What
Made SenderBerl Suspicious of President Bush
On September 11th we
connected the terrorism toppling the World Trade
Center to China. However, as soon as we heard that
military jets charged with the responsibility of
defending the nation were kept grounded, we thought
it wise not to discount the new world order shadow
government from having a hand in it as well. On
learning that the NSA, who misses nothing, supposedly
missed picking up on this planned US terrorism, and
further learning that the CIA denied being advised by
Israel of an imminent act of terrorism against the
US, when Israel claimed that it did so advise, and
learning that US defense forces were not on any form
of heightened alert, when President Bush himself
attested to being advised of a heightened threat of
terrorism in August 2001, we focused on the
President's trip to Jacksonville and Sarasota Florida
to be with elementary school children, after being
away from Washington all of August 2001.
During this time, on October 8,
2001, Bush launched the attack against Afghanistan.
We IMMEDIATELY perceived that Bush
was baiting a coup in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia by
playing up their leadership’s cooperation with
the US in waging the attack. We thus wrote to House
and Senate Intelligence Committees as follows:
"Has anyone outside the
ambit of the administration assessed the consequences
of a putative overthrow of the current regimes in
Pakistan (Islamic nuclear) and Saudi Arabia (Islamic
oil)? Would not these be likely and doable projects
encouraged by the American presence and activity in
the area and thus worsen rather than improve things
for America long term, unless
the U.S. intends to then invade and occupy these two
countries to in fact remedy the situation it itself
encouraged? Could such a plan be
implemented without your review and vote?"
At this time, we called Florida
newspapers and examined the White House web site,
learning that Bush ONLY announced
his school trip plan on September 7th[1],
finding that very unusual, since it was not a
campaign period, he was just away for an entire month
from the White House, secluded at his ranch in
Crawford, and received criticism for being away from
Washington so long.
The Florida newspapers confirmed
that they were first told about his trip on September
7th. The
Secret Service usually demands, not requests, on such
a nonessential trip, a longer time frame to secure
the subject areas and make the necessary security
arrangements.
We wrote as follows on October
11th, on the third day after the launch against
Afghanistan:
Deep Cover
Before the dust settled on the
World Trade Center building collapse, President Bush nearly
immediately announced an American military
response that would be implemented over an
extended time period, and would require
great sacrifice from the Nation. This showed us that
the government agenda was on autopilot,
having been planned some time before.
Otherwise, the President’s remarks in such
regard could only be accepted as impulsive,
reflecting the emotion of the day. That they proved
accurate and true attests to the advance
nature of his words.
Moreover, the President exhibited some obtuse
behavior for a politician and President in the period
preceding the collapse of the World Trade Center
buildings. He took the entire month of August off
from Washington and the White House. No President had
ever matched this time away from the Nation’s
Capital. Moreover, on his return just prior to Labor
Day, he was off and away to various states, despite
all the criticism lodged against him. When the World
Trade Center buildings collapsed, days after Labor
Day, one of the busiest times for the Nation,
President Bush had just completed visiting an
elementary school in Jacksonville, Florida on
September 10th and was at another elementary school
in Sarasota, Florida on September 11th.
Thus, fair comment from the above would include that
the U.S. was expecting an attack and knew that its
focus would include Washington, D.C. to wit: the
White House, and kept its President constantly away
from it, or otherwise, on the other side of the
spectrum, it was prepared for it, not in
terms of stopping it, but in terms of implementing a
strategy and agenda that had important people
endorsing it. Similar to the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor, the attack on the World Trade
Center towers spurred the people of the United
States into a mindset supporting the intrusions since
then, looking at anyone questioning them with
jaundice eye. The stage was set for military
action, without a need for justification for what
might unravel.
Now, some weeks thereafter, we see the United States
blasting Afghanistan to a degree where it will look
as though it were hit with a series of atomic
weapons. The amount of firepower far exceeds any
identifiable political need or result. Thus in the
search for meaning among the smoke, and the U.S.
baiting the Islamic world with talk of seeking
terrorists in other sovereign lands, we perceive an intent by the
government to fuel a response in the Islamic world.
Michael Boyce, chief of the British defense staff,
told a news conference today, “We must expect at
least to go through the winter into the next summer
at the very least.” A U.S. defense official
said, “We dropped a lot of bombs. We have said
this will be relentless, and it will.” An Afghan
witness to the bombings said, “It was like an
inferno. The explosions were so huge and so massive,
that it felt like an earthquake, as if an atomic bomb
had been dropped on Kabul.”
