PUBLIC
SERVICE GEOPOLITICAL ANALYSIS FROM SENDERBERL ENDS
January 30, 2003
SenderBerl has tackled the tough questions and given
answers to each and every one of them. SenderBerl has
integrated the secular and religious planes and
dimensions into geopolitical analyses that have
accurately interpreted the dire state of affairs
before us today. Our web site not only asks the tough
questions, and gives clear and cogent answers, but
gives direction as to the solutions, before the world
crosses a precipice upon which there is no return and
that will shift the paradigm of power from the West
to China.
We have finalized our web site including
therein links to top geopolitical analyses in 2002. www.senderberl.com
We
have also highlighted AND ANSWERED the key issues of
this time:
Is it possible that war might be avoided by
Saddam being given safe haven (exile)?
Is
President Bush's goal simply the elimination of
Saddam Hussein to assure Americans and the rest of
the world that Iraq is no longer a threat? Or is his
true plan to seize Iraqi oil and oil reserves, occupy
Iraq, to further the agenda of world domination and
control proffered by his own National Security
Strategy?
Does North Korea act on its own, or is it
acting as a surrogate for China, and what is China's
design in having North Korea threaten the US and its
allies in Asia?
Why
has there been nothing of true substance released to
the American public regarding 9-11? Was the US
complicit in any manner in 9-11 and if so, why? If
so, is there proof of such complicity?
Did Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia
call for a formal UN investigation of 9-11 and why
did he do so? What was President Bush's reaction to
it?
Why
is the rest of the world so angry at the United
States?
Why our August 5, 2002, interview on the Jeff
Rense Show was apparently earth-shattering to those
in the government, when we claimed that the US in
August was thinking about attacking Saudi Arabia
first over Iraq?
Was
Trent Lott's racist gaff representative of something
more sinister than meets the eye?
If those in government are pursuing a
unipolar world government, as many connected with
government admit to be the case, does that mean that
a central world government may be stationed somewhere
other than the United States in the future?
Is
there any chance that the United States may get
rebuffed by attacking Iraq? Is there a lot more at
stake than a sinister dictator who could have been
removed many years ago? Does the President's
attacking Iraq open the portal to bioterrorism, the
antithesis of the claimed goal of the National
Security Strategy?
Who made Iraq and China the enemies of
America?
Is
Japan a target of North Korea and why? Would Bush 41
and Bush 43 have any regrets or reservations about
seeing Japan attacked by North Korea?
Could President Bush have done all that he
has done since 9-11 without the predicate of moral
outrage generated by the attacks of 9-11?
Does
President Bush need a new platform of moral outrage?
Why hasn't there been a single major follow up
terrorist attack against the US domestically since
9-11? Why have Vice President Cheney and others in
the administration been predicting that one has been
imminent since 9-11?
Does Bush need to occupy Iraq? If he does,
why, and will he stay on if the
oil fields are blown up?
Why
has the President conveniently forgotten about the
contents of his National Security Strategy, while the
rest of the world has not?
Were there internal explosions at the World
Trade Center buildings, as we long claimed, now that
it is evident that burning jet fuel did not take down
the towers? If so, who was behind the elevation of
the planned terrorism, resulting in the historical
collapse of the two towers?
Why did SenderBerl expound in early 1999
of a global war commencing in 2003, seeing the
participants and the results?
Is the West Nile Virus a Chinese platform for
bioterrorism against domestic interests? Why was the
West Nile Virus chosen by China as the platform for
bioterrorism?
Do
President Bush and Jiang Zemin detest one another?
Why did SenderBerl assess that Jiang Zemin
would remain in de facto control of China after the
Chinese Congress met in early November 2002?
Are China and the United States in a state of war,
and if so, why does President Bush and the United
States participate in legerdemain to keep it secreted
from the American people and the world?
Did
the Oslo process ever intend that there be peace in
the Middle East? If not, why not?
Why did President Bush deem it appropriate to
change his schedule on September 7, 2001, to spend 40
minutes in Jacksonville with second graders, and the
same amount of time with second graders the next day
in Sarasota , after being criticized for being away
from Washington the entire month of August 2001?
How
can the President and the Secret Service ever explain
the President remaining at a high risk site,
subjecting the Commander in Chief and school children
to the real threat of terrorism, since the site was
publicly known for days prior thereto, when there
were two missing aircraft still aloft, and the
reality that terrorism was in play and in
operation at 9:03 AM et seq. that
historical day when "America is under
attack," as Andrew Card accordingly advised the
President?
Are regional and global war likely in 2003,
and if so why? Who will win? Why?
ALL THESE QUESTIONS ARE ADDRESSED AND
ANSWERED AT OUR FINALIZED WEB SITE
HIGHLIGHTING OUR GEOPOLITICAL ANALYSES, DONE AS A
PUBLIC SERVICE FOR SEVEN YEARS, AND DONE AS PART OF
SENDERBERL'S BUSINESS OPERATIONS FAR LONGER THAN
THAT.
SENDERBERL HAS COVERED JAPAN, RUSSIA,
THE MIDDLE EAST SINCE THE EARLY 80s, AND NOW DUE TO
THE HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE OF TODAY'S EVENTS, SEEN BY
US AS UNRAVELING, AS IT HAS, MANY YEARS AGO, WE HAVE
DONE WHAT WE COULD TO HAVE DECISION MAKERS FACE THE
REALITIES THAT OTHERWISE MAY HAVE ESCAPED THEIR
ATTENTION AND FOCUS.
WITH SINCEREST WISHES FOR A FUTURE
THAT WILL PROVIDE THE NEXT GENERATION WITH A GOOD
FUTURE, SO THAT WE ARE NOT RECORDED IN HISTORY AS THE
GENERATION THAT LET THE BLESSINGS AFFORDED US, DUE TO
THE EFFORTS AND PRAYERS OF PRIOR GENERATIONS, ESCAPE,
DUE TO OUR INDIFFERENCE AND LACK OF COURAGE.
Joseph Ehrlich, President
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
January 30, 2003
END