Why Jay Rockerfeller is coming to the forefront in the President's failure conjures up the game being played with Bush claiming he's dissed at France and Germany. This is such a ruse in play now to carve up the world, that people cannot imagine what is really going on and that these world leaders would participate as they have in the charade.

Senator Rips Lack of Iraqi Weapons Finds

WASHINGTON (AP) - If Iraq's weapons of mass destruction posed enough of a threat to justify war, they should have been found by now, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee said Thursday.
Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia
challenged comments by Bush administration officials that the weapons were well-hidden and may not be located soon. 05/30/03 08:56 EDT

SenderBerl: The timing of Rockefeller's announcement gives it away. It is to give the rest of the world when Bush is overseas the impression that there is going to be some semblance of accountability for the lies and deceit. It's Rockefeller classic disinformation The Senator comes out here and there with these caustic remarks, but nothing is done and nothing will ever be done. We have a challenge for the Senator: what do you intend to do about this serious abuse of office?


U.S. insiders say Iraq intel deliberately skewed

By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON, May 30 (Reuters) - A growing number of U.S. national security professionals are accusing the Bush administration of slanting the facts
and hijacking the $30 billion intelligence apparatus to justify its rush to war in Iraq. A key target is a four-person Pentagon team that reviewed material gathered by other intelligence outfits for any missed bits that might have tied Iraqi President Saddam Hussein to banned weapons or terrorist groups. This team, self-mockingly called the Cabal, "cherry-picked the intelligence stream" in a bid to portray Iraq as an imminent threat, said Patrick Lang, a former head of worldwide human intelligence gathering for the Defense Intelligence Agency, which coordinates military intelligence.
The DIA was "exploited and abused and bypassed in the process of making the case for war in Iraq based on the presence of WMD," or weapons of mass destruction, he added in a phone interview. He said the CIA had "no guts at all" to resist the allegedly deliberate skewing of intelligence by a Pentagon that he said was now dominating U.S. foreign policy. 05/30/03 19:14 ET

THESE REPORTS ARE ALL FLOWING OUT THE EVE OF THE G-8!

Wolfowitz, seen as one of the most hawkish figures in the Bush administration's policy on Iraq, said President Saddam Hussein's alleged cache of chemical, biological and possibly nuclear weapons was merely one of several reasons behind the decision to go to war.

"For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on," Wolfowitz was quoted as saying in Vanity Fair magazine's July issue.

QUESTION: WOULD WOLFOWITZ BEING SAYING WHAT HE HAS ABOVE IF THEY HAD FOUND WMD OR IF THEY WERE USED? OF COURSE NOT!

THE USA AND ITS MILITARY ARE NOT PAWNS OF THOSE WHO THINK THEY HAVE THE POWER OF THE ROMAN EMPEROR. THE EVIDENCE IS AS WE SAID ALL ALONG, AND THE REALLY PATHETIC STORY IS THE ONE THE MILITARY HAS BECOME AWARE OF AND WHY IT IS SUPPORTING INTELLIGENCE: SETTING UP THE TROOPS FOR WMD ATTACK IN N. KUWAIT.

FOR THIS REASON, IT WAS HARD TO SAY THAT WE WOULD NOT BE JUDGEMENTAL OF PRESIDENT BUSH. HOWEVER, THIS PUTATIVE REALITY SHOWS THE CRIMINAL MINDSET OF THE STRAUSSIAN ELITISTS AND WHY SENATOR ROCKEFELLER WE DON'T BELIEVE YOUR WORDS TODAY MEAN THAT THIS COUNTRY WILL SEE CONGRESS NOT ANYONE ELSE HOLD THIS NWO GOVERNMENT TO ACCOUNT.

SENATOR WARNER: WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY?