The reaction to such U.S. military action is
predictable. The AP report states, “Muslims
outraged at the raid on Afghanistan staged protests
in countries including Bangladesh, Jordan, South
Africa, India, Iran, Pakistan and Indonesia.” Thus
couple the bait of entering more countries, with the
intensity of the attack, and the commitment to an
enduring presence and what does this all translate
into? Here is what we wrote to the Senate
and House members on the U.S. intelligence committees
yesterday:
"Has anyone outside
the ambit of the administration assessed the
consequences of a putative overthrow of the current
regimes in Pakistan (Islamic nuclear) and Saudi
Arabia (Islamic oil)? Would not these be likely and
doable projects encouraged by the American presence
and activity in the area and thus worsen rather than
improve things for America long term, unless the U.S.
intends to then invade and occupy these two countries
to in fact remedy the situation it itself encouraged?
Could such a plan be implemented without your review
and vote?"
Conclusion: This tactic is very
high risk and for the reasons expressed in Peres
Personified is destined to lead to a massive conflict
where the result will be other than what the U.S.
anticipates. It is exactly during this
time that serious oversight must rest over secret
government plans, especially when they do not seem to
add up or otherwise make sense. However,
instead of the people or the media encouraging
oversight, they allow the President to tell the
country that he is going to withhold intelligence
from the Congress and just offer it to eight or so
Congressional representatives. While he immediately
thereafter said that he was just relaying a message
to those with loose lips, the message from our
perspective is other than what is initially apparent,
to wit: that everything that
will soon unravel will be by the will of the few over the wishes of the country, if
they of course knew the truth, not to say had a
choice or say in it.
With Israel, it was our position that all
Clinton’s efforts would fail because no peace
could be supported that lead Israel away from (the
new world order agenda) rather than to G-d (the only
true course for peace). No matter what signs the
Israeli people and government receive or have put
before them, they refuse to accept the correction.
Now, the World Trade Center buildings, as most
subliminally perceive, is a final sign: that the
paradigm of world control under the monotheistic
religions will collapse. In our opinion,
the emerging new power is China.
President Bush, his dad, and their cohorts are
betting Texas style, that China will not intervene
into these events. For the reasons expressed and
explained in Peres Personified, it is highly likely
that China will ultimately intervene. In its attempt
to wrestle the next step of world control and
domination, again under the deep cover of world
peace, the new world order group will take us beyond
the precipice and into a Holocaust where the
living will envy the dead. Thus, we continue
to hold by the proposition that the only safety valve
to escape a destiny which has now been signaled, is
to do whatever is possible to have a leadership in
Israel that understands the historical lessons in
Peres Personified. After many years, what seemed
far-fetched now seems close, for many, too close. The
real demarcation line is when it is irreversible.
The U.S. will now call in its markers and demand
Israel to turn over the West Bank and the Holy City.
Thereafter the line will be crossed and the
historical reality of Peres Personified will be
carved in stone. Start learning Chinese as the world
turns into the dust and ash seen around the World
Trade Center Towers after their collapse, a reality
which would have been seen fifty years ago had G-d
not intervened to assure victory for the U.S. and its
allies, when the U.S. adhered to religious tenets
which allowed the U.S. to grow and prosper. Now, with a management
worshipping the domination elixir of the new world
order, under a pretense and façade of peace, where
it sacrifices its children, allowing drugs, sex and
violence to dominate, it will be no surprise to find
that a reckless and dangerous strategy turns false, as did Clinton’s when he
strong-armed Israel into accepting the U.S. peace
plan. Now, President Bush’s success in the
created environment in foisting such a result only
proves that the biblical warnings of the trilogy of
religions under monotheism are about to take an
irreversible hold and status. Thus, the clock really
has just about run out.
Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
October 11, 2001
PS. One of the most often heard questions is why the
U.S.did not oppose Syria's admission into the U.N.
Security Council? We have routinely addressed China's
behind the scenes presence in Syria. The U.S. thus
provided ying to offset China's yang. The U.S. knows
that Syria is a key player, particularly with China
behind it. The U.S. is desperate to neutralize China.
Thus, we can expect that after the Palestinian State
and the return of the Holy City that Israel will say
good-bye to the Golan, if not whatever more Syria
asks, now that it is an esteemed member of the select
U.N. Security Council community
Now, Iraq,
could be the demarcation line for no return.
