Election Fraud 2004

Section One

Important Notice to Readers of the SenderBerl Website
Written by Joseph Ehrlich, President, Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
November 5, 2004 7:00 AM

SenderBerl is going to give you an important and grave responsibility. We are going to beg you to contact every Senator, Congressmen (in the hope that some honest ones remain), every newspaper, every Internet site, and anyone else you deem relevant to tell them how to prove the election fraud. We are closing down, and we were going to post this weekend a library of links to our writings, highlighting China, but since I have not been able to get a good night’s sleep recognizing what happened here to us, the American people, I reviewed what happened and felt compelled to charge you with the task of taking an important role.

This web page has the evidence. However, as with evidence, there are different ways of seeing and using what you have in front of you. However, permit me to give you the details of what I have been thinking about.

Recapturing America was written by me in late 1996 and completed and filed with the copyright office in February 1997. As you may know we had two major literary agencies with whom we had major contacts interested in the book and then they ran away from it in total fear. One agent, who initially interacted with me as though I was family, ultimately even refused to get on the phone with me when the agency’s biggest client was the person making the initial introduction. Thus, this attested to me that there were very powerful and major forces who were not going to let this book see the light of day from a publishing house. Thus, since I wrote it as a public service, I put it on the Internet for free global access.

However, it dawned on me after this election what those opposed to the book were highly sensitive regarding. No doubt, they didn’t want the N.W.O. agenda in front of people too early on. Now, that you and many others know about it, they don’t much care. Why? They are in control. Thus, aside from delaying the message of the book, there is something else in there that they really were avid about not getting out. I think I know what it is and why they were hysterical over it.

In one of the conversations between Bush 41 and Noah Guerin, Noah points out that weapons that the US government sold directly or indirectly, getting into the hands of Iraq, were all built so that the US military could control them during the course of their use in war. The electronics and other components were built for such stealth manipulation. Consequently, Noah Guerin knew (as of course I knew) that when the US permitted live television coverage of the first invasion of Iraq, that Bush 41 knew that there was not going to be any meaningful US casualties for live TV. Thus, he knew American flyers were safe because he knew that the Iraqi anti-aircraft would not hit near anyone. Noah Guerin points out to Bush 41 in Recapturing America that if anyone with one anti-aircraft gun shot randomly into the air, knowing that the skies were filled with American bombers, that the results would have been higher than witnessed. Thus, the only answer was that the armaments (covertly sold and in the hands of Saddam) were electronically rigged. No doubt this dynamic was important and one of national security.

However, what Recapturing America points out is what we pointed out to both the Bush and Clinton administrations. Power corrupts. Thus, after Bush extirpated the Soviet Union and then Clinton finished the job with Japan, these people, many of whom we now see in connection with Iraq, obtained a mob mentality. They were tough, they won, they carried the nation’s secrets, and thus they knew what was best for the future and no one should dare think that they know better than them what is better for America. They became a power clique of the first magnitude but by design they fell into the grasp of the EU faction of the N.W.O. that know that with such a power base, and with an elitist implanted mentality, they could format a shadow government that ultimately would take open operational control. This group thus knew the deep secrets of how things came about, laying a foundation that the American citizen was simply a beneficiary of the good fortune of having them in operational control of the government. This then permitted the EU oil faction of the N.W.O. to, as part of the process put in place, control media for the national good (implemented via TWA Flight 800), and allow a course where it was imbedded into the wider group of N.W.O. pawns and poodles, so that they could believe they were acting as a good parent would act to bring the country to the just and correct course, determined by the few. Of course all this gave the true N.W.O. Board of Directors operational control of the government, where Bush 43 today as a member of good standing by birth in the elitist centrix discharges his work for the cause.

I will skip more background discussion to get to the main point. This type of electronic control of weaponry of course unequivocally attests that full control of electronic election results are in the hands of N.W.O. They pushed through, as they push through everything else they want, electronic voting, under the banner that it serves the best interests of the USA when of course it serves them not the country. In this last election, the easy part was controlling the actual voting numbers because enough electronic devices were out there for them to produce the numbers they want to the exact degree they want without any paper trail.

Thus, the only real problem they had was exit polling. As SenderBerl touched on below, if the exit polling for this election would be at material variance with the election results, they had a major problem and thus John Kerry was there to do the grudge work of becoming our 44^th president. Thus, Bush was told, campaign your heart out, the N.W.O. Board of Directors (of the EU dominant division) knowing that if it were anywhere close, they could produce the win quite easily. However, they still had a problem, if it came down to a key state, such as Ohio, the very case, where the exit poll numbers were coming in live at material variance with the result. Thus, if a key state, such as Ohio, a single state, did have a material skew for Kerry, reflecting the true national sentiment by the way (I dislike being repetitive but outside the Goebbels propaganda why would anyone vote for Bush on his historically dismal record), the exit polls would be at material variance against the vital needed result in Ohio.

Thus, the electronic intervention went into the exit poll program such as on CNN where N.W.O. pawns either at CNN, or even N.W.O. agents from the outside, such as they did on 9-11 with airplanes, could direct and change the numbers. Thus, as shown by what we came across below, the exit polling numbers HAD TO HAVE BEEN ELECTRONICALLY ALTERED AND FALSIFIED. Thus, the proof, and what I am charging you with is to present this argument to all those initially mentioned with the following advice based on my experience. Find American citizens who taped and captured the election programs from other channels, main and cable, during this period of time. If you or they can establish that the same type of alterations took place during the early morning hours, then you have conclusive circumstantial evidence of the fraud and the crime that proves that we the American people have been stripped of our vote by those that disdain us so much that they must have laughed it up real good when they watched videos of Americans waiting up to five hours to register their meaningless vote.

The difference in reported respondents is 57 and the data shifted from +2 for Kerry to +5 for Bush on Male respondents. Thus literally every one of these respondents would have to be a. male and b. have voted for Bush. Moreover there were 1963 respondents (at 12:21AM) times .47 = 923 males. 923 times .51 means that 471 voted for Kerry. 2020 respondents (1:41 AM) times .47= 950 males attesting first that the delta sample were not all males. Moreover, even if Kerry didn't get one additional vote 471/950 = .495. Thus in the early morning hours CNN brazenly allowed a shift in voter sentiment via an exit poll that did not square with its earlier data. We applaud those American citizens who help capture these events since they support and suggest the need to pursue the true election results when there is enough evidence that such pursuit is warranted and called for to ensure the public confidence in the election process.

FNC AND FOX CALL OHIO FIRST FOR BUSH.
THEY DID THE SAME THING RE FLORIDA IN 2000
THEY LOVE TO SLAP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN THE FACE.
Source: http://mediamatters.org/index.html

November 4: A last word on the "election": One of the problems that the NWO has to deal with are the exit polls. The plan was that if Bush got close, there was no problem with the amount of electronic voting manipulation they could do to have him win the count. However, if it was going to be a landslide rejection, the exit polls would reveal the manipulation. Thus, Bush had to get it close, or no cigar. Even when he got it close, say in Ohio, it still was a problem if the exit polls suggested otherwise. Thus, the exit polls play an important roll suggesting impropriety, but the NWO of course was ready for the worse case scenario, Kerry ready to step into office. Thus, stand on guard for a NWO onslaught against the exit polls. They will come up with some ruse we are sure to disallow it. Stand on guard. Otherwise, as was the case here, the pawns at the media centers had to start fudging the numbers, as we displayed below.