WASHINGTON (May 30) - The United States on Friday announced a major expansion of so-far fruitless efforts to find chemical and biological arms in Iraq, forming a team of 1,400 U.S., British and Australian experts to take up the hunt. The Pentagon named Army Maj. Gen. Keith Dayton to head the new Iraq Survey Group, which will try to find alleged arms that Washington cited as its main justification for the invasion of Iraq in March that toppled President Saddam Hussein. No such weapons have been found, and the move was announced just hours after Lt. Gen. James Conway, the top U.S. Marine officer in Iraq, said U.S. intelligence was ''simply wrong'' in leading the military to believe that the invading troops were likely to be attacked with chemical weapons. ''The Iraq Survey Group represents a significant expansion of effort in the hunt for weapons of mass destruction as we build on the efforts that are ongoing,'' Dayton, director of operations for the Defense Intelligence Agency, told a Pentagon briefing. Reuters 15:50 05-30-03

SENDERBERL: THEY WILL BE FOUND BECAUSE THE NWO NEEDS THEM TO BE FOUND EVEN THOUGH IT HAS THAT ELITE ARROGANT MINDSET THESE DAYS THAT IT CAN DO AS IT PLEASES, WHEN IT PLEASES. TONY BLAIR OBVIOUSLY REFUSED TO PLAY ALONG WITH BUSH PLANTING THEM, BUT DO YOU THINK THAT BUSH AND THE NEOCON PAWNS AND POODLES WOULD NOT TAKE STEPS TO DO IT? IF THEY CAUGHT, IT'S HANGING TIME AT THE PLANTATION. SO THEY MAY NOT. BUT IF THEY COULD, THEY WOULD AND WILL UNLESS THE ISSUES DIES AS WE BELIEVE IT WILL BECAUSE WITH THE CONGRESS AND THE PRESS AND MEDIA IN POCKET, ALL THIS ABOVE SUGGESTS A NEED TO LOOK LIKE THERE IS SOME OVERSIGHT AND CHECKS AND BALANCES AND THUS IT IS APPARENT TO US THAT THE CHARADE TIES INTO THE G8, PERHAPS TO OFFSET HU JINTAO AND CHINA'S POSTURING AS AN INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED FORCE (OR TO LET IT APPEAR THAT IT IS).

HAS ANYONE HEARD FROM JIANG ZEMIN?

MONTHS EARLIER INTERLUDE
MARCH 16, 2003

Senator Wants Fake Iraq Documents Probed
WASHINGTON (AP) - The top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee asked the FBI on Friday to investigate forged documents the Bush administration used as evidence against Saddam Hussein and his military ambitions in Iraq. Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia said he was uneasy about a possible campaign to deceive the public about the status of Iraq's nuclear program.

Rockefeller said U.S. worries about Iraqi nuclear weapons were not based primarily on the documents, but ``there is a possibility that the fabrication of these documents may be part of a larger deception campaign aimed at manipulating public opinion and foreign policy regarding Iraq.''


Rumsfeld changes tack by insisting that WMD will be found

hot off the press

Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary, insisted yesterday that weapons of mass destruction were still in Iraq as Washington and London rejected claims that they used intelligence as "propaganda". But the fightback was immediately undermined when former Washington security officials claimed that US "intelligence had been cooked to the recipe of policy". Mr Rumsfeld triggered an outcry from critics of the war earlier this week when he suggested that the Iraqi regime may have destroyed chemical and biological weapons before the Anglo-American invasion. However, he told a radio phone-in yesterday that he personally believed that evidence of the secret programme would be found in the country. In his latest remarks, he said the reason that weapons had not been found was because the government of Saddam Hussein had worked so hard to hide them. "It is not because they are not there," he said. Mr Rumsfeld also rejected the idea that the war was waged under any false pretext. The US and British case against Iraq was based on what he called "good intelligence".

transcript Polish TV today

Q: But, still, those countries who didn't support the Iraqi Freedom operation use the same argument, weapons of mass destruction haven't been found. So what argument will you use now to justify this war? THE PRESIDENT: We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories. You remember when Colin Powell stood up in front of the world, and he said, Iraq has got laboratories, mobile labs to build biological weapons. They're illegal. They're against the United Nations resolutions, and we've so far discovered two. And we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them.

