.
             
 

e-MAIL SENDERBERL

While Iran is giving up production of nuclear weapons, nothing in what it has agreed to has faced the fact that it already may be in possession of nuclear weapons. SenderBerl believes this to be the case and the presentation below featured on the lead page intended to suggest that very perception and that if Bush secured a second term as he apparently has that Iran is highly likely and ready to deploy it should Bush widen his incursion into Syria and Iran..

SenderBerl Believes that Iran Already Possesses Nuclear Weapons

Presentation Posted: October 3, 2004

When Jiang Zemin made a pact with Syria and Iran, it was recognized that Bush NWO policy allowed pre-emptive military intrusions against countries having oil but no nuclear weapons. Thus, Bush moved forward against Venezuela and Iraq. SenderBerl interpreted that if Bush could not even succeed in Venezuela then how could anyone in government pretend to believe that he could proceed successfully against Iraq.

The bottom line is that by November 19, 2003, SenderBerl provided the formal assessment that a decision was made within a now divided NWO group that Bush could not be allowed to win in November 2004 because he did not accomplish his mission: controlling Iraq, Syria and Iran and consequently his remaining in office for a second term compromised the NWO agenda. This agenda is willing to take two steps forward and then one step back to consolidate when necessary. However, Bush and his oil cabal were unwilling to relinquish what they had tasted: control of Iraqi oil (second largest global reserves) and thus resisted acknowledging that since Bush failed in the full scope of his mission, that the agenda had to take a step back and allow another more accommodating NWO leader to take the reigns of power (Kerry).


click to link to SenderBerl's exposition
SenderBerl's perspective was proven true in February 2004 when Bush appeared for a one hour TAPED interview on Meet the Press. His performance was horrid and the evidence was clear that the NWO leadership had given instructions to undermine him. This is what we noted at the time:

When we proffered on November 19, 2003, that the Democratic nominee would be the next President, knowing that Dean therefore had to be undermined, we could not have known how openly and evident they were going to be about it. It all started, as far as proving out point, on Feb 8th when Karl Rove did not yank the Meet the Press interview after the first fifteen minutes of the President's performance. Then came the 9-11 Commission posturing, with Condy Rice in the limelight, next came the position of supporting outsourcing of jobs, gay marriage, followed by Alan Greenspan on compromising Social Security. Now the ad campaign.

WASHINGTON, March 8 (UPI) -- Is Karl Rove the new Joe Trippi of U.S. politics: a supposed genius who turns out to be just a disastrously unrealistic dreamer when the real campaign starts? It's starting to look that way. Even Democratic Party insiders and Kerry campaign strategists have been bewildered at the passive silence and blundering slowness of the massive Republican Attack Machine to crank up and start countering their own powerful and highly effective blasts***


SenderBerl asked:
Is Karl Rove following orders? Whose orders?
Bush and the oil cabal were not willing or going to accept the NWO's decision. Bush and his oil cabal affirmatively divided the NWO leadership itself and scared leaders throughout the world when the truth behind Madrid 2004 became evident. SenderBerl immediately analyzed that Madrid coincidentally paralleled Bush's new advertising campaign seeking to make terrorism Issue #1 for November 2004 and to open the foundation for domestic terrorism to unfold again in the USA. Whereas, the White House openly argued that domestic terrorism was aimed to undermine the President in November 2004, SenderBerl forcibly and correctly argued that it would help him particularly if Bush concluded that he had little chance of winning against Kerry.


Click to link to SenderBerl's analyses regarding Madrid 2004
The divided NWO had already made the decision that Bush should be publicly diminished on the basis of Iraq (not 9-11) particularly the uncovered scandal known as Abu Ghraib. Bush and the oil cabal group recognized that they under the weight of both the 9-11 Commission hearings and Abu Ghraib had little chance of winning in November.


Click to link to SenderBerl's analyses regarding Ghost Detainees

Thus, they really threatened the divided NWO group by having the White House in May further Madrid by declaring that domestic terrorism before the November elections was a certainty.