THE REPUBLICANS ON CABLE ARE CROWING ABOUT THEIR WIN. THIS DISGUSTS US. THEY DIDN'T WIN. THEY LOST LIKE THE REST OF US. THEY LOST THIS COUNTRY, OUR RIGHT TO VOTE, OUR RIGHT TO CHOOSE OUR LEADERS AND OUR POLICIES. IF BEING OCCUPIED AND CONTROLLED IS THEIR IDEA OF DEMOCRACY AND AMERICA, THEY CAN JOIN TOMMY FRANKS WHO DARED DECLARE THAT DEMOCRACY HAS BEEN A NOBLE EXPERIMENT (IMPLYING WHOSE TIME HAS COME AND GONE).

SenderBerl: We said it long ago. Bush 43 would not carry the same reservations his father did in winning a second term by rigging the election results. The very sad thing is that Bush not only had to rig Ohio but he also needed an opponent that wouldn't make an issue of it. Thus, Bush won in essence via the same dynamic as in 2000. Moreover, while it seems he didn't need it, with his brother as Governor of Florida, he was all set up to take Florida if required (supply the public with numbers justifying his re-election).
The material below should make the American people weep not to discount having to hear that the Independent in London wrote how could 58 million Americans be so dumb?

Keep in Touch
If you liked what you saw on this website and want us to keep in touch with you, it will be our pleasure to do so.

The recent javascript insertion on our page has caused many in our global audience problems in accessing our lead page. Thus, for those who have enjoyed our site and want us to keep in touch with them, please link here if you are javascript enabled or otherwise click here to complete the form. As a last resort you can E-mail us directly, however, due to the size of the response, it will be time consuming for us to process E-mailed requests for inclusion but if necessary we will do so. Thank you.

Question from Joseph Ehrlich (to examine whether we have truly made our points): Why didn't President George W. Bush want a coalition similiar to what his father put together, under any circumstances, in the invasion of Iraq? In other words, Bush 43 wanted to go it alone in Iraq. Do you know the real reasons why?

First, SenderBerl's position has been the France and Germany are main elements within the NWO and that in securing control over the oil vital and essential to their future interests that there was no reason to implicate and involve them (France and Germany) into a planned long term war and conflict.

Second, France and Germany's opposition to Bush's war permitted them to further the NWO agenda by creating the beginnings of a new alternative to NATO which brazenly welcomed all current members of NATO less one country: the USA, serving the NWO design for the USA perfectly as described by SenderBerl publicly since 1997.

Third, France and Germany publicly opposing the invasion freed them from any financial commitment for the declared ten to twenty year war against terrorism.

Fourth, Bush furthers yet again the NWO agenda to sap the USA of its wealth by having Congress authorize massive increases to the public debt to win the war against terrorism thereby condoning manipulating the public to support a "national consumption tax," via manipulation of public poll numbers that will purport to confirm that the public wants such a tax taking the bait of having nothing more to do with IRS.

Fifth, France and Germany (NWO interests therein) obtained major contracting work not as main contractors precluded by law to misdirect the American public but by being the major subcontractors to what they envisioned was the rebuilding of not only Iraq but Syria and Iran as well once under NWO control (via thanks to the services of the US military). They showed themselves again when troops first hospitalized in Germany with injuries were given bills for the food consumed at the hospital. They even thought that they could get away with that showing their utter contempt for the American people.

Sixth: Since NWO nations had no financial commitment (only siphoning off the US Treasury) they could move on their schedule to blow up the US dollar to ultimately remove it as the international reserve currency replacing it with the Euro.

Keep in mind in assessing these real deep dynamics, originally unraveled for you and presented in Recapturing America, that the NWO elitist centrix don't have any special or particular love for their own serfs and slaves in their own countries. What the American and French Revolutions did was take them out of power and cut into their domination, control and massive wealth (properties and natural resources). The injustices done now to the US will flow again to their own peoples in their respective nations. Thus, when SenderBerl points to Paris, France, we are not pointing to the French people, but to the location of the assets held most dear to the elitist centrix. Moreover forget about how many lives the terrorists could target: the true terrorists are the NWO leadership and their deeply secret agenda for global depopulation. It behooves all good people of all nations and lands to recognize an enemy to all men of good will, those who were targeted by the American and French Revolutions, and whom have returned to recapture the domination, control and wealth they deem they were unjustly deprived as they return the planet to their version of the natural order: their rule.

Ehrlich Farewell Comments Part III closing SenderBerl's public service commitment should be posted by Tuesday, next week.

Rense.com story brought to our attention showing China moving out full force to create new power blocs against Bush/USA openly made know due to Bush re-election. This is yet another phase of what Annan, Blix and OBL were in fact warning the American people. The only problem of course is that the American people went to the polls but the results we believe are different. If they weren't different, there would be no evidence of fraud. The NWO is on the wrong course. They were going to sink us, the American people, but they are going down by their own hand as Ehrlich Farewell Comments Part II will highlight.

Ehrlich previously wrote at http://www.rense.com/general57/whitemn.htm "I also pointed out to the group that the N.W.O. building up China contravened G-d's agenda as well. China without G-d's intervention would have probably ruled the world. They are outstanding achievers on plateaus we admire, especially business, where they and Asia would control global commerce. But G-d made it that China and Asia were economically weak and secondary to the USA, but the N.W.O. reflective of their distance from G-d, failed to recognize the ultimate implications of making China and Asia strong. Ultimately they would undermine the N.W.O. single world government itself, and establish a little recognized historical fact that those from the Caucasian race are subject to defeat by the other races in the world. However, Caucasians who compromise a large segment of monotheism, who resided by necessity in the colder regions of the planet, received G-d intervention, and ironically the N.W.O., who today cause so many to turn their backs on G-d and promote hedonism, are replatforming China and Asia back into the place they would have otherwise held but for G-d's intervention. You may have to pause and think about this exclusive SenderBerl postulate, but in doing so, you come to recognize that the scope of the issues are multi-dimensional."