THIS IS A MISTAKE. HE SHOWS HIS CARDS. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DON'T BUY THIS TYPE OF TALK AND LOGIC.


BUSH VOWS TO FIND WMD
CRAWFORD, Texas
(May 3) - President Bush said Saturday it is a matter of when - not if - weapons of mass destruction will be found in Iraq while suggesting that task is getting little help from Saddam Hussein's captured confederates.
''We'll find them,'' Bush said of Iraq's suspected chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. ''It'll be a matter of time to do so.''
Iraq's alleged possession of such weapons was Bush's main rationale for war, but none has been found since Saddam's government fell more than three weeks ago.
SENDERBERL INTERPRETS THAT HE WILL 100% FIND THEM. HOW DO WE KNOW? UNTIL THE TRUTH OF 9-11 UNFOLDS, WE CAN SAFELY ASSUME THAT IF THERE WAS COMPLICITY IN 9-11 THEN IT IS A SLAM DUNK THAT US FORCES WILL STUMBLE UPON OR BE TOLD BY A SUITABLE PAWN EXACTLY WHERE TO FIND APPROPRIATE WMD (ALBEIT THE SALIENT DYNAMIC IS THAT NONE WERE DEPLOYED AGAINST U.S. FORCES EVEN THOUGH IRAQ WAS RENDERED MILITARILY IMPOTENT BY US TACTICS IN HAVING THE U.N. EMASCULATE IRAQ SO THAT THEY WOULD USE WMD). THE NWO HAS TO BE CAREFUL HOWEVER. ONE SLIP OR MISTAKE HERE AND ITS BACK TO SQUARE ONE OR ELSE FACE THE SPECTER OF SEEING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DEMAND THE TRUTH BEHIND 9-11! WILL BUSH TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO EAT CAKE? HIS POLL RATINGS HAVE FALLEN SIX POINTS. PERHAPS ITS BEST TO TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHAT HE SAID AND WE THINK HE MEANT IT SO THAT THEY CAN READY THEMSELVES FOR THE 2004 ELECTIONS. THE MISTAKE BUSH 43 WILL NOT MAKE THAT BUSH 41 MADE IS THAT BUSH 43 WILL LISTEN TO JIM BAKER. IF BUSH 41 DID, BILL CLINTON WOULD NOT HAVE WON IN 1992..
"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." --President-Elect George W. Bush, CNN News,
Aired December 18, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. ET
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0012/18/nd.01.html

THERE HAS A BEEN A CONSTANT LINK BETWEEN THE BUSH FAMILY AND THE GERMANS
WHILE WE DON'T COMMENT ON THE HORRIFIC INNUENDOS, WE DO REFERENCE THEM DUE TO THE FACT THAT BUSH 43 SAID THE ABOVE MORE THAN ONCE AND BECAUSE OF HIS SELECTION AND DEPLOYMENT OF DONALD RUMSFELD WHO IMPLEMENTS THE NWO AGENDA, FROM THE MILITARY SIDE, IN A FASHION THAT CAUSED US CONCERN PARTICULARLY, TO WIT STAGING FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE US TROOPS FOR WMD ATTACK (NOT TO DISCOUNT THE WAY HE ALLOWED HOSPITALS TO BE RANSACKED).
http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm
http://www.iraqwar.ru/iraq-read_article.php?articleId=5817&lang=en
FURTHER, INDEPENDENTLY OF THESE ALLEGATIONS, WE DETECTED THE NWO STRATEGIC DESIGN FOR ISRAEL AS ARTICULATED IN
THE BUSH DOUBLE DOUBLE CROSS. THIS TYPE OF NEFARIOUS COVERT PLANNING WOULD BE, IF TRUE, CONSISTENT WITH THE HORRIFIC ALLUSIONS MADE BY THE ABOVE REFERENCES, INCLUDED HEREIN AS RECENT REPRESENTATIONS OF CLAIMS THAT HAVE BEEN CAST AGAINST THE BUSH FAMILY FOR YEARS.