Click on image to enlarge.
SenderBerl then took the public position and appeared on XMRADIO in May and July 2004 to announce that domestic terrorism was a certainty believing that it was likely contemporaneous with the RNC in New York the end of August 2004. However, a very strange thing happened after the DNC in Boston. Kerry's poll numbers were lame, even in view of the 9-11 Commission evidence, Abu Ghraib, and the public tuning into the DNC. On or about August 2, 2004, we then asked you why you believed this to be the case. We said we would give our answer on Labor Day but for those who did not want to wait we gave the answer via autoresponder to those sending e-mail to answer@senderberl.com. The link is still operative. See also http://www.senderberl.com/madrid.htm#poll


Click on image to read more and link to XMRADIO interview
There was no domestic terrorism, Bush leading Kerry big time post the RNC. Bush was told that his re-election was in the bag. SenderBerl wrote that we believe Kerry would make up for lost time at the debates. However, even before the first debate on September 30, 2004, SenderBerl's lead page indicated:

E-mail received 09-20-04 11:51 AM from distinguished overseas journalist: Just minutes ago I heard on CNN John Kerry finish his first really effective attacking speech against Bush at New York University. How right you were. You predicted that once the Bush team became complacent enough to not bank on a terror strike, Kerry would mount his attack. That has started. Even if Kerry is NWO, as you have suggested, his win will be a step forward. Our concern should be primarily with the agenda. If that starts changing, good!

Released: September 21, 2004 Race for President Falls Back into Dead Heat, New Zogby Interactive Presidential Battleground Poll Reveals The race for President of the United States continued to tighten during the last two weeks, as President Bush continued his long, hard slog back toward parity with Democratic challenger John Kerry, throwing the race into a virtual dead heat, the latest package of polls by Zogby Interactive shows

We believe that Hu Jintao coming out with this statement now (September 30, 2004) has nothing at all to do with Taiwan but everything to do with Iran and possibly even North Korea. SenderBerl in May 2003 when the NWO believed that Jiang Zemin was out interpreted that this was not true that Zemin still controlled China and what made it evidence to us was that he still held his position with the CMC. A year later the NYT said we were right that Zemin still held the power. Thereafter Bush forced the issue of where China supposedly stood by forcing Zemin out. We wrote on September 19, 2004:

Now, let SenderBerl point out one thing that Zemin said on Sunday. To us, it is clear: Hu Jintao has subscribed to Zemin's perspective that Bush and the NWO are the enemies of China today and tomorrow. They know they are being played and this story above only proves it. While Bush wants to push and play Hu Jintao to see where he really sits, we know where he sits and as we all along said China will not play along with the NWO long game. Jiang said in his resignation letter that he decided to leave the Central Military Commission after "meticulous consideration." He said Hu was "absolutely qualified for this post." http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/09/19/international1307EDT0474.DTL We got to know Jiang Zemin and we think we know what he meant.

Hu Jintao since assumed the leadership position in China saw what Bush did in Iraq and he has concluded that Zemin is totally correct in that the NWO seeks to dominate and control China over time by infiltrating Chinese infrastructure as the NWO accomplished in Israel. Hu Jintao sees what Bush is willing to do in the USA to hold onto the reigns of power and NOW since domestic terrorism is unlikely BEFORE the November elections but MARTIAL LAW is likely before Kerry is sworn into office, should Kerry prevail in November, Hu Jintao recognizes that Bush may as a condition apriori for domestic terrorism (Code Red status) move against Iran or North Korea. In other words, Hu Jintao telling the PLA to prepare for a military struggle in our opinion does not connect with China itself, or Taiwan, but THAT CHINA INTENDS TO HONOR THE PROTECTION PACTS MADE BY ZEMIN WITH IRAN AND SYRIA.