HOT OFF THE PRESS, EVENTS ARE UNFOLDING JUST AS SENDERBERL INTERPRETED AND GREATLY FEARED. IN VIEW OF THAT WE WILL TRY TO POST EHRLICH FAREWELL PART II AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. FORMER HEAD OF CIA'S OSAMA BIN LADEN UNIT SAYS THE QAEDA LEADER HAS SECURED RELIGIOUS APPROVAL TO USE A NUCLEAR BOMB AGAINST AMERICANS Fri Nov 12 2004 12:02:34 ET Osama bin Laden now has religious approval to use a nuclear device against Americans, says the former head of the CIA unit charged with tracking down the Saudi terrorist. The former agent, Michael Scheuer, speaks to Steve Kroft in his first television interview without disguise to be broadcast on 60 MINUTES Sunday, Nov. 14 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network. http://www.drudgereport.com/flash2.htm

SenderBerl: If this story is accurate which we believe it is then this is the reason for the OBL tape as we analyzed. See links below on this page. OBL had to warn directly the American people the consequences of electing Bush. If they did, there would be nuclear terrorism. Now, you can see that what we have seen all along is depressingly true. Thus, stay away from those areas we have targeted as likely siteS for such terrorism. While of course we may be incorrect, the logic behind our analysis is valid making them highly vulnerable.

Venezuela and Colombia may build oil pipeline to Pacific to supply China!
See November 11 Insert for important commentary

Highly Recommended:
http://www.senderberl.com/DESKEY.pdf

Something for the American people to think about when casting their votes for Bush...10.27.04

The American Dream Slipping Away from the Middle Class http://www.washingtondispatch.com/article_10399.shtml Few leaders make the connection that the outsourcing, insourcing and offshoring of American jobs brings America’s middle class to its knees. Last year, American Flyer, manufacturers of that little red wagon we all pulled as kids--suddenly pulled up stakes and now operates in China. Our trade deficit with China stood at $230 billion in 2003. No wonder! They’re making more profit at 50 cents an hour in a country with 1.3 billion people! However, when Middle America lacks a paycheck, it can’t buy Domino’s Pizza, cars or step out to the circus. Americans can’t go to movies or take that vacation. They can’t send that first kid off to college. It’s called the “Wal-Mart Effect.” Chains such as Safeway, Albertson’s and Kroger cut pay and benefits for workers as 40 Wal-Mart stores opened up in a five month period in southern California. Why? Wal-Mart pays less than half the union wages with few benefits. Sherry Kovas, with 26 years as a cashier, made $17.90 an hour but will be losing that wage quickly. “But I’m 44,” she said. “I’m too old to start over.”Thus, the American Dream is now the Mexican Dream in our country. Trouble is, it’s destroying families in Mexico as it destroys American families in the country that created it. At the current rate of GATT and NAFTA via globalization as well as outsourcing, insourcing and offshoring, Americans will look back on the myth of what was once “The American Dream,” and wonder what happened to it and their families. Why? With 80 million people added to the planet around the world annually, there is no end of the line for cheap labor as it implants itself and dislodges Americans from the American Dream.

SenderBerl: What the heck is wrong with America? Even those that prosper today: don't they realize they are going to be victims tomorrow? This entire sceanrio serves the elite, the higher echelons of the elite, who care little to nothing for the American people but relish the thought that they will face endless cheap labor, no meaningful competition, and no tax or governmental concerns or interventions. Do you understand this. It's all for them and nothing for you -- nothing for sure for future generations who will detest you for allowing this to happen.

Important Comment from Joseph Ehrlich. I find I have to shout. This is not encouraging. When I laid out the case against President Bush's complicity in 9-11 the logic of the argument was flawless showing that he was absolutely complicit in 9-11. However, here I am at the end of near a decade of public service seeing that the country is ready to elect this man back to office. The dissapointment is beyond words because in turning away from the truth the general public is allowing themselves to be enslaved in a way not seen before in this country. When the Hebrews were freed from their bondage in Egypt, many of them wanted to go back, because they feared freedom and yearned for the comfort of an everyday routine no matter the element of their victimization. I sense the same thing taking place right here when the American people take the easy road instead of the one fighting to protect the rights others sacrificed their lives to afford them.

What is more important to the elitist centrix other than their own lives? Wealth. Thus, the explained need to contain nuclear weapons as we have expounded upon on this site. Thereafter, the ideal situation for the elite is to have the masses, their serfs, provide them low cost labor and even better than that pay for everything while they de facto retain all their own wealth. Even better for the elitist centrix is to be able to steal back all the wages paid to the serfs no matter how little. How do you do this in front of their noses? Well let me explain it this way. Say the cost of government for educational purposes is $1,000,000,000 and there are ten million people people with an average annual wage of $100. The elitist earns $100,000 a year. Gas costs 10 cents a gallon or $20 yearly. The serf pays 15% in taxes or $15 a year, the elitist pays (generously said) 35% or $35,000. The serf has $65 for purposes of expenses including educating his children in college, already with little hope of saving anything. The very rich have a lot more their annual wealth each year representing 1000 times the money available each year to the serf ( in today's terms say the average gross wage is $40,000 while the super rich gross $40 million). Now, back to our example, the elitist is out to put the entire tax burden on the masses rather than any at all on himself. Thus in this educational example, the elitist pushes for the following result: remove the "equitable" national tax and impose a 30 cents a gallon on all gasoline consumed. Wow the masses say. No more national tax. No more IRS. However, when all is said and done they have given the elitist who control the government more tax revenue than ever before and the elitist has reduced their tax rate to essentially zip since they consume about the same gasoline as the serf but the serf has undertaken to reduce their remaining income from $100 less $15 tax and $20 annual gasoline cost ($65) to $100 less $40 or$60. The elitist now has $100,000 less $120 (let's be generous) annual gasoline expenditure or essentially no tax at all. Government needs a little more money so that it can give the people what they deserve? Raise the gasoline tax to 40 cents a gallon.

The point of course is that the masses pay the cost while the elitist laughs because no matter how high the cost of gasoline, he keeps the lion share at the expense of his serfs. The best part of it for the elitist is that his companies provide the services given by the government to the people. Since he is an elitist his companies are best positioned to get the work and of course the profits for providing this work to the government are enormous so that not only does he have the serfs pay for everything, but through the work his companies do for the government he can reap back some of the little the serfs have for themselves.

Now, wasn't this type of injustice put to bed with the French and American revolutions? Yes. Now you see our point. Now, let's look at your future with another Bush term. Forget about everything else and just focus on the fact that stooge Jim Demint has paved the way for a 23% national tax. This is coming as sure as I am writing this albeit criticism emanated quickly from several sources. Here's what one newspaper wrote: http://greenvilleonline.com/news/opinion/2004/09/29/2004092950046.htm

In any case, we need to see Rep. DeMint's proposal as part of the process by which ultraconservatives, step by step, are shifting the burden of taxation onto the backs of working- and middle-class Americans as well as small businessmen and retirees of modest means. As Daniel Altman, a former economics reporter for The Economist, points out in his new book, "Neoconomy: George Bush's Revolutionary Gamble with America's Future," the long-range goal is to destroy the progressive income tax, abolish the estate taxes on the super-rich, reduce or abolish all taxes on dividends and capital gains and replace these sources of revenue with "consumption" or sales taxes. The end result will be to shift the tax burden completely away from the wealthy few who receive their income from stocks, bonds and securities, to middle-class workers and small businesspeople. The process is already under way.