FOR OUR CURRENT PURPOSES, THERE IS AN INTENTIONAL DESIGN TO PROTECT GERMANY AND FRANCE FROM THE ABUSIVE DEPLOYMENT OF THE US MILITARY TO OBTAIN CONTROL OF CRITICAL GLOBAL RESOURCES AND UNDERMINE REGIMES AND COUNTRIES AT WILL. THIS ULTIMATELY WILL LEAVE THE US WEAKENED AND ISOLATED, AS IT IS BECOMING TODAY, THE FINAL STAGE TO REVEAL A COURSE TO DEBILITATE THE MILITARY.

THUS THE NWO HAS NO LOVE FOR AMERICA, BUT THE OPPOSITE AND THE SIGNS HAVE BEEN QUITE APPARENT WITH NO ONE RESPONDING TO THE TRUTH EVIDENT FROM THEM, BECAUSE NO ONE BELIEVES IT:
NAFTA, OPEN BORDERS, MAKING SPANISH A SECOND LANGUAGE OF AMERICA, DRUGS, DESENSITIZATION OF CHILDREN VIA TV PROGRAMMING, LIBERAL TO DEVIANT SEXUAL MORES AND STANDARDS, DIMINISHING PUBIC EDUCATION, COLLAPSING US DOLLAR, EMERGING EURO, ABANDONMENT OF NATO WITH A NEW EU EMERGING MILITARY ALLIANCE ABSENT THE U.S..

WWW.SENDERBERL.COM/CHINA/CNWO.HTM

The truth, the whole truth and nothing but ...
By Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON -
When all three major US newsweeklies - Time, Newsweek and US News & World Report - run major features on the same day on possible government lying, you can bet you have the makings of a major scandal.

And when the two most important outlets of neo-conservative opinion - The Weekly Standard and The Wall Street Journal - come out on the same days with lead editorials spluttering outrage about suggestions of government lying, you can bet that things are going to get very hot as summer approaches in Washington.

The controversy over whether the administration of President George W Bush either exaggerated or lied about evidence that it said it had about the existence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq before the US-led invasion has mushroomed over the past week.

"This is potentially very serious," said one Congressional aide. "If it's shown we went to war because of intelligence that was 'cooked' by the administration, heads will have to roll, and not just little heads, big ones."

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EF04Ak02.html

MAR 27 2003

ONE QUESTION THAT COMES TO MIND FROM THE ABOVE PHOTO?
WE WILL ASSUME IN THIS ONE INSTANCE THAT SADDAM HAS WMD. IF THE US WERE THE WEAKER NATION WITH THE LESSER MILITARY AND AMERICAN BURNS AS BAGHDAD BURNS ABOVE, DOES ANYONE DOUBT THAT THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION WOULD USE WMD (OR FOR WHAT OTHER REASON HAS IT DEVELOPED IT)? SINCE LOGIC COMPELS YOU TO CONCLUDE THAT BUSH WOULD USE IT, THE CONCLUSION IS EITHER THAT SADDAM DOES NOT HAVE WMD OR IF HE HAS WMD HE SHOWS MORE RESPONSIBILITY THAN PRESIDENT BUSH IN NOT DEPLOYING IT TO OPEN THE WORLD STAGE TO BIOTERRORISM. THIS BEGETS THE QUESTION,
THEN WHAT JUSTIFICATION DOES PRESIDENT BUSH TODAY HAVE IN CONTINUING TO ATTACK IRAQ?

