Add on material/discussion to Nov 5 Important Notice

Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.

Links and other information received since posting our important notice

Inserted November 5: Noon: Source: World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)

"Here are the figures. They list the four contemporaneous and uncorrected exit polls. Kerry is listed first and Bush second in each pair of figures. Published = the figure presented as the vote count as of 10.00 a.m. EST on 11/3/04.

Arizona
Poll one 45-55 Final 45-55 Published 44-55
Colorado
Poll one 48-51 2nd 48-50 3rd 46-53 Published 46-53
Louisiana
Poll one 42-57 Final 43-56 Published 42-57
Michigan
Poll one 51-48 Published 51-48 Published 51-48
Iowa
Poll one 49-49 3rd 50-48 Final 49-49 Published 49-50
New Mexico
Poll one 50-48 2nd 50-48 3rd 50-48 Final 50-49 Published 49-50
Maine
3rd poll 55-44 Published 53-45
Nevada
3rd poll 48-49 Published 48-51
Arkansas
3rd poll 45-54 Published 45-54
Missouri
Final 46-54 Published 46-53

"These tracking polls were right where you would expect them to be and within the margin of error. However, if we look at some other states, the figures are beyond curious. Either the exit polls were wrong or the vote count is wrong:

Wisconsin
Poll one 52-48 3rd 51-46 Final 52-47 Published 50-49
Pennsylvania
Poll one 60-40 3rd 54-45 Final 53-46 Published 51-49
Ohio
Poll one 52-48 2nd 50-49 3rd 50-49 Final 51-49 Published 49-51
Florida
Poll one 51-48 2nd 50-49 3rd 50-49 Final 51-49 Published 47-52
Minnesota
Poll one 58-40 3rd 58-40 Final 54-44 Published 51-48
New Hampshire
Poll one 57-41 3rd 58-41 Published 50-49
North Carolina
Poll one 3rd 49-51 Final 48-52 Published 43-56

"Taking the figures and measuring the size and direction of the poll to supposed vote count discrepancy, we find the variance between the exit poll and the final result: Wisconsin: Bush plus 4%; Pennsylvania: Bush plus 5%; Ohio: Bush plus 4%; Florida: Bush plus 7%; Minnesota: Bush plus 7%; New Hampshire: Bush plus 15%; North Carolina: Bush plus 9%." [End of Otter analysis.]

My comments: It is noteworthy that the manipulators (insiders with the companies that provide the machines to state governments) chose states where a paper record is not required or not easily audited afterward. Exit polling has been proven to be extremely accurate (empahsis added by SBS), so this study should not be dismissed. A caller to a radio talk show I was on yesterday pointed out to me that the mainstream media was crying "foul" about these exit polls (showing Kerry winning), suggesting that this may be proof of the left trying to influence the outcome of the election. It could also be that the controlled media knew that Bush was going to be the winner, and that the election results would show a significant difference from the exit polls—hence the need to denigrate the exit polling results beforehand, so the public would believe the skewed election results.

Links received from readers. Great material. Thanks.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/110604Y.shtml
http://www.gregpalast.com/
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/110604Z.shtml
http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/3/2004/981
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAD411A.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/04/nyregion/04york.html

Yes, in addition to Jeff Rense and Rense.com to whom we owe a great debt for highlighting over a hundred SenderBerl articles, we also tip our hats and recommend other sites doing important work such as www.whatreallyhappened.com hosted by Michael Rivero who has done outstanding public service work for a very long time and has just highlighted our important special request from this morning. Thank you Michael Rivero.

Also many other sites have highlighted our work. However, www.truthout.org and www.apfn.org standout as worthy of your time and attention. They provide their public service via E-mail. Also noteworthy are http://www.propagandamatrix.com/ and www.prisonplanet.com. Finally, Joel Skousen's World Affair Brief is something we routinely look foward to reading: http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com

http://www.tnimc.org/newswire/display/3379/index.php
The above link from propagandamatrix.com highlights those secret prisons we heard about three years ago (from reliable sources). This truly highlights the pathos in seeing Bush 43 re-elected, or more accurately said, manipulted into office.

With all the grass roots sounds of discontent, the NWO tells its agents to admit to an error involving 3893 votes for Bush. Here they had no choice, having thousands of votes go to Bush when less than 1000 voted. This kind of computerized stuffing amortized over the spectrum of precincts would account for enough votes to turn the election around, even before anyone gets to the ballots not already counted.

WHAT IS WORTHY OF EMPHASIS IS THAT THE ERROR WAS NOT IN KERRY'S FAVOR BUT BUSH'S, GIVING A FOUNDATION WHEN DETECTED ELSEWHERE THAT IT IS A FRAUD. SO THE NWO WILL BE GOING OUT IF THEY CAN AND PLANTING SOME EXTRA VOTES FOR KERRY TO SHOW THAT COMPUTER ERRORS GO BOTH WAYS.