Thus while we targeted China
between September 11th and September 13th
in our analyses, we now found ourselves very
disturbed by Bush actions and behavior. You must also
note that it was clear to us, early on, that everyone
knew where Bush was the morning of September 11th:
THE PRESIDENT'S VISIT Bush to
speak at Booker Elementary
Published on September
8, 2001
(Sarasota Herald-Tribune (FL), 143 words.) The
centerpiece of President Bush's visit to Sarasota
next week will be an education
speech Tuesday morning at Emma E. Booker Elementary
School. Principal
Gwen Rigell said Friday evening that school officials
are still working out the details. "Right now
we're just excited that we were actually selected to
do it," she said. The president is scheduled to
arrive Monday evening at Sarasota-Bradenton
International Airport and to depart on Tuesday.
Many were questioning what he was doing at elementary
schools (and please recognize that he spent less
than an hour on September 10th at the
Jacksonville Florida elementary school, and there was
no 9-11 urgency that day)!
Bush wraps up
Jacksonville visit
Times-Union staff President Bush left Jacksonville
aboard Air Force One. ***I have no love for him
at all," said Erin Robinson, 30, a computer
technician who lives two blocks from the
school.Robinson said she didn't understand why Bush
would bother with her neighborhood, and that she
wasn't convinced of his commitment to education.
|
The
President in Jacksonville on September 10th,
looking not altogether well.
|
To augment that
his visit was well known, there were protesters at
the Booker Elementary School:
http://www.sarasotamagazine.com/Pages/hotstories/hotstories.asp?136
The next morning the President was due
at Booker Elementary for an event similar to the one
at Jacksonville. I arrived just before eight; and the first thing I
noticed were the protesters, herded behind an orange fence on MLK Drive,
carrying banners decrying all sorts of things, mostly
environmental. I checked in with the press desk and
found our photographer Rebecca Baxter.
Robert Plunket, present with
President Bush at the Booker Elementary School,
writing for the Sarasota magazine offers some
important material:
Another plane,
this one definitely identified as a passenger jet,
had crashed into the other tower. The reporters and
photographers literally ran over to a small TV studio
located off to the side of the media center, where
for the first time we saw the images that have become
all too familiar.
For 10 minutes or so, confusion reigned. Would the President be
leaving immediately? Had he already left?
 |
Card tells the President that
America is under attack. Bush doesn't ask a
single question, such as, whether there were
any nuclear or biological weapons involved in
the second attack. He doesn't deem it
appropriate to excuse himself. The Secret
Service doesn't deem it appropriate to remove
him from a place probably targeted by
terrorists, it being a matter of public
knowledge for days where he would be that
very morning and time. Moreover, the
President stays at the Booker Elementary
School nearly 30 additional minutes, putting
himself and the school children at risk,
unless he knows that he is safe
.DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO FROM THE MAIN PAGE
|
 |
Plunket'S
instinct was totally consistent with the reality that
would have been the case had there been no
complicity.
Further,he describes the
President's trip to Justina Elementary School by
writing:
The politicians
in suits sat rigidly at attention, leaning slightly
forward, each riveted to their President and role
model.
The
program, such as it was, dealt with reading, and was
on what struck me as a very superficial level, even
for an elementary school. "Every child should learn to
read," the President said, and then emphasized
"the importance of practicing reading. If it
takes teaching reading all day long, do it!" he
exclaimed. Perhaps the most endearing part of his
presentation was the way he and the little kids
sitting in the first row would make funny faces at
each other when the other people were talking.
At precisely
4:30 the program was over. The kids, yours truly included, surged
around Mr. Bush for pictures and autographs. Then I
proceeded to the White House press filing center,
where the reporters plug in their laptops and write
their stories. There was a desk for SARASOTA
Magazine, set up right between Time and the New York
Times.
Thus, the President criticized
for being away from Washington, traveled to the
Justina Elementary School in Jacksonville, to spend
40 minutes at the school.
Plunket further writes:
At 8:55 Tuesday
morning he was standing in front of Emma E. Booker
Elementary School as part of the official greeting
party, along with Congressman Adam Putnam. An aide
had just whispered to Miller the news of the first
plane crash in New York, but if the President yet
knew, his greeting as he got out of the limo did not
give it away. He
did, however, make an unscheduled stop in a
communications room, where he talked with Condoleeza
Rice in Washington. He then proceeded into a
classroom where 16 second graders, led by their
teacher, Sandra K. Daniels, were going to demonstrate
their reading skills.
