider what will be the case if the Saudis give the green light on the same point. It is only a function of time before it becomes an open and apparent holy war with China and Islamic nations on one side and the US, its allies and Israel on the other. Does this sound like biblical prophecy unraveling before your eyes?

SenderBerl: We must emphasize that President Bush is being given secular advice: confront China and the Islamic nations now while we still can do it. However, what we have been telling the government through the avenues we speak through is that regardless of the righteousness of the intent and pursuit of the course the only question and issue is whether success by the US and Israel translates in moving the people of the subject nations to or away from G-d. Since the answer is away from G-d, then the result will be contrary to the best laid plans and thoughts. Similar thereto, when war was waged against the evil Romans, righteousness was inherent in the losing side. History was to provide man with the predicate to understand why the righteous and just side lost and lost big.

Excerpt Three: Saddam plans urban campaign if U.S. attacks-LA Times


WASHINGTON, Aug 8 (Reuters) - Iraqi President Saddam Hussein plans to avoid open desert fighting and mass his forces in major cities in case of a U.S. invasion, the Los Angeles Times reported on Thursday.

SenderBerl: This confirms the Chinese strategy we envisioned. He will lace all infrastructure sites with explosives if not worse to cause massive damage. The US to offset it will send in scout forces to try to detect whether the infrastructure sites are suitable for larger incursions. This is where the use of biotoxins come into play; where US forces may or may not suffer immediate consequence. The entire episode is difficult to write about because the US must understand that it is pursuing an incorrect course to resolve the problems. You cannot go back in time and use the dynamic of a benevolent Rome to resolve territorial conflict issues.

Conclusion: We don't know when the US will say "Uncle." For sure Israel is saying it because it is sinking on a notable basis economically and in spirit and morale on a daily basis. While it proffers misinformation, it is naive to think that the Chinese cannot monitor the situation with near accuracy. Zemin is staying on because no other leader is  better suited for a war mode future. War these days does not mean military war only: it means psychological, economic, strategic engagements which shift balances of power and opportunity. The Chinese have prevailed because they only need simple acts of intervention to uproot a complex set of US logistics to wit: seen via two serial bus attacks in Israel undermining the entire agenda. Keep you eye on Musharraf. It only takes a helicopter accident to completely change the balance of power. If Musharraf lasts a year we will be really dumfounded. We doubt he will last very much longer. Moreover, China will never make the same mistake in slipping in thinking that Musharraf like Assad would never do a last minute shift in allegiance. We can thus conclude that Assad of Syria has been given full assurances by China that it will protect Syria against US and Israeli machinations. This also sets forth the groundwork for a major regional war (holocaust).  We again ask you to make every effort to relay the importance of a religious resolution.

Addendum: Just last night I received a telephone call from a Kabbalist Rabbi whom a friend suggested I speak with. What I relayed to him after he brought up a myriad of issues for discussion and exploration was that it was fruitless at this point of time to talk, talk, talk. People have been studying and talking for centuries but when it came time to apply all that study and talk to what was before them, they just continued talking, talking and talking, doing nothing.

There is only one issue: whether Israel has the affirmative obligation based on its history and heritage to be a nation which honors G-d before the nation of the world. Period. There is only one answer. Thus, the need to act in accord with the answer and again without logic, rhyme or reason, events will change. If one avoids this truth then one is willing if not wanting to face the specter of the abyss, where the truth will be obvious under the lash and whip of his or her Chinese taskmaster as history and the world turns out to become what it would have been long ago without G-d's intervention.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
August 9, 2002

SenderBerl: Global War in 2003

Warning to Arial Sharon that he, like Gorbachev and Rabin, has been marked for assassination

In 1999 we relayed that what we were seeing unraveling might unravel into the possibility of global war in 2003. It is the only time we made a time specific interpretation of this nature. The single article below from the current issue of Newsweek succinctly said clearly supports it.

This article subtitled “Washington looks at overhauling the Islamic and Arab world,” clearly admits that new world order forces are in control of the United States and that efforts to render this agenda unconstitutional and the like will fail. Thus, our efforts to explain that only via a religious resolution could true peace prevail. Otherwise, forces which are not only anti-G-d but also clearly anti-American will prevail in taking the world to the abyss.

The Arab/Islamic world now on this article of admission can conclude and proffer that this is as they claimed a crusade against Islam. It is thus based on this article a religious/ holy war. In this regard, the Arab/Islamic world will affirmatively and openly soon permanently bond with China to defend itself.

Protests here in American whether violent or peaceful are not the answer. There is only one answer: the religious resolution. It is now a proper question to ask how can we move to a religious resolution when those in charge, the new world order forces, are anti-G-d? In our opinion, there are only two men who can possibly change things at this sensitive juncture.

The first is Arial Sharon. A secular Zionist, he is now the target of new world order forces exactly paralleling the new world order attack on Mikael Gorbachev about a decade back. While Gorbachev allowed the Soviet Union to fail under the promises and noble agenda that convinced him to undertake the dismantling of the Soviet Union, he still was sympathetic to the Communist Party, and would be too slow in moving things ahead. Ronald Reagan could not bear the intent to take his life; so he lived, but power shifted to collaborator Boris Yeltsin, a drunk, molded to take over the country under the staged coup against Gorbachev.

Similarly, such control was established over Israel under Shimon Peres. He sold out Israel’s sovereignty to join Rabin and Arafat in capturing the Noble Peace prize. When he could not overtake Rabin internally in Israel, he played his role, Rabin ultimately one day acting as though Israel was a sovereign nation, wavering on his role in giving up land for peace (having second thoughts concerning Jerusalem). Unlike Gorbachev, there was no one to spare his life when power shifted to collaborator Shimon Peres. To show the power of the new world order forces, despite the Israeli public denying him victory five times over these many years, despite the Israeli public disliking him, Shimon Peres continues a single heart beat away again from leading the country should anything befall Arial Sharon. Odds are high that an attempt will soon be made on his life under the cover of Hamas targeting the Israeli leadership. Sharon unlike Rabin has been a friend for many years with Peres. However, Sharon will soon see the control of the new world forces over its agents: when he faces the specter of death. We tell Israel that it should do everything to prevent this from happening and if it happens it should know who did it again.

What is Israel to do? If the US is now under new world order control, how can little Israel change things? In our respectful opinion, Israel must quickly put forth leaders that acknowledge Israel’s covenant with G-d and that it exists to honor G-d before the nations of the world. If Israel refuses to do this, if the people who claim to be the religious leadership within Israel, willingly stand blind, or continue to offer rationalizations, to save themselves the effort to do what is right, in the unmitigated hope, that things will improve, then we are headed for a nightmare of a future. Nothing on this planet at this point of time can defeat the new world order forces. They control both sides of the fence. You cannot trust anyone for they have infiltrated the infrastructure of every entity that will be looked to for relief against its agenda.  Only G-d can save the reality that evil controls. Again, why do we know it is evil? Because it works to eradicate G-d from the world making it a godless culture bowing to global capitalism as the means to world peace. This is very good for those behind the new world order forces because they will have consolidated their power and control for the generations to come. Once they do so, they know nothing can stop them.