HE HAS NONE AND NOTHING CLEARER SHOWS IT THAN THE STORY BELOW THAT HALLIBURTON ALREADY HAS BEEN AWARDED THE CONTRACT FOR RESTORATION OF THE OIL FIELDS AND THE BUSH ADMINISTATION HAS ISSUED AN ADVISORY THAT IT INTENDS TO BE SHIPPING OIL OUT OF BASRAH WITHIN WEEKS.

MARCH 28, 2003

LONDON (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Tony Blair flew to Washington Wednesday for a war council with President Bush, insisting that the United Nations must play a central role in post-war Iraq.

DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT THIS IS WHY BLAIR HAS BEEN SUMMONED?
BUSH'S WAR NEEDS DISCOVERY/USE OF WMD!

WITHOUT THE USE OF WMD BY IRAQ, BUSH HAS NO PLATFORM TO WAGE FURTHER NWO CAMPAIGNS AGAINST OTHER TARGETED REGIMES UNDER HIS WAR AGAINST TERRORISM. IF SADDAM DIDN'T USE IT AGAINST THE US THEN HOW IN THE WORLD CAN BUSH POINT TO ANY OTHER REGIME POSING A THREAT UNDER THE NSS?

For the past two months, President Bush has been stepping up harsh rhetoric towards Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. Bush accuses Hussein of developing weapons of mass destruction (WMD) such as chemical nerve gas and highly dangerous nuclear bombs. Hussein may have used some WMD on his own people before, and Bush says that the dictator won't hesitate to use them again. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/speakout/editorial/military_iraq.html

Lips pursed and eyes narrowed, Bush punches the air shouting "murderer," "criminal" and warning Saddam's soldiers they will be "treated, tried and persecuted" as war criminals if they use WMD against American invaders. http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/op-ed/goldsborough/20030127-9999_1e27golds.html

IF YOU WANT TO HONOR AND SAVE OUR TROOPS AGAINST THE POSSIBILITY OF WHAT WE FEAR UNRAVELING, THEN PASS THIS MESSAGE ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW. WE COULD NOT FATHOM, AS BUSH CANNOT, THAT SADDAM WOULD NOT ALREADY DEPLOY WMD WHEN HE KNEW THAT US TROOPS WOULD AMASS IN NORTHERN KUWAIT. WHEN SADDAM DID NOT DEPLOY WMD THE PRESIDENT BASED ON INFO FROM THE NWO CIA LAUNCHED 36 MISSILES AND THEN SLIPPED IN SEEKING TO ENTICE SADDAM INTO THEN DOING WHAT WAS STRATEGICALLY Y AND MILITARILY CALLED FOR: TAKING OUT A LARGE PART OF THE US INVADING FORCE SITTING STILL FOR HIM AND WITHIN RANGE.

Was Hussein really there? The intelligence was "damn good," in the words of one source, and a consensus emerged that it was worth taking a shot.Within hours, F-117A stealth fighters dropped a pair of 2,000-pound bombs on the complex, followed by a volley of Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from U.S. warships in the Red Sea and Persian Gulf.The president went on national television at 10:15 p.m. to announce the onset of war. The next morning, Franks recommended advancing the ground operation by 24 hours. The massive assault by 21/3 divisions began that evening. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12215-2003Mar22.html
SenderBerl: This article written by Woodward is intended to protect Bush by claiming that the attack against Saddam occurred after the start of the war when the US itself declared the next day that the war had not commenced. Without doubt the personal attack with cruise missiles and bunker busting bombs against Saddam showed the start of the war by the US as the unilateral aggressor without any need for Bush that evening to confirm the start of the war or any attempted claim that the war didn't start until US troops moved into Iraq from the northern border of Kuwait.