About eight minutes into Daniels’ lesson,
the world fell apart. While Mr. Bush continued
reading for a few more minutes, the White House staff
considered their options and decided the President
would return to Washington at once but would first
make a brief statement to the crowd—and news
cameras—assembled in the media center.
Our point has been of course
that he should have never gone into the classroom and
after he knew that America was under attack, the
Secret Service should have hustled him away, but
instead he sat there lamely while two other planes
were unaccounted for, and when the government had to
assume that he could be a very target of the
terrorism in play that day. Moreover, truly
incredibly, he stayed at a high risk location for
twenty more minutes. It is not only that there were
protesters in the area attesting that the terrorists
knew where he was, but when leaving for for Air Force
One, according to Plunket, he passed Jones Aviation,
where two of the terrorists had taken their flying
lessons.
Therefore, this platformed our
trilogy of analyses on our main page showing that the
proof is that the Bush administration had advance
knowledge of 9-11 and allowed it to happen. Without
the moral outrage, President Bush could not have
implemented the National Security Strategy. That he
got more than he bargained, when China escalated the
terrorism, is something to which he bears
responsibility. Moreover, the failure of the military
planes to launch immediately, and his and General
Myers being unavailable for executive decisions, when
America was under attack, has caused us to at least
present the argument below that perhaps the terrorism
was not only allowed by Bush but that Bush and the
shadow government of advisors behind the new world
order for unipolar world government elevated it.
In this regard,. the following
photo disturbed us from the very first:
What set off the explosion seen
in the white cloud to the north to the towers? There
is no smoke linkage between it and the towers?
The Drudge Report conveyed some
awesome photos. Let us simply say that after the
publication, Drudge nor anyone else has commented
further upon them, as far as we know.
XXXXX DRUDGE
REPORT XXXXX SUN SEPT 16, 2001 19:51:28 ET XXXXX
MYSTERY OBJECT CAUGHT ON TAPE MOMENTS AFTER SECOND
TOWER HIT
A flying mystery object was captured on video just
moment after a second aircraft crashed into New
York's World Trade Center, it can be revealed.
MORE
Stills from a video taken by GAMMA PRESS USA --
showing the twin towers from an east angle -- clearly
show an unknown object moving at a 90 degree angle to
the second plane's flight path.
Was a military jet following the second plane? Is the
object a radar-guided missile that was fired at the
airliner -- but arrived seconds late? Is the object a
post-event distortion by a GAMMA PRESS editor? Could
the image be a giant piece of debris racing toward
the horizon?
The mystery surrounding the video intensified in and
out of official government over the weekend.
A close examination of the footage appears to first
show the object flashed by sunlight -- above the left
tower -- a full 10 seconds after impact of the second
airliner. The mystery object quickly streeks across
the the back of the right tower before swooping down
at a rapid clip and out of the camera's frame.
The video featuring the mystery object has so far
failed to catch the attention of the nation's main
press.
It should be noted that no reports from countless
bystanders or other video footage has backed up the
GAMMA video, which was running at FOXNEWS.COM as of
Sunday evening [ http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34238,00.html
Scroll to: Video, the attack: East angle 2nd plane
hits tower.]
Where did the object go? The American
public has learned nothing from the events of 9-11,
everything important and material to the public's
right to know being buried under the facade of
national security. The only thing the public knows is
that 9-11 gave Bush an open license to do many things
he could not have done at all, absent 9-11.
In April 2002 a powerful presentation
supporting the need for a full investigation was
presented to the leadership of the UAE. It also
touches upon WTC 7 (2). We were led to understand,
and logic compels us to understand, that under the
mask of the attack on the WTC, another building was
targeted. We heard that there was a massive amount of
investigative material concerning the oil/energy
industry at WTC-7 in an office not publicly known.
Regardless, the point is that without a formal
investigation, nothing is uncovered or learned.
Giving the fox the keys to the hen house, surely does
not offer confidence to us or anyone else that there
will be anything revealed connecting with the precept
of truth.
We present below
a transcript of the presentation given by Thierry
Meyssan on 8 April 2002 at the Zayed Center in
AbuDhabi (United Arab Emirates), at a gathering
organized under the auspices Arab League and attended
by the diplomatic corps and the international press
corps. This presentation was followed by questions
and answers, which are in the process of being
transcribed and translated.