However, the new world order will not succeed for their failure will attest even in the dark future that G-d not man is in control. If those countries and peoples under monotheism do not undertake the correct course, then the paradigm of power will shift to the godless cultures that would have had it long ago but for G-d’s intervention (giving it to those peoples under the countries historically aligned with monotheism).

Now for the immediate future. China saw how President Bush went out and bought Musharraf. The consequence of President Bush’s success is that China in our opinion had to give Syria and Iran commitments to defend these countries against US machinations. Without doing so, Assad of Syria would have had no choice but to disengage from China.

This one highlighted reference by Newsweek: “ Everyone wants to go to Baghdad. Real men want to go to Tehran,” really should scare everyone. This shows you how the new world order forces are preparing for global conflict, realizing that it is better to confront the situation now rather than tomorrow. However, from their secular perspective, the situation is that their safety (and of course incidentally their financial success, gaining eternal power and control) is best assured by taking over the world (one world government). To subscribe to any agenda or better said propaganda that the answer is to overhaul the Islamic and Arab world is to subscribe to a agenda which defies the bedrock principles upon which this country was founded. America doesn’t subscribe to a government that tells its citizens we are going to war with anyone who we don’t like who could possibly pose as a threat to us. If we subscribe to such a tenet or claim, then what stops China from proffering to its people the very same tenet or claim against the United States? If they did it first, the uproar from Washington would be deafening.

Thus, assuming the validity of the dynamics attendant to the Newsweek article below, we have crossed and possibly irreversibly so the demarcation line for forthcoming global warfare. We can seek a religious resolution to abate the threat of nuclear and other similar weapons or we can face the specter of war. The American people should understand that the new world order agenda is to use the umbrella of WMD to eviscerate G-d from the Islamic/Arab world as they have successfully done so in Israel under the backed control of Shimon Peres. Now, if Sharon can understand that his good friend may be pursuing the orders of his controllers as he did with Rabin, he might save himself, get rid of Israel’s living cancer, and then open a gateway to pursuing a genuine peace.

To this end, Sharon should take action to protect Israel and the world, in case he is the target of Hamas, for like Gandi, Hamas may pull the trigger, but the target has been authorized by the true murderer with the protection of eliminating anyone standing in the way of success by new world order forces. There is only one entity strong enough to defeat this evil which has intertwined itself as it has in the United States and Israel: G-d. It is time that men and women of good will do everything they can to invokes G-d’s intervention. For the Jewish people it is to recognize that they obviously are doing something wrong (for why else these problems and dire course). So the only question should be what are we doing wrong? What can we do to correct it?  The only exception to the sequence of these questions is to force Shimon Peres out of official office for his removal from the Israeli government itself opens a gateway to moving in the right direction. Again, there is little doubt in our mind that Arial Sharon no matter what the sequence of things is the primary target to move Shimon Peres again into the office five times denied him by the Israeli public. Again, while Sharon has made his bed with the new world order forces, he, like Gorbachev, has a heart, and carries a commitment to the Israeli people and nation inapposite to the new world order agenda and interests.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
Early morning, August 12, 2002

Beyond Baghdad: Expanding Target List

Washington looks at overhauling the Islamic and Arab world

By Roy Gutman and John Barry
NEWSWEEK

Aug. 19 issue - While still wrangling over how to overthrow Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, the Bush administration is already looking for other targets. President Bush has called for the ouster of Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat. Now some in the administration-and allies at D.C. think tanks-are eyeing Iran and even Saudi Arabia. As one senior British official put it: “Everyone wants to go to Baghdad. Real men want to go to Tehran.”

IN A STATEMENT BROADCAST into Iran in mid-July, Bush promised unspecified U.S. “support” to “Iran’s people” as they “move toward a future defined by greater freedom.” And early this month, a top Bush aide said the current regime-both the elected government of reformist Mohammed Khatami and the unelected mullahs who dominate public life-was ineffectual. Speaking to an audience at the Washington Institute for Near East Affairs, National Security Council aide Zalmay Khalilzad did not call outright for a regime change in Iran, but didn’t argue when a questioner asserted that this was the policy’s aim. Khalilzad did not indicate any plan to use force, but promised to “reach out” to the Iranian people and find “ways and means” of helping them.

Richard Perle, chairman of Bush’s Defense Policy Board, recently invited a controversial French scholar to brief the outside advisers on “taking the Saudi out of Arabia.” When word leaked to the press, the Bush administration strongly denied it wanted to oust the Saudi royal regime. Still, some insiders continue to whisper about the possibility. Syria and even Egypt are now under discussion in neoconservative circles, along with North Korea and Burma.

“The thinking in the administration is really evolving toward the idea of promoting democracy and regime change-an overhaul of the Arab and Islamic world, rather than dealing with it as it is,” says Kenneth Katzman, a leading expert on Iran who works with the Congressional Research Service. Some military strategists worry that the talk of overthrowing other nations could jeopardize any invasion of Iraq. Tony Blair, the only foreign leader who might join in a U.S.-led intervention in Iraq, is asking tough questions. “He wants to know a lot more about what the administration’s real agenda is,” says a top Blair aide. Some Iraq-invasion scenarios under review have U.S. carriers steaming into the narrow Persian Gulf-a place where they’d be vulnerable to missile strikes from Iranian shore batteries. Richard Murphy, a former top State Department official dealing with the Mideast, warns the United States could lose Iran as a needed ally. “They will be pretty cautious about putting their hands firmly in ours, knowing we have a knife headed for their back

SenderBerl: The question was posited why Sharon and why now. Again, Sharon with Bush Jr. like Gorbachev with Reagan and Bush Sr. works with the new world agenda. However, in case of actual war, it is important that the military be contained in who to attack, when and with what. Sharon, a brilliant military leader, is not inclined to follow US directives when Israel faces major attack and extinction. He will do what he deems in the best interest of Israel albeit he at the same time undermines it in the first place by becoming a political puppet of new world order forces. More significantly, if Sharon is assassinated at the right time, the trail can be traced back to Hamas and no doubt Lebanon and Syria. The moral outrage of the time will no doubt coincide with the US plans to move against Iraq. We have longed said as you well know that Israel will be charged with taking out the current regime in Syria when the US moves against Iraq. If its Prime Minister is assassinated in this war ready environment the key dynamic of justified war is created: MORAL OUTRAGE. This was the purpose of 9-11, to platform an excuse for the world and the American people for all the abusive decisions made since then; to allow those plotters and planners to paint as putative traitors anyone questioning or seeking oversight over their personalized war agendas haphazardly or otherwise compromising basic tenets of individual rights and freedoms associated with the United States Constitution.