SenderBerl offered the following on March 21, 2003, two days after the commencement of the invasion:


Where America and Americans have been at direct fault is their reticence regarding both Shock and Awe and Abu Ghraib. Thus, SenderBerl interpreted quickly with Hurricane Frances that we were receiving a message regarding our failings in allowing an administration pursuing policies rejected by bible and history. We wrote inter alia as follows post Jeanne:

Now, we write because we believe the NWO with this added loop in the track of Jeanne allows them to factor in this special message so that they can understand our point that the use of nuclear weapons lies ahead. The USA used nuclear weapons to end WWII, the decision made because US leadership, military and civilian, assessed that its use was necessary to effectuate the surrender. Thus, it is not a jump in logic to assess that leadership of Islamic nations will similarly assess that its use will be necessary to effectuate a peace.


Click on image for discussion
Consequently, if Bush wins we are certain that the use of nuclear weapons is now a given. However, Hu Jintao's recent declaration is reflecting concern about what the NWO oil cabal segment may do if Bush losses, factoring in an attempt to bring the USA to a Code Red status impose martial law and suspend constitutional process. Thus, we conclude that Iran has been supplied with nuclear weapons. If Israel heeds Bush's suggestion to in any way inflame things with Syria or Iran, Israel will have made a fatal error in judgement at the hands of the NWO pawns and poodles in control of its country. If they move against Iran to take out the nuclear facilities, Israel in our opinion will find out that the issue is no longer Iran making nuclear bombs but possessing them. Likewise, SenderBerl argued all throughout 2002 that Bush proceeding against Iraq only prompted North Korea, Iran and other nations to develop nuclear weapons programs. What Kerry did not mention during his first debate with Bush is that when Bush called the North Korean leader "loathsome" to the peoples of the world, Bush showed how plain stupid he could be as a leader and how likely and willing he could one day prove in taking the world to nuclear war.


SenderBerl December 15, 2002: The President has shown conduct inconsistent with his responsibilities in office. When he takes the time during a state of war to give a self-serving taped interview with a reporter/author to declare that he finds the North Korean President “loathsome,” it defies the diplomatic responsibilities of his office, and recklessly has expanded the scope and breadth of conflict to several world arenas. North Korea since the statement has reactivated its nuclear reactors and programs.
We have usurped our regular lead page due to the importance of our concerns. Not only do we believe that Israel is at the precipice of a nuclear war with Iran but we believe that even if Kerry wins, the dominant NWO leadership may recognize that it may be necessary to eliminate Bush and Cheney. From what we heard Tenet may have been complicit with Powell in assessing the danger of Bush/Cheney in terms of the election and domestic terrorism. Powell as we argued (click on picture) warned Condy Rice that she herself was in danger. Cheney and Rumsfeld detest Powell and that's because he and Condy now are threats that have to be sustained until election day. However, Condy as we have detailed has a strong connection through Madeline Albright with the dominant NWO leadership. While we first thought that Bush dumped her because he discovered her true role with his father, we believe it has more to do with the fact that Cheney senses that she is a threat. While the NWO oil group offered her lifetime security and wealth, we believe that the division and battle between the NWO groups is much more intense and serious than anyone knows. For good reason as we attempt to identify and explain above: Bush no matter what is leading us and the planet to the use of nuclear weapons. This is feared now to be the case whether or not he wins.


Click on image

You are looking at the right at one of the most important photos in recent history. Cheney at this time was in hiding no where to be seen, claiming imminent domestic terrorism and publicly taking the position that he and Bush needed to safeguard the country by not being with one another. SenderBerl always publicly offered there was no danger of domestic terrorism until Madrid 2004. However, this photo means a lot to Powell and explains his concerns with Cheney and Rumsfeld and the predicate for him to publicly proffer his perception that there is a shadow government within the White House. http://www.senderberl.com/fp/notes3.htm No doubt that Condy Rice understands the meaning of this photo today as well. Always remember that 9-11 took place when former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Powell was in South America. Had he been here, the results of 9-11 may have been different. By definition, Powell and Rice are not part of the true NWO/oil cabal group. They are house pets for political purposes. Now, that Bush has also assessed that he will not have the black vote, he shifted his primary focus on the Latino vote.