Your Highness, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
In the first minutes following the first attack on
the World Trade Center, officials suggested to the
media that the person behind the attacks was Osama bn
Laden, the epitome of Muslim fanaticism. Not long
after, the recently appointed director of the FBI,
Robert Mueller III, designated nineteen kamikazes by
name and mobilized all the means at the disposal of
his agency to track down their accomplices. The FBI
thus never undertook any investigation but, instead,
organized a man hunt, which, in the eyes much of the
United States public, quickly took on the appearance
of an Arab hunt. This reached such a pitch that
people were incited to attack – even kill –
Arabs whom they naively considered collectively
responsible for the attacks.
There was no investigation by Congress, which, at the
request of the White House, renounced exercising its
constitutional role, supposedly in order not to
adversely affect national security. Nor was there
investigation by any media representatives, who had
been summoned to the White House and prevailed upon
to abstain from following up any leads lest such
inquiries also adversely affect national security.
If we analyze the attacks of September the eleventh,
we notice first off that there was much more to them
than the official version acknowledges.
1.We know about only four planes,
whereas at one point it was a question of eleven
planes. Further, an examination of the
insider-trading conducted in relation to the attacks
shows put-option speculative trading in the stock of
three airline companies: American Airlines, United
Airlines and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines.
2. The official version does not
include the attack on the White House annex, the Old
Executive Office Building (called the
"Eisenhower Building"). Yet, on the
morning of the eleventh, ABC television broadcast,
live, pictures of a fire ravaging the presidential
services building.
3. Neither does the official version take
into account the collapse of a third building in
Manhattan World Trade Center complex, independently of
the twin towers. This third building was not hit by a
plane. However, it, too, was ravaged by a fire
before collapsing for an unknown reason. This
building contained the world's biggest secret CIA
operations base, where the Agency engaged in economic
intelligence gathering that the military-industrial
lobby considered a waste of resources that should
have been devoted to strategic intelligence
gathering.
If we look closely at the attack against the
Pentagon, we notice that the official version amounts
to an enormous lie.
It is obviously impossible that a Boeing 757 could,
for some 500 kilometers, escape detection by civil
and military radar, by fighter-bomber planes sent in
pursuit of it and by observation satellites that had
just been activated.
It is also obviously impossible that a Boeing 757
could enter the Pentagon's air space without being
destroyed by one or more of the five missile
batteries protecting the building.
When one examines the photographs of the façade,
taken in the minutes following the attack (even
before the Arlington civilian fire fighters had time
to deploy), one sees no trace of the right wing on
fire in front of the façade, nor any hole in the
façade into which the plane could have been
swallowed up.
Apparently without the least fear of laying itself
open to ridicule, the Defense Department declared
that the jet engines, made out of tempered steel, had
disintegrated under the shock of the impact –
without damaging the façade. The aluminum of the
fuselage is claimed to have combusted at more than
2,500° Celsius within the building and to have been
transformed into gas, but the bodies of the
passengers which it contained were so little burned
that they were later identified from their finger
prints.
Responding to journalists during
a press conference at the Pentagon, the fire chief
claimed that "no voluminous debris from the
aircraft" had remained, "nor any piece of
the fuselage, nor anything of that sort". He
declared that neither he nor his men knew what had
become of the aircraft.
Close examination of the
official photographs of the scene of the attack,
taken and published by the Defense Department, shows
that no part of the Pentagon bears any mark of an
impact that could be attributed to the crash of a
Boeing 757.
One must acknowledged the evidence: it is impossible
that the attack against the Pentagon on September 11,
killing 125 persons, was carried out by a jet
airliner.
The scene of the attack was thoroughly disturbed on
the following day by the immediate launch of new
construction work, with the result that many of the
elements necessary to reconstruct what had happened
are missing. The elements that do remain, however,
converge in a single hypothesis that it is not
possible to prove with certainty.
An air traffic controller from Washington has
testified seeing on radar an object flying at about
800 kilometers per hour, moving initially toward the
White House, then turning sharply toward the
Pentagon, where it seemed to crash. The air
traffic controller has testified that the
characteristics of the flight were such that it could
only have been a military projectile.
Several hundred witnesses have claimed that they head
"a shrill noise like the noise of a
fighter-bomber", but nothing like the noise of a
civilian aircraft.
Eye-witnesses have said that they saw
"something like a cruise missile with
wings" or a small flying object "like a
plane carrying eight or twelve persons".