During this very time, it was a heaven sent experience to see Aaron Fuerstein on 60 Minutes. Here is a man who represents what the Jewish people and Israel were meant to be in service to G-d. He is a role model for Israel and the Jewish people. He sends a message and sets a standard to which the world should aspire. He makes decisions that are a light to the future whereas everyone else today makes decision taking us to the abyss.

What decisions did he make which warrant such acclaim?

He was not a young man when a fire took out a factory from which he could have pocketed 300 million dollars from a business in his family for generations. He was (wisely) counseled to do so because the future for textiles in the US was bleak with textile corporations moving in mass overseas to use cost effective labor. This man made decisions honoring his community; showing them that a man possibly soon to die with a string of zeroes after his name was shallow compared with the opportunity to show his community that he really cared about them. So he paid them weekly salaries for three months while he rebuilt the factory. What was his immediate fate? He faced corporate bankruptcy. However, the light and aura of the man commanded love and support from not only his community but from people everywhere to support a man who was willing to compromise his wealth to reflect a decision not to abandon his community.

Let us also tell you why we believe he received such universal support for his company and product. If he made these noble decisions but lived a grand lifestyle we don't believe he would have received it. However, Aaron Feurstein and his supportive wife live simply, one never knowing that this man had a nexus to great wealth. He as Israel should be as a nation proved to the world that decisions should be made reflecting itself as role model for a better world. Aaron Feurstein should be the model not the exception for the world. Israel could learn much from Aaron Feurstein. Aaron Feurstein did not abandon his community. Needles to highlight, that Israel should not abandon her G-d.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
August 13, 2002


Two Extremes of Corporate Leadership
   
by Mark Shields
   
   
Texans regularly brag about Texas. Sometimes they so exaggerate their home state's alleged virtues that independent observers argue that Texans have little regard for the truth. That is unfair. Texans have such a high regard for the truth that they use it economically in order not to deplete the supply. Here is a recent example. A hugely successful Texas company, with more than $100 billion in revenue last year -- more than IBM or AT&T -- issued this statement: "Financial statements for (1997 through 2000 and the first two quarters of 2001) and the audit reports relating to the year-end financial statements for 1997 through 2000 should not be relied upon."

And why should the financial statements of Enron, the Houston-based heavyweight champion of energy trading in the U.S.'s deregulated electricity and natural gas markets, "not be relied upon"?

For starters, Enron's net income for those three years was $591 million less than Enron reported to its investors, its creditors, its employees and the American public.

Add to that "big lie" the further embarrassing disclosure that Enron's own chief financial officer had formed and operated two partnerships which, through their arrangement with the company, stood to profit at Enron's expense. Does the term conflict of interest come to mind?

Enron, under the strong leadership of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Kenneth Lay, had pioneered and dominated the field of buying and selling contracts for electricity and natural gas. In August 2000, when Lay's close personal friend, Texas governor George W. Bush, was nominated for the White House, Enron's stock sold for $90 a share. Today, that stock is worthless.

Along the way, Lay had been more than helpful to Bush, whose political campaigns had received $2 million from Lay and his Enron colleagues. According to The Wall Street Journal, the Enron fleet of corporate jets had been made available for political travel for Bush. Lay had also hired two of the first President Bush's former Cabinet officers, Secretary of State James A. Baker III and Secretary of Commerce Robert Mosbacher.

Never unappreciative, the Bush folks demonstrated their gratitude to Lay for his help and respect for his judgment. Only one energy industry executive was granted a private, leisurely, one-on-one session with Vice President Dick Cheney (also a close personal friend), the head of the Bush administration's energy task force. That's right: Enron.

The man from Enron also had a private one-on-one in the White House with another friend, presidential counselor Karl Rove -- a meeting complicated by the fact that Rove then held Enron stock he had valued between $100,000 and $250,000. In addition, Lay and other Enron executives interviewed the prospective Bush appointees to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the agency with potential oversight of Enron's activities.

Sad to say, this is one model of contemporary corporate leadership that demonstrated brutal indifference to Enron's 20,000 employees, for whom this will hardly be a very merry Christmas. But wait -- consider the humane and enlightened CEO of Malden Mills in Lawrence, Mass., the admirable Aaron Feurstein.

On Dec. 11, 1995, with the temperature hovering just above zero, a fire whipped by 45-mph winds destroyed three entire buildings, totaling 600,000 square feet of factory floor, at the 95-year-old Malden Mills. Malden Mills has long been the principal provider of Polartec, a lightweight thermal material, to L.L. Bean and Patagonia.

Feurstein, then 70, announced among the smoldering embers that he would not do the shrewd thing and pocket the billions in insurance and either retire or move his company to a place where there were no unions and 11-year-olds were not prevented by meddling public officials from earning 35 cents an hour. Not only did Feurstein immediately begin rebuilding, he gave each of his 3,000 employees a $275 Christmas bonus and then paid the idled workers their full salary for December, February and March.

Wasn't that impractical? No, Feurstein told Paul Solman on PBSs' "NewsHour": "I consider our workers an asset, not an expense. ... It would have been unconscionable to put 3,000 people on the streets." Why not leave down-at-the-heels Lawrence? "You have a responsibility to the community."

Doing the right thing cost Feurstein $25 million, and today that is the amount Malden Mills must borrow to meet creditor obligations.

My knowledge of corporate finance is non-existent. But I know a decent and noble man when I see one. This year, whether asked for or not, everyone on my Christmas list will receive a gift with a lot of Malden Mills Polartec in it. It's the least we can do.

Mark Shields is a political columnist based in Washington, D.C. He is a regular commentator on PBS' "The NewsHour With Jim Lehrer" and CNN's "Capital Gang."

Point for the Jewish New Year

The Jewish State with its Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is steeped in survival techniques. Realizing the Chinese/Islamic strategy to have Israel lose its tourism industry and then sink by its own weight, heightened by driving it to reoccupy the West Bank, the Jewish State has now countered. It has taken the strategy and turned it against the Palestinians.

Prime Minister Sharon has gotten financial backing for the reoccupation and now will make life more miserable for the Palestinians than the Palestinians planned for the citizens of Israel. Using the very same strategy in reverse, enhanced by no economy, no opportunity, little food, the Palestinians by the law of nature will have to ultimately push to move out of the West Bank entirely, life there proving unbearable.

Is this a brilliant counter strategy? Does it result in Israel safely possessing the entire land of Israel as promised by Torah? Has Israel now prevailed and will it in fact survive? The problem is that the leadership just as the case 2000 years ago thinks it has it all figured out. What it has figured out is how to circumvent the given opportunity again to properly assess what is happening so that it can find and pursue the correct road in moving to a religious resolution.