However, our point in this presentation is to tell you why we believe that chaos, havoc and mayhem may be around the corner for the USA. There are a number of scenarios. If Bush pushes Israel to start with Syria and/or Iran before the November elections, our purpose is to strongly urge Israel not to comply: we believe Iran will retaliate with a nuclear attack. If Bush wins, we have discussed the high probability of nuclear domestic terrorism to pre-emptively undermine Bush's attack on Syria and Iran with US troops. If Bush loses, the NWO/oil cabal will push for Middle East war and domestic terrorism to invoke a Cod Red status to preclude the transfer of power and imposition of martial law. Kerry as we formally identified on November 19, 2003, before he was even nominated, needs to assume presidential control of the country. Thus, on his victory, it is highly likely that steps will be taken to foreclose Bush and the oil cabal from taking the world to war in a last gasp but driven effort by Bush and his NWO henchmen to retain control by declaring martial law.

It's a historically dangerous time. It's much similar to the time Kennedy was assassinated. However, the consequences of these dynamics are global and nuclear in nature. We already gave our position that allowing this administration to continue on was wrong and that by having to control poll numbers and have everyone dance around Bush and those plotting military control was only making things worse not better. Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin are now joined at the hip.


The Wink Photograph
Do societies believe they can endure when they allow evil to enter their midst. Allowing Johnson and his cabal to get away with it opened the portal to the NWO achieving full operational control of the government.

We like to conclude with the following because it succinctly shakes Americans into thinking what has changed:

Question Why does godless China address the issue in a more Christian like manner than the USA? We mean: didn't every prior generation in the USA hold by China's position? What changed?

September 6 04: China Threatens Internet Porn Merchants with Life BEIJING (Reuters) - China has intensified its battle against Internet and mobile phone pornography by threatening distributors with life in prison, Xinhua news agency said. "Depending on the seriousness of the cases, the sentences range from living under compulsory surveillance, detainment, taking into custody by the police, to various terms of imprisonment and life imprisonment," Xinhua said. Beijing has stepped up its battle against smut in recent weeks, saying it is worried that the easy access to such material on the Internet and elsewhere will have a bad effect on youth and society.

What changed is that those who knowingly and willingly dilute education for American youth, desensitize them to sex and violence, institutionalize drugs and hedonistic values, to every form of vice and sin, dominate and control this country. These are men who value Satan not G-d. These are men who have brought you 9-11 with impunity and who condoned humiliation, abuse and torture at Abu Ghraib, the American people needing to understand that but for the photos they would stand blind or unbelieving to these crimes as they continue to do to all the other multiple unending crimes that they stand totally unaware. Those who can speak via the Internet, including ourselves, have made an effort to broadcast truths to the American people, who without a truly viable fourth estate are held hostage to those who work daily to undermine and diminish this country. Their reasons therefor are articulated by this website.

   

AMAZING Recent Developments (Updated October 7, 2004)
SenderBerl highlighted the following after the news story to the right