The flying object penetrated the building without
causing major damage to the façade. It crossed
several of the building rings of the Pentagon,
creating in each wall it pierced a progressively
bigger hole. The final hole, perfectly circular,
measured about one meter eighty in diameter. When
traversing the first ring of the Pentagon, the object
set off a fire, as gigantic as it was sudden. Huge
flames burst from the building licking the façades,
then they shrank back just as fast, leaving behind a
cloud of black soot. The fire spread through a part
of the first ring and along two perpendicular
corridors. It was so sudden that the fire protection
system could not react.
All these testimonies and observations correspond to
the effects of an AGM[air to ground missile]-86C of
the third (most recent) generation of CALCM
[conventional air launched cruise missile -- see
picture at: http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/agm-86c.htm
equipped with depleted uranium warheads and guided by
GPS [global positioning system]. This type of
missile, seen from the side, would easily remind one
of a small civilian airplane, but it is not a plane.
It produces a shrill whistle comparable to that of a
fighter-bomber, can be guided with enough accuracy to
be directed through a window, can pierce the most
resistant armor and can set off a fire –
independent of its piercing effect – that will
generate heat of over 2,000° Celsius.
This type of missile was developed jointly by the
Navy and the Air Force and is fired from a plane. The
missile used against the Pentagon destroyed the part
of the building where the new Supreme Naval Command
Center was being installed. Following the attack, the
Navy Chief of Staff, Admiral Vernon Walters, failed
to show up in the crisis room of the National
Military Joint Intelligence Center when the other
members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff reported there.
Instead, he abruptly left the Pentagon.
Who, then, could have fired such a missile on the
Pentagon? The answer was given by the off-the-record
revelations of Ari Fleischer, the White House
spokesman, and by Karl Rove, senior advisor to the
president, to journalists from the New York Times and
the Washington Post. Eighteen days later, these men
discounted the veracity of the information they had
given the journalists, claiming that they had been
speaking under the stress of great emotion.
According to those close to George W. Bush, in the
course of the morning, the Secret Service received a
telephone call from those behind the attacks,
apparently in order to make demands. To give credence
to their demands, the masterminds revealed the secret
codes giving access to the secure telephone lines
available to the president for secure
communication with the various intelligence agencies
and services as well as for access to the nuclear
arsenal. In fact, only a very few persons
with the highest security clearances, in the top
ranks of the government, could have had these codes.
It follows that at least one of the persons behind
the attacks of September 11 has a top government
post, either civilian or military.
To give credence to the fable of Islamic terrorists,
the United States authorities invented kamikazes.
Although it would have been possible for a well
organized group of persons to bring fire arms into
commercial air liners, the kamikazes apparently used
cardboard cutters as their only weapons. They are said to have learned
to pilot Boeing 757s and 767s in the space of several
hours of simulator training, becoming better pilots
than professionals. This mastery
allowed them to carry out complex in-flight approach
maneuvers.
The Justice Department has never explained how it
established the list of the kamikazes. The airline
companies have furnished the exact number of
passengers in each plane, and the passenger lists,
incomplete, do not mention the persons who boarded at
the last minute. In checking the these lists, one
notices that names of the kamikazes are not on them
and that only three passengers are not identified for
flight 11 and only two for flight 93. It is thus
impossible that 19 kamikazes boarded. Further,
several of those listed as kamikazes have turned up,
alive. The FBI nonetheless maintains that the
high-jackers have all been definitively identified
and that complementary information such as birth
dates makes it improbable that they could be confused
with persons of the same name. For those who might
doubt this, the FBI has a ridiculous proof: whereas
the planes burned and the twin towers collapsed, the
passport of Mohammed Atta was miraculously found
intact on the smoking ruins of the World Trade
Center.
The existence of high-jackers, whether these
or others, is confirmed by telephone calls made by
several passengers to members of their families.
Unfortunately, these conversations are known to us
only by hearsay and have not been published, even in
the case of those that were recorded. Thus,
it has been impossible to verify that they were
actually made from a particular cell phone of from a
telephone on board. Here, too, we are asked to take
the FBI at its word.
Further, it was not indispensable to have
high-jackers to carry out the attacks. The Global Hawk technology,
developed by the Air Force, makes it possible to take
control of a commercial airliner regardless of the
intentions of its pilot(s) and to direct it by remote
control.