In such regard, it was noted to me recently that the top rabbi in Israel went to meet his religious counterpart in the Islamic world in Cairo. I was told that not only were efforts to move on the religious front fruitless but the attitude of the Islamic leader was anything but positive toward moving to such a resolution. My response was that a positive attitude could not be anticipated as long as Israel pushed the cart before the horse. First, Israel had to change its attitude to its obligations to G-d, recognizing G-d as a material part of the state’s existence, and showing intent to honor His name before the other nations of the world. Then, a negative attitude and result would be inconsistent. However, to escape the need to address this required route (as attested to by Torah) the leadership notes the futility of the pursuit and then develops a brilliant counter strategy to the one it itself faces.

While it looks like it just might work, and while it looks like a fitting response to one that intended to sink the Jewish State, it cannot work. First, it cannot work, because if it successful and Israel gets back the entire West Bank, now not giving up Jerusalem and the West Bank, leaving Israel intact, and free of Palestinian intrusion, the pivotal question is whether Israel continues on its course of moving away from G-d, now even more secure in the institutionalized course? Again, G-d by recent history again attests that this course will not be allowed to prevail coupled now with the seeming reality that those speaking His name have lost. This I write as I noted yesterday PBS doing a one-hour special advertised as having 911 families asking where was G-d for them on 911?

This is why I today write to note the obsession of the new world order to remove G-d and allowing strategies by Israel the new world would never have recently allowed (please note that Israel in the past would never have been allowed to pursue this strategy but seemingly it is being allowed to do so because it was threatened with defeat and the strategy then raises the specter of whether its success and the continued implementation of the course diluting G-d in Israel will establish that G-d in fact is not there, coupled further with now raising the issue where was He on 911). Therefore, again, with even more confidence then when I noted that confident President Clinton would also fail, I can with new confidence relay that this strategy for the above reasons will not ultimately succeed. Similar to those in the last days before the Diaspora, when undertaking Rome, all perceptions of initial success and initial successes only platformed the most severe consequences of history.

Now, to also quickly tackle the question of where was G-d on 911? In Peres Personified I noted that it was a true miracle that the building/planes were not laced with anything from a small nuclear device to biotoxins or biochemicals that could have devastated a large segment of New York City with innumerable deaths and casualties.

Again, the mainstay proposition of Torah is that there would absolutely no life for the Jewish people without G-d’s covenant with Abraham because when we were just 70 in number we would have all fallen at or about the time of famine taking us by G-d’s intervention per Joseph to Egypt. The biblical dynamic is whether an entire people would be here or not. The biblical dynamic is whether the people who should not be here at all will let light prevail over darkness, the latter destined to arise as its first shadows enter the arena, by not denying their obligations to G-d. Attempts to circumvent the messages sent by creating new creative solutions to not face their obligations are destined only to fail and assure darkness to restore the consequence closer to original destiny than to results post G-d’s intervention.

Man’s mindset defies description. This past week I heard a learned rabbi in discussing the Torah sections for the High holidays cover the segment where Abraham reached an agreement with Abimelech, the Palestinian of his day. In discussing this segment, I heard from the group of top Jewish community minds every interpretation but the one which I ultimately offered thereafter receiving the approval of the rabbi and the group. I noted that the reason Abimelech came to Abraham paralleled why the world leaders years later, when the Jews first entered Israel, came to Israel to make peace and show favor: they saw that Abraham (the Jewish people) were with G-d. When Israel is with G-d the surrounding leaders will come to Israel to establish a genuine peace.

Moreover, the rabbi in answering another question posited to him noted that the Palestinians of the day of Abraham did believe that G-d created the world but they then convoluted it by concluding that G-d thereafter was out of the picture leaving religious power in the sun moon etc. When I heard this I laughed. Later, the rabbi asked me why I laughed. I answered because when it is said that those of times past made the barbaric determination that G-d left the picture leaving in His stead the sun moon and other idols to take over His exited role, that the rabbinic leaders could not conclude that the very same barbaric act took place when Raban Gamliel in exiling Rabbi Eliezer used it as a platform to render a ruling that G-d, in giving us Torah, wiped His hands of His continuing role, giving over power to the rabbis (instead of the sun moon etc.). This very Talmudic tract written at the time we were exiled from Israel 2000 years ago platformed the reality that Israel does not exist with G-d being central to the State of Israel or that the State of Israel finds a need to honor the obligation that we have to see Israel honor His name before the nations of the world.

Prime Minister Sharon was advised and wise enough to see the strategy he and Israel first missed. His answer was to give back what Israel was given. Why not be wise enough to see that while it is brilliant and seemingly just, history provides that it will platform like previous brilliant strategies and counter strategies devastation, unless one compels himself to be wise enough to recognize what is really happening and why it is taking place.

Without doing so, there cannot be repentance this coming week for strategies whose success will only continue the course of removing G-d from the region under the covert agenda of the new world order.

Respectfully submitted,

Joseph Ehrlich
September 4, 2002

During the weekend I read for the first time Ha’Aretz Magazine. What did I stumble upon but a most revealing interview of former Prime Minister Ehud Barak.

He made a mistake in giving such an interview.

First, he revels in the fact that failure of his intent to give up all that land for what he now admits would be a transient peace, revealed that Yasser Arafat was no partner in peace, but a man intent to recapture all of Israel.

He fails to address what would have happened under his new perspective if Arafat had accepted with the intent to then pursue the agenda from a more strategic advantage than before.

Would Barak have hung himself for giving up the biblical land vested to Israel for a peace that would prove by his own admission to be nothing more than an illusion and a transfer that would have been a “mistake,” costing innumerable Israeli lives in addition to lives he has already cost Israel?  He should give himself forty lashes each and every night for his zeal in pursuing what he now won’t admit would have been an unmitigated disaster. He applauds himself for revealing Arafat. The man is shameless.

Moreover, in his stupidity to applaud himself, he opened himself up to questioning which shows that he and Netanyahu are willing pawns and collaborators with the new world order (Peres corrupts). He was asked whether he felt any reservation about flaunting his new wealth when Israel bleeds. He relays in his response that he is a consultant to EDS, a partner in an investment fund, and also gives lectures. Clinton and Barak do not make the same naïve mistake Hillary made in cashing out via remarkably successful commodity trades. The public stands as passive sheep to the reality that Israel has had a string of Prime Ministers all who sold out the sovereignty of their country to new world order pressures, usually folding with a big check on the other end of the capitulation. Here is what the interviewer asked…

Q:…But we have had two prime ministers of the same generation whose brief terms of office ended unsuccessfully and shortly afterward are getting rich. One is going to smoke big cigars in Caesarea and the other is going to smoke cigars in Kfar Shmaryyahu. Isn’t there something here that should make us uneasy?

Q:…Both of you are living like members of the jet set while the country you left behind is hurting badly and grieving.

The reason we write is because when Ha’Aretz, a paper we once saw as sympathetic to Oslo can begin detecting that they are speaking to former Prime Ministers who not only became rich due to selling out their country to outside controllers, but also find no shame in living it up to enjoy the fruits of their collaboration,  the Israeli people have to start to grapple with the reality that they must free themselves from the grip of the new world order which controls the candidates in both major political parties.