NOW WE CAN SEE WHY SADDAM AND NORTH KOREA DID NOT BEHAVE AND ACT AS WE ANTICIPATED. CHINA AND THOSE ALIGNED WITH IT AGAINST THE NWO NEED TO PUT IT INTO A BOX FROM WHICH IT CANNOT ESCAPE, TO STRANGLE IT SO THAT IT CAN NO LONGER THRIVE AND EXTEND ITS AGENDA. IN THIS REGARD, IT IS IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT THE NWO, WHILE HIDING AND ACTING AS A SHADOW GOVERNMENT, IS ANTI-AMERICAN, AND THUS HAS VICTIMIZED THIS COUNTRY AND IS OUT TO INTENTIONALLY WEAKEN AND MAIM IT.

LISTEN CAREFULLY: THE ANALYSES IMMEDIATELY BELOW SHOULD BE REVIEWED NOW TO ATTEST THAT THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION WAS COMPLICIT IN 9-11 BECAUSE IT WAS THE REQUIRED PLATFORM OF MORAL OUTRAGE TO LAUNCH THE PHASE SEEKING TO SEIZE AND ACQUIRE CONTROL OVER MIDDLE EASTERN OIL.

PRESIDENT BUSH
SenderBerl explained why he needs to occupy Iraq,

why the Arabs and the EU would agree to blow up Iraqi oil,

and why the President's behavior attendant to 9-11requires review,

before the United States launched a war against our own best interests.

WHAT MADE SENDERBERL SUSPICIOUS OF PRESIDENT BUSH?

THEREAFTER THE NWO PROCEEDED AGAINST AFGHANISTAN (OSAMA) AND LINKED PER ITS DESIGN TO IRAQ FOR THE REAL PRIZE: THE OIL NEEDED TO FINANCE THE NEXT PHASE OF ITS AGENDA AND TO OCCUPY IRAQ AS THE IDEAL STAGING AREA THEREFOR. THE NWO NEEDED A NEW PLATFORM OF MORAL OUTRAGE (9-11 WAS THE FIRST) AND SENDERBERL IDENTIFIED IT AS ISRAEL.

BUSH DOUBLE DOUBLE CROSS
SenderBerl identified how the unipolar world agenda was setting up both
Israel and Saudi Arabia to fall victim by intentional design to a failed Oslo process.

NOW THAT ISRAEL BECAME AWARE OF ITS OWN STUPIDITY IN BECOMING ENSNARED INTO A DESIGN HARD FOR ANYONE TO IMAGINE, BUSH, AS INTERPRETED, LAUNCHED AGAINST IRAQ UNILATERALLY AND THEN CALLOUSLY EXPECTED SADDAM TO DEPLOY WMD CREATING THE NEEDED NEXT LEVEL OF MORAL OUTRAGE TO JUSTIFY AMERICAN ANGER TO PURSUE THE NSS AGENDA. IT IS CLEAR THAT SADDAM HAS NOT FOLLOWED THE SCRIPT. IN FAILING TO DO SO, BUSH SLIPPED IN LAUNCHING AS WE DETAILED THE OTHER DAY (BELOW) THE CRUISE MISSILES WHILE KEEPING THE TROOPS DORMANT AS SITTING DUCKS FOR WMD ATTACK. WHEN SADDAM DID NOT DEPLOY THEM AFTER THE CRUISE MISSILE LAUNCH, THE US BECAME CONCERNED THAT SADDAM MAY NOT USE THEM. THUS IT MUST BE ACCEPTED THAT ONE COMPLICIT IN 9-11 WOULD HAVE NO RESERVATION IN ASSURING THE USE OF WMD IN THIS CAMPAIGN.

YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THAT BUSH AND THE NWO FACE SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES IF WMD ARE NOT DISCOVERED OR USED BY IRAQ.

MARCH 22, 2003

The $64,000 question
At this juncture who has more to gain by the use of WMD: Saddam or Bush?