SPECIAL NOTE TO THE NWO (BOTH FACTIONS): JIANG ZEMIN DETESTS BEYOND WORDS GEORGE BUSH. FROM THE DIPLOMATIC/GEOPOLITICAL PERSPECTIVE GEORGE BUSH FOR THIS AMONG THE NUMEROUS OTHER REASONS DETAILED BY OUR SITE CAN OFFER THIS COUNTRY AND THIS PLANET ONLY ONE THING: DESTRUCTIVE WAR. IF HE WERE ABLE TO FAIRLY ASSESS HIMSELF AND THE THREAT HE POSES TO THE NATION, HE WOULDN'T EVEN RUN AFTER ALIENATING THE ENTIRE WORLD AND FAILING EVEN IN HIS OWN AGENDAS. HE HAS FAILED. SORRY. WE DON'T WANT TO MAKE PERSONAL TYPE ASSESSMENTS, BUT WHEN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE USA AND THE FUTURE ARE AT STAKE, WE HAVE TO SAY IT AND BUSH AND ALL FACTIONS OF THE NWO SHOULD BE SMART ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT HE SHOULD NOT EVEN BE RUNNING FOR A SECOND TERM. HE GOT AWAY WITH PURSUING AN AGENDA THAT SHOULD HAVE NEVER SEEN THE LIGHT OF DAY AND NOW THAT HE PURSUED IT AND FAILED HE HAS TO KNOW WHEN TO FOLD. IF HE IS WILLING TO PUSH THE ENVELOPE FOR A SECOND TERM AND IF HE IS CONSIDERING THE CODE RED OFFSET TO A KERRY VICTORY THEN HE WILL TAKE THIS COUNTRY WHERE IT SHOULD NOT BE GOING. FOR THIS REASON SENDERBERL ALWAYS SAID THAT BUSH SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN APPEASED BECAUSE LEADERS WITH HIS MINDSET WHO ARE APPEASED ALWAYS MANAGE TO CAUSE TREMENDOUS DAMAGE.


Click on image to enlarge
There is no other way to say it but that incredible events happened after our October 3rd presentation. First, Iran announced that it had upgraded its missile capabilities now clearly able to "counter a possible Israeli strike against its nuclear facilities." Iran was suggesting that it possessed nuclear warheads and fully intended to use them. Nearly simultaneous therewith Donald Rumsfeld at the Council of Foreign Relations declares that he had seen no "strong, hard evidence" linking former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein with al-Qaeda." Paul Bremer then immediately follows with the damaging declaration that Bush did not have enough troops in Iraq.

Paul Bremer's criticism of Bush bolsters Kerry USA TODAY

"Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry seized yesterday on new criticism of Iraq policy by the former U.S. administrator there, to bolster his case that President Bush has mismanaged the war. In at least two recent appearances, former administrator Paul Bremer said the United States didn't have enough troops in Iraq after the fall of Baghdad and failed to contain chaos."


Rumsfeld made his admissions at the CFR so Bush 43
would not miss the message.
SenderBerl interpreted Rumsfeld's and Bremer's actions as the NWO moving out to aggressively neutralize the danger described by our presentation that even if Kerry wins Bush and his cabal were intent to offset Kerry's victory by creating an environment to impose military government under a Code Red declaration. Thus, the NWO implicitly agreed that under almost every election permutation there was a threat of probable use of nuclear devices. See SBS Kofi Anan analysis. Thus, the NWO moved forward to eliminate the threat by separating those most loyal to Bush from the President to let him understand that it is over. SenderBerl thus was able to interpret that Cheney's performance in the debates would reflect this reality; that while Cheney was loyal to Bush and their agenda, he was not a brave man, and would accede that their agenda did not turn out as expected and that it was over for him and Bush. The NWO message was clear to those members loyal to the aggressive Bush agenda. Further that very day the long-awaited report, authored by Charles Duelfer, who advises the director of central intelligence on Iraqi weapons, publicly declared that Iraq's WMD program was essentially destroyed in 1991 and Saddam ended Iraq's nuclear program after the 1991 Gulf War. Moreover, a Cheney slip during the debate with Sen. John Edwards led Web surfers to a site run by George Soros, a billionaire who makes no secret of his opposition to the Bush administration. SenderBerl interpreted that henceforth Bush not only had to tackle the Kerry/DNC machine but the more powerful NWO machine.