There remains the case of Osama bin Laden. If it is
generally admitted that he was a CIA agent or
collaborator during the war against the Soviet Union
in Afghanistan, the current version of events claims
that he turned coat and became public enemy number
one of the United States. This story does not bear up
under scrutiny either. The French daily le Figaro
revealed that last July, Osmam bn Laden was a patient
at the American hospital in Dubai, where he was
visited by the head of CIA regional office. CBS
television in the United States has revealed that, on
September 10, Osama bn Laden was undergoing dialysis
at the Rawalpindi military hospital, under the
protection of the Pakistani army. And the renown
French journalist Michel Peyrard, who was a prisoner
of the Taliban, has recounted how, last November,
Osama bn Laden was living openly in Jalalabad while
the United States was bombing other regions of the
country. It is difficult to believe that the greatest
army in the world, come to Afghanistan to arrest him,
was unable to do so, while the mollah Omar was able
to escape from United States military force on a
moped.
In view of the elements that I have just presented,
it appears that the attacks of September can not be
attributed to foreign terrorists from the Arab-Muslim
world – even if some of those involved might
have been Muslim – but to United States
terrorists.
The day after the attacks of September 11, United
Nations Security Council Resolution 1368 acknowledged
"the inherent right of individual or collective
self-defense in accordance with the Charter",
calling on "all States to work together urgently
to bring to justice the perpetrators, organizers and
sponsors of these terrorist attacks and stresses that
those responsible for aiding, supporting or harboring
the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of these
acts will be held accountable".
If one wishes to heed the call of
the Security Council, to enforce Resolution 1368 and
to punish those who really are guilty, the only way
to accurately identify the guilty parties is to set up a commission
of inquiry whose independence and objectivity are
guaranteed by the United Nations.
This would also be the only way to preserve
international peace. In the meantime, Your Highness,
Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, the foreign military
interventions of the United States of America are
devoid of any basis in international law, whether it
be their recent intervention in Afghanistan or their
announced interventions in Iran, Iraq and in numerous
other countries.
|
The
President after his meeting with Crown Prince
Abdullah in April 2002, no doubt the Crown
Prince seeking a formal investigation to
obtain answers to the above issues.
|
SenderBerl agrees that taking
flying lessons could not account for the deadly
accuracy of the terrorist strikes that day on the
World Trade Center towers. If you have read through
our site, it is very apparent, too apparent, that
when a deeply nefarious and secret plan is in the
hands of a limited group, mistakes and omissions will
be made and found. Moreover, President Bush's actions
against Iraq reveal that Bush 43 is in pursuit of the
new world order unipolar government plans of Bush 41
and oil cartel group, who want to take over the oil,
and no longer face the threat of being cut off,
particularly as China emerges as the dominant
influential force in the Middle East. However,
everything we cover and criticize represents evil,
not good. Those behind the new world order are
consumed by avarice and power, thus, they stand
passively to death and destruction, even when they
involve innocents and children. They have no
patriotism, no loyalty, to country or G-d, and thus
they must be rooted out. Keeping facts and truths
hidden under the umbrella of national security and
interests results in the very dangers we long
identified and feared.
An agenda we relayed in Recapturing America seven
years ago is taking place today. Thus based on the
accuracy of analyses for over a decade, it behooves
you to protect yourself against the propaganda and
manipulation deployed by a press and media in service
to the new world order agenda, not to the American
people and public. TWA Flight 800 and Princess Diana
weaned out independent and courageous journalists
from the mainstream press and media, leaving the
pawns, poodles and stooges behind. However, sometimes
a pawn, poodle and even a stooge will recognize that
he has been used and is used as a dupe, and his
actions undermine his country and his family, and
portend a dark future rather than a good one. In
these circumstances, we carry continued hope,
especially in view of the massive recent protests,
before Bush even launched against Iraq, that the
President based on recognized truths will withdraw
from his unacceptable course and design, albeit we
have identified the many dimensions why he needs the
oil and occupation of Iraq.
We close by producing below a video in a shorter
and longer format showing what is thought to be a US
military aircraft flying adjacent to the World Trade
Center prior to the strike against the South Tower.
The US military has such advanced aircraft that can
fly SILENTLY at incredible speeds. The veracity of
such a video would account for the missile seen above
and it would also attest that the strike of the South
Tower was allowed to take place. We do not believe
that terrorist taking flying lessons had any hope of
striking the WTC towers with the accuracy and power
seen that day. Moreover, we are certain that even
with the on target strikes seen that day, that the
aircraft strikes were the mask to the planted
internal explosives demolishing the two buildings. At
www.senderberl.com/china/internal
we have photos that attest to the nature of the
implosion.