A Congressional Budget Office report recently authored by Douglas Holtz-Eakin, the former chief of President Bush's Council of Economic Advisers, showed that the administration's tax policies instituted over the last four years have led to a 12 percent reduction in the share of federal taxes paid by those Americans earning more than $1.1 million a year. (A third of the tax reduction went to the top 1 percent.) At the same time, the middle class has seen its share of the tax burden increase more than 5 percent.

These revolutionary changes in our tax system have been promoted and justified by wealthy interests as a sure-fire way to guarantee economic prosperity that will somehow trickle down to the average South Carolinian. As they might have said on "Saturday Night Live" of such self-serving arguments: "How convenient."

There have been two significant sales-tax increases in the state of South Carolina: in 1951 under Gov. James Byrnes and in the 1980s under Gov. Dick Riley. Both of these increases placed a heavier burden upon lower-income taxpayers, but their impact was far less significant than the DeMint plan. And they had the virtue of offering improvements in education in a state badly lagging behind the nation.

Unfortunately, this latest attack on South Carolina's working and middle class is consistent with Rep. DeMint's other political positions. He has refused to support changes in the tax code that would end tax incentives for American corporations that export jobs abroad. And his proposal for an alternative to Social Security (outlined on his Web site) would require far higher contributions by working- and middle-class workers than for wealthy taxpayers.

Whenever critics point out these DeMint positions, they are met with a charge that they are engaged in "class warfare." My response is that Rep. DeMint and his allies are the ones who have been engaged in a nonstop class war against working- and middle-class South Carolinians. And they've been winning.

Much has been made of Rep. DeMint's "bold" ideas. But boldness does not always equal good judgment. In November, the voters will have a chance to decide if they want to elect an individual like Rep. DeMint whose policies seem designed to benefit a small minority of his wealthy supporters while damaging the basic pocketbook interests of working- and middle-class South Carolinians.

To my valued readers of this site: I detest the wrongdoing and injustice I see in this administration and in their designs. They represent all that history rejects. They represent those very people that willingly and knowingly enslave their fellow man. I beg of you to do all you can do to go the other way. The only choice is Kerry. You have to understand that a vote for Kerry is the best we can do to reject the above. America represented the Judeo-Christian ethic, G-d, justice, opportunity. Don't signal these people that you are voluntarily choosing to go back to Egypt. They will surely laugh at you for doing so and I will sit in pain knowing how much they will enjoy what they have accomplished. Again, the video:

www.senderberl.com/video/dickens.wmv
Windows media file for broadband

SenderBerl faces a harsh putative reality

October 26, 2004

We have sources that we deem to be highly reliable. These sources suggest that we will be crestfallen election eve. Thus, we share the news with you.

First, one of our reliable sources ran a true poll of a quarter of a million people and while he is ardently anti-Bush, he, with great sadness, told us that Bush has truly increased his lead by eight points or more against Kerry.

Second, our other reliable source told us two months back that Kerry would not win. Since this source was pro-Bush we discounted it under our paradigm. Thus, we want to share our current perspective with you.

The most important thing we highlighted recently turns out to be the difference between the N.W.O. factions. Thus the reality we confront is one where the dominant one prevails.

Thus, seeing this to be the case, from the purely secular point of view, even incorporating the religious paradigm, Kerry was N.W.O. chosen to lose the election. The truly ironic stratagem they used to “shove it to us” was to have a candidate that would offend the electorate whom would be otherwise opposed to a Bush second term by having Kerry prove himself anti-G-d to that block making the sitting president appear the choice for those who yearn to reconnect to Judeo-Christian/American values.

Thus, Kerry’s liberal record and bias in fact has proven the dynamic shifting the votes to Bush when the Catholic Church itself spurns Kerry. Thus, the majority block of Americans who cannot fathom Bush/oil cabal complicity in 9-11, turn to what they see as the better of the two choices as far as their own desire to honor the Judeo-Christian ethic.

Thus, Kerry was the ideal choice on this dynamic to allow the dominant N.W.O. group to prevail and thus we were looking inside out when we interpreted the failure of Kerry to address 9-11, the slam dunk portal to knock out Bush from a second term. Couple this with his raw misjudgments connective to Mary Cheney and the unadulterated reality that he is all-for gay marriage and that key block of voters has shifted on cue against Kerry, while Kerry does little to address this dynamic, and Teresa Heinz Kerry does enough to further push that critical block of voters further away, and you have Bush leading Kerry as expressed by our reliable poll source.

The dominant block thus has de facto prevailed and pulled the wool over the mainstream (majority (pawn and poodle)) N.W.O. block, having them accede to leaving 9-11 out, giving them and Kerry enough ammunition to take Bush down. Now, the dominant block will look at the disappointed mainstream block of N.W.O. pawns and poodles and say (we have Kissenger in mind in expressing it): “Can you believe it? What can we do when the American people vote as they do under the facts before them? You understand why we couldn’t allow the truths of 9-11 be made part of the campaign, but otherwise we gave you a clear field to get Bush replaced and we stood here ready to accept it.” Thus, the pivotal dynamics attendant to Kerry were carefully crafted, where the dominant group can laugh and say that it was the Catholic Church itself that swung the day against Kerry.

What do we think and what can be done? First, if Kerry was knowingly in on the end result then our fears publicly expressed in 1999 come to the forefront and will be highlighted when the election results come in. Second, one of our mainstay points has been that from where we sit G-d would not allow Bush a second term to allow the N.W.O.’s agenda against Him to openly prevail. However, with Kerry, and based on what he said, could it be that voting in Kerry does more to diminish G-d that voting in the illusion? Or is that by voting in either, the agenda is the very same so there is no difference? Thus, allowing Bush to prevail only quickens the dark consequences of the current day failings.

If this is the case, we are being foreclosed from another opportunity to recapture our country and eliminate the enemies within. However, having said all this, SenderBerl still concludes that Kerry will win since there is still a message to be relayed to the dominant N.W.O. group, especially when the perceived reality is that this election will go the way they have designed.

Thus, for those for Kerry or more accurately said opposed to Bush, knowing the harsh truths of this presidency, on the secular plane you should hound Kerry’s people that they will lose unless they bring in the club: 9-11 and the president knowingly going into the Booker elementary school when he knew what America didn’t know when the first plane struck the north tower: America was under terrorist attack. On the G-d fearing plane, we suggest you join us in prayer that Bush lose and that G-d help us rid this world of these people and help the good people of the USA and the rest of the world understand exactly what is taking place and beg G-d to instill a leadership unselfishly and genuinely committed to the precepts and principles of the Judeo-Christian ethic and lifestyle.

What is the rest of the world going to think when they see the American people give Bush a second term? They are going to think that the American people have lost their minds and are going to deservedly face the harsh reality that in fact lies ahead for us.