SenderBerl: Unless someone controverts our perception that American troops were kept sitting stagnant as sitting ducks to entice a WMD attack after the US launched 36 cruise missiles in starting the war against Iraq, then we are of the position that this is further evidence that this administration, desperate to find WMD, and doing everything to entice Iraq to use them, will uncover them even it has to ship them into an area of Iraq. Of course, it will then face the dilemma of why Iraq possesses them to not use them, leading to the further conclusion that they will have to be used. If Saddam didn't use them when US troops were amassed on the Northern Kuwaiti border, why would he use them now? The $64,0000 question that we are adept at asking is: at this juncture who has more to gain by the use of WMD: Saddam or Bush? It makes us ill, very ill, that we feel justified in proffering the question. We would never ask it at this point but for the reality that 9-11 goes unaddressed and unanswered when mounting evidence has arisen that without Bush administration complicity the long held goal of the launch of the last phase of world domination and control could never have come into play -- admitted to by Richard Perle and a consequence he and the Bush administration were awaiting and then when it arose Condy Rice felt comfortable despite three known reports to the contrary in saying that the Bush administration and affiliates (cohorts) had no reason in the world to expect that the terrorists would deploy an airplane as they did on 9-11, an assertion proven immediately to be a false and deceptive statement to the American people and global public. This highlights our anger not only over letting American troops sit there as sitting ducks, but invokes our anger in recognizing the only truth that can emerge from the Secret Service allowing President Bush to remain seated at the Booker Elementary School after Andrew Card told President Bush that "America is under attack."

MARCH 21, 2003 EARLY AM
NO RESISTANCE. WHAT IS GOING ON?

THE US AMASSED TROOPS IN NORTHERN KUWAIT AS SITTING DUCKS. WHEN SADDAM DID NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITUATION, BUSH SENT 36 CRUISE MISSILES TO ELIMINATE SADDAM'S SONS AND OTHER LEADERSHIP TARGETS TO ENTICE HIM INTO USING BIOTOXINS. SADDAM DID NOT! THIS SUGGESTS TO US THAT HE IS FOLLOWING A HIGH LEVEL PLAN AND DESIGN, NOT HIS OWN. IT IS ONE NO DOUBT TO SHOW THE WORLD THE TRUE DESIGN OF BUSH'S WAR. NOT ONE AMERICAN SOLDIER DEAD BECAUSE OF IRAQ. NO WMD -- IF SADDAM HAD THEM, HE SURELY WOULD BE USING THEM AGAINST AN INVADING FORCE, ONE ATTACKING IN CONTRAVENTION TO INTERNATIONAL LAW! THUS PART OF THIS HIGHER LEVEL DESIGN IS TO SHOW THE WORLD, WITH MOUNTING WORLD ANGER, THAT THE US THROUGH ITS UNIPOLAR WORLD GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP, IS EVIL, AND THAT ITS ATTACK HAS LITTLE TO NOTHING TO DO WITH LIBERATING IRAQ BUT TO BOMB IT TO REBUILD IT, OCCUPY IT, TO CONTROL IT AND ITS TREASURE, AND TO DEPLOY IRAQ AS THE STAGING AREA TO LAUNCH THE NEXT PHASE IN ITS FORMALLY RELEASED AGENDA FOR WORLD DOMINATION AND CONTROL. ALL THIS EVIL AND DANGER PURSUED UNDER THE MASK OF WMD THE US ITSELF DELIVERED TO SADDAM IN THE 80S. WHERE IT NOW USES SADDAM AS THE BOGEYMAN TO MASK ITS TRUE DESIGN IN ITS INVASION, IT STRUCTURED WMD AS THE BOGEYMAN AND RUSE FOR ITS OCCUPATION AND THE FOUNDATION FOR SEEKING WORLD DOMINATION AND CONTROL THE TRUTH OF IT IS THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO TERRORISM AGAINST THE US SINCE 9-11 AND THERE HAS BEEN NO INVESTIGATION ABOUT THE TRUTH OF 9-11. AN APPROPRIATE AND TOTALLY JUSTIFIED PUBLIC INVESTIGATION WILL SHOW THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHAT CHINA AND THOSE NOW UNITED WITH IT INTEND TO SHOW THE WORLD FROM THE BUSH INVASION. THUS IF BUSH NOW DEPLOYS THE NWO SHOCK AND AWE DESIGN, WHEN THERE IS NO RESISTANCE, NO DEATH OF US TROOPS, AND NO USE OF WMD, IT WILL PROVE BY ITS OWN HAND TO THE WORLD THAT THE US IS THE DANGER THAT THE REST OF THE WORLD WILL HAVE TO UNITE WITH CHINA TO DEAL WITH. SADLY, IT IS NOT THE US THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS PUTATIVE REALITY BUT THE WRESTING OF CONTROL OF THIS COUNTRY BY PEOPLE NOT LOYAL TO IT BUT TO THEMSELVES AND THEIR UNBRIDLED GREED: THE ELITIST CENTRIX FROM WHOM WE ORIGINALLY SEPARATED OURSELVES IN ESTABLISHING OUR INDEPENDENCE AND LIBERTY. THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEVER ACCEPTED THEIR LOSS AND COULD NOT RESIST COMING BACK TO TAKE CONTROL OF OUR COUNTRY AND SET IT UP FOR ITS OWN DEMISE, AFTER FIRST LOOTING IT AND THEN USING IT AS THE PLATFORM FOR WORLD DOMINATION AND CONTROL. THINK ABOUT IT. READ RECAPTURING AMERICA, RELEASED IN 1997 AND SEE THAT WE UNDERSTOOD WHAT IS IN PLAY TODAY. WE KNOW THE CHARACTERS AND WE HAVE BEEN SICKENED BY MUCH THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE. HOWEVER, THAT SADDAM DID NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF AN IDEAL SET UP TO TAKE OUT A LARGE NUMBER OF US TROOPS, OR DEPLOY WMD, AS WE ANTICIPATED HE WOULD, WITH THE US MOVING ACROSS IRAQ AS THOUGH IT HAD A FREEDOM PASS, SUGGESTS A HIGHER ORDER COUNTER, ONE THAT WE DID NOT EXPECT SADDAM TO PLAY ALONG WITH ONCE US TROOPS ENTERED IRAQI SOVEREIGN TERRITORY.

