1. The whereabouts of Brenda Wells. She has been reported missing and her statements as interpreted by us give concrete circumstantial evidence of foul play since her statements assert that she was impeded from entering into the Alma tunnel at the critical moments before the accident as a black Fiat Uno was allowed to pass her.
   
   Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
   
2. Production of all her statements directly or indirectly bearing on her being impeded from entering the Alma tunnel at the critical time in issue.
   
   Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
   
3. The identity of those in the black Fiat Uno. This car without question played a role in the accident as its paint was found on the Mercedes driven by Henri Paul.
   
   Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
   
4. The identity of those in the white Mercedes. There were also reports that white paint was found on the Mercedes and this car was seen leaving the scene in a suspicious manner behind a small black car, manifestly the black Fiat Uno.
   
   Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
   
5. The identity of the three persons on the two motorcycles operating in unison with the black Fiat Uno.
   
   Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
   
6. The identity of the "fireman" who immediately had contact with the passengers in the Mercedes. He was present at the scene moments after the accident and before police or fire rescue ambulances were notified or called to the scene. He was photographed by a passing car. Where did he come from?
   
   Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
   
7. An exact accounting from the ambulance crew of the (one hour) time between Diana's entry into the ambulance and being taken to a hospital 6 kilometers away.
   
   Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
   
8. Identification of all those in the ambulance with Diana AT ANY TIME.
   
   Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
   
9. Production of statements from everyone in the ambulance about what was done by each during the course of Diana's entry into the ambulance and arrival at the hospital.
   
   Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
   
10. Disclosure whether anyone in the ambulance urged that Diana should be brought quickly to the hospital and further whether any telephone calls or other communications of whatever nature were received by anyone on the ambulance, and, if so from whom, urging that Diana be quickly brought to the hospital, inquiring what was taking so long, or disclosing that a team of medical specialists were awaiting her arrival.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
11. Disclosure whether Diana received any blood transfusions, and, if so, what type of blood was given her, and disclosure what quantities of her blood type were on the ambulance.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
12. If there was not an adequate supply of her blood type on the ambulance, an explanation in this one regard why Diana was not rushed to the hospital.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
13. Disclosure whether the ambulance stopped during its journey to the hospital, why, and whether anyone or anything entered into or left (was removed from) the ambulance during its one hour journey to the hospital.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
14. Disclosure of findings as to who was responsible for misinformation that the roof of the car had to be cut off to free Diana from the wreckage.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
15. Explanation of who was responsible for the misinformation that the Mercedes was an armored car, further falsely attributed to the lengthy time lapse in getting Diana to the hospital.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
16. Confirmation that Diana was immediately accessible and removable from the Mercedes to wit: the accident presented no material physical impediment to her removal from the car.
    
    Status: Confirmed by media reports.
    
17. Disclosure of how the physicians and medical specialists awaiting Diana's arrival at the hospital were preparing for her; why no one suggested or prepared a heart-lung bypass machine, and disclosure of how many of the medical team were interviewed by media at the hospital prior to Diana's arrival.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
18. Disclosure of whether the Chief of Police and the Interior Minister for the country were singularly or jointly present at the hospital awaiting Diana's arrival.
    
    Status: Media accounts confirm Interior Minister at hospital and suggest that the Police Chief was also there with him.
    
19. An answer to why both the Chief of Police and Interior Minister who were admittedly mystified over the inordinate time to deliver Diana to the hospital, did not call to get an answer as to why the ambulance was taking so long.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
20. An answer as to how two escort motorcycles could "lose" the ambulance with an identification of the two police officers on the motorcycles.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
21. An answer whether they were told or authorized to leave the ambulance, and if so, by whom and when.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
22. An answer whether they communicated with anyone in the ambulance that night.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
23. An answer whether anyone from the ambulance or any other person at any time from the moment of the accident rode as a passenger on any of the police motorcycles accompanying the Diana ambulance.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
24. Statements from the motorcycle policemen regarding the inordinate journey of the ambulance and anything else with regard to their involvement, official or otherwise, that evening.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
25. An answer to whether any of the medical team awaiting Diana were in contact with the ambulance and further disclosure whether any in the medical team, during the inordinate journey of the ambulance, were urging that she be brought to the hospital as quickly as possible.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
26. Disclosure of what report/information, and from whom, the medical team, awaiting Diana's arrival, received from the ambulance as to the specific nature of Diana's injuries and condition.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
27. Clarification whether the occupant(s) in the Fiat Uno seen in front of the Mercedes after the accident, or passengers on the two motorcycles in issue, would have had sufficient time, in a foul-play scenario, to visit the crashed Mercedes to artificially intervene with the health and welfare of the occupants to wit: administer any substance which would cause Henri Paul to generate the reported intoxication levels achieved from the tests conducted. Disclosure whether there is any substance which could have been injected into Henri Paul moments after his death to support, in whole or part, the intoxication levels and findings reported thereafter.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
28. Clarification whether the skid marks in the tunnel were professionally preserved and if not , why not. If preserved, disclosure whether Henri Paul straight braked or was forced over to the side by another car, a matter according to accident professionals otherwise determinable from the skid markings.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
29. Disclosure why French authorities would turn down the offer of Daimler-Benz hours after the accident to immediately investigate and analyze the crash site.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
30. An answer to the hypothetical that if Henri Paul was deliberately blinded temporarily by intense light (what would look to those outside the tunnel as photographers' flash bulbs), whether there could have been a created condition by the involved vehicles which would cause Henri Paul, on regaining his vision from the blinding light, to swerve to the left, thinking that by doing so he was avoiding causing injury to himself, his passengers and/or to others outside the car.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
31. Alternatively, or in addition to 30, whether the left front tire in particular was carefully preserved and investigated to inspect for damage/ puncture which could have caused the car to dramatically swerve to the left at the very time Henri Paul was blinded and holding his hands up to instinctively protect his eyes from the blinding light.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
32. Alternatively or in addition to 30 and 31, whether the Fiat or white Mercedes could have had a mechanical device which could have deliberately pushed the Mercedes to the left without leaving any markings of the intervention, the device being covered by rubber or otherwise.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    
33. Whether Diana by turning around was attempting to identify the driver of the Fiat or motorcycle(s), and why.
    