What will we think? We will think that when we accepted Kerry’s failings in highlighting the issues regarding 9-11 we were taken in allowing the rationalization that this was the case because it was agreed that Kerry would be N.W.O. supported for a second term. Now, the real sad joke is that even with Bremer and Rumsfeld stabbing Bush in the back, and with Bush himself literally each day carrying the entire campaign, he is going to win, allowing Bush and Cheney to repeat their statement that they continue on by G-d’s design. This latter one reality is why we will pray and why we believe that G-d will intervene so that these guys and this group cannot say that very thing. We have put in a video segment from Dickens’s Tale of Two Cities that is worthy for all of us to keep in mind when we pray for G-d’s intervention.

www.senderberl.com/video/dickens.wmv
Windows media file for broadband

BY AUTORESPONDER
SENDERBERL HAS WRITTEN ITS COMMENTARY HERALDING KERRY'S ELECTION VICTORY
WE WILL POST IT NOVEMBER 3, 2004 ON THIS SITE OR
YOU CAN READ IT NOW
KERRYWINS@SENDERBERL.COM.

Your prayers might be answered...simply the MOST dramatic shift we have seen
in 6 months and it happened over three days. With 5000 people polled
nationwide on the Internet and balanced for party affiliation...Kerry was up
49.6% to 48.7% for Bush. The margin of error is too close to call, but the
DRAMATIC shift is absolutely amazing and we checked the numbers three times
to make sure...

If the next several hours continues this trend, Kerry will win. But all in
all, it IS too close to call and Bush was headed for a landslide just a few
days ago.

Private Unbiased Poll Numbers Still Point to Bush Landslide.
Does SenderBer's Special Report thus indicate the reality basis for the miracle ahead?
We will soon have the answers to this major event.
SenderBerl continues to pray that Bush is defeated.
This web page clearly explains why Kerry even with all his baggage must be the next President to avoid nuclear domestic terrorism.

Total number of polls filled out for dates 10/22-10/29:
N = 23,468 Margin of error, +/- .2%

......... Dem ........Ind ........ Rep .... Total
Bush ....1445 ...... 3932 ........ 7466 .... 12,843
Kerry ...7349 ...... 2446 ........ 231 .... 10,026
Nader ... 26 ...... 155 ........   13 .... 194
Undec. .. 97 ...... 274 ........   34 .... 405

BEIJING (Reuters) - On the eve of the U.S. election, China laid into what it called the "Bush doctrine," said the Iraq war has destroyed the global anti-terror coalition and blamed arrogance for the problems dogging the United States worldwide.

CAROLINE KENNEDY TO BUSH: STOP INVOKING MY FATHER Wed Oct 27 2004 15:19:01 ET WASHINGTON, DC *In response to George W. Bush's invocation of prominent Democrats including President John F. Kennedy, Kennedy's daughter Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg issued this statement. "It's hard for me to listen to President Bush invoking my father's memory to attack John Kerry. Senator Kerry has demonstrated his courage and commitment to a stronger America throughout his entire career. President Kennedy inspired and united the country and so will John Kerry. President Bush is doing just the opposite. All of us who revere the strength and resolve of President Kennedy will be supporting John Kerry on Election Day."

MANY E-MAILS RECEIVED BY SENDERBERL ARE SUGGESTING PEOPLE VOTING FOR THIRD PARTY CANDIDATES. PLEASE REMEMBER OUR NOTE BELOW WHICH WE NOW REPEAT!

PLEASE STAND ON GUARD AGAINST THE CAMPAIGN TO WEAKEN KERRY BY TELLING THOSE AGAINST BUSH NOT TO VOTE FOR KERRY EITHER BECAUSE HE'S A NWO ELITE HIMSELF. This no doubt is the brainchild of Rove who knows that each Kerry vote lost is a Bush gain. Thus, there has been imbedded in otherwise legitimate quarters a disdain also for Kerry when Kerry is not the issue at all: the issue is to remove Bush and Cheney for the reasons we don't have to expound on at this point to you. Thus, do not fall for the trap of not voting at all. Your vote first, second and third is against Bush and to register it, you a. have to vote b. don't waste it by voting for Nader or anyone else because it's the same consequence for Bush as not voting at all and c. vote for Kerry because with all his luggage there is a foundation for change where with Bush there is none at all.

EVERY TIME WE SEE THE BUSH AD REGARDING ASHLEY FAULKNER WE BRISTLE AT BUSH ALLOWING THE RNC TO UTILIZE THIS GIRL AND HER FAMILY WHO HAVE NO IDEA OF THE TRUTH BEHIND THE LOSS OF THEIR MOTHER AND WIFE RESPECTIVELY. WE REPEAT.

Now we have just seen that image of Ashley Faulkner used to help Bush win. This disgusts us. We used the image to convey a message to President Bush in view that our perception of the image showed a man holding BY CIRCUMSTANCE a daughter of a victim of 9-11. Click here to link to our analysis.

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - President Bush and Sen. John Kerry stayed on the offensive in swing states Sunday as the presidential race entered its final full week. In a television interview, Bush said it is "up in the air" whether the nation can ever be fully safe from another terror attack and suggested terrorists may still be contemplating ways to disrupt the election.

SenderBerl: These terrorists are the same terrorists responsible for 9-11. It is important to recognize whom they are because they are the enemy within. This is the election for the USA. Have no doubt about it. Another four years with Bush and the country will be in total shambles.

Quite frankly, the man's either wired or mad. If it's the former, he should be flung out of office: tarred, feathered and kicked in the nuts. And if it's the latter, his behaviour goes beyond strange, and heads toward terrifying. He looks like he's listening to something we can't hear. He blinks, he mumbles, he lets a sentence trail off, starts a new one, then reverts back to whatever he was saying in the first place. Each time he recalls a statistic (either from memory or the voice in his head), he flashes us a dumb little smile, like a toddler proudly showing off its first bowel movement. Forgive me for employing the language of the playground, but the man's a tool. So I sit there and I watch this and I start scratching my head, because I'm trying to work out why Bush is afforded any kind of credence or respect whatsoever in his native country. His performance is so transparently bizarre, so feeble and stumbling, it's a miracle he wasn't laughed off the stage. And then I start hunting around the internet, looking to see what the US media made of the whole "wire" debate. And they just let it die. They mentioned it in passing, called it a wacko conspiracy theory and moved on. Yet whether it turns out to be true or not, right now it's certainly plausible - even if you discount the bulge photos and simply watch the president's ridiculous smirking face. Perhaps he isn't wired. Perhaps he's just gone gaga. If you don't ask the questions, you'll never know the truth. *** Throughout the debate, John Kerry, for his part, looks and sounds a bit like a haunted tree. But at least he's not a lying, sniggering, drink-driving, selfish, reckless, ignorant, dangerous, backward, drooling, twitching, blinking, mouse-faced little cheat. And besides, in a fight between a tree and a bush, I know who I'd favour. On November 2, the entire civilised world will be praying, praying Bush loses.

THIS IS A POLL THAT COUNTS!

Great News: Kids ARE smart and have excellent instincts! THIS IS A POLL THAT COUNTS! Click on image.
NEW YORK - Kid power! Democrat John Kerry is the winner, and the rest of the country should pay attention because the vote on Nickelodeon's Web site has correctly chosen the president of the United States in the past four elections. Nearly 400,000 children and teens voted, and the results were released Wednesday. Kerry received 57 percent of the vote; President Bush got 43 percent.