Absent intervention by our Republic or its
citizens, this administration seems intent on taking
us onto a course that will open the gateway to
bioterrorism as the offsetting response to the
superior military US armada. Once that portal is
opened, the future is destined to be dark. Thus,
again, our efforts to convince you to do all that you
can to stop the course. No doubt if 500,000 turned
out before a war launches, millions will turn out
later, as this country becomes divided, in line with
the new world order game plan: their only objective
to first gain world domination and control.
Thereafter, Americans can protest all they want, as
the country collapses from division and isolation.
The video:
SENDERBERL
CANNOT CONFIRM THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE VIDEO
RECEIVED. WE OFFER IT AS ANOTHER REASON SUPPORTING
THE NEED FOR FULL DISCLOSURE OF ALL FACTS KNOWN
REGARDING 9-11.
WHEN
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WINS BY A SLIM
MARGIN, SUPPORTED BY THE OIL CARTEL, AND THEN
UNDERTAKES WAR TO FURTHER THE INTERESTS OF HIS FAMILY
AND THAT OF THE OIL CARTEL, IT IS NOT A CASE
OF PRESUMED INNOCENCE, WHEN
IT ENTAILS DECISIONS BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES THAT PUTS OUR MILITARY AND OUR COUNTRY IN
HARM'S WAY.
MR.
FLEISCHER: Yes, let me get you the week ahead.
I promise not to use the words "OMB" or
"CBO" on the entire week ahead. The
President will launch an initiative beginning tonight
and it will continue into next week that is a
reminder of the importance of reading throughout
America. He and Mrs. Bush will give a series of
remarks and will also, in the case of the President,
remind the Congress of the importance of sending the
education package to the White House so that we can
improve our public schools. Specifically -- and now
let me give you the entire events for the week -- the
President on Sunday will participate in a coin toss
to kick off the NFL season. That will take place in
the Rose Garden on Sunday afternoon. On Monday, the
President will go to the Navy Yard with the Prime
Minister of Australia for an event and he'll have a
working lunch and a meeting with the Prime Minister
in the White House. In the afternoon on Monday, the
President will continue his focus on reading and
education when he travels to Jacksonville, Florida,
and then on to Sarasota, Florida. He'll return to the
White House on Tuesday afternoon, where he will host,
in the evening, the Congressional Barbecue on the
South Lawn. Also on Tuesday, Mrs. Bush will make
remarks on early child cognitive development to
Senator Kennedy's committee. On Thursday, President
and Mrs. Bush will make remarks at the White House
Assembly on Reading at the Library of Congress. And
on Friday, the President will help dedicate the
Eisenhower Executive Office Building and he'll host a
reception in honor of Diez y Seis before departing
for Camp David. Q The Sunday Rose Garden event, is
that open for coverage? MR. FLEISCHER: Yes, it is. Q
Thank you.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010907-1.html
(2) Date: 5/15/02
8:14:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time Just a couple of
things I know first and second hand. Did you know
that John LeBoutlier, an ex-congressman and now
columnist, reported that he learned through a federal
judge that the CIA had secured a secret ex-parte
order from one of the judges to give them exclusive
rights and jurisdiction over the site of Building No.
7 in the cleanup. The CIA had an office in this
building and explained to the judge that the order
was need for national security. This order gave the
CIA and its operatives exclusive jurisdiction over
the clean-up site. One must reflect whether any of
the investigators studying the cause of the collapse
were given access to the site around Building
No. 7. See Columnist on newsmax.com website.
Did
you know that that Building No. 7 was evacuated
before any other building. The building was evacuated
immediately after the FIRST plane struck the north
tower. A friend of mine who worked in the building
told me that the building was completely evacuated
immediately after the north tower was struck and that
she was blocks away and did not even learn of
the second plane hitting the building until some time
later. She was home in New Jersey when the buildings
collapsed. This should be reflected upon when
considering that the people in both the north and
south tower received no instructions to evacuate
until well after the second plane struck the south
tower.
It was
reported in the newspapers on the first or second day
after the bombing that a Michael Hess of the
Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, and
another employee of the City Housing Authority,
entered Building No. 7 IMMEDIATELY AFTER the first
plane struck the north tower when the building was
almost completely evacuated. They went up to the 23rd
Floor of Bldg 7 where the City's
"compound" was located. The reported that
AFTER the second plane struck the they heard a large
explosion on the floors above and below them.
They ran down to the lobby of Bldg 7 and said the
lobby was completely destroyed. They said it
"looked like hell" in the lobby of Building
7. This was reported in The New York Post and I
believe in the Newsday in the first few days after
the bombing (I still have the papers).
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/cia7.htm
END