We have said for many years that the reason we took out our advertisement in May 1996 revealing the horrible truth behind Peres and the new world order infiltration of Israeli infrastructure is because if Israel would pursue the Rabin assassination, it had a chance to free itself of the new world order grip. We pointed out that Israel had nothing better than a caretaker government, something which the Israeli public could not easily accept, until now.

The future of the world is in the hands of Israel.

We received requests to print some of our prior analysis. We looked them over and there is a lot which bears repeating. We start today with extracts of what we posted on 9-11-01.

8:00PM September 11, 2001 - SenderBerl believes it was the first to point to China

Without question, {China} obtaining important military technology over the past decade has emboldened them to step covertly in the areas of the world connected with today’s events. They see America as the enemy, and they have manipulated America’s interest in seeking to intervene in Chinese internal affairs, as the very platform to extract major military and commercial secrets. They have succeeded mightily in this regard.

No matter who the U.S. now publicly determines was “behind” this attack, it will never accuse at this point China. Those the U.S. points to wouldn’t have the resources to take down BOTH World Trade Center Towers which could not have been mere luck or coincidence.

Thus, the important thing to do is to preclude the emergence of China as the superpower it soon will become, and to do this the U.S. has to reassess itself. This country grew to the mighty power it showed itself to be in WWI and WWII connective to the time it carried religious tenets as part and parcel of its everyday life. The U.S. has abandoned those religious tenets, and in my respectful opinion weakened itself creating the reality of a strong China, one which is anxious to confront the U.S. in the decade ahead, first seeking to gain dominance and alliances with a host of countries opposed to the single U.S. superpower status.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
September 11, 2001 8:00 PM

To read the entire posting: <http://www.senderberl.com/china/china0.htm>

SenderBerl: It has been our position since the Rabin assassination that if Israel had the guts to pursue the truth behind the murder of Rabin that Israel could have saved itself from its current situation and platform an understanding that it exists to honor G-d's name before the other nations of the world.

People deeply now recognize that we are close to massive death and destruction. They realize that what we have been hollering about for years is real.

Is it too late? We hope not. However, keep sitting around doing nothing about it and it's not far away from being irreversible. As I told a very good friend in 1998 or 1999, once we enter 2003, it may be too late.

We look at the story below as a basis to encourage those who are embraced by its truths to repent and apologize and recognize that the only solution is the religious solution.

We also include a piece written by Morton Klein who deserves applause to standing up against those in the American Jewish leadership who stupidly supported Oslo and criticized Klein for years regarding his accurate warnings regarding Oslo.

Our contribution and effort was to focus attention on the paramount dynamic: that no peace plan moving the people of the region away from G-d could ever succeed. We note that the main dynamics were contained in Missed Message of Torah and its attachment Peres Personified. We really are encouraged that Israel and the Jewish people may wake up before it is too late, and soon it is too late, to understand what they need to do to change the dire course. Winston below highlights the ten years Arafat taught hatred. SenderBerl faults the Jewish leadership for failing since 1967 to teach the Jewish children love for G-d. Love for G-d doesn't translate into ritual performance but to understanding what Israel should be about and why. It took getting to the precipice before seeing what should have been written long ago, but better still before Bush attacks. Will someone now get Sharon to do the right thing, make an announcement detailing what Israel is about and that it will recommit itself to G-d?


Can A Leftist Look Inward?
by Emanuel A. Winston
September 17, 2002


Before we begin, let us exclude from our definition those who are merely left ‘liberal’ and easily recruited to ‘bleeding heart causes’ by professional mind twisters of the radical left.

The radical left would generally include the Oslo gang; Shimon Peres, Yossi Beilin, Ron Pundak, Uri Savir, Yossi Sarid, et al. Then there are the families who own the three ultra left Hebrew newspapers of Ha’aretz, Yediot Achronot and Ma’ariv. One could throw in the Jerusalem Report and the Van Leer Institute. Other well-known ultra leftists are, of course, Peace Now, Gush Shalom and a lengthy list of peace radical rationalizers like Benvenisti, Ben Ami, Ben Eliezer, Avraham Burg..

I have often wondered, after the spreading ripples of more than 610 murdered Jews (just in the last 2 years) while under the protective umbrella provided by Oslo, if these Leftists ever look inward. Perhaps by being an active participant in a philosophy where terrorists are cast as viable peace partners, those who assisted in making the now dead and maimed vulnerable cannot face themselves honestly.

Frequently, we see articles by or about Ehud Barak where he refuses to take any responsibility for evacuating Lebanon on the run, giving impetus to Arafat’s Al Aksa Oslo War. It would be astonishing indeed to hear Peres or Beilin apologize or reflect on their illegal meetings with Arab terrorists like Yassir Arafat in order to force Oslo on the people of Israel against their will.

Even serial killers sometimes admit to culpability in their rampage of killings. Those of the ultra left not only refuse to look inward, but they press on with their own errors despite the proofs of their mistakes, to be found in ever-expanding graveyards across Israel.

Worse yet, now that their illegal secret negotiations have come into the sunlight, they wish to resurrect the territorial retreats that allowed Arafat’s Arabs such ease in slaughtering Israelis and others, including Americans.

Perhaps they cannot bear to look inward and face the fact that they are co-conspirators who enabled the murders of their fellow Jews. Perhaps they cannot admit their participation with Arab terrorists, for fear that one day they may have to face a new (non-leftist) judiciary who will have them meet the gallows.

Since the signing of the Oslo Accords on September 13, 1993 (9 years ago exactly), more than 1000 Jews have been murdered by Arab terrorists, with tens of thousands more wounded, many maimed for life, and hundreds of children orphaned. The ripple effects are incalculable in terms of wives without husbands, children without mothers or fathers who must be raised on welfare, parents who will never be able to stop grieving. The leftists acted to appease the Arab terror organizations that declared they were the sworn enemies of the Jews and the Jewish State. Will these radical leftists ever admit that they risked the lives of fellow Jews on their experiments? Will they ever understand that they are like pagan priests who sacrificed women, children, and men to gods of stone? These high priests of the radical left chose the Arabs under Arafat and gave him what was called the Palestinian Authority to create a new Arab State. Why does the left worship this icon of its own making? This was the new earthly god whom they, the radical left, trusted, and to whom they offered their sacrifices for peace - beautiful Jewish souls.

What is the explanation for their lack of vision, of conscience, of self-awareness? Is it just extreme arrogance and self-aggrandizement? Or are they like habitual criminals, pedophiles, serial killers who simply cannot recognize what they do, let alone control their predilection to offer sacrifices of their fellow humans

What shall we do with these aberrant, malfunctioning, dangerous people who are in a position of power to inflict such pain and death upon us all?