Highly Recommended: http://www.rense.com/general58/bsusu.htm
Highly Recommended: http://moveonpac.org/gore5/
There are fifteen days left before our country makes this fateful choice – for us and the whole world.
Join me on November 2 nd in taking our country back.
Highly Recommended: Maimed in Iraq, then mistreated, neglected, and hidden in America
http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=3784
SenderBerl: One of the things greatly confusing us is why the poll numbers shows the military in any way supporting Bush. He has treated them exactly as the serfs he sees them to be. He cares little to nothing of them. He is the President who positioned them in Northern Kuwait, started the war, and kept them sitting their expecting Condy Rice to wake him up in the morning with the news that Saddam launched WMD against them. See www.senderberl.com/BMI.pdf. Now we have just seen that image of Ashley Faulkner used to help Bush win. This disgusts us. We used the image to convey a message to President Bush in view that our perception of the image showed a man holding BY CIRCUMSTANCE a daughter of a victim of 9-11. Click here to link to our analysis.

Beware!
This, as we noted above the photo, is the height of effrontery regarding the events of 9-11. SenderBerl finds it difficult to believe that Bush 43 would allow the RNC to use it as they have. This really shows Bush for who he is: quoting Lynn Cheney: "This is not a good man." See our original analysis http://www.senderberl.com/prisoner.htm#ashley

Moreover, PLEASE STAND ON GUARD AGAINST THE CAMPAIGN TO WEAKEN KERRY BY TELLING THOSE AGAINST BUSH NOT TO VOTE FOR KERRY EITHER BECAUSE HE'S A NWO ELITE HIMSELF. This no doubt is the brainchild of Rove who knows that each Kerry vote lost is a Bush gain. Thus, there has been imbedded in otherwise legitimate quarters a disdain also for Kerry when Kerry is not the issue at all: the issue is to remove Bush and Cheney for the reasons we don't have to expound on at this point to you. Thus, do not fall for the trap of not voting at all. Your vote first, second and third is against Bush and to register it, you a. have to vote b. don't waste it by voting for Nader or anyone else because it's the same consequence for Bush as not voting at all and c. vote for Kerry because with all his luggage there is a foundation for change where with Bush there is none at all.

Edwards calls Cheney a hypocrite for suggesting possible nuclear attack
Senderberl: What may be going on here is Cheney whipping up the nuclear issue as a predicate for a move against Iran and/or North Korea before or after the elections. Again, if the poll numbers were not as narrow as they appear to be to Bush and Cheney, the odds greatly favor an attack prior to the elections. SenderBerl's interpretations on the small gap phenomenon, if true, as many globally believe they have been, attests to the enormous danger of the sitting president and his administration. Again, it is extemely difficult to see how any American would allow this administration to continue another term. LOOK AT THE US DOLLAR, LOOK AT OIL AND GASOLINE PRICES, LOOK AT THE ECONOMY, LOOK AT THE TRUE STATE OF UNEMPLOYMENT FOR AMERICA, LOOK AT THE EXPORT OF AMERICAN JOBS, LOOK AT THE OPEN BORDERS, LOOK AT THE TRUTHS CONNECTIVE TO 9-11, LOOK AT ABU GHRAIB, LOOK AT THE EXPANDED PATRIOT ACT PROVISIONS, LOOK AT INFLATION AND THE STOCK MARKET, LOOK AT WHAT OUR CHILDREN ARE SUBJECT TO IN TV PROGRAMMING AND ADVERTISEMENTS, LOOK AT EDUCATION, LOOK AT THE DRUGS, LOOK AT PORNOGRAPHY, LOOK AT THE STATE OF THE CONGRESS AND GOVERNMENT. Does any true American want this trend to continue. Remember what we wrote in July 2004? If not, look at it again. We had $40 oil then, now we have $55 oil and everything else is far worse than it was six months ago. Just imagine what Bush can accomplish in another four years. The man has not been successful at anything but those things that have undermined this country and put the world to the brink of war. October 20 04

CHENEY BRINGS IN THE N THREAT
October 19 04

CARROLL, Ohio (AP) - Vice President Dick Cheney on Tuesday raised the possibility of terrorists bombing U.S. cities with nuclear weapons and questioned whether Sen. John Kerry could combat such an "ultimate threat ... you've got to get your mind around." "The biggest threat we face now as a nation is the possibility of terrorists ending up in the middle of one of our cities with deadlier weapons than have ever before been used against us - biological agents or a nuclear weapon or a chemical weapon of some kind to be able to threaten the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans," Cheney said. "That's the ultimate threat. For us to have a strategy that's capable of defeating that threat, you've got to get your mind around that concept," Cheney said. Oct 19, 6:03 PM (ET) Source: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041019/D85QOUF80.html

SenderBerl: The incredible thing is that Cheney knows that if Bush and he get re-elected that the likelihood of it is high whereas if Kerry is in, it is extremely low. However, his words attest that he and Bush are going in after the elections whether they win or lose.

Drudgereport.com. Click on image to link

FAHRENHEIT 911

Michael Moore has provided the factual background for the entire movie. http://www.michaelmoore.com/warroom/f911notes/index.php?id=16 We just watched it on DVD for a second time and it was better than the first experience at the theaters. As we said from the get-go, the movie provides the factual stories that the mainstream media "missed." These stories weighheavily against President Bush; thus. the argument that the movie is political. The easiest and most important thing you can do to help defeat Bush is to strongly suggest everyone see it or see it again.

Amazingly, a recent CNN/USA Today poll showed 62% of Republicans still believe Iraq was behind 9/11. This is after a flood of contrary evidence and Duelfer's report. How can Republicans remain so blinkered? Part of the fault lies with the sycophantic national media, which collaborated with the Bush administration in whipping up war fever. The media still are not telling people the truth about Iraq, Afghanistan, or the so-called war on terrorism. The media utterly failed to remind Americans that Bush, who loves to play war leader, actually claimed Iraqi drone aircraft were poised to fly off ships in the North Atlantic and bombard America with germs. Bush should have been laughed out of office for believing and promoting this comic-book nonsense. Many Republicans simply don't see what the rest of the world does. So what if Iraq was no threat? Don't bother these golf club Rambos with details. They're delighted to see the U.S. pounding Arabs in revenge for 9/11. Bush's core Republican support lies in the suburbs and Bible-belt rural areas, where many people rely on TV sound bites for their world view, and have little understanding of history, geography or foreign affairs. This is the new "dumbed-down Republicans Party," fertile ground for nationalist hysteria, religious extremism, and anti-foreign xenophobia. *** No matter that Bush's policies have created millions of jobs in China instead of the U.S., or that he turned a $236-billion US surplus into a $521-billion deficit. His tax cuts and spending win elections. As the real president, v-p Dick Cheney, observed to a horrified U.S. Treasurer Paul O'Neill, "deficits don't matter." This kind of liberal-left Democrat economic voodoo used to be anathema to Republicans. Today, there's no real conservative party left in Washington, says Buchanan. Only in tax-cutting do Republicans still hew to their principles. Otherwise, they are just like the wildest-spending liberal Democrats. "Historically, Republicans have been the party of conservative virtues -- balanced budgets, healthy skepticism towards foreign wars, fierce resistance to the growth of government power. "No more," Buchanan says. "To win and hold office, many have sold their souls to the very devil they were baptized to do battle with." As for Bush's vow to wage unceasing war on America's enemies around the globe, Buchanan quotes President James Madison: "Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps the most to be dreaded, because it compromises and develops the germ of every other. No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare. Source: http://www.rense.com/general58/BLUIND.HTM