STRATEGIC ERROR
MARCH 20, 2003 7:00 AM

PRESIDENT BUSH BASED ON INTEL FROM CIA LAUNCHED ATTACK AGAINST IRAQI LEADERSHIP WHILE KEEPING TROOPS SITTING IDLY MASSED IN KUWAIT AWAITING THEIR FORMAL ORDERS TO INITIATE THE PANNED CAMPAIGN. THIS ESTABLISHES THE US AS THE HISTORICAL AGGRESSOR AND CREATED THE VERY DYNAMIC WE PRIMARILY FEARED: A BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL ATTACK ON US TROOPS IN A STATIC CONCENTRATED AREA SOUTH OF THE IRAQI BORDER. IF SUCH AN ATTACK WAS LAUNCHED AGAINST THEM THE CRIME IS THE VERY ONE WE DETAILED ACCOMPLISHING THE COVERT NWO AGENDA OF WEAKENING AND MAIMING OUR COUNTRY AND ITS FUTURE. NO MATTER THE RESULT THAT UNRAVELS, EVEN IF A COMPLETE US VICTORY RESULTS BY TOMORROW MORNING, WE ARE SICKENED WITH THE REALITY OF ALLOWING OUR TROOPS TO REMAIN STAGNANT AND STATIONARY AFTER A FORMAL LAUNCH OF AN ATTACK AGAINST IRAQ. THE SOLDIERS KNOW IT. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE TOLD ABOUT IT. CONGRESS SHOULD TAKE ACTION OR IT SHOULD RESIGN AS A DEFUNCT CHECK AND BALANCE POWER OF THIS NATION.

END