As we cannot trust the Muslim Arabs, the radical Islamists, so too, we cannot trust the radical left, for they also walk hand-in-hand with the Arab terrorists. I remember hearing Shimon Peres declare to a press conference of the International Jewish Media that “Jihad can be like a love letter.” I cannot help but feel that we are rapidly approaching the time where, as during the French Revolution, those of the aristocracy who brought misery upon the ordinary people were accorded rough justice via the guillotine.

Jews are generally not disposed to corporal punishment. However, should Israel ever be hit with unconventional catastrophic WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) with NBC (Nuclear, Biological or Chemical) warheads or even more vicious attacks by local Arab terrorists accorded arms and comfort by the radical left, normally placid Jews may decide that Nuremburg hanging Justice, where no crime goes unpunished, is the only correct action to take.
------------------------------------
Emanuel Winston is a Mid East commentator and analyst

How the Oslo Accords Have Harmed Israel
by Morton Klein
September 15, 2002

Nine years have passed since the signing of the Oslo accords on the White House lawn. Is Israel better off, or worse off, as a result of Oslo?

During the first seven years following the accords, more than 300 Israelis were murdered by Palestinian Arab terrorists--far more than the number killed during the seven years before Oslo. Since October 2000, when the Palestinian Authority launched its all-out war against Israel, another 600 Israelis have been murdered--a total of nearly 1,000 fatalities since the Oslo agreement. From the standpoint of personal security, Israelis are far worse off today than before Oslo.

The terrorism has caused a drastic deterioration in the quality of life. People are afraid to go into shopping centers, nightclubs, movie theaters and restaurants. They are afraid to ride buses. If they attend a wedding, a bar mitzvah, even a Passover seder, they know they could be risking their lives. Israelis are frightened and demoralized.

And who can imagine what life is like for the wounded—the thousands of Israelis who have been left permanently maimed as a result of terrorist attacks? After a bombing, the media report on the fatalities, but little is heard about the many more people who suffer injuries that literally shatter their lives. They are truly the forgotten victims of Oslo--the ordinary Israelis who now must struggle through life without a limb, or without sight or hearing, with faces and bodies burned or deeply scarred.

The Oslo accords created the conditions that led to this increased terrorism. As part of the agreement, Israel set free thousands of imprisoned terrorists; many of them quickly returned to their terrorist ways. Oslo gave Yasir Arafat his own territory and his own autonomous governing agency, the Palestinian Authority. That made it possible for him to shelter groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad, to shield them from Israeli capture. In the PA territories, these groups have been able to set up training camps and bomb factories, and improve their techniques. They never would have been able to become as lethal and effective if Israeli forces had remained in control of Judea, Samaria, and Gaza.

Oslo even put guns in the terrorists' hands. As part of the agreement, Israel supplied the PA security forces with thousands of rifles that weresupposed to be used to fight against terrorists. Instead, they have been used to murder Israelis.

The Oslo accords also facilitated the creation of the Palestinian Arabs' culture of hatred and violence. Before Oslo, when Israel controlled the territories, it could control the curriculum in Palestinian Arab schools and it could prevent hate-mongering clergymen from preaching in the mosques. But with Arafat and the PA in charge, anti-Jewish hatred and violence were actively promulgated in the official PA schools, media, mosques, and summer camps.

Today, every child in the PA's schools reads the textbook ‘Our Country Palestine’, with a banner headline on its title page which says: "There is no alternative to destroying Israel." Similar hatred features prominently in speeches by PA officials and sermons by PA-appointed religious preachers—such as the sermon given by Dr. Ahmad Abu Halabiya in a mosque in Gaza (and broadcast repeatedly on PA television) in which he declared: "Have no mercy on the Jews, no matter where they are, in any country. Fight them, wherever you are. Wherever you meet them, kill them."

Thanks to Oslo, an entire generation of young Palestinian Arabs is being raised to hate and murder Jews. Reform Judaism's leader, Rabbi Eric Yoffee, was right on the mark when he called the PA "murderous" and "blood thirsty," and said its media use "neo-Nazi language" to foster "a culture of hatred" against Jews and Israel. A recent Israeli government report noted that "slitting the throats of Israelis is a rehearsed drill taught to Palestinian children at summer camps organized by Arafat's Palestinian Authority." Would such a thing have been possible if Israel still controlled the territories?

Jewish religious sites have also been victimized as a result of the Oslo process. The PA was given control of the Tomb of Joseph, in Shechem (Nablus) and the ancient Shalom al-Yisrael synagogue, in Jericho. It burned down both of them. The Tomb of Joseph is now a mosque. The Tomb of Rachel is now within easy shooting range of PA-controlled Bethlehem--and the result is that Jewish worshippers are constantly the targets of shooting attacks. The Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron --burial site of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob--is now situated in a city that is almost entirely under PA control, meaning that Jews now literally risk their lives if they want to pray in the cave, which is one of Judaism's holiest sites.

The Oslo agreements also made possible the emergence of what the Forward once called "the world's smallest police state." With Arafat in charge and the West turning a blind eye, the PA routinely shuts down dissident newspapers, arrests and tortures Arafat's critics, and abuses women and Christians.

The Oslo process has also promoted the appeasement of terrorists. Soon after the Oslo accords were signed, it became clear that the PA was aiding and abetting Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Yet the State Department pressured Israel to make more concessions, to appease the terrorists and their helpers. Even after the PA launched its terrorist war against Israel in October 2000, the State Department continued pressing Israel to give up land, to ease up its counter-terror actions, and more. Then last autumn, at the very height of PA terrorism, the U.S. rewarded and appeased the terrorists by offering them a sovereign state that would leave Israel behind borders just nine miles wide.

Elsewhere, America fights terrorists; in the Mideast, it appeases them. This too is the result of the Oslo process, and it seriously undermines America's war against terrorism. Terrorists everywhere see the change in U.S. policy in favor of Palestinian Arab statehood, and inevitably conclude that terrorism pays.

The new Chief of Staff of the Israeli Army, Moshe Ya'alon, said recently that the Oslo process has brought Israel to the point that the Palestinian Arabs now "constitute an existential threat to Israel," and are "mobilizing the Palestinian people for war with the goal of bringing about Israel's collapse. What they are after is not to arrive at the end of the conflict but to turn Israel into a Palestinian state." He added that any Israeli territorial surrender now "under terrorism and violence, will strengthen the path of terrorism and violence and will endanger Israel...We must end the confrontation in a way that makes it clear to every Palestinian that terrorism does not lead to agreement."

The Oslo accords have left Israel with a graveyard full of fatalities; thousands of orphans and widows; a demoralized populace; a strong, heavily-armed dictatorship in its backyard; and an alarming U.S. tilt in favor of Palestinian Arab statehood. The pre-Oslo years were far from idyllic, but they were much better than this.
---------------------------------
Morton Klein is National President of the Zionist Organization of America

SenderBerl: Yesterday we heard the arguments against Bush's desire for blanket war powers eloquently addressed by Senators Byrd and Boxer.