HONOR OUR TROOPS BY UNDERSTANDING THE PAIN OF THE SOLDIER WRITING THIS LETTER
http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041028/REPOSITORY/410280355&SearchID=73188412774667

When I was home in New Hampshire on leave last month, a lot of people approached me to tell what a good job we're doing here in Iraq. I appreciate the support, but I don't need the media or those people to tell me what I see every day. We are not getting the job done. People ask me, "How's it going over there?" Cities have been overrun and are in a state of lawlessness. My job brings me into the streets. I see these things as they happen. They aren't just headlines for me. All we are doing here is treading water, and at this rate we can't keep afloat much longer. I'm just a simple man, but I can see that everything this administration has done with Iraq has been dead wrong. We appreciate your support, but we can't see those yellow ribbons from here. I ask that you let your vote show your support. I don't know what you go to bed thinking, but I go to bed wondering not how many more years of this administration I can handle but how many more days I might survive.

SenderBerl Thinks it Important to Remind Readers why President Bush is 100% Committed to the War against Terrorism

What President Bush is doing is setting the platform via the war against terrorism and the Patriot Act laws to protect the NWO against YOU, the American people. Remember, but for China's refusal to play ball, the NWO would have no major power opponents and thereby surely move for control of global oil. Thereafter it needs to dismantle the USA from superpower supreme status. Those reasons we have thoroughly covered at our site including the premise that the Patriot Act laws liberally and easily cover Americans protesting the government where they can be ensnared and imprisoned as enemy combatants. Bush detests anyone protesting him and without question in a second term would make sure as he has (see photo below) that protest is discouraged. The NWO has built many unfilled longer term detention centers and nothing upsets us more than the ability of a government to imprison a citizen, deny having him, deny him counsel or contact, for as long as they want or please, and having it all made legal. We have covered these issues during our XMRADIO appearances and we keep hearing the Bush people tell the American people that Bush will get every terrorist. However, it behooves us to point out that the definition of a terrorist to Bush and his ilk is anyone who wants to oppose wrongful, unjust and/or illegal actions on their part. We mean, Bush approves of a nation going to war defending itself, but he deems it objectionable that when a nation cannot go to war that the citizens oppose an occupation government. His intent to bring democracy and freedom to the Iraqi people is a sick joke when the world knows that he wants the oil, a staging platform for more pre-emeptive wars, and a government that bows low to Bush and his oil cabal. Unfortunately for Americans, after the NWO takes care of all the loose ends, it then focuses on the wind up agenda for the USA where it blows up completely the US dollar and diminishes the nation to a third world power that has no choice but to accede to global government. Part and parcel of it is that it extirpates the US military and thus you have the reason why it treats the troops as it does, because it wants no one interested in the US military in the planned future for the USA (it intends that the US has no military other than the NWO global military). The most important proof is that the EU has formed a new alternative to NATO and all former NATO nations are invited but for one: THE USA. We have heralded this as evidence that the controlling leadership of the NWO has its current and/or future roots only in the EU. Did you think the elitist centrix would ever allow the most powerful military in the world to fall into the hands of the likes of President Al Sharpton, when they fail to sleep at night thinking that the fast growing African-American population could vote him or someone like him into office one day. Moreover, they don't want any blacks or Jews or any seeds of serfs in their inner club. They have tolerated the consequences of the French and American revolutions long enough. So when we hear that Bush is out to get the terrorists we hear it that he is out to get us the American people as he adeptly has and how he would further it with a second term. The war against terrorism is the war against just dissent. It may not be clear to you today, but it has been very clear to us for a very long time. Think about it.

Notably and admirably it writes as follows: "The biggest mistake, though, was one that will haunt America for years to come. It lay in dealing with prisoners-of-war by sending hundreds of them to the American base at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba, putting them in a legal limbo, outside the Geneva conventions and outside America's own legal system. That act reflected a genuinely difficult problem: that of having captured people of unknown status but many of whom probably did want to kill Americans, at a time when to set them free would have been politically controversial, to say the least. That difficulty cannot neutralise the damage caused by this decision, however. Today, Guantánamo Bay offers constant evidence of America's hypocrisy, evidence that is disturbing for those who sympathise with it, cause-affirming for those who hate it. This administration, which claims to be fighting for justice, the rule of law and liberty, is incarcerating hundreds of people, whether innocent or guilty, without trial or access to legal representation. The White House's proposed remedy, namely military tribunals, merely compounds the problem."

SenderBerl: We were asked to watch Stolen Honor. We did. These are our comments. There are a handful of former POWs largely from the Air Force who detest John Kerry. They are bitter and without question have good reason for when they returned to the USA they found out that those that served hid in the closet since those serving in Vietnam were persona non grata in America. The American people had taken the reality of losing a war and transferred it onto the American soldier. We thought it wrong when it happened and thus we can fully empathize with those who never can subsconsiously forgive the country for treating them with disdain when they endured torture and suffering in its service.

However, the reality is that there are an endless list of military men that support John Kerry and no matter how many times they want to earn Bush points by calling Kerry a traitor and one who abandoned them, the reality is that a man guilty of treason would not find the type of support Kerry enjoyed and enjoys in his candidacy for high office. Moreover, our military does not award the medals and honors given Kerry if he doesn't carry commensurate character and courage. Thereby, these men who have carried their anger and bitterness for decades, were now able with Rove and company flaming the fires to find an outlet to dump all their anger and bitterness on Kerry. If it makes them feel better, its OK with us because we understand how they feel but we don't support those the true cause of suffering of those that serve using them to continue on so that those dying and being maimed in Iraq can continue to do so for the next ten to twenty years if NWO Bush has his way.

Kerry has his baggage but the type of wrong Bush represents is the silent, subtle, behind the scenes ones that don't take center stage and ones he surely never admits to engaging, such as 9-11. We won't bother men who have already suffered much, but if we did we would bother them to listen to www.senderberl.com/jeaudio.wma so that we can start the discussion as to what abandoning troops and the country is really all about. Kerry's wrongdoings are bush league. Bush's wrongdoings are historic and tragic in degree and nature. Kerry we believe meant well. He was young, tired, confused, and misled. Bush is no longer in his youth, and he is and has been deliberate, deceptive, sinister in his agenda and designs. Those designs encompass a wrongdoing far deeper and more deadly than anything Kerry has been responsible for. Thus, to the degree that Stolen Honor is an effort to undermine Kerry and support Bush, it does not identify the person responsible for current egregious wrongs and future egregious wrongs if re-elected president.