Click on image to link to news story
The significance of events after our posted presentation seemed never ending. SenderBerl received an E-mail noting how the NYT yet again for a second time echoed our reading of events in China. When Jiang Zemin gave up his CMC position on or about September 20, 2004, SenderBerl interpreted as seen above in the presentation that Zemin did so only because Hu Jintao proved to Jiang Zemin that after witnessing NWO actions via Bush in Iraq and elsewhere that Jintao subscribes to Jiang Zemin's precepts as proffered in the movie The Emperor and the Assassin. Thereby Hu Jintao understands that China's national sovereignty is not at risk in terms of Taiwan but in terms of NWO infiltration and control of China's infrastructure. If the NWO did not recognize that Bush 43 had to go, it surely knew that this had to be the case when Hu Jintao (China) on or about September 20, 2004, rejected publicly any attempt to impose Western forms of government/democracy on China. The NWO agenda thus was dealt a severe blow. There was no choice now for sure but for the NWO to consolidate.
October 5, 2004 NEW YORK TIMES EDITORIAL

Decoding Chinese Communism

The many questions around the abrupt consolidation of power by the Communist Party's chief, Hu Jintao, suggest that it's too soon to conclude that the freedom to make money in modern China spawns other freedoms. One chilling indication of that was the arrest of a Chinese journalist, apparently out of suspicion that he had helped a New York Times reporter get a scoop on the political shift. On Sept. 19, Jiang Zemin, the former party leader, apparently ceded the last of his official functions, effective command of the armed forces, to Mr. Hu. If Mr. Hu has indeed emerged as the paramount leader, it is the first time that the transfer of power in China has been so orderly. What that means is not so clear. Mr. Hu has appeared at times to be more populist and modern than Mr. Jiang, as when he sacked top health officials for covering up the SARS epidemic. But he has betrayed no strong reformist urges, referring to democracy as a "blind alley" and tightening media controls. For that matter, it is not even certain that Mr. Jiang is entirely gone.Two days before the leadership transition was announced, Shanghai authorities detained the Chinese journalist, Zhao Yan, a news assistant in the Beijing bureau of The New York Times who was formerly a reporter for the magazine China Reform. Two days later, Mr. Zhao's family was advised that he was accused of "providing state secrets to foreigners." Apparently, the "state secret" in this case was an advance report that Mr. Jiang was about to retire. The Times has said Mr. Zhao, who has yet to see a lawyer, had nothing to do with the article. But the very suggestion that routine politics is a state secret in Beijing speaks volumes about the state of Chinese Communism. If he wants to suggest otherwise, Mr. Hu should immediately release Mr. Zhao.

Hu explicitly dismissed the possibility of Western-style democracy, calling it a “dead end” for China.
September 15, 2004 http://www.iht.com/articles/538912.html

Thus the very dynamic SenderBerl articulated formally on November 19, 2003 at www.senderberl.com/BMI.pdf was proven correct and operative. Kerry has the full NWO endorsement and Bush cannot be allowed to win in November. The danger of deployment of nuclear devices is now abated. A sign that we are correct: on top of all of the above is that the danger of implosion at Mount St. Helens "coincidentally" on October 6th abated as well after the NWO publicly moved out to quash Bush and send his cabal the needed message.


Click to link to news story

All the above within the span of a handful of days! Amazing! Incredible!

Affiliated Material and references:

Code Red Alert and Martial Law (http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=1944)

The possibility of a code red terror alert has been announced time and again since September 11 2001, with a view to galvanizing public opinion across the country in support of an emergency situation, if and when it occurs. The terror alerts have become part of America's day to day life: "at each threat condition [yellow, orange, red], federal departments and agencies would implement a corresponding set of "Protective Measures" to further reduce vulnerability or increase response capability during a period of heightened alert. (see http://www.fema.gov/pdf/areyouready/security.pdf Supported by a barrage of media propaganda, these repeated terror alerts have created an environment of fear and intimidation, a wait and accept attitude, a false normality. US citizens are led to believe that a military solution is required to protect democracy. In other words, the possibility of an impending attack on America by this "outside enemy" has been accepted by the American public; this tacit acceptance has set the stage for the adoption of "the highest threat level": code red alert. What the US public is not aware of is that a code red alert suspends civilian government, it triggers a whole series of emergency procedures. It is tantamount to a Coup d'Etat. (Although in many regards the Coup d'Etat has already taken place under the post-9/11 anti-terrorist legislation and the rigging of the 2000 elections which brought George W. Bush into the White House.) 

See www.senderberl.com/lead2.html