Senator Byrd appeared on the Donahue show which in itself reflects the point of our writing today. Senator Byrd carries an important message, not argument. Who interviews him, the show with the lowest rating among news/discussion shows on cable. What does Donahue ask the Senator? He asks him why he seems to be standing alone with his message (argument). We are greatly sympathetic because people ask us the same question as well.

Thus this begets an important story which will attest why soon there will be tears flowing among the death and devastation ahead. In biblical times, we had King Solomon who built the First Temple in Jerusalem. Historically, he is known for this and his wisdom. He is thought to have been especially worthy of G-d's blessings. Let us however look a little deeper into the true reality and how it relates to today.

King Solomon took upon himself 1000 wives. It contravened G-d's direct divine decree. The political body, congress, during his time was known as the Sanhendrin. They were charged with bringing King Solomon before it to rebuke his actions in taking on so many wives. This congressional body was showered with favors and wealth during this heyday period by King Solomon. Thus, even though they were charged with taking him to task for violating G-d's laws, any compelling argument to do what was correct, in honor of G-d, was swept under the rug to honor the King (man).

The consequence to the people of Israel was parallel to what is forthcoming soon today. King Solomon's violation of divine decree opened the portal to assimilation, then idol worship, and then destruction of the temple and unbridled death and destruction resulting in the Exile of the people of Israel. Likewise, today, here domestically, we see the congressional body charged with honoring the precepts and principles of the US Constitution, equally stand blind to its obligations, keeping a deaf ear to the just arguments pointing to their responsibilities to honor the precepts and principles therein, to serve today's king, our current President.

These congressional members have been swamped since Clinton with favors and wealth, to detract them from undertaking the correct course. This moreover opens the portal to the incorrect course, to attack Iraq for unjust reasons, where America no longer represents the precepts and principles which bedrock the country once honored and held in high esteem throughout the world, turning it, as Rome changed itself, into an aggressive dictatorial empire seeking world control and domination, and thus a country which is destined to follow the fate of Rome.

King Solomon was not a man to honor but a man to dishonor because he platformed death and destruction. What confuses analysts is that he seemed to be favored by G-d. After all wasn't he the man chosen to build G-d's temple? The answer is that his father David, and his forefathers, and the prior generations earned and deserved the temple. Because David had the blood of wars upon his hands he could not build it. But G-d's favors to David and prior generations were directed and imbued in Solomon, the beneficiary. However, while living the glorious life, with 1000 wives, wealth, and the protection of G-d throughout the land, he squandered what he was given, shown best by his willingness to use the pretext of his wisdom, a G-d given gift, to help justify the Sanhendrin's standing deaf to arguments clearly attesting that he needed to be rebuked for a direct violation of G-d's divine decree.

Here today we see Senator Byrd forcibly proffer that the Congress by doing what the king (president) asks is removing the powers given by the Constitution to the Congress and willingly (and illegally in our opinion) transferring it to the executive. The violation and breach of the checks and balance system will operate to create the same consequence of death and destruction as opened by the biblical congress (Sanhendrin) in time past.

The people of the land of Israel squandered their gifts and blessings received because of the sacrifices of prior generations, where history shows they remain confused and befuddled at what even happened to cause the death, destruction, tears and pain endured for multiple generations when they were supposed to assess it during their Exile.

The same dynamics are in play today, as this generation, like King Solomon, the beneficiary of the blessings and gifts earned by previous generations, will soon face death and destruction, sit with pain and tears, and wonder why what will happen did happen. Let the record show that it connects to Donahue's question to Senator Byrd why it appears that he alone stands with the position that the congress is undermining the US Constitution in permitting such a transfer of power to the president (the king).  The Senate if it joins the House in squandering our country's legacy, gifts and blessings earned by past generations, will trigger the same type of sequence leading to death and destruction.

Sadly, it seems, that likewise, all we have written, will only serve and only possibly so, as a discarded record of why what will happen will occur. Those arguing that King Solomon should be brought to task and rebuked have been long forgotten by history, a history which sees King Solomon as a man blessed by G-d, a man who carried the gift of wisdom, whereas the truth of it is nowhere to be remembered or found. Likewise, it seems for our future, if imbued with death and devastation, that President Bush and his administration may only be remembered as those who sought to fight evil and rid the world of weapons of mass destruction. However, the truth is that they were following a covert agenda, which is evidenced by this country's distancing itself not only from G-d but from its own Constitution. If the Senate allows the President the first gateway and pretext to pursue the onerous guidelines presented in the National Security Strategy, then it will only fool itself if it attempts to one day hide from accountability to the consequences which will follow which also include institutionalizing the marginalization of our bedrock Constitution.

The rest of the world sees the President's National Security Strategy and his pursuit of a blank check authorization for war, which he originally deemed as something he didn't even really need from Congress, as dictatorial in tone and nature. If they are wrong, then they would no doubt like to see the Senate say no, when Iraq has become more benign today than it was earlier in its history as a threat to
US interests. If the US wants to identify an enemy, the true enemy is China. If President Bush would answer that attacking Iraq is the first step in confronting our (and the NWO's) true enemy, then we say that promoting a regional war, seeing American troops die in a wholesale manner, and seeing the US be subject to bioterrorism is respectfully submitted not the proper course to confront the true enemy or to rectify the sinking economy.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
October 4, 2002

Oct. 6, 2002 Jerusalem Post
Report: Israeli general sees war threat looming with Hizbullah, Syria
By JANINE ZACHARIA

Hizbullah operatives, with the help of Iranian diplomats, have been making surveillance tapes of diplomatic installations in Europe, South America, and Southeast Asia, according to an article in The New Yorker that hits newsstands Monday. Jeffrey Goldberg, who traveled to south Lebanon and is writing a two-part series on the terrorist group for the magazine, writes that "the tapes, along with maps and other tools, are said to be kept in well-organized clandestine libraries." Goldberg reports that Hizbullah has more than 8,000 rockets, some with a range of 45-miles. And he writes that Maj.-Gen Benny Gantz, the chief of the IDF's northern command "is almost certain that he will soon wage war against Hizbullah and Syria. "I'll be surprised if we don't see this fight," Gantz is quoted as saying. US officials are deeply concerned about the possibility of a flare up along Israel's northern border, particular as they piece together a plan for ousting Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

SenderBerl: "US officials are deeply concerned..." what they should be deeply concerned is that things will not go the way they are expecting. This is incredible. This is the first time that the US is pursuing a course of pre-emptive strike in what can only be interpreted to be an unjust war because the intent is to mold countries into the image of the new world order. It was wrong when they did it to Israel, and it is is wrong to use Israel as a pawn to do it to Syria. This type of agenda can never lead to peace when the new world order agenda is inherently evil as we have explained. Moreover, the entire world in these times sees the set up and thus America and Israel by participating with Bush in this treacherous design will only invoke world hatred for the long term future.