SENDBERL ELECTION COMMENT AND OPINION 11:00 pm: WE HEARD GULIANI WHO BRILLIANTLY STOOGES FOR BUSH ACTUALLY ADMIT TONIGHT ON CNN THAT THERE WAS NO QUESTION THAT ANOTHER TERRORIST ATTACK WAS FORTHCOMING. THUS, WITH ALL THE BRILLIANT MINDS IN THE US IT BEHOOVES RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE TO ASK WHY THE DYNAMICS OF A FORTHCOMING ATTACK ARE NOT DISCUSSED. SIMPLE. FOR THE SAME REASON NO ONE HAD THE NERVE TO DISCUSS BUSH SKIPPING HIS ANNUAL PHYSICAL NOT TO SAY ANSWER WHAT WAS RUNNING UP HIS BACK DURING THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES. THE IMPACT OF THE MASSIVE VOTE WILL NOT BE SEEN UNTIL TOMORROW MORNING. THUS, THIS WILL BE THE LAST UPDATE UNTIL THAT TIME.

SENDERBERL ELECTION REPORT 8:15PM: NEW JERSEY (PER CNN) GOES FOR KERRY. TERRORISM NUMBER ONE ISSUE BUT PEOPLE OF NEW JERSEY OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORT AND CHOOSE KERRY. THIS IS REMARKABLY IN LINE WITH OUR SILENT RAGE ASSESSMENT BELOW. WE EXPECT THIS DYNAMIC NOT TO BE UNIQUE TO NEW JERSEY

SENDERBERL ELECTION REPORT 12:30 pm: TURNOUT SEEMS HIGH. A DEFINITE PLUS FOR KERRY AND THAT THE RESULTS WILL NOT BE CLOSE AND SUBJECT TO COURT INTERVENTION. CURRENCY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS AROUND THE WORLD REFLECT A KERRY VICTORY. WHILE THE LATTER ARE NOT DETERMINATIVE, THEY ARE POWERFUL MIRRORS OF FORTHCOMING REALITIES. GOLD IS DOWN NEARLY $9 AS WELL, DOLLAR UP, EURO DOWN. HISTORY IN OUR OPINION UNDER A KERRY VICTORY WILL RECORD THAT THE WORLD CONSIDERED BUSH RE-ELECTION A THREAT BEYOND MOST AMERICANS' WILDEST IMAGINATION. WE FULLY AGREE WITH THAT FUTURE ASSESSMENT. AGAIN, BECAUSE OF KERRY NWO ALIGNMENT HE CARRIES CONSIDERABLE BAGGAGE AND THUS FUTURE PROBLEMS, BUT WITH BUSH WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A VERY DARK AND DIRE FUTURE WITHOUT ANY CHANCE TO SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECT OUR COURSE.

SENDERBERL IS ASKED WHETHER BUSH WILL EMPLOY A MILITARY DRAFT

Absolutely. The proof is from Bush and his administration. They have openly characterized the war against terrorism as a ten to twenty year effort. Who is going to replace the current military troops in terms of another ten to twenty years of conflict and war? Moreover, since Bush intends to invade Syria and Iran, it is ludicrous for anyone to believe he will not deploy a draft. This is the man who said he would go to war as a last resort.

We want to add here on the eve before election day some excerpts from our postings:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,1188133,00.html

SenderBerl: Gary Hart a former presidential candidate and who is a verified expert on domestic matters relating to terrorism has made it known that he finds it incredible that the 9-11 panel has not invited him to testify regarding 9-11. The relayed reason for his ire is that he told Condy Rice, someone he personally knows for twenty years, five days before 9-11, that major domestic terrorism was imminent. Hart told the Guardian his warning had been ignored.

"She [Rice] said: 'I'll discuss it with the vice-president'," Mr Hart said; but he felt the response was a brush-off. "All I can say is she didn't feel the degree of urgency I thought was necessary," he said. He said he has known Ms Rice for 20 years, since she had volunteered to work on his Colorado Senate campaign.

SenderBerl: There you have yet another proof of not only the sandbagging by the Bush administration of all impediments to allowing 9-11 to unravel, but the reference by Rice to Hart of the true National Security Advisor operating no doubt before 9-11 from his secret bunker with the shadow government overseeing what unraveled as 9-11. No one has really detailed why the high state of alert was abandoned to a state of neglect, allowing the barn door to remain fully open to the events of 9-11. What is inescapable is that 9-11 did reveal itself during this hiatus from full alert. Of course, the evidence by the 9-11 panel that the FBI really hadn’t been tasked in terms of the known danger of imminent domestic terrorism, says as much as Rice saying what could we expect from an administration only in office 233 days. The evidence and concern mounts as noted by this excellent editorial we recently encountered .

President Bush should not have gone into the classroom. Mr. Ehrlich noted the major difference between President Bush and the American public the morning of 9-11. Whereas the American public needed two planes striking landmark NYC buildings to conclude that America was under attack and subject to major terrorism, President Bush only required knowing that a single plane, not to say four planes, were hijacked and off transponder. Thus, before the first plane struck the North World Trade Center tower, President Bush based on Tenet's warning that something big was coming and the US just off, according to the White House per Richard Armitage the highest alert level in United States history, KNEW that the hijacked plane was EXACTLY what was feared forthcoming. Thus, NORAD and US military defense forces should have been sent aloft and the President should have passed altogether on sitting down reading with second graders when presidential decisions were highly likely regarding interception of hijacked planes heading for major metropolitan areas, planes that may have well carried nuclear payloads.

President Bush remaining at the Booker elementary school conclusively proved that the President knew the parameters of the events of 9-11: Secret Service protocol is to protect the President of the United States. The Secret Service charged with protecting the life of the President was compelled to remove him immediately from a publicly known facility that was highly likely a putative target of the terrorism in play on 9-11. However not only did President continue reading with second graders he offered a live televised national address from the school. Thus, it is clear that the Secret Service hearing about a single hijacked plane, and knowing the President was scheduled to appear at a publicly known facility, adjacent itself to an airfield, would never ever under any circumstances have allowed the president to pursue a schedule to a hastily arranged publicly known non secure facility -- to mingle among second grade school children who further who have been put at risk. There was only one conclusion: the President knew the parameters of the terrorism in play that day.

That's one terrible pilot: Again the president was acutely aware, as made clear by Condoleezza Rice and Richard Armitage, that this country faced imminent danger from terrorism. Plane hijackings were exactly in accord with the putative parameters of the terrorism expected and feared. Thus when a hijacked plane is driven into the North World Trade Center tower, the President, contrary to the rest of America, well knew that this was terrorism. For him to then characterize his original reaction to finding out about the first plane going into the north WTC tower as one where he thought that now "there's one terrible pilot" seriously demeans this nation on an even higher plateau than when he demeaned this nation and his responsibilities by shooting off so far away from Washington in August 2001, knowing that terrorism was imminent and the American people were being kept in the dark about it.