    Status: Unanswered/unresolved.
    

The following are "facts" as presented in the September 30, 1997 update. They supplement the open questions and issues stated above, and overall support that the entire episode appears now to be one of deliberate foul play. Absent production of Brenda Wells, and answers to all the open questions and issues above, it is the only conclusion.

Regarding the accident and death of Princess Diana:

1. It involved the Princess of Wales.
   
2. It occurred just prior to an anticipated announcement of engagement to Dodi Fayed.
   
3. Her death eviscerated the steep problems which would have faced the Royals and England had she in fact married Dodi, or worse, become pregnant during the marriage.
   
4. The original focus should not have been on Henri Paul but the fact that Diana could have survived the accident.
   
5. The Police Chief for Paris, France and the Interior Minister for the country, jointly admitted that they were surprised at the inordinate delay in the ambulance delivering Diana to the hospital. Yet no one picked up a phone to call the ambulance.
   
6. No facts have been revealed as to who was on the ambulance, or what treatment was rendered to Diana, and who made the decisions to take one hour to bring her to a hospital 6 kilometers from the accident site. It moreover is unlikely that the ambulance even carried sufficient amounts of blood she needed.
   
7. The ambulance was originally accompanied by two police motorcycles, who "lost" the ambulance.
   
8. Diana's suffered an injury to her left pulmonary vein, not to her aorta, which we understand is the type of injury normally sustained in a "deceleration" incident. She would have materially benefited if she was quickly delivered to the hospital and placed on a heart lung bypass unit. Neither was done.
   
9. Misinformation was released that the Mercedes was armored to support why it took so long to get Diana to a hospital. Only after intense world interest and focus did salient truthful facts became available including that she could have been swiftly removed from the car and scene and whisked to a hospital where 25 specialists were awaiting her.
   
10. A picture was taken showing Diana not looking at the photographer taking the picture but at a motorcycle behind the car. To do so she had to fully turn around, and it would appear that she was trying to identify those on the motorcycle. Why?
    
11. Trevor Rees-Jones put on his seat belt. Diana was a devoted seat belt user. If the focus and concern was Henri Paul then they would have simply told him to stop the car or pull over. Diana and Dodi both could handle another confrontation with the press. They wouldn't risk their lives to allow someone driving erratically to continue.
    
12. To further attest that Henri Paul wasn't their concern, we have Brian Anderson seeing the Mercedes driving in a straight path. We have Trevor Rees-Jones remembering nothing unusual about Henri Paul. We have the fact that Henri Paul parked his car normally, a feat hard to do when highly intoxicated, thereafter walking normally, even speaking with both Dodi and Diana. Yet the contention is that this man was a chronic alcoholic, and based on this contention we should all blindly accept it and go on with our lives.
    
13. We do not hear the fact that during the course of Henri Paul's chronic long term alcoholic condition he was a licensed pilot with 600 hours flying time. As one news story stated: "'Flying an aircraft through fog is not something you can do just hoping for the best,' Jean-Andre Cahazuc, his former instructor, told one French newspaper. 'It takes discipline, and Paul was the complete opposite of a clown.'"
    
14. While the media reports the French conducting one of the most thorough auto accident investigations in history, it is already a sham since they have polluted the opportunity to obtain critical evidence. Moreover, the investigators seem to discount and belittle the evidence of a Gary Hunter and Brenda Wells, while at the same time discouraging others to come forward. The press and media moreover circumvent any follow-up or discussion concerning what Wells in particular had to say. Brenda Wells is nowhere to be found, as far as we know.
    
15. It doesn't take an Einstein to recognize that the accident took place in an area where the chances of witnesses were minimized. Sheer coincidence? We don't think so, when the mystery black car and two motorcycles seemingly made their move in the tunnel, and Brenda Wells has effectively stated that she was stymied from entering the tunnel at this very critical time window.
    
16. How can the French leak and then confirm that they are bent on seeing here a routine accident caused by an "addicted" long term alcoholic until and unless they know the identity of the passengers on the motorcycles and in the mystery black car. To even assert blame under the circumstances and facts detailed above is an abomination of responsibility and accountability and an insult to the public.
    
17. There are obviously forces who want to derail intelligent thought, press coverage and investigation of the Diana accident and death. The investigation and press and media coverage of the Diana accident and death are vastly important to the future of all citizens of the world. If the press and media can be manipulated, if anyone wishing to pursue serious inquiry and discussion can be thwarted, then do such characteristics reflect democracy, or autocracy? In a democratic society and environment a free, open, and aggressively inquiring press and media is essential to offset the power and control of central government and control. In the new world order being successfully pursued this past decade plus, it is imperative to preserve the power and responsibilities of the press and media. If they fail here, as they have failed recently with TWA Flight 800, then one has to question on what principles and platform the evolving central government operates. Can people in an expanding capitalistic environment, where opportunity seemingly expands, at least for a period of time, recognize the erosion taking place to important democratic platforms. In the new world order, are elementary democratic precepts inherently in conflict with it? Is this conflict evidenced by the Diana's accident and death? We think so.