Bush and Sharon are thinking that when they win complaints will fall like our E-mails on House and Senate members standing passive to ther realities before them. The issue for Bush and Sharon is control and supremacy. Invasion and conquest. Since the new world order has been successful implementing this design, they like Americans, believe that tomorrow will be like today. Our point is that it may be not and if it isn't what do you think the consequences for you are going to be. This isn't a movie, nor a dream. You have to understand that the military predicate for war is no longer operative. Bush and the oil cartel refuse to accept it and they are pushing Israel into playing this game.

Thus again, the US Congress MUST operate to honor the check and balances provided by the US Constitution.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
October 6, 2002

Analysis:

On June 25, 2002, we wrote that President Bush in his Rose Garden remarks on June 24, 2002, took the battle from Israel and the PLO and made it one between the New World Order and Islam. We wrote that Oslo united the Arab world against Israel, and now, from his remarks, President Bush united the Islamic world against the United States and the West.

Further, to make it crystal clear, President Bush issued on September 20, 2002, the historical National Security Strategy document, letting not only the Islamic world but the entire world know that new US policy was to pursue any perceived enemy at any time to undermine the enemy and colonize it to mold it into the New World Order image for that previous sovereign state.

Moreover, we went deep into the interpretation to show that Israel itself was a successful target of the New World Order strategy and that with its controlled leadership and infiltrated infrastructure, Israel followed New World Order directives, to set up the Middle East region for New World Order domination and control.

Saddam Hussein could have been one way or another removed from office, but he was kept around for the day the New World Order crew needed to capture Iraqi oil and establish a long term residency in the Middle East.

The only dynamic we never would have seen or interpreted and which truly surprises us, if not shocks us, is that President Bush would so openly and brazenly let everyone know it, and act as if he didn't care whether anyone internationally or domestically knew now the truths of the New World Order.

As unfortunately the case, the New World Order knew that ultimately no one could stop it, and despite a couple of unforeseen "minor" problems, such as Senator Byrd pointing out the NSS was a document declaring the US Constitution no longer operative, President Bush got the green light to do what he wants with Iraq, well knowing what he intends to do is trigger a regional war, with Israel needing to take out Syria as part and parcel of the New World Order strategy and design.

The Islamic world clearly sees it, so does Europe and the rest of the world who can't understand the open arrogance and brazenness of the US President. Look at the news stories below, immediately subsequent to the Congressional license to President Bush to act an Emperor Bush.

This is just the beginning. When we wrote on October 3, 2002, that we were expecting the Chinese to send a warning message to President Bush, within hours, we saw the first murders in Montgomery County as that putative message as the local community there sustained not only the fear but the economic consequences seen in Israel from suicide bombings.

The message sent is that the US is highly vulnerable, the most simple act of terrorism foreshadowing the panic and chaos which can result to America if President Bush pursues war against the Middle East (knowing that the war against Iraq is the mask for the true breadth of the war to be launched by President Bush).

However, what we interpreted which China may have missed is that the New World Order strategy doesn't really care about the death and devastation which can consume the world including America.

The control over the media is heart wrenching, with the terrorist attack in Bali taking 150 lives and injuring hundreds falling into the background as the media focused on the sniper(s) saying the same things, essentially nothing at all, endlessly. Of course, the fact, that that the Islamic fundamentalist won incredible victories in Pakistan Saturday gained little air time.

President Bush found out to his surprise that the Middle East was infiltrated and won over by China.

Then Bush since taking office and post 9-11 found out that China wasn't going to play ball with the New World Order agenda.

The oil cartel then interpreted that they may lose their interests in the Middle East and that President Bush needed to harness all US resources to make sure we didn't lose it.

Subsequently, President Bush and his administration pursued avenues which showed a weak hand. First, it was successful in buying Musharraf. However, while President Bush abated nuclear war between Pakistan and India, at least for the immediate term, his entire policy in that area was based on Musharraf.

We interpreted that China would do everything to undermine Musharraf who was aligned with China until Bush sent over an incredible check.

Assassinating him was too extreme it seems, China, like in Nepal, showing, patience, confidence, discipline, in consolidating networks within Pakistan to ultimately undermine him.

With the elections on Saturday, it is clear that the love affair between Pakistan and the US is over. Pakistan can no longer support the US campaign against terrorism, which in any event everyone now knows is a declared war against Islam.

Since all relevant parties are now stuck in the mud of their own mistakes and designs, the only way we see to interrupt a soon to be seen major war in the Middle East is if China persuades Saddam to step down, allowing China to gain control over Iraq, and for China not the US to put in its caretaker government with Chinese protection, and Chinese guarantees to the UN to destroy all WMD.

This totally neutralizes President Bush, China claiming the same rights as asserted for itself by the US. The world will applaud China, and the US will be in quicksand.

Most doubt that Saddam will allow this course to take hold, rather seeing the US prove to the world that it is the evil empire, the new Rome, intent to not only capture Iraqi oil and reserves, but to control the world.

Of course, this puts the US and China on a collision course, where we are sad to say that Bush 43 is intent on proving that China, not the US as China openly claims, is the paper tiger. So in this contest between the two major superpowers, the platform for global war is real in 2003, as we long ago interpreted.

Read the new stories below and you can feel the shadow of darkness moving forward to consume the world.

Counterpoint: The only argument against the above is that the US will move right into and take out Saddam, conquer Iraq, capture and control the oil fields, install a provisional government, colonize Iraq, see Israel move out against Syria and or Iran, militarily conquering the entire region with China sitting quietly saying nothing at all. The US controls OPEC, oil prices collapse, world capitalism prevails, Israel obtains its peace, and the platform for economic world participation and bounty. China then changes its mind, and with a change in leadership adopts the one world government platform of the New World Order agenda. Why not you might legitimately ask. Succinctly put, G-d in all of recorded history never intervenes for those countries under monotheism pursuing policies moving the people away from Him or which operate to defame His Name. The New World Order agenda is anti-G-d; there is no force of man which can conquer it, thus G-d will not intervene to support it. This is our position and we have been uncanny in our accuracy to interpret what would unravel, which did unravel, and thus we interpret that the New World Order agenda will not succeed and we attempted to convey this to those behind the New World Order since they are supreme pragmatists who simply fear it but will not confront the reality until they see themselves defeated. Of course, since they will be in the safety of their bunkers, time they feel does not work against them. They can always throw in the towel, shedding crocodile tears for the endless line of body bags connected to their mistake and covert desire to take over the world.

The American people now join the Israeli people in being passive inept and impotent to recognize that their leadership is now their enemy. The Islamic people are in a rage, and understandably so, when the President of the United States confirms that he is out to capture the Middle East and mold the region into one which changes its relationship with G-d.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
October 13, 2002

